Success of research projects : prediction and assessment from the point of view of project stakeholders thereby taking into account a sustainability approach

• Autorzy: Klaus-Rosińska Agata , Iwko Joanna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.37190/ord230406

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the article is to present the results of research on the success of research projects. Based on the conducted quantitative research, the importance of individual success factors and success criteria of research projects were determined, taking into account the opinions of various stakeholders thereby a sustainable approach. The research results indicate the high importance of most of the success factors and the success criteria of research projects pointed out in the literature and those in turn are important for project management and supports decision-making.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

project success; success factor; success criteria; research project; project stakeholder; sustainable approach

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
• Czasopismo: Operations Research and Decisions
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 33, No. 4
• Strony: 97--118
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 76 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Klaus-Rosińska Agata

• Faculty of Management, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4862-0500

autor

Iwko Joanna

• Faculty of Management, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3993-9528

Bibliografia

• [1] Aarseth, W., Ahola, T., Aaltonen, K., Økland, A., and Andersen, B. Project sustainability strategies: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Project Management 35, 6 (2017), 1071–1083.
• [2] Achman, R. Stakeholders’ perspectives on sustainability in project management. In Sustainability Integration for Effective Project Management, G. Silvius and J. Tharp, Eds., IGI Global, 2013.
• [3] AlWaer, H., Sibley, M., and Lewis, J. Different stakeholder perceptions of sustainability assessment. Architectural Science Review 51, 1 (2008), 48–59.
• [4] Atkinson, R. Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management 17, 6 (1999), 337–342.
• [5] Baccarini, D. The logical framework method for defining project success. Project Management Journal Vol. 30, No. 4 (1999), 25–32.
• [6] Bal, M., Bryde, D., Fearon, D., and Ochieng, E. Stakeholder engagement: Achieving sustainability in the construction sector. Sustainability 5, 2 (2013), 695–710.
• [7] Barbolla, A. M. B., and Corredera, J. R. C. Critical factors for success in university-industry research projects. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 21, 5 (2009), 599–616.
• [8] Bartlett, A. G. Factors affecting the relative success of collaborative forestry research projects in Indonesia. The European Journal of Development Research 30, 5 (2018), 892–913.
• [9] Bartlett, A. G., Kanowski, P. J., van Kerkhoff, L., and Byron, R. N. Identifying factors that influence the success of forestry research projects implemented in developing countries: Case study results from Vietnam. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research 90, 3 (2017), 413–425.
• [10] Betta, J., and Skomra, A. The impact of project stakeholders and their management on project success. In Local and regional projects. Project stakeholders, H. Brandenburg and G. Tobor, Eds., Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach (2017), 42–65 (in Polish).
• [11] Booth, A., Sutton, A., and Papaioannou, D. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. SAGE Publications, 2012.
• [12] Caldas, C., and Gupta, A. Critical factors impacting the performance of mega-projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 24, 6 (2017), 920–934.
• [13] Camilleri, E. Project Success: Critical Factors and Behaviours, 1st ed. Routledge, 2011.
• [14] Capaldo, G., Capone, V., Babiak, J., Bajcar, B., and Kuchta, D. Efficacy beliefs, empowering leadership and project success in public research centers: An Italian–Polish study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, 13 (2021), 6763.
• [15] Carvalho, M. M., and Rabechini Jr, R. Can project sustainability management impact project success? An empirical study applying a contingent approach. International Journal of Project Management 35, 6 (2017), 1120–1132.
• [16] Case, R. H., and Shane, S. Fostering risk taking in research and development: The importance of a project’s terminal value. Decision Sciences 29, 4 (1998), 765–783.
• [17] Cassanelli, A. N., Fernandez-Sanchez, G., and Guiridlian, M. C. Principal researcher and project manager: who should drive R&D projects? R&D Management 47, 2 (2017), 277–287.
• [18] Chawla, V., Chanda, A., Angra, S., and Chawla, G. The sustainable project management: A review and future possibilities. Journal of Project Management 3, 3 (2018), 157–170.
• [19] Cooke-Davies, T. The “real” success factors on projects. International Journal of Project Management 20, 3 (2002), 185–190.
• [20] Davis, K. Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success. International Journal of Project Management 32, 2 (2014), 189–201.
• [21] Davis, K. A method to measure success dimensions relating to individual stakeholder groups. International Journal of Project Management 34, 3 (2016), 480–493.
• [22] Davis, K. An empirical investigation into different stakeholder groups perception of project success. International Journal of Project Management 35, 4 (2017), 604–617.
