The importance of the energy sector in building social well-being: challenges of sustainable development and the Polish perspective

• Autorzy: Wolska Grażyna , Kizielewicz Joanna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2025.216.34

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The main objective of the article is to demonstrate that the currently adopted path of economic development in the Polish energy sector is accelerating ecological crisis and failing to ensure the ecological and economic security essential for long-term sustainability. By highlighting the negative consequences of present-day energy policies, it emphasizes the need for a more holistic approach that incorporates economic, social, and environmental considerations. Design/methodology/approach: This article employs a triangulation of methods, including a critical literature review, hermeneutic analysis, logical-semantic analysis, and conceptualization of key terms, guided by the principle of Occam’s razor for clarity and precision. It examines the implications of Poland’s energy sector policies on ecological sustainability, economic security, and social well-being. The approach provides a multifaceted perspective on energy transition within the framework of sustainable development. Findings: A crucial focus has been placed on the energy sector, given its substantial contribution to CO2 emissions. The argument presented here is that only by integrating environmental objectives with economic and social goals could Poland - and indeed other nations - achieve relevant level of the sustainable development. The key point is that such integration requires rethinking current policy and energy strategies, prioritizing investments in low-carbon technologies, and strengthening public participation mechanisms to foster greater awareness and engagement. Research limitations/implications: The Polish energy sector operates within a unique socio-political and economic context, influenced by historical dependence on coal, current policy structures, and public sentiment. These factors may reduce the generalizability of research findings to other countries with different energy mixes and policy frameworks. While this research emphasizes the importance of public participation, it does not extensively analyze the perspectives of all stakeholder groups e.g., local communities, private sector, or non-governmental organizations. A broader range of viewpoints could further enrich the findings. Practical implications: The findings of this research could serve as a valuable resource for researchers and experts in sustainable development, energy policy, and environmental studies, as well as policymakers and local government representatives responsible for implementing environmental and energy strategies. Social implications: Additionally, non-governmental organizations, scientific research institutions who are engaged in the future of the energy sector should also find the results of the study valuable for the public debate and policy decisions. Originality/value: The study calls for policy changes, investments in low-carbon technologies, and greater public involvement to support sustainable energy transitions. These recommendations are tailored to Poland’s specific social and economic context, offering practical insights for improving sustainability.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

natural environment; sustainable development; energy policy

PL

środowisko naturalne; zrównoważony rozwój; polityka energetyczna

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2025
• Tom: z. 216
• Strony: 567--583
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 37 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Wolska Grażyna

