PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Comparison of Monte Carlo and bootstrap analyses for residual life and confidence interval

Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Failure starts with creation of a crack, then the propagation of the crack and eventually the fracture of the material. Furthermore, material selection, geometry, processing and residual stresses are critical factors that may contribute to uncertainty and prospective failure mechanisms in engineering. These issues may also arise in computational analysis, a problematic model, for instance, a three-dimensional surface fracture that may necessitate numerous degrees of freedom during analysis. However, considering the multiple incidents of material failure, detailed analysis and efforts to prevent premature material failure for safety and engineering integrity can be carried out. Thus, the objective of this study is to model crack growth in a surface-cracked structure. Aluminium alloy 7075-T6 was the material of interest in this study. The S-version finite element method (SFEM) was used to study fracture propagation. The numerical approach developed in this research was the probabilistic SFEM. Instead of mesh rebuilding, a typical finite element approach, the SFEM uses global–local element overlay method to create a fatigue crack growth model, which was then used for crack research. Empirical computation and previous experimental data were used to evaluate the stress intensity factor (SIF), surface crack growth and fatigue life. The SIF was determined using a virtual crack closure method (VCCM). In addition, the probabilistic approach is also a critical method to generate random parameters, such as Monte Carlo and bootstrap methods. The SIF, fatigue life and surface crack growth were validated and deemed to be within the acceptable range.
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca
Rocznik
Strony
15--26
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 31 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26600 Pekan, Pahang, MALAYSIA
  • Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26600 Pekan, Pahang, MALAYSIA
autor
  • Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26600 Pekan, Pahang, MALAYSIA
  • Tokyo University of Science, 2641 Yamazaki, Noda, Chiba, 278-8510, JAPAN
  • Mechanical Engineering Department, Jazan University, P. O. Box 114, Jazan 45142, Saudi
  • Mechanical Engineering Department, Jazan University, P. O. Box 114, Jazan 45142, Saudi
Bibliografia
  • [1] Field I, Kandare E, Dixon B, Tian J, Barter S. Effect of underloads in small fatigue crack growth. Int J Fatigue. 2022;157: 106706. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106706.
  • [2] Solovyov L, Solovyov A, Fedorenko V. Thermal method for detecting fatigue cracks in welded steel bridges under random loads. Transp Res Procedia. 2022;61: 588–93. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2022.01.095.
  • [3] Mehmanparast A, Nikbin K. Local creep damage effects on subsequent low temperature fatigue crack growth behaviour of thick-walled pressure vessels. Eng Fract Mech. 2022;272: 108720. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108720.
  • [4] Wang Y, Chen Z, Yan Q, Hu Y, Wang C, Luo W, et al. A dynamic failure analysis methodology for fault diagnosis of fatigue cracks of subsea wellhead connectors with material aging. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2022;159: 36– 52. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2021.12.044.
  • [5] Yamanoi Y, Maekawa K. Disintegration of low and normal strength concrete in shear localized bands and its constitutive modeling. Eng Struct. 2022;266: 114593. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114593.
  • [6] Cussac P, Gardin C, Pelosin V, Hénaff G, de Baglion L, Ancelet O, et al. Low-cycle fatigue crack initiation and propagation from controlled surface imperfections in nuclear steels. Int J Fatigue. 2020;139: 105703. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105703.
  • [7] Alshoaibi AM, Ali Fageehi Y. 3D modelling of fatigue crack growth and life predictions using ANSYS. Ain Shams Eng J. 2022;13(4): 101636. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2021.11.005.
  • [8] Okada H, Kawai H, Araki K. A virtual crack closureintegral method (VCCM) to compute the energy release rates and stress intensity factors based on quadratic tetrahedral finite elements. Eng Fract Mech. 2008;75: 4466– 85. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.04.014.
  • [9] Leski A. Implementation of the virtual crack closure technique in engineering FE calculations. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2007;43(3): 261–8. doi:10.1016/j.finel.2006.10.004.
  • [10] Shekhar S, Akhtar N, Hasan S. Study of load bearing capacity of an infinite sheet weakened by multiple collinear straight cracks with coalesced yield zones. Mater Sci Pol. 2021;39(2): 265–84. doi:10.2478/msp-2021-0023.
  • [11] Sekhar AS. Multiple cracks effects and identification. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2008;22(4): 845–78. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.11.008.
  • [12] Zeng Y, Qu Y, Tan Y, Jiang Y, Gu A. Analysis of fatigue cracking of orthotropic steel decks using XFEM. Eng Fail Anal. 2022;140: 106536. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106536.
