Prediction of aircraft lost of control in the flight by continuation, bifurcation, and catastrophe theory methods

• Autorzy: Sibilski K. , Kowalski M.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/12314005.1217280

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Lost of Control in Flight (LOC-I) is ordinarily associated with flight outside of the normal flight envelope, with nonlinear behaviours, and with an inability of the pilot to control the aircraft. These results provide a means for analysing accident data to establish whether or not the accident should be classified as LOC-I. Moreover, they help identify when the initial upset occurred, and when control was lost. The analysis also suggests which variables were involved, thereby providing clues as to the underlying mechanism of upset. However, it does not provide direct links to the flight mechanics of the aircraft, so it cannot be used proactively to identify weaknesses or limitations in the aircraft or its control systems. Moreover, it does not explain how departures from controlled flight occur. The complexity of the disaster aetiology stems from both the scale and coupling of the systems (not only the physical aircraft systems but also the organizational systems that support the operation). This complexity creates a pattern of disaster that evolves or it is precipitated through a series of several small failures. The cusp catastrophe model facilitates the mapping of Reason’s latent failure model, providing a descriptive and predictive illustration of the emergence of latent conditions under the trigger of situational factors. The risk of an accident increases as the situational and systematic factors combine to create an inherent instability resulting in the catastrophic event.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

nonlinear dynamics of flight; lost of control in the flight; catastrophe theory; bifurcation; continuation method

• Wydawca: Łukasiewicz Research Network - Institute of Aviation ; European Science Society of Powertrain and Transport KONES Poland ; Wydawnictwo Instytutu Technicznego Wojsk Lotniczych
• Czasopismo: Journal of KONES
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 23, No. 4
• Strony: 451--460
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 25 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Sibilski K.

• Air Force Institute of Technology Ksiecia Boleslawa 6, 01-494 Warszawa, Poland tel.: [phone], fax: [phone]

autor

Kowalski M.

• Air Force Institute of Technology Ksiecia Boleslawa 6, 01-494 Warszawa, Poland tel.: [phone], fax: [phone]

Bibliografia

• [1] Calkins, D. E., Aircraft accident flight patch simulation and animation, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 376-36, 1994.
• [2] Dietenberger, M. A., Haines, P. A., Luers, J. K., Reconstruction of Pan Am New Orleans accident, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 22, No. 8, pp. 719-728, 1985.
• [3] Luers, J., Dietenberger, M. A., Analyses of Arrow Air DC-8-63 Accident of December 12, 1985: Gander, Newfoundland, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 543-550, 1990.
• [4] Nelson, R. C., Jumper, E. J., Aircraft wake vortices and their effect on following aircraft, AIAA Meeting Papers, Atmospheric Flight mechanics Conference and Exhibit, Montreal, Canada, August 2001, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, AIAA 2001-4073 TP, http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2001-4073
• [5] Anon, Rapport NTSB, Aircraft Accident Report; United Airlines Flight 232, 1990.
• [6] Anon, Rapport NTSB, Aircraft Accident Report; Uncontrolled descent and collision with terrain USAir flight 427 Boeing 737-300, N513AU near Aliquippa, Pennsylvania, September 8, 1994,
• [7] Russell, P., Pardee, J., Final Report: JSAT Loss of Control: Results and Analysis, Tech. rep., Federal Aviation Administration: Commercial Airline Safety Team, 2000.
• [8] Ranter, H., Airliner Accident Statistics 2006,Tech. rep., Aviation Safety Network, 2007.
• [9] Lambregts, A. A., Nesemeier, G., Wilborn, J. E., Newman, R. E., Airplane Upsets: Old Problem, New Issues, AIAA Meeting Papers, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit, 18-21 August, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2008, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2008-6867, AIAA 2008-6867 TP,.
• [10] Wilborn, J. E., Foster, J. V., Defining Commercial Aircraft Loss-of-Control: a Quantitative Approach, AIAA Meetong Papers, Atmospheric Flight mechanics Conference and Exhibit, Providence, Rhode Island, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, AIAA 2004-4811TP, http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2004-4811, 16-19 August 2004.
• [11] Kwatny, H. G., Dongmo, J-E. T., Bor-Chin Chang, Aircraft Accident Prevention: Loss-of-Control Analysis, AIAA Meeting Papers, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA 2009-6256 TP, http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdfplus/10.2514/6.2009-6256, Chicago, Illinois 2009.
• [12] Pamadi, B., Performance, Stability, Dynamics and Control of Aeroplanes, 2nd Edition, AIAA Educational Series, Richmint, VA, 2007.
• [13] Etkin, B, Reid, L. D., Dynamics of Flight: Stability and Control, 3rd Edition, J. Willey & Sons, New York 1996
• [14] Carroll, J. V., Mehra, R. K., Bifurcation Analysis of Non-Linear Aircraft Dynamics, Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, Vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 529-536, 1982.
• [15] Jahnke, C. C., Culick, F. E. C., Application of Bifurcation Theory to the High-Angle-of-Attack Dynamics of the F-14, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 26-34, 1994.
• [16] Goman, M. G., Khramtsovsky, A. V., Application of continuation and bifurcation methods to the design of control systems, Phil. Trans. R. Soc., No. A 356, pp. 2277-2295, London 1998.
• [17] Goman, M. G., Zagainov, G. I., Khramtsovsky, A. V., Application of Bifurcation Methods to Nonlinear Flight Dynamics Problems, Progress in Aerospace Science , Vol. 33, pp. 539-586, 1997.
• [18] Guicheteau, P., Bifurcation Theory: a Tool for Nonlinear Flight Dynamics, Phil. Trans. R. Soc., No. A 356, pp. 2181-2201, London 1998.
• [19] Lowenberg, M. H., Bifurcation Analysis of Multiple-Attractor Flight Dynamics, Phil. Trans. R. Soc., No. A 356, pp. 2297-2319, London 1998.
• [20] Marusak, A. J., Pietrucha, J. A., Sibilski, K. S., Prediction of Aircraft Critical Flight Regimes Using Continuation and Bifurcation Methods, AIAA Meeting Papers , 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibits, Reno, NV, USA, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, AIAA-2000-0976-TP, http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2000-976, 2000.
• [21] Foster, J. V., et. all., Dynamics Modeling and Simulation of Large Transport Aircraft in Upset Conditions, AIAA Meeting Papers, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, San Francisco, CA, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, AIAA 2005-5933TP, http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2005-5933, 2005.
• [22] Masys, A. J., Aviation accident aetiology: catastrophe theory perspective, Diasert Prevention and Management, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 33-38, 2004.
• [23] Sibilski, K., Numerical reconstruction of aircraft accidents flight dynamics, Archives of Transport, Vol. IX, No. 1-2, 1997.
• [24] Sibilski, K., Some thoughts on mathematical models for aircraft accidents simulation, Aviation Safety (H. Soekha (eds.), VSP Publishing Company, Utrecht, Nederland 1997.
• [25] Wiggins, S., Introduction to Applied Non-linear Dynamical Systems and Chaos, Springer-Verlag, New York 1990. 460

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.