PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Which of the five classical ballet positions is the most demanding for the dancer’s body? An electromyography-based study to determine muscular activity

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The study aimed to determine which of the five classical ballet positions is the most demanding regarding muscular activity, values of external rotation in the hip joints, angular values of foot progression as well as the inclination (tilt) of the pelvis in the sagittal plane. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 14 female pre-professional ballet dancers (aged 11–16) participated. Participants were tasked with the sequential adoption of five classical ballet positions (CP1–CP5). The electromyographic activity of the muscles of the trunk and the lower limb was recorded with surface electrodes. Kinematic data including hip and knee external rotation, foot progression angle and pelvic tilt were collected using a motion capture system. Results: Symmetric positions CP1 and CP2 were not as demanding as asymmetric CP3–CP5. Higher values of hip and foot external rotation without greater muscular effort in CP2 than CP1 was noticed. Considering asymmetric positions, CP3 did not trigger a greater activity of hip or foot muscular groups than CP4 and CP5. CP4 was characterised by the greatest pelvic anterior tilt and the lowest activity of GM in the forward lower limb. In CP5, forward lower limb entailed a higher activity of muscles supporting the foot than in the remaining positions. Conclusion: In terms of biomechanics, the most demanding classical ballet position in pre-professional dancers is CP4, followed by CP5, CP3, CP1 and CP2. This finding can be applied in educational methodology of dancers, figure skaters, synchronized swimmers, acrobatic gymnasts, rhythmic gymnasts or cheerleaders.
Rocznik
Strony
3--14
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 27 poz., fot., tab.
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Biomechanics, Chair of Theory and Methodology of Sport, Poznan University of Physical Education, Poznań, Poland
  • Department of Biomechanics, Chair of Theory and Methodology of Sport, Poznan University of Physical Education, Poznań, Poland
  • Department of Biomechanics, Chair of Theory and Methodology of Sport, Poznan University of Physical Education, Poznań, Poland
  • Department of Biomechanics, Chair of Theory and Methodology of Sport, Poznan University of Physical Education, Poznań, Poland
Bibliografia
  • [1] BOGDANOVA M., Regarding the methods of the preparation of the ballroom dancing performers, National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, 2015, 4, 65–69, DOI: 10.32461/2226-3209.4.2015.138430.
  • [2] BOLIA I., UTSUNOMIYA H., LOCKS R., BRIGGS K., PHILIPPON M., Twenty-year systematic review of the hip pathology, risk factors, treatment, and clinical outcomes in artistic athletes-dancers, figure skaters, and gymnasts, Clin. J. Sport Med., 2018, 28 (1), 82–90, DOI: 10.1097/ JSM.0000000000000440.
  • [3] CHAMPION L.M., CHATFIELD S.J., Measurement of turnout in dance research. A critical review, J. Dance Med. Sci., 2008, 12 (4), 121–135.
  • [4] COPLAN J.A., Ballet dancer’s turnout and its relationship to self-reported injury, J. Orthop. Sports Phys., 2002, 32 (11), 579–584, DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2002.32.11.579.
  • [5] DANARDANI W., SOEGIYANTO K., SETIJONO H., SULAIMAN S., Artistic swimming helps the intelligence development. Proceedings of the international seminar on public health and education 2018 (ISPHE 2018), Adv. Health Sci. Res., 2018, 12, 81–85, DOI: 10.2991/isphe-18.2018.18.
  • [6] DAVIS R.B., OUNPUU S., TYBURSKI D., GAGE J.R., A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique, Hum. Mov. Sci., 1991, 10 (5), 575–587, DOI: 10.1016/0167-9457(91)90046-Z.
  • [7] GILBERT C.B., GROSS M.T., KLUG K.B., Relationship between hip external rotation and turnout angle for the five classical ballet positions, J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther., 1998, 27 (5), 339–348, DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1998.27.5.339.
  • [8] GORWA J., KABACIŃSKI J., MURAWA M., FRYZOWICZ A., On the track of the ideal turnout: Electromyographic and kinematic analysis of the five classical ballet positions, PLoS ONE, 2020, 15 (3), e0230654, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230654.
  • [9] GORWA J., MICHNIK R., NOWAKOWSKA K., JURKOJĆ J., JOCHYMCZYK-WOŹNIAK K., Is it possible to reduce loads of the locomotor system during the landing phase of dance figures? Biomechanical analysis of the landing phase in Grand Jeté, Entrelacé and Ballonné, Acta Bioeng. Biomech., 2019, 21 (4), 111–121, DOI: 10.5277/ABB-01429-2019-02.
