Comparative advantage of the EU in global value chains: How important and efficient are new EU members in transition?

• Autorzy: Gurgul H. , Lach Ł.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7494/manage.2016.17.1.21

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

We suggest original modifications and extensions of the recently presented methodological developments in ex-post accounting framework in global value chains in order to obtain empirical results both for the analyzed group of ten CEE economies as well as at a country-and-sectorspecific level. The empirical results confirm that the role of the selected CEE economies in transition in creating value added with respect to the total value added in the European Union in the GVC framework was biggest in the cases of agriculture-, wood-products-, metal-production, and travel-and-tourism-related sectors. We also found that, after two decades of transition, the measures of productivity in the examined economies in 2009 were still much lower as compared to the EU average for most of the sectors. Moreover, in the transition period, these indexes were increasing, especially after EU accession. In contrary, after two decades of transition, the measures of capital efficiency in the ten CEE economies in 2009 were comparable to the EU average for most of the sectors. Moreover, during this period, the growth rates of these indexes were, in general, positive. However, their growth rates dropped after EU accession.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

value added; productivity; capital efficiency; CEE economies; international input-output matrices; transition

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwa AGH
• Czasopismo: Managerial Economics
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 17, no. 1
• Strony: 21--58
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Gurgul H.

• AGH University of Science and Technology in Cracow, Faculty of Management, Department of Applications of Mathematics in Economics

autor

Lach Ł.

• AGH University of Science and Technology in Cracow, Faculty of Management, Department of Applications of Mathematics in Economics

Bibliografia

• [1] Ali-Yrkko, J., Rouvinen, P., Seppala, T. and Yla-Anttila, P. (2011) ‘Who captures value in global supply chains?’, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 11(3), pp. 263–278.
• [2] Ando, M., and Kimura, F. (2005) ‘The Formation of International Production and Distribution Networks in East Asia’, in Takatoshi, I. and Rose, A.K. (eds) International Trade in East Asia, NBER – East Asia Seminar on Economics, vol. 14, pp. 177–216.
• [3] Baldwin, R., Venables, A.J. (2013) ‘Spiders and Snakes: Offshoring and Agglomeration in the Global Economy’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 90(2), pp. 245–254.
• [4] Bems, R., Johnson, R.C. and Yi, K.-M. (2011) ‘Vertical linkages and the collapse of global trade’, American Economic Review, vol. 101(3), pp. 308–312.
• [5] Dedrick, J., Kraemer, K.L. and Linden, G. (2010) ‘Who profits from innovation in global value chains? A study of the iPod and notebook PCs’, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 19(1), pp. 81–116.
• [6] Di Mauro, F. and Forster, K. (2008) ‘Globalisation and the competitiveness of the euro area’, ECB Occasional Paper No. 97.
• [7] Dudenhoeffer, F. (2005) ‘Wieviel Deutschland steckt im Porsche?’, Ifo Schnelldienst, vol. 58(24), pp. 3–5.
• [8] Escaith, H. and Inomata, S. (2011) Trade Patterns and Global Value Chains in East Asia: From trade in Goods to Trade in Tasks, Geneva: WTO/IDE-JETRO.
• [9] Feenstra, R.C. (1998) ‘Integration of trade and disintegration of production in the global economy’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 12(4), pp. 31–50.
• [10] Feenstra, R.C. (2010) Offshoring in the Global Economy: Microeconomic Structure and Macroeconomic Implications, Cambridge: MIT Press.
• [11] Fukao, K., Ishido, H. and Ito, K. (2003) ‘Vertical Intra-Industry Trade and Foreign Direct Investment in East Asia’, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, vol. 17(4), pp. 468–506.
• [12] Grossman, G. and Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2008) ‘Trading tasks: a simple theory of offshoring’, American Economic Review, vol. 98(5), pp. 1978–1997.
• [13] Gurgul, H. and Lach, Ł., (2014) ‘Globalization and economic growth: Evidence from two decades of transition in CEE’, Economic Modelling, vol. 36, pp. 99–107.
• [14] Hanson, G.H., Mataloni, R.J.and Slaughter, M.J. (2005) ‘Vertical Production Networks in Multinational Firms’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 87(4), pp. 664–678.
• [15] Herrendorf, B., Rogerson, R. and Valentinyi, A. (2013) ‘Two perspectives on preferences and structural transformation’, American Economic Review, vol. 103(7), pp. 2752–2789.
• [16] Hummels, D., Ishii, J. and Yi, K-M. (2001) ‘The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 54(1), pp. 75–96.
• [17] Isard, W. (1951) ‘Interregional and Regional Input-Output Analysis: A Model of a Space Economy’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 33(4), pp. 318–328.
• [18] Johnson, R.C. and Noguera, G. (2012) ‘Accounting for Intermediates: Production Sharing and Trade in Value Added’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 86(2), pp. 224–236.
• [19] Kalvet, T. and Kattel, R. (2006) Creative Destruction Management: Meeting the Challenges of the Techno-economic Paradigm Shift, Tallinn: Praxis.
• [20] Koopman, R., Wang, Z. and Wei, S.-J. (2012) ‘Estimating domestic content in exports when processing trade is pervasive’, Journal of Development Economics, vol. 99(1), pp. 178–189.
• [21] Kuboniwa, M. (2015) ‘Russia’s Global Value Chain Using Modified World Input-Output Data’, Eastern European Economics, vol. 53, pp. 277–308.
• [22] Marin, D. (2006) ‘A New International Division of Labor in Europe: Outsourcing and Offshoring to Eastern Europe’, Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 4, pp. 612–622.
• [23] Marin, D. (2011) ‘The Opening Up of Eastern Europe at 20: Jobs, Skills, and «Reverse Maquiladoras»’ in Jovanovic, M.N. (ed.) International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, vol. 2, Chap. 13, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 293–323.
• [24] Miller, R.E. (1966) ‘Interregional feedback effects in input-output models: some preliminary results’, Papers in Regional Science, vol. 17(1), pp. 105–125.
• [25] Ottaviano, G., Taglioni, D. and di Mauro, F. (2009) ‘The euro and the competitiveness of European firms’, Economic Policy, vol. 24(57), pp. 5–53.
• [26] Sinn, H.-W. (2006) ‘The pathological export boom and the bazaar effect: how to solve the German puzzle’, The World Economy, vol. 29(9), pp. 1157–1175.
• [27] Timmer, M.P. (2012) The World Input-Output Database (WIOD): Contents, Sources and Methods, WIOD Working Paper 10, [Online], Available: http://www.wiod.org/publications/papers/wiod10.pdf [12 May 2014].
• [28] Timmer, M.P., Los, B., Stehrer, R. and de Vries, G.J. (2013) ‘Fragmentation, Incomes and Jobs. An Analysis of European Competitiveness’, Economic Policy, vol. 28(76), pp. 613–661.
• [29] Trefler, D. and Zhu, S. (2010) ‘The structure of factor content predictions’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 82(2), pp. 195–207.

Uwagi

Financial support for this paper from the National Science Centre of Poland (Research Grant no. DEC-2015/19/B/HS4/00088) is gratefully acknowledged