• [23] de Wit, A. Measurement of project success. International Journal of Project Management 6, 3 (1988), 164–170.
• [24] Di Maddaloni, F., and Davis, K. Project manager’s perception of the local communities’ stakeholder in megaprojects. An empirical investigation in the UK. International Journal of Project Management 36, 3 (2018), 542–565.
• [25] Domurath, A., Behrens, J., and Patzelt, H. Scientists’ commitment to underperforming research projects: Linking past success and the social environment. R and D Management 45, 5 (2015), 569–588.
• [26] Dubois, O., and Silvius, G. The relation between sustainable project management and project success. International Journal of Management and Sustainability 9, 4 (2020), 218–238.
• [27] Durand, C., Leyrie, C., and Bousquet, J. Exploratory study of success factors for research and development projects run by SMEs in Quebec linked to secondary and tertiary aluminum production. Journal of Modern Project Management 4, 2 (2016), 74–83.
• [28] Dvir, D., Lipovetsky, S., Shenhar, A., and Tishler, A. In search of project classification: A non-universal approach to project success factors. Research Policy 27, 9 (1998), 915–935.
• [29] Dvir, D., Raz, T., and Shenhar, A. J. An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success. International Journal of Project Management 21, 2 (2003), 89–95.
• [30] Ebadi, Y. M. and Dilts D. A. The relation between research and development project performance and technical communication in a developing country—Afghanistan. Management Science 32, 7 (1986), 822–830.
• [31] Eskerod, P., and Huemann, M. Sustainable development and project stakeholder management: What standards say. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 6, 1 (2013), 36–50.
• [32] Fuentes-Ardeo, L., Otegi-Olaso, J. R., and Aguilar-Fernandez, M. E. How the project knowledge management and the sustainability in project management affect the project success. In Proceedings of the IEEE 9th International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications, IDAACS 2017 (Bucharest, Romania, 2017), vol. 2, IEEE, pp. 884–887.
• [33] Ghomi, H., and Barzinpour, F. Identifying the success factors of knowledge management tools in research projects (Case study: A corporate university). Management Science Letters 8, 8 (2018), 805–818.
• [34] Iams, H. Some factors related to management of an applied research project. IRE Transactions on Engineering Management PGEM-3 (1955), 16–21.
• [35] ISO 26000: 2010. Guidance on Social Responsibility. 1st ed., International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2010.
• [36] Jugdev, K., Thomas, J., and Delisle, C. L. Rethinking project management – old truths and new insights, International Project Management Journal 7, 1, (2001), 36–58.
• [37] Kerzner, H. Project Management Metrics, KPIs, and Dashboards. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013.
• [38] Khalifeh, A., Farrell, P., and Al-edenat, M. The impact of project sustainability management (PSM) on project success: A systematic literature review. Journal of Management Development 39, 4 (2020), 453–474.
• [39] Klaus-Rosińska, A. Success of research and research-development projects in the science sector. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, 2019 (in Polish).
• [40] Klaus-Rosińska, A., and Iwko, J. Stakeholder management. One of the clues of sustainable project management — as an underestimated factor of project success in small construction companies. Sustainability 13, 17 (2021).
• [41] Klaus-Rosińska, A., and Kuchta, D. The success and failure of research projects according to the opinions of various stakeholders. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, (ICERI 2016) (Seville, Spain, 2016), IATED, pp. 1947–1956.
• [42] Klaus-Rosińska, A., Kuchta, D., and Marchwicka, E. Identification of success and failure factors of research projects. Methods and tools used. In Innovations in Polish science in the field of economic sciences. An overview of current research topics, A. Mempel-Snieżyk, J. Doskocz, and P. Kardasz, Eds., Innovations in Polish science in the field of economic sciences. Overview of current research topics. Wydawnictwo Nauka i Biznes, Brzeziny, 2016, pp. 32–49 (in Polish).
• [43] Koops, L., van Loenhout, C., Bosch-Rekveldt, M., Hertogh, M., and Bakker, H. Different perspectives of public project managers on project success. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 24, 6 (2017), 1294–1318.
• [44] Koutsikouri, D., Austin, S., and Dainty, A. Critical success factors in collaborative multi-disciplinary design projects. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology 6, 3 (2008), 198–226.
• [45] Krzos, G., and Szumowski, W. Identification of success factors of a project in the management of research and development project of the medical industry based on the "Rehabio - Telerehabilitation”. Management Sciences. Nauki o Zarz ˛adzaniu, 32 (2017), 59–64, (in Polish).
• [46] Kuchta, D. The success and failure of a publicly funded research project. Prace Naukowe / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach (2016), 166–179 (in Polish).
• [47] Labelle, F., and Leyrie, C. "Stakepartner management" in projects: A turn-of-the-century turnaround at Alcan. Journal of Modern Project Management 1, 1 (2013), 33–43.