  • [13] Hu L, Wang Y, Feng P, Wang H, Qiang H. Debonding development in cracked steel plates strengthened by CFRP laminates under fatigue loading: experimental and boundary element method analysis. Thin-Walled Struct. 2021;166: 108038. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2021.108038.
  • [14] Liang Y-J, Dávila CG, Iarve EV. A reduced-input cohesive zone model with regularized extended finite element method for fatigue analysis of laminated composites in Abaqus. Compos Struct. 2021;275: 114494. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114494.
  • [15] Kikuchi M, Wada Y, Li Y. Crack growth simulation in heterogeneous material by S-FEM and comparison with experiments. Eng Fract Mech. 2016;167: 239–47. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.038.
  • [16] Suga K, Kikuchi M, Wada Y, Kawai H. Study on fatigue growth of multi-surface flaws in shaft under rotary bending by S-FEM. Eng Fract Mech. 2016;1–8. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.11.001.
  • [17] Wada Y, Kikuchi M, Yamada S, Serizawa R, Li Y. Fatigue growth of internal flaw: simulation of subsurface crack penetration to the surface of the structure. Eng Fract Mech. 2014;123: 100–15. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.03.016.
  • [18] Kikuchi M, Wada Y, Shimizu Y, Li Y. Crack growth analysis in a weld-heat-affected zone using S-version FEM. Int J Press Vessels Pip. 2012;90–91: 2–8. doi:10.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.10.001.
  • [19] Akramin MRM, Shaari MS, Ariffin AK, Kikuchi M, Abdullah S. Surface crack analysis under cyclic loads using probabilistic S-version finite element model. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. pages 1851–1865, 2015;37(6). doi:10.1007/s40430-015-0416-3.
  • [20] Husnain MNM, Akramin MRM, Chuan ZL, Takahashi A. Fatigue crack growth analysis using Bootstrap Sversion finite element model. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. Page184, 2020;42(4). doi:10.1007/s40430-020-2268-8.
  • [21] Belyamna MA, Zeghida C, Tlili S, Guedri A. Piping reliability prediction using Monte Carlo simulation and artificial neural network. Procedia Struct Integrity. 2022;41: 372–83. doi:10.1016/j.prostr.2022.05.043.
  • [22] Jiang S, Zhang W. A hybrid approach of modified bootstrap and physics-based methods for probabilistic fatigue life prediction considering overload effects. Probab Eng Mech. 2022;70: 103343. doi:10.1016/j.probengmech.2022.103343.
  • [23] Okada H, Endoh S, Kikuchi M. On fracture analysis using an element overlay technique. Eng Fract Mech. 2005;72(5): 773–89. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.05.003.
  • [24] Giani S, Solin P. Solving elliptic eigenproblems with adaptive multimesh hp-FEM. J Comput Appl Math. 2021;394: 113528. doi:10.1016/j.cam.2021.113528.
  • [25] Okada H, Higashi M, Kikuchi M, Fukui Y, Kumazawa N. Three dimensional virtual crack closure-integral method (VCCM) with skewed and non-symmetric mesh arrangement at the crack front. Eng Fract Mech. 2005;72(11): 1717–37. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.12.005.
  • [26] Richard HA, Fulland M, Sander M. Theoretical crack path prediction. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2005;28(1–2): 3–12. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00855.x.
  • [27] Liu Y, Mahadevan S. Probabilistic fatigue life prediction using an equivalent initial flaw size distribution. Int J Fatigue. 2009;31(3): 476–87. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.06.005.
  • [28] Newman JC, Raju IS. An empirical stress-intensity factor equation for the surface crack. Eng Fract Mech. 1981;15(1–2): 185–92. doi:10.1016/0013-7944(81)90116-8.
  • [29] Newman I, Raju I. Stress intensity factor equations for cracks in three-dimensional finite bodies subjected to tension and bending loads. NASA Technical Memorandum. 1984;85.
  • [30] Kikuchi M, Wada Y, Ohdama C. Effect of KIII on fatigue crack growth behavior. ASME J Eng Mater Technol. 2012;134(4): 1–7. doi:10.1115/1.4006978.
  • [31] Akramin MRM, Ariffin AK, Kikuchi M, Abdullah S. Sampling method in probabilistic S-version finite element analysis for initial flaw size. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2017;39(1): 357–65. doi:10.1007/s40430-016-0549-z.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-0d7c298d-9b14-4231-bf89-6a4666920030
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.