  • [10] GORWA J., ZIELIŃSKI J., WOLAŃSKI W., MICHNIK R., LARYSZ, D., DWORAK L.B., KUSY K., Decreased bone mineral density in forearm vs loaded skeletal sites in professional ballet dancers, Med. Probl. Perform. Art., 2019, 34 (1), 25–32, DOI: 10.21091/mppa.2019.1006.
  • [11] GOTTSCHLICH L.M., YOUNG C.C., Spine injuries in dancers, Curr. Sports Med. Rep., 2011, 10 (1), 40–44, DOI: 10.1249/ JSR.0b013e318205e08b.
  • [12] HAIGHT H.J., Morphologic, physiologic, and functional interactions in elite female ballet dancers, Med. Probl. Perform. Art., 1998, 13 (1), 4–13.
  • [13] HERMENS H.J., FRERIKS B., DISSELHORST-KLUG C., RAU G., Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures, J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol., 2000, 10 (5), 361–374, DOI: 10.1016/s1050-6411(00)00027-4.
  • [14] HOWSE J., MCCORMACK M., Anatomy, dance technique and injury prevention, A & C Black Publishers Ltd., London, England, 2009.
  • [15] KRASNOW D., AMBEGAONKAR J.P., WILMERDING M.V., STECYK S., KOUTEDAKIS Y., WYON M., Electromyographic comparison of grand battement devant at the barre, in the center, and traveling, Med. Probl. Perform. Art., 2012, 2 7 (3), 143–155, DOI: 10.1016/s1050-6411(00)00027-4.
  • [16] QUANBECK A.E., RUSSELL J.A., HANDLEY S.C., QUANBECK D.S., Kinematic analysis of hip and knee rotation and other contributors to ballet turnout, J. Sports Sci., 2017, 35 (4), 331–338, DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1164335.
  • [17] SHERMAN A.J., MAYALL E., TASKER S.L., Can a prescribed turnout conditioning program reduce the differential between passive and active turnout in pre-professional dancers? J. Dance Med. Sci., 2014, 18 (4), 159–168, DOI: 10.12678/ 1089-313X.18.4.159.
  • [18] SKWIOT M., ŚLIWIŃSKI G., MILANESE S., ŚLIWIŃSKI Z., Hypermobility of joints in dancers, 2019, PLoS ONE, 14 (2), e0212188, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212188.
  • [19] TANABE H., FUJII K., KOUZAKI M., Joint coordination and muscle activities of ballet dancers during tiptoe standing, Motor Control, 2017, 21 (1), 72–89, DOI: 10.1123/ mc.2015-0002.
  • [20] TREPMAN E., GELLMAN R.E., MICHELI L.J., DE LUCA C.J., Electromyographic analysis of grand-plié in ballet and modern dancers, Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 1998, 30 (12), 1708–1720, DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199812000-00009.
  • [21] TREPMAN E., GELLMAN R.E., SOLOMON R., MURTHY K.R., MICHELI L.J., DE LUCA C.J., Electromyographic analysis of standing posture and demi-plié in ballet and modern dancers, Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 1994, 26(6), 771–782, DOI: 10.1249/ 00005768-199406000-00018.
  • [22] VAGANOVA A., Basic principles of classical ballet. Russian ballet technique, Dover Publications, Inc., New York 2015.
  • [23] VAUGHAN C., DAVIS B., O’CONNOR J., Dynamics of human gait, Kiboho Publishers, 1992.
  • [24] WASHINGTON I., MAYES S., GENDERTON C., PIZZARI T., Differentials in turnout among professional classical ballet dancers, Med. Probl. Perform. Art., 2016, 31 (3), 160–165, DOI: 10.21091/mppa.2016.3029.
  • [25] WESTBLAD P., TSAI-FELLANDER L., JOHANSSON C., Eccentric and concentric knee extensor muscle performance in professional ballet dancers, Clin. J. Sport Med., 1995, 5 (1), 48–52, DOI: 10.1097/00042752-199501000-00009.
  • [26] WOODHULL-MCNEAL A.P., CLARKSON P.M., JAMES R., WATKINS A., BARRETT S., How linear is dancers’ posture? Med. Probl. Perform. Art., 1990, 5 (4), 151–154.
  • [27] ZAFERIOU A.M., FLASHNER H., WILCOX P.R., MCNITT-GRAY J.L., Lower extremity control during turns initiated with and without hip external rotation. J. Biomech., 2017, 52, 130–139, DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.12.017.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-0c553be4-8aa9-4731-94ae-44d556b176a5
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.