• [48] Li, J., and Pu, X. Creativity, management and success of research projects: A cross-country comparison. In China’s Role in Global Economic Recovery, X. Fu, Ed., China’s Role in Global Economic Recovery. Routledge, 2011, pp. 272–282.
• [49] Lipovetsky, S., Tishler, A., and Dvir, D.and Shenhar, A. The relative importance of project success dimensions R&D Management 27, 2 (1997), 97–106.
• [50] Mahmood, A., Asghar, F., and Naoreen, B. Success factors on research projects at university. An exploratory study. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 116 (2014), 2779–2783.
• [51] Martens, M., and Carvalho, M. Sustainability and success variables in the project management context: An expert panel. Project Management Journal 47, 6 (2016), 24–43.
• [52] Müller, R., and Jugdev, K. Critical success factors in projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 5, 4 (2012), 757–775.
• [53] Munns, A. K., and Bjeirmi, B. F. The role of project management in achieving project success. International Journal of Project Management 14, 2 (1996), 81–87.
• [54] Murray-Websrer, R., and Dalcher, D. APM Body of Knowledge, 7th ed., Association for Project Management, 2019.
• [55] Nguyen, N. H., Skitmore, M., and Wong, J. K. W. Stakeholder impact analysis of infrastructure project management in developing countries: A study of perception of project managers in state-owned engineering firms in Vietnam. Construction Management and Economics 27, 11 (2009), 1129–1140.
• [56] Nguyen, T. H. D., Chileshe, N., Rameezdeen, R., and Wood, A. Stakeholder influence pathways in construction projects: Multicase study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 145, 9 (2019), 05019011.
• [57] Nicholas, J., and Hidding, G. Management principles associated with IT project success. International Journal of Management and Information Systems (IJMIS) 14, 5 (2010), 147–156.
• [58] O’Keefe, W. M. Factors which contribute to project management difficulties in Brazilian industrial research institutes. IEEE Engineering Management Review 8, 3 (1980), 9–13.
• [59] Pade, C., Mallinson, B., and Sewry, D. An elaboration of critical success factors for rural ICT project sustainability in developing countries: Exploring the DWESA case. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research 10, 4 (2008), 32–55.
• [60] Perrini, F., and Tencati, A. Sustainability and stakeholder management: The need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems. Business Strategy and the Environment 15, 5 (2006), 296–308.
• [61] Pinto, J. K., and Mantel Jr., S. J. The causes of project failure. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 37, 4 (1990), 269–276.
• [62] Pinto, J. K., and Prescott, J. E. Variations in critical success factors over the stages in the project life cycle. Journal of Management 14, 1 (1988), 5-18.
• [63] Pinto, J. K., and Slevin, D. P. Project success: Definitions and measurement techniques. Project Management Journal 19, 1 (1988), 67–72.
• [64] Rohman, M. A., Doloi, H., and Heywood, C. A. Success criteria of toll road projects from a community societal perspective. Built Environment Project and Asset Management 7, 1 (2017), 32–44.
• [65] Sakakibara, K. R&D cooperation among competitors: A case study of the VLSI semiconductor research project in Japan. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 10, 4 (1993), 393–407.
• [66] Saunders, R. G., and Stewart, R. W. Failure of communication in research and development. International Journal of Project Management 8, 2 (1990), 71–78.
• [67] Segalla, M. Factors for the success or failure of international teams: The special case of international research projects. Journal of Managerial Psychology 13, 3/4 (1998), 133–136.
• [68] Serra, C. E. M., and Kunc, M. Benefits realisation management and its influence on project success and on the execution of business strategies. International Journal of Project Management 33, 1 (2015), 53–66.
• [69] Shenhar, A. J., Dvir, D., Levy, O., and Maltz, A. C. Project success: A multidimensional strategic concept. Long Range Planning 34, 6 (2001), 699–725.
• [70] Silvius, A. J. G., Kampinga, M., Paniagua, S., and Mooi, H. Considering sustainability in project management decision-making; an investigation using Q-methodology. International Journal of Project Management 35, 6 (2017), 1133–1150.
• [71] Silvius, A. J. G., and Schipper, R. A conceptual model for exploring the relationship between sustainability and project success. Procedia Computer Science 64 (2015), 334–342.
• [72] Silvius, G. Sustainability as a new school of thought in project management. Journal of Cleaner Production 166 (2017), 1479–1493.
• [73] Wateridge, J. How can IS/IT projects be measured for success? International Journal of Project Management 16, 1 (1998), 59–63.
• [74] Yazici, H. J. An exploratory analysis of the project management and corporate sustainability capabilities for organizational success. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 13, 4 (2020), 793–817.
• [75] Yu, T., Man, Q., Wang, Y., Shen, G. Q., Hong, J., Zhang, J., and Zhong, J. Evaluating different stakeholder impacts on the occurrence of quality defects in offsite construction projects: A Bayesian-network-based model. Journal of Cleaner Production 241 (2019), 118390.
• [76] Zaleski, S., and Michalski, R. Success factors in sustainable management of IT service projects: Exploratory factor analysis. Sustainability 13, 8 (2021), 4457.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).