National sustainability index as a tool for evaluating the implementation of sustainable development goals in Poland in 2010-2019

• Autorzy: Kasztelan Armand

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.34659/eis.2022.82.3.481

Warianty tytułu

PL

Krajowy indeks zrównoważoności jako narzędzie oceny realizacji celów zrównoważonego rozwoju w Polsce w latach 2010-2019

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper presents the assessment results of the implementation of Poland's national sustainable development goals from 2010 to 2019. For this purpose, a synthetic index (National Sustainability Index) was designed using taxonomic methods. The study sought answers to the following questions: What is Poland's general level of accomplishment of sustainable development goals? What were the dynamics of changes in respective years? Which plans require special attention and actions in the coming years? Considering the possible range of the NSI, a significant improvement in accomplishing Poland's national sustainable development goals was observed in the surveyed years. Nevertheless, some areas still need intervention at the decision-making level, contributing to further balancing Poland's economic growth and development paths. The analysis's added value is the synthetic measure designed based on 76 specific indicators and the evaluation of sustainable development in Poland over ten years.

PL

W artykule przedstawiono wyniki oceny realizacji krajowych celów zrównoważonego rozwoju w Polsce w latach 2010-2019. W tym celu, wykorzystując metody taksonomiczne, skonstruowano syntetyczny indeks NSI (National Sustainability Index). W pracy poszukiwano odpowiedzi na następujące pytania: Jaki jest ogólny poziom realizacji celów zrównoważonego rozwoju w Polsce? Jak wyglądała dynamika zmian w poszczególnych latach? Które priorytety krajowe SD będą wymagały szczególnej uwagi i działań w najbliższych latach? Biorąc pod uwagę możliwy zakres kształtowania się NSI, w badanych latach zaobserwowano znaczną poprawę w zakresie realizacji celów zrównoważonego rozwoju w Polsce. Tym niemniej istnieją obszary, które wciąż wymagają interwencji na szczeblu decyzyjnym, co przyczyniłoby się dalszego równoważenia ścieżek wzrostu i rozwoju gospodarczego w Polsce. Wartością dodaną przeprowadzonych analiz jest skonstruowanie miernika syntetycznego, bazującego na 76 wskaźnikach dla priorytetów krajowych oraz przeprowadzenie oceny zrównoważonego rozwoju w Polsce na przestrzeni 10 lat.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

sustainable development goals; taxonomic methods; synthetic index; Poland; dynamic analysis

PL

cele zrównoważonego rozwoju; metody taksonomiczne; indeks syntetyczny; Polska; analiza dynamiczna

• Wydawca: Polskie Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistów Środowiska i Zasobów Naturalnych
• Czasopismo: Ekonomia i Środowisko
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: nr 3
• Strony: 150--172
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 78 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Kasztelan Armand

