Examining how logistics service providers\' adaptability impacts logistics outsourcing performance, customers\' satisfaction and loyalty

• Autorzy: Świtała M. , Niestrój K. , Hanus P.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17270/J.LOG.2018.298

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wpływ adaptacyjności usługodawców logistycznych na performance obsługi oraz satysfakcję i lojalność klientów

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background: This article examines the adaptability of logistics services providers (LSPs), which has been relatively rarely tackled in the literature on supply chain management. We examined the impacts of LSPs' adaptability on logistics outsourcing performance, as well as on satisfaction and loyalty of their customers. Methods: We formulated specific research hypotheses and assessed them using structural equation. The data was obtained via IT survey of 110 companies using LSPs. Our analyses were conducted in the SPSS and R software packages. Results: Based on the estimated path coefficients from the structural equation model, we found evidence of a dependency between the adaptability of LSPs and their logistic services performance, as well as customer satisfaction and loyalty. Conclusions: Our results confirm the importance of adaptability for the development of logistics outsourcing relationships, primarily due to the strong direct impact of LSP adaptability on logistics services performance, as well as the impact of this factor on customer satisfaction and loyalty. Therefore, when struggling to improve relations with customers, LSPs should take adaptive actions that can enhance performance outcomes.

PL

Wstęp: Niniejszy artykuł poświęcono stosunkowo rzadko podejmowanej w literaturze przedmiotu problematyce adaptacyjności usługodawców logistycznych. Celem zrealizowanych badań była ocena wpływu adaptacyjności usługodawców logistycznych na performance obsługi oraz satysfakcję i lojalność klientów. Metody: Sformułowano hipotezy badawcze, które zweryfikowano wykorzystując modelowanie równań strukturalnych. Badania przeprowadzono z zastosowaniem metody ankiety elektronicznej wśród 110 przedsiębiorstw zlecających obsługę logistyczną. Analizę oraz interpretację pozyskanych w ten sposób danych przeprowadzono z wykorzystaniem pakietu SPSS oraz programu R. Wyniki: Na podstawie oszacowanych współczynników ścieżek w modelu równań strukturalnych odnotowano zależności pomiędzy adaptacyjnością usługodawcy logistycznego a performance obsługi oraz satysfakcją i lojalnością klientów. Wnioski: Uzyskane w toku analizy statystycznej wyniki pozwoliły na pozytywną weryfikację postawionych hipotez badawczych. Potwierdzono, że działania adaptacyjne usługodawców mają bezpośredni pozytywny wpływ na performance obsługi, i co ważne – zależność ta jest bardzo istotna dla umacniania współpracy, ponieważ dzięki poprawie obsługi wyraźnie wzrasta satysfakcja klientów, kreując ich lojalność wobec usługodawcy.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

logistics service providers; adaptability; performance

PL

usługodawcy logistyczni; adaptacyjność; performance obsługi; satysfakcja; lojalność

• Wydawca: Wyższa Szkoła Logistyki
• Czasopismo: LogForum
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: Vol. 14, no. 4
• Strony: 449--465
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 57 poz. rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Świtała M.

• University of Economics in Katowice Faculty of Management Department of Business Logistics ul. 1 Maja 50, 40-287 Katowice, Poland

autor

Niestrój K.

• University of Economics in Katowice Faculty of Management Department of Business Logistics ul. 1 Maja 50, 40-287 Katowice, Poland

autor

Hanus P.

