Tytuł artykułu
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Purpose: The aim of the article is a comparative analysis of selected cryptocurrencies and gold in the context of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic. Design/methodology/approach: The study covered the stock exchange of Gold and the four largest cryptocurrencies in terms of market capitalization: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Binance Coin, and Cardano. The data for the analysis for the period 2020-2021 was taken from the internet platform www.coinmarketcap.com, where all cryptocurrencies are published in daily intervals, and from the Investing website www.investing.com for Gold. The analysis of data in the form of time series was carried out, based on the assumption that successive values in the data set represent successive measurements made at equal time intervals. Findings: Our findings prove that the studied cryptocurrencies proved to be resistant to economic fluctuations related to the pandemic crisis. Originality/value: We present original scientific research that provides useful information in a practical dimension for investors interested in the cryptocurrency market and safe assets, and anyone interested in the specificity of the problem at hand.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
489--500
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 23 poz.
Twórcy
autor
- The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
autor
- The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
autor
- The Catholic University in Ružomberok, Slovakia
Bibliografia
- 1. Al-Awadhi, A.M., Al-Saifi, K., Al-Awadhi, A., Alhamadi, S. (2020). Death and contagious infectious diseases: Impact of the COVID-19 virus on stock market returns. Science Direct. Finance, Vol. 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100326.
- 2. Al-Yahyaee, K.H., Mensi, W., Ko, H.U., Yoon, S.M., Kang, S.H. (2020). Why cryptocurrency markets are inefficient: the impact of liquidity and volatility. North Am. J. Econ. Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2020.101168.
- 3. Arnfield, R. (2015). Regulation of Virtual Currencies. A Global Overview. https://assets.ctfassets.net/sdlntm3tthp6/resource-asset-r42/5a0fde03555905a4a6ee545fc2e09696/3ed86777-8235-4dd0-9e21-73d97f63368e.pdf.
- 4. Baeck, C., Elbeck, M. (2015). Bitcoins as an investment or speculative vehicle? A first look. Economic Letter, 22, pp. 30-34.
- 5. Bakry, W., Kavalmthara, P.J., Saverimuttu, V., Liu, Y., Cyril, S. (2021). Response of stock market volatility to COVID-19 announcements and stringency measures: A comparison of developed and emerging markets. Finance Res. Lett., Vol. 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.frl.2021.102350.
- 6. Bannigidadmath, D., Narayan, P.K., Phan Dinh, H.B., Gong, Q. (2021). How stock markets reacted to COVID-19? Evidence from 25 countries. Finance Res. Lett.
- 7. Brito, J., Castillo, A. (2016). Bitcoin. A Primer for Policymakers. Arlington: George Mason University.
- 8. Heller, D. (2017). The Implications of Digital Currencies for Monetary Policy. Monetary Dialogue. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2017/602048/IPOL_IDA(2017)602048_EN.pdf.
- 9. Kristoufek, L. (2020). Grandpa, Grandpa, Tell Me the One About Bitcoin Being a Safe Haven: New Evidence From the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front. Phys. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00296.
- 10. Li, J., Ruan X., Zhang, J.E. (2022). The price of COVID-19-induced uncertainty in the options market. Economics Letters, 211, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.110265.
- 11. Mokni, K., Youssef, M., Ajmi, A.N. (2022). COVID-19 pandemic and economic policy uncertainty: The first test on the hedging and safe haven properties of cryptocurrencies. Research in International Business and Finance, Vol. 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ribaf.2021.101573.
- 12. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, https://bitcoin.org.
- 13. Pieters, G., Vivanco, S. (2017). Financial Regulations and Price Inconsistencies across Bitcoin Markets. Information Economics and Policy, Vol. 39.
- 14. Przyłuska-Schmitt, J. (2021). Bitcoin - legal and tax issues. Review of Law, Business & Economics, https://doi.org/10.31743/ppe.12731.
- 15. Sandner, P., Blassl, J. (2020). Blockchain steht nun unter BaFin Aufsicht, Neue Regulierung digitaler Vermögenswerte. Legal Tribune Online. https://www.lto.de/recht/hintergruende/h/blockchain-bitcoin-regulierung-bafin-aufsicht-digitale-vermoegenswerte-erlaubnis/.
- 16. Selgin, G. (2015). Synthetic commodity money. Journal of Financial Stability. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1572308914000722.
- 17. Shahzad, S.J.H., Bouri, E., Roubaud, D., Kristoufek, L., Lucey, B. (2019). Is Bitcoin a better safe-haven investment than gold and commodities? International Review of Financial Analysis. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2019.01.002.
- 18. Smales, L.A. (2019). Bitcoin as a safe haven: is it even worth considering? Finance Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3204237.
- 19. Trimborn, S., Härdle, W.K. (2018). CRIX an Index for cryptocurrencies. Journal of Empirical Finance, Vol. 49.
- 20. Urquhart, A. (2016). The inefficiency of Bitcoin. Economic Letter, 148.
- 21. Wüstenfeld, J., Geldner, T. (2022). Economic uncertainty and national bitcoin trading activity. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2021.101625.
- 22. Yermacka, D. (2016). Is Bitcoin a Real Currency? An Economic Appraisal. In: Handbook of Digital Currency. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- 23. Zhang, W., Wang, P., Li, X., Shen, D. (2018). The inefficiency of cryptocurrency and its cross-correlation with Dow Jones Industrial Average. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 510.
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-0c9910ff-07b9-4e6b-a57d-acdc7136f432