Key indicators as a source of analysis of the level of progress of sustainable development

• Autorzy: Czerwińska Karolina , Pacana Andrzej , Kudelas Dušan

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2023.172.9

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to analyze the importance of the issue and the level of sustainable development in the context of the functioning of Poland and Slovakia against the background of the European Union, based on a system of indicators, and to analyze the level of implementation of selected sustainable development goals by these countries. Design/methodology/approach: The research process was based on the diagnostic survey method. The techniques used for data collection were content analysis and desk research. The study covered the years 2000-2021. Findings: Both in theory and in practice, a problem has been recognized, namely that the surveillance methods developed are fraught with various disadvantages (e.g., standardization or uniformity of data for all EU countries). Within the framework of each of the examined indicators (from the area of SDG7, SDG8, SDG9), Poland showed a rise in the ranking of EU member states between 2000 and 2021. Slovakia, on the other hand, only in relation to the indicator of ross domestic expenditure on R&D by sector (SDG9) showed a decline in placement. Research limitations/implications: A limitation of the study's implementation is the potential constraints on the availability of the data needed to calculate indicators to monitor the degree to which the Sustainable Development Goals are being met. Practical implications: The results of the research will positively influence the planning of further activities by both the analyzed countries, Poland and Slovakia. The results of the research provide constructive information that may prove useful for the development of future strategic plans related to the implementation of the goals of the concept of sustainable development. Originality/value: The study fills a research gap in the field of comparative analysis of selected spectra of Poland and Slovakia against the background of the European Union in the context of the implementation of sustainable development goals (Development Agenda 2030).

Słowa kluczowe

EN

sustainability; sustainability management; key indicator; monitoring indicators

PL

zrównoważony rozwój; zarządzanie zrównoważonym rozwojem; wskaźnik kluczowy; wskaźniki monitoringu

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: z. 172
• Strony: 151--164
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Czerwińska Karolina

• Rzeszow University of Technology; Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics

• https://orcid.org/000-0003-2150-0963

autor

Pacana Andrzej

• Rzeszow University of Technology; Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1121-6352

autor

Kudelas Dušan

• Technical University in Košice, Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Slovakia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0304-6202