• University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1947-9846

Bibliografia

• Adrangi, B., & Kerr, L. (2022). Sustainable development indicators and their relationship to GDP: Evidence from emerging economies. Sustainability, 14, 658. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020658
• Allen, C., Metternichta, G., & Wiedmannb, T. (2016). National pathways to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A comparative review of scenario modelling tools. Environmental Science & Policy, 66, 199-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.09.008
• Asadullah, M. N., & Savoia, A. (2018). Poverty reduction during 1990-2013: Did Millennium Development Goals adoption and state capacity matter? World Development, 105, 70-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.010
• Baba Ali, E., Pavlovich Anufriev, V., & Amfo, B. (2021). Green economy implementation in Ghana as a road map for a sustainable development drive: A review. Scientific African, 12, e00756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e00756
• Bâc Dorin, P. (2008). A history of the concept of sustainable development: literature review. Annals of the University of Oradea. Economic Science Series, 17(2), 581- 585.
• Balmford, A., Bennun, L., Ten Brink, B., Cooper, D., Coˆte´, M. I., Crane, P., Dobson, A., Dudley, N., Dutton, I., Green, R. E., Gregory, R. D., Harrison, J., Kennedy, E. T., Kremen, C., Leader-Williams, N., Lovejoy, T. E., Mace, G., May, R., Mayaux, P., Morling, P., Phillips, J., Redford, K., Ricketts, T. H., Rodriguez, J. P., Sanjayan, M., Schei, P. J., Van Jaarsveld, A. S., & Walther, B. A. (2005). The convention on biological diversity's 2010 target. Science, 307, 212-213.
• Barbier, E. B., & Burgess, J. C. (2019). Sustainable development goal indicators: Analyzing trade-offs and complementarities. World Development, 122, 295-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.026
• Bartlett, A. A. (2006). Reflections on sustainability, population growth, and the environment. In: M. Keiner (Ed.) The Future of Sustainability. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4908-0_1
• Belmonte-Ureña, L. J., Plaza-Úbeda, J. A., Vazquez-Brust, D., & Yakovleva, N. (2021). Circular economy, degrowth and green growth as pathways for research on sustainable development goals: A global analysis and future agenda. Ecological Economics, 185, 107050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107050
• Bellantuono, L., Monaco, A., Amoroso, N., Aquaro, V., Lombardi, A., Tangaro, S., & Bellotti, R. (2022). Sustainable development goals: conceptualization, communication and achievement synergies in a complex network framework. Applied Network Science, 7, 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-022-00455-1
• Benton, T. (1994). The greening of Machiavelli: the evolution of international environmental politics. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs/Earthscan.
• Berchin, I. I., de Aguiar Dutra, A. R., & Salgueirinho Osório de Andrade Guerra, J. B. (2021). How do higher education institutions promote sustainable development? A literature review. Sustainable Development, 29 (6), 1204-1222. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2219
• Bin Mohd Yusof, M. I., & Ariffin, M. (2020). A journey towards sustainability: a review on sustainable development implementation in Malaysia. 14th International UMT Annual Symposium. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 494, 012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/494/1/012011
• Bina, O. (2013). The green economy and sustainable development: an uneasy balance? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31, 1023-1047. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1310j
• Bonnedahl, K. J., Heikkurinen, P., & Paavola, J. (2022). Strongly sustainable development goals: overcoming distances constraining responsible action. Environmental Science and Policy, 129, 150-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.004
• Bova, D. M., & Śleszyński, J. (2020). Sustainable development indicators: The Italian equitable and sustainable well-being approach and its application to the local level. Ekonomia i Środowisko, 2(73), 32-47. https://doi.org/10.34659/2020/2/14
• Bujanowicz-Haraś, B., Janulewicz, P., Nowak, A., & Krukowski, A. (2015). Evaluation of sustainable development in the member states of the European Union. Problemy Ekorozwoju - Problems of Sustainable Development, 10(2), 71-78.
• Charrouf, Z., & Guillaume, D. (2009); Sustainable development in Northern Africa: The argan forest case. Sustainability, 1, 1012-1022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1041012
• Cornescu, V., & Adam, R. (2014). Considerations regarding the role of indicators used in the analysis and assessment of sustainable development in the EU. Procedia Economics and Finance, 8, 10-16.
• Corona, B., Shen, L., Reike, D., Rosales Carreón, J., & Worrell, E. (2019). Towards sustainable development through the circular economy - A review and critical assessment on current circularity metrics. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 151, 104498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104498
• de Jong, E., & Vijge, M. J. (2021). From Millennium to Sustainable Development Goals: Evolving discourses and their reflection in policy coherence for development. Earth System Governance, 7, 100087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100087
• Diaz-Sarachega, J. M., Jato-Espino, D., & Castro-Fresno, D. (2018). Is the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) index an adequate framework to measure the progress of the 2030 Agenda? Sustainable Development, 6, 663-671. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1735
• Dogaru, L. (2020). Green economy and green growth - opportunities for sustainable development. The 14th International Conference on Interdisciplinarity in Engineering - INTER-ENG 2020. Proceedings, 63(1), 70. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020063070