• University of Economics in Katowice Faculty of Management Department of Business Logistics ul. 1 Maja 50, 40-287 Katowice, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Bensaou M., 1999. Portfolios of buyer-supplier relationships, Sloan Management Review, 40, 4, 35-44.
• [2] Bowersox D.J., Closs D.J., Stank T.P., Keller S.B., 2000. How supply chain competency leads to business success, Supply Chain Management Review, 4, 4, 70-78.
• [3] Brennan D.R., Canning L., 2002. Adaptation processes in supplier-customer relationships, Journal of Customer Behaviour, 1, 2, 117-144, http://dx.doi.org/10.1362/14753920260595183
• [4] Brennan D.R., Turnbull P.W., Wilson D.T., 2003. Dyadic adaptation in business-tobusiness markets, European Journal of Marketing, 37, 11/12, 1636-1665, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090560310495393
• [5] Cahill D.L., Goldsby T.J., Knemeyer A.M., Wallenburg C.M., 2010. Customer loyalty in logistics outsourcing relationships: an examination of the moderating effects of conflict frequency, Journal of Business Logistics, 31, 2, 253-277, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2010.tb00151.x
• [6] Calarco A., Guravis J., 2006. Adaptability: responding effectively to change, CCL, Greensboro.
• [7] Çerri S., 2012. The impact of the quality of logistics activities on customer commitment, loyalty and firm’s performance, Journal of Advanced Research in Management, 3, 2, 79-88.
• [8] Chu, Z., Wang Q., Lado A.A., 2016. Customer orientation, relationship quality, and performance: the third-party logistics provider’s perspective, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 27, 3, 738-754, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-08-2013-0093
• [9] Cichosz M., 2010. Lojalność klienta a logistyka firm usługowych [Customer loyalty and logistics in service companies], SGH, Warszawa.
• [10] Curasi C.F., Kennedy K.N., 2002. From prisoners to apostles: a typology of repeat buyers and loyal customers in service businesses, Journal of Services Marketing, 16, 4, 322-341, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08876040210433220
• [11] Daugherty P.J., Stank T.P., Ellinger A.E., 1998. Leveraging logistics/distribution capabilities: the impact of logistics service on market share, Journal of Business Logistics, 19, 2, 35-51.
• [12] Deepen J.M., 2007. Logistics outsourcing relationships. Measurement, antecedents and effects of logistics outsourcing performance, Physica Verlag, Heidelberg, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-79081938-0
• [13] Dillman D.A., 2000. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method, Wiley, New Jersey, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003435520104400309
• [14] Forslund H., 2011. The size of a logistics performance measurement system, Facilities, 29, 3/4, 133-148, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02632771111109261
• [15] Forslund H., 2012. Performance management in supply chains: logistics service providers' perspective, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42, 3, 296-311, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09600031211225972
• [16] Fugate B.S., Mentzer J.T., Stank T.P., 2010. Logistics performance: efficiency, effectiveness and differentiation, Journal of Business Logistics, 31, 1, 43-62, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2010.tb00127.x
• [17] Giannoccaro I., 2015. Adaptive supply chains in industrial districts: a complexity science approach focused on learning, International Journal of Production Economics, 170, B, 576-589, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.004
• [18] Grigoroudis E., Siskos Y., 2010. Customer satisfaction evaluation methods for measuring and implementing service quality, Springer, New York, http://dx.doi.org/1010.1007/978-1-4419-1640-2
• [19] Green Jr. K.W., Whitten D., Inman R.A., 2008. The impact of logistics performance on organizational performance in a supply chain context, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13, 4, 317-327, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13598540810882206
• [20] Henseler J., Hubona G., Ray P.A., 2016. Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines, Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116, 1, 2-20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
• [21] Henseler J., Ringle C.M., Sinkovics R.R., 2009. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing, New Challenges to International Marketing – Advances in International Marketing, 8, 20, 277-319, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
• [22] Hertz S., Alfredsson M., 2003. Strategic development of third party logistics providers, Industrial Marketing Management, 32, 2, 139-149, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(02)00228-6
• [23] Holma A., 2008. Interfirm adaptation in a triadic business relationship setting – a case study in business travel industry, Proceedings of the 24th IMP Conference. Available from Internet: https://www.impgroup.org/paper_view.php?viewPaper=6828
• [24] Holma A., 2013. Adaptation in business contexts: working triadic relationships, in Woodside, A.G., Baxter, R. (Eds.), Deep knowledge of B2B relationships within and across boarders: advances in business marketing & purchasing, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, 119-291, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1069-0964%282013%290000020009
• [25] Iqbal M., Nisha N., Raza S.A., 2017. Customers' perceptions of green banking: examining service quality dimensions in Bangladesh, in Ordóñez de Pablos, P. (Ed.), Managerial strategies and solutions for business success in Asia, IGI Global, Hershey, Pennsylvania, 1-20, http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1886-0.ch001
• [26] Ivanov D., Sokolov B., Kaeschel J., 2010. A multi-structural framework for adaptive supply chain planning and operations control with structure dynamics considerations, European Journal of Operational Research, 200, 2, 409-420, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.002
• [27] Jafarkarimi H., Sim A.T.H., Saadatdoost R., Hee J.M., 2016. Designing a scenario-based questionnaire to assess behavioral intention in social networking sites' ethical dilemmas, in D'Ascenzo, F., Magni, M., Lazazzara, A., Za, S. (Eds.), Blurring the boundaries through digital innovation: individual, organizational, and societal challenges, Springer International Publishing, Bazel, 145-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38974-5_12
• [28] Juga J., Juntunen J., Grant D.B., 2010. Service quality and its relation to satisfaction and loyalty in logistics outsourcing relationships, Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 20, 6, 496-510, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09604521011092857