Bibliografia

• 1. Astorga, E.M., Valdes, Z.M. (2021). Sustainable Development and Nonrenewable Resources. Conceptual Issues. Estudios Del Desarrollo Social-Cuba Y America Latina, Vol. 9, I. 3, pp. 348-362.
• 2. Balas, A., Molenda, A. (2016). Koncepcja doboru wskaźników zrównoważonego rozwoju Polski oraz narzędzie ich udostępniania i prezentacji. Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne, Vol. 2(80).
• 3. Bassen, A., Fieberg, C., Kordsachia, O., Lopatta, K., Nendza, B. (2023). Index construction for sustainable development investing. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Vol. 13, I. 1, pp. 702-722. DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2022.2105790.
• 4. Benavides-Sanchez, E., Moya-Clementa, I., Ribes-Gliner, G. (2022). TEC Empresarial, Vol. 16, I. 1, pp. 101-122. DOI: 10.18845/te.v16i1.5994.
• 5. Czerwińska, K., Pacana, A. (2020). Analysis of the exterior door production process using key performance indicators (KPI). Zarządzanie Przedsiębiorstwem, Wyd. 1, t. 23.
• 6. Czerwińska, K., Pacana, A., Dwornicka, R. (2020). Improvement Of The Production Process With The Use Of Selected Kpis. System Safety: Human-Technical FacilityEnvironment, Wyd. 1, t. 2, pp. 307-315.
• 7. Dagbanja, D.N. (2022). The CAI and Sustainable Development. Journal Of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 23, I. 4, pp. 574-600. DOI: 10.1163/22119000-12340261.
• 8. Dyatlov, D., Selishcheva, T. (2020). Principles, Tools and Indicators for Sustainable Development. 35th International-Business-Information-Management-Association Conference (IBIMA), Education Excellence And Innovation Management: A 2025 Vision to Sustain Economic Development During Global Challenges, pp. 7081-7090.
• 9. Fojtikova, L., Vavrek, R., Dolezelova, P. (2023). Road of the least developed countries to sustainable development: Assessing trade participation in the context of the sustainable development goals. Sustainable Development. DOI: 10.1002/sd.2524.
• 10. Fonseca, L.M., Domingues, J.P., Dima, A.M. (2020). Mapping the Sustainable Development Goals Relationships, Sustainability, Vol. 12, I. 8. DOI: 10.3390/su12083359.
• 11. Grebski, M.E., Czerwińska, K., Pacana, A. (2022). Swot analysis of individual components within the innovativeness ecosystem. Modern Management Review, Wyd. 2, t. 27, pp. 57-66.
• 12. Gunnarsdottir, I., Davidsdottir, B., Worrell, E., Sigurgeirsdottie, S. (2021). Sustainable energy development: History of the concept and emerging themes. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. Vol. 141, No. 110770. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110770.
• 13. Hajduk-Stelmachowicz, M. (2014). Znaczenie strategii proekologicznych w kontekście budowania przewagi konkurencyjnej przedsiębiorstw. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 366, pp. 152-162.
• 14. Hajduk-Stelmachowicz, M. (2017). Korzyści zewnętrzne z funkcjonowania ekoinnowacji organizacyjnych jako skutki wyborów strategicznych. Handel Wewnętrzny, Wyd. 3/1, t. 368, pp. 132-141.
• 15. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat, 19.04.2023.
• 16. Kusljic, S.K. (2023). Young people's perception on sustainable development. Casopis za Ekonomiju i Trzisne Komunikacije. Vol. 12, I. 2, pp. 393-407. DOI: 10.7251/EMC2202393K.
• 17. Lazar, S., Klimecka-Tatar, D., Obrecht, M. (2021). Sustainability orientation and focus in logistics and supply chains. Sustainability, Vol. 13, I. 6. DOI: 10.3390/su13063280.
• 18. Misztal, A., (2019). Zrównoważony rozwój przedsiębiorstw a Stopień Rozwoju społeczno-Gospodarczego. Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów, nr 174, pp. 33-45. https://doi.org/10.33119/SIP.2019.174.2.
• 19. Pacana, A., Czerwińska, K. (2017). Wykorzystanie metody 8D do rozwiązania problemu jakościowego. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Częstochowskiej. Zarządzanie, Nr 28, t. 2, pp. 73-87.
• 20. Peng, Y.X., Zhang, H.J. (2022). Global Sustainable Development Evaluation Methods With Multiple-Dimensional: Sustainable Development Index. Frontiers in Environmental Science, Vol. 10, No. 957095. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.957095.
• 21. Pondel, H. (2021). An attempt to evaluate the level of sustainable development in European Union countries. Economics and Law, Vol. 20, I. 2, pp. 383-399. DOI: 10.12775/EiP.2021.023.
• 22. Sakharov, A., Andronova, I. (2022). BRICS Sustainable Development Index: Methodological Aspects, Vestnik Mezhdunarodnykh Organizatsii-International Organisations Research Journal, Vol. 17, I. 3. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2022-03-02.
• 23. Shulla, K., Leal, W., Lardjane, S., Sommer, J.H., Borgemeister, C. (2020). Sustainable development education in the context of the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, Vol. 27, I. 5, pp. 458-468. DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2020.1721378.
• 24. Staniszewska, E., Klimecka-Tatar, D., Obrecht, M. (2020). Eco-design processes in the automotive industry, Production Engineering Archives, Vol. 26, I. 4, pp. 131-137. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2020.26.25.
• 25. Trąpczyński, P., Gorynia, M., Nowak, J., Wolniak, R. (2019). EU countries from central and Eastern Europe, and the investment development path model: a new assessment, Argumenta Oeconomica, Wyd. 43, t. 2, pp. 385-406.
• 26. Trusina, I., Jermolajeva, E. (2021). A new approach to the application of the principles of sustainable development, Economic Science For Rural Development, I. 55, pp. 231-240. DOI: 10.22616/ESRD.2021.55.023.
• 27. Ulewicz, R., Blaskova, M. (2018). Sustainable development and knowledge management from the stakeholders’ point of view. Polish Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2. Czestochowa University of Technology, pp. 363-374.
• 28. United Nations Statistics Division, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/indicators-list/, 19.04.2023.
• 29. Vig, S. (2022). Sustainable development through sustainable entrepreneurship and innovation: a single-case approach. Social Responsibility Journal. DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-02-2022-0093.
• 30. Wskaźniki Zrównoważonego Rozwoju Polski (2011). Katowice, p.16. ISBN 978-8389641-04-5.
• 31. www.un.org.pl/, 19.04.2023.