• Faculty of Management and Quality Science, Gdynia Maritime University

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7289-5179

autor

Kizielewicz Joanna

• Faculty of Management and Quality Science, Gdynia Maritime University

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7415-9928

Bibliografia

• 1. Atak zimy w USA (2023, January 19). Dobra Pogoda. Retrieved from: https://dobrapogoda24.pl/artykul/atak-zimy-usa-luty-2021-stan-kleski-zywiolowej-teksas, February 12, 2024.
• 2. Barnett, M.L. (2019). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A critique and an indirect path forward. Business & Society, 58(1), 167-190.
• 3. Bąk, I., Barwińska-Małajowicz, A., Wolska, G. (2021). Is the European Union making progress on energy decarbonisation while moving towards sustainable development? Energies, 14(13), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14133792
• 4. Bednorz, J. (2010). Polityka państwa wobec pakietu klimatycznego z uwzględnieniem znaczenia węgla kamiennego w gospodarce Polski. Polityka Energetyczna, 13(20), 47-60.
• 5. Buildings in Poland will be divided into classes from A to G. (n.d.). Retrieved from: https://wysokienapiecie.pl/82483-budynki-w-polsce-zostana-podzielone, February 10, 2024.
• 6. Burchard-Dziubińska, M., Rzeńca, A., Drzazga, D. (Eds.) (2014). Zrównoważony rozwój - naturalny wybór. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
• 7. CEN (2012). EN 16258: Methodology for calculation and declaration of energy consumption and GHG emissions of transport services (freight and passengers). European Committee for Standardization. Retrieved from: https://standards.globalspec.com/std/ 1562222/EN 16258#, February 2, 2024.
• 8. COM (2011). A roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050 (COM 112). European Environment Agency. Retrieved from: https://www.eea.europa.eu/policydocuments/com-2011-112-a-roadmap, February 10, 2024.
• 9. COM (2019). EU Climate Action Progress Report 2019 (Report No. 559). Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52019DC0550, February 15, 2024.
• 10. CSO (1993). Definitions in the field of environmental protection. Central Statistical Office, Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Environmental Protection.
• 11. Czaja, S., Fiedor, B. (2010). Ekonomia środowiska i ekologiczna jako filary ekonomii zrównoważonego rozwoju. In: B. Poskrobko (Ed.), Ekonomia zrównoważonego rozwoju (pp. 17-38). Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Ekonomicznej w Białymstoku.
• 12. Danowska-Prokop, B., Pęciak, R. (Eds.) (2021). Polska myśl ekonomiczna - wybrane problemy. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach.
• 13. Decision No 406/2009/EC (2009). Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the effort of Member States to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to meet the Community's greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments up to 2020. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv OJ.L_. 2009.140.01.0136.01.ENG, February 5, 2024.
• 14. Directive 2003/87/EC (2003). Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC. Retrieved from: https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX 32003L0087, February 12, 2024.
• 15. Directive 2009/31/EC (2009). Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the geological storage of carbon dioxide. Retrieved from https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX 32009L0031, February 12, 2024.
• 16. Grzeszczak, A. (2023). Opał z wykopalisk. Polityka, 11, 42-71.
• 17. Grzeszczak, A. (2023). Złapani w sieci. Polityka, 27, 41.
• 18. Hinc, A. (2011). Jak skutecznie wdrożyć CCS w Polsce? Polska Strategia CCS. Demos EUROPA.
• 19. Ile Polska płaci za importowany węgiel (n.d.). Retrieved from: http://knurow.solidarnoscgornicza.org.pl/2022/02/21/ile-polska-placi-za-importowanywegiel/, February 7, 2024.
• 20. IMGW (2023). Obserwator. Retrieved from: https://www.imgw.pl/instytut/imgwobserwator, January 15, 2023.
• 21. International Energy Agency (2013). Technology Roadmap: Carbon Capture and Storage. Paris: OECD/IEA.
• 22. ISO (2020). ISO 14046:2014 Environmental management - Water footprint - Principles, requirements, and guidelines. Retrieved from: https://www.iso.org/standard/43263.html, February 2, 2024.
• 23. ISO (2020). ISO 14046:2014 Environmental management - Water footprint - Principles, requirements, and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization. Retrieved from: https://www.iso.org/standard/43263.html, February 2, 2024.
• 24. Kaczorowska, G. (2023). Jacy są Polacy? Polityka, No. 13.
• 25. KE oskarża Polskę o zaniedbania dotyczące ochrony środowiska (n.d.). Retrieved from: https://zielona.interia.pl/polityka-klimatyczna/news-ke-oskarza-polske-o-zaniedbaniadotyczace-ochrony-srodowiska,nId,5296481, June 3, 2023.
• 26. Kizielewicz, J. (2022). Monitoring energy efficiency and environmental ship index by cruise seaports in Northern Europe. Energies, 15, 4215. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15084215
• 27. Knoepfel, P., Nahrath, S. (2005). Sustainable management of natural resources: From traditional environmental protection policies towards institutional natural resource regimes. IDHEAP.
• 28. Kowalewski, A.T. (2006). Społeczne, ekonomiczne i przestrzenne bariery rozwoju zrównoważonego. Instytut Rozwoju Miast.
• 29. Kowanda, C. (2023). Gra w butelkę. Polityka, 11, 43.
• 30. Rogall, H. (2010). Ekonomia zrównoważonego rozwoju. Teoria i praktyka. Zysk i S-ka.
• 31. Strzępka, K. (2018). Ambitne cele, ale znikome rezultaty. Teraz Środowisko. Retrieved from: https://www.teraz-srodowisko.pl, February 2, 2024.
• 32. SWD (2019). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: Laying the groundwork for increased long-term ambition, 2019 EU Climate Action Progress Report (SWD 396 final). Brussels: European Commission.
• 33. The Global Status of CCS (2019). Global CCS Institute. Retrieved from: https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/resources/publications-reports-research/global-statusof-ccs-report-2019, September 23, 2019.
• 34. UN (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1). Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment, February 2, 2024.
• 35. UN (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1). United Nations.
• 36. Wolska, G. (2021). Ocena jakości życia w wybranych krajach UE w latach 2004-2019 na przykładzie wskaźnika rozwoju społecznego HDI. In: B. Danowska-Prokop, R. Pęciak (Eds.), Polska myśl ekonomiczna - wybrane problemy (pp. 179-188). Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach.
• 37. Ziębik, A., Gładysz, P. (2015). Uzasadnienie krajowej i unijnej polityki energetycznej - analiza porównawcza. Energetyka, 9, 569-577.