• Dziekański, P., Prus, P., Maitah, M., & Wrońska, M. (2021). Assessment of spatial diversity of the potential of the natural environment in the context of sustainable development of poviats in Poland. Energies, 14(19), 6027. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en14196027
• European Commission. (2021). EU SDG Indicator set 202. Result of the review in preparation of the 2021 edition of the EU SDG monitoring report. Eurostat. Directorate E: Sectoral and Regional Statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/276524/12239692/SDG_indicator_set_2021.pdf
• Główny Urząd Statystyczny. (2022a, May). Statystyka publiczna na rzecz SDGs. Krajowa Platforma Raportująca - SDG. https://sdg.gov.pl/o_sdg/#stat
• Główny Urząd Statystyczny. (2022b, May). Polska na drodze zrównoważonego rozwoju. Raport 2020. Departament Opracowań Statystycznych. https://raportsdg.stat.gov.pl/2020/index.html
• Główny Urząd Statystyczny. (2022c, May). Polska na drodze zrównoważonego rozwoju. Inkluzywny wzrost gospodarczy. Raport 2020. Departament Opracowań Statystycznych. https://raportsdg.stat.gov.pl/index.html
• Główny Urząd Statystyczny. (2022d, May). Priorytety krajowe SDG. Krajowa Platforma Raportująca - SDG. https://sdg.gov.pl/priorytet/
• Grainger-Brown, J., & Malekpour, S. (2019). Implementing the sustainable development goals: A review of strategic tools and frameworks available to organisations. Sustainability, 11(5), 1381. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11051381
• Grzebyk, M., & Stec, M. (2015). Sustainable development in EU countries: Concept and rating of levels of development. Sustainable Development, 23, 110-123. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1577
• Guan, Ch., Weng, Y., Zhao, J., Lin, Y., Zhang, W., & Tu, Q. (2021). Examining China's sustainable development based on genuine progress indicator. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 1635-1644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.09.007
• Guijarro, F., & Poyatos, J. (2018). Designing a sustainable development goal index through a goal programming model: The case of EU-28 countries. Sustainability, 10(9), 3167. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10093167
• Gunnarsdottir, I., Davidsdottir, B., Worrell, E., & Sigurgeirsdottir, S. (2022). Indicators for sustainable energy development: An Icelandic case study. Energy Policy, 164, 112926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112926
• Gusheva, E., Gjorgievski, V., Obradovic Grncarovska, T., & Markovska, N. (2022). How do waste climate policies contribute to sustainable development? A case study of North Macedonia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 354, 131572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131572
• Guzowska, M. K., & Kryk, B. (2020). Implementation of the social goals of the Europe 2020 strategy by EU member states, European Research Studies Journal, Volume XXIII Issue 4, 1213-1229, https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1739
• Häikiö, L. (2014). Institutionalization of sustainable development in decision-making and everyday life practices: A critical view on the Finnish case. Sustainability, 6(9), 5639-5654. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su6095639
• Janousková, S., Hák, T., Necas, V., & Moldan, B. (2019). Sustainable development - a poorly communicated concept by mass media. Another challenge for SDGs? Sustainability, 11, 3181. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113181
• Jarocka, M. (2015). Wybór formuły normalizacyjnej w analizie porównawczej obiektów wielocechowych (The choice of a formula of the data normalization in the comparative analysis of multivariate objects). Economics and Management, 1, 113-126.
• Kasztelan, A. (2017). Green growth, green economy and sustainable development - terminological and relational discourse, Prague Economic Papers, 26(4), 487- 499. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.626
• Kasztelan, A., Jarosz-Angowska, A., Nowak, A., & Krukowski, A. (2021). Konkurencyjna biogospodarka szansą dla zrównoważonego rozwoju krajów Unii Europejskiej. ISBN 978-83-67033-13-8; e-ISBN 978-83-67033-14-5. Radom: Instytut Naukowo- Wydawniczy "Spatium".
• Kryk, B., & Guzowska, M. K. (2021). Implementation of climate/energy targets of the Europe 2020 strategy by the EU member states, Energies, 14(9), 2711. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en14092711
• Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., Schmidt-Traub, G., & Kroll, C. (2020). How Is progress towards the sustainable development goals measured? Comparing four approaches for the EU. Sustainability, 12(18), 7675. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12187675
• Lawn, P.A. (2001). Toward sustainable development. An ecological economics approach. Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington, D.C.: CRC Press LLC.
• Lele, S. M. (1991). Sustainable development: A critical review. World Development, 19, 607-621.
• Mair, S., Jones, A., Ward, J., Christie, I., Druckman, A., & Lyon, F. (2018). A Critical Review of the Role of Indicators in Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. In W. Leal Filho (Ed.), Handbook of Sustainability Science and Research (pp. 41-56). World Sustainability Series, Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63007-6_3
• Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2013). Methods for constructing composite indices: One for all or all for one? RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, LXVII(2), 67-80.
• Megyesiova, S., & Lieskovska, V. (2018). Analysis of the sustainable development indicators in the OECD countries. Sustainability, 10, 4554. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124554
• Mio, Ch., Panfilo, S., & Blundo, B. (2020). Sustainable development goals and the strategic role of business: A systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29, 3220-3245. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2568
• Muff, K., Kapalka, A., & Dyllick, T. (2017). The gap frame - translating the SDGs into relevant national grand challenges for strategic business opportunities. The International Journal of Management Education, 15, 363-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.004