• [29] Kotler P., Armstrong G., 2010. Principles of marketing, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Knemeyer A.M., Murphy P.R., 2004. Evaluating the performance of third-party logistics arrangements: a relationship marketing perspective, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40,1, 35-51, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2004.tb00254.x
• [30] Križman A., 2011. Involvement, knowledge sharing and proactive improvement as antecedents of logistics outsourcing performance, Economic and Business Review, 11, 3, 233-256.
• [31] Kumar V., Pozza I.D., Ganesh J., 2013. Revisiting the satisfaction–loyalty relationship: empirical generalizations and directions for future research, Journal of Retailing, 89, 3, 246-262, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2013.02.001
• [32] Langley C.J., Holcomb M.C., 1992. Creating logistics customer value, Journal of Business Logistics, 13, 2, 1-27.
• [33] Lao S.I., Choy K.L., Ho G.T.S., Tsim Y.C., Chung N.S.H., 2011. Determination of the success factors in supply chain networks: a Hong Kong-based manufacturer's perspective, Measuring Business Excellence, 15, 1, 34-48, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13683041111113231
• [34] Large R.O., Kramer N., Hartmann R.K., 2011. Customer-specific adaptation by providers and their perception of 3PL-relationship success, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41, 9, 822-838, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09600031111175807
• [35] Leszczyński G., 2014. Adaptacja w relacjach business-to-business: uwarunkowania i efekty [Adaptation in business-to-business relations: determinants and effects], UE Poznań, Poznań.
• [36] Little R.J.A, Rubin D.B., 2002. Statistical analysis with missing data, Wiley, New York, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119013563
• [37] Mentzer J.T., Konrad B.P., 1991. An efficiency/effectiveness approach to logistics performance analysis, Journal of Business Logistics, 12, 1, 33-62.
• [38] Oláh J., Karmazin G., Pető K., Popp J., 2018. Information technology developments of logistics service providers in Hungary, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 21, 3, 332-334, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2017.1393506
• [39] Olivier R.L., 1999. Whence consumer loyalty?, Journal of Marketing, 63, 4, 33-44, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1252099
• [40] Olsen S.O., 2002, Comparative evaluation and the relationship between quality, satisfaction and repurchase loyalty, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30, 3, 240-249, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0092070302303005
• [41] Qayyum A., Khang D.B., Krairit D., 2013, An analysis of the antecedents of loyalty and the moderating role of customer demographics in an emerging mobile phone industry, International Journal of Emerging Markets, 8, 4, 373–391, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-02-2011-0019
• [42] Ranjan J., Puri S., 2012. Out of stock conditions affecting customer satisfaction and customer loyalty, Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 6, 2, 38-52.
• [43] Rauyruen P., Miller K.E., 2007. Relationship quality as a predictor of B2B customer loyalty, Journal of Business Research, 60, 1, 21-31, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.11.006
• [44] Sanchez G., Trinchera L., 2010. Package plspm [software]. Available from Internet:https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/plspm.
• [45] Schmidt S.O., Tyler K., Brennan R., 2007. Adaptation in inter-firm relationships: classification, motivation, calculation, Journal of Services Marketing, 21, 7, 530-537, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08876040710824889
• [46] Seker H., 2013. In/out-of-school learning environment and SEM analyses on attitude towards school, in Khine, M.S. (Ed.), Application of structural equation modeling in educational research and practice, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, 135-167, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-332-4_7
• [47] Singh S.H., 2015. The impact of service satisfaction, relational satisfaction and commitment on customer loyalty in logistics outsourcing relationship, Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems, 4, 1&2, 58-71.
• [48] Stan V., Caemmerer B., Cattan-Jallet R., 2013. Customer loyalty development: the role of switching costs, The Journal of Applied Business Research, 29, 5, 1541-1554, http://dx.doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v29i5.8069
• [49] Stank T.P., Goldsby T.J., Vicitery S.K., Savitskie K., 2003. Logistics service performance: estimating its influence on market share, Journal of Business Logistics, 24, 1, 27-55, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2003.tb00031.x
• [50] Świtała M., Klosa E., 2015. The determinants of logistics cooperation in the supply chain – selected results of the opinion poll within logistics service providers and their customers, LogForum, 11, 4, 329-340, http://dx.doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2015.4.2
• [51] Ueltschy Murfield M.L., Esper T.L., 2016. Supplier adaptation: a qualitative investigation of customer and supplier perspectives, Industrial Marketing Management, 59, 96-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.02.004
• [52] Van Doorn J., Verhoef P.C., 2008, Critical incidents and the impact of satisfaction on customer share, Journal of Marketing, 72, 4, 123-142, http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.4.123
• [53] Walsh H., Evanschitzky H., Wunderlich M., 2008, Identification and analysis of moderator variables: investigating the customer satisfaction-loyalty link, European Journal of Marketing, 42, 9/10, 977-1004, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090560810891109
• [54] Weber J., 2003. Macht logistik erfolgreich? – konzeptionelle uberlegungen und empirische ergebnisse [Does logistics make successfull? – conceptual considerations and empirical results], Logistik Management, 5, 3, 11-22.
• [55] Zacharia G.Z., Sanders N.R., Nix N.W., 2011. The emerging role of third-party logistics provider (3PL) as an orchestrator, Journal of Business Logistics, 30, 1, 40-54, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2158- 1592.2011.01004.x
• [56] Zhang Q., Vonderembse M., Lim J.S., 2005. Logistics flexibility and its impact on customer satisfaction, International Journal of Logistics Management, 16, 1, 71-95, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09574090510617367
• [57] Zhu X., Żółkiewski J., 2016, Exploring service adaptation in a business-to-business context, Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 26, 3, 315-337, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-02-2014-0039

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).