• Nasibulina, A. (2015). Education for sustainable development and environmental ethics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 1077-1082.
• Olsson, L., Hourcade, J-C., & Kohler, J. (2014). Sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of Environment & Development, 23(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496514521418
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators. Methodology and user guide. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/sdd/42495745.pdf
• Otamendi-Irizar, I., Grijalba, O., Arias, A., Pennese, C., & Hernandez, R. (2022). How can local energy communities promote sustainable development in European cities? Energy Research & Social Science, 84, 102363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102363
• Panchal, R., Singh, A., & Diwan, H. (2021). Does circular economy performance lead to sustainable development? - A systematic literature review, Journal of Environmental Management, Volume 293, 112811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112811
• Petkovová, L., Hartman, D., & Pavelka, T. (2020). Problems of aggregation of sustainable development indicators at the regional level. Sustainability, 12(17), 7156. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12177156
• Piotrowska, E., & Roszkowska, E. (2011). Analiza zróżnicowania województw Polski pod względem poziomu innowacyjności (Analysis of the diversity of Polish voivodeships in terms of the level of innovation). Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne, 2(50), 65-85.
• Piwowarski, M., Miałszewicz, D., Łatuszyńska, M., Borawski, M., & Kesra, N. (2018). TOPSIS and VIKOR methods in study of sustainable development in the EU countries. Procedia Computer Science, 126, 1683-1692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.109
• Popović, B., Janković Šoja, S., Paunović, T., & Maletić, R. (2019). Evaluation of sustainable development management in EU countries. Sustainability, 11(24), 7140. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11247140
• Qu, W., Shi, W., Zhang, J., & Liu, T. (2020). T21 China 2050: A tool for National Sustainable Development Planning. Geography and Sustainability, 1, 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.03.004
• Radojicic, Z., Isljamovic, S., Petrovic, N., & Jeremic, V. (2012). A novel approach to evaluating sustainable development. Problemy Ekorozwoju - Problems of Sustainable Development, 7(1), 81-85.
• Raszkowski, A., & Bartniczak, B. (2019a). On the road to sustainability: Implementation of the 2030 Agenda Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) in Poland. Sustainability, 11(2), 366. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11020366
• Raszkowski, A., & Bartniczak, B. (2019b). Sustainable development in the Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs): Challenges and opportunities. Sustainability, 11(4), 1180. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11041180
• Rodríguez-Antón, J. M., Rubio-Andrada, L., Celemín-Pedroche, M. S., & Ruíz-Peñalver, S. M. (2022). From the circular economy to the sustainable development goals in the European Union: An empirical comparison. Int Environ Agreements, 22, 67-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-021-09553-4
• Ross, A. (2018). The evolution of sustainable development in Scotland - A case study of Community Right-to-Buy Law and Policy 2003-2018. Sustainability, 11, 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010130
• Ruggerio, C. A. (2021). Sustainability and sustainable development: A review of principles and definitions. Science of the Total Environment, 786, 147481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147481
• Rybak, A., & Włodarczyk, E. (2021). Implementation of the 2030 sustainable development goals - affordable and clean energy in Poland. 7th World Multidisciplinary Earth Sciences Symposium (WMESS 2021). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 906, 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/906/1/012016
• Strahl, D. (Ed.) (2006). Metody oceny rozwoju regionalnego (Methods for evaluation of regional development). Wrocław, Poland: AE Publishing House.
• Strange, T., & Bayley, A. (2008). Sustainable development. Linking economy, society, environment. Paris: OECD Insights.
• Teneta-Skwiercz, D. (2018). Wskaźniki pomiaru zrównoważonego rozwoju - Polska na tle krajów Unii Europejskiej. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 516, 121-132. https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2018.515.11
• United Nations. (1987). Our common future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, New York.
• United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, A/RES/70/1.
• Urbaniec, M. (2015). Sustainable development indicators in Poland: Measurement and system evaluation. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 3(1), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2015.030109
• Wang, Q., Yuan, X., Zhang, J., Gao, Y., Hong, J., Zuo, J., & Liu, W. (2015). Assessment of the sustainable development capacity with the entropy weight coefficient method. Sustainability, 7(10), 13542-13563. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su71013542
• Waas, T., Hugé, J., Block, T., Wright, T., Benitez-Capistros, F., & Verbruggen, A. (2014). Sustainability assessment and indicators: Tools in a decision-making strategy for sustainable development. Sustainability, 6, 5512-5534. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6095512
• Waas, T., Hugé, J., Verbruggen, A., & Wright, T. (2011). Sustainable development: A bird's eye view. Sustainability, 3, 1637-1661. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3101637
• Zargartalebi, M. (2021). Sustainability as a competitiveness factor: A quantitative cross-country analysis. Ekonomia i Środowisko, 1(76), 70-90. https://doi.org/10.34659/2021/1/4
• Zhou, Y., Clarke, A., & Cairns, S. (2022). Toward awchieving local sustainable development: Market-based instruments (MBIs) for localizing UN Sustainable Development Goals. Urban Science, 6, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci6010024

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).