Identification of Formal Fallacies in a Natural Dialogue

• Autorzy: Kacprzak M. , Sawicka A.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.3233/FI-2014-1131

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper is a continuation of the work [26] in which the LND dialogue system was proposed. LND reconstructs the dialogical logic introduced by Lorenzen using the terminology of persuasion dialogue games as specified by Prakken [18]. The aim of the LND system is to recognize formal fallacies in natural dialogues and remove them. Now we extend this system to include a new protocol enabling the reconstruction of natural dialogues in which parties can commit formal fallacies. We then present the implementation of the protocols applied.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

fallacies; dialogue; game theory; continuation method; terms and phrases; identification

• Wydawca: IOS Press
• Czasopismo: Fundamenta Informaticae
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 135, nr 4
• Strony: 403--417
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 26 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Kacprzak M.

• Faculty of Computer Science, Bialystok University of Technology, Bialystok, Poland

autor

Sawicka A.

• Faculty of Computer Science, Polish-Japanese Institute of Information Technology, Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Amgoud, L., Maudet, N., Parsons, S.: Modelling dialogues using argumentation. In: Proc. of the Fourth Int. Conf. on Mulit-Agent Systems (2000) 31–38
• [2] Black, E., Hunter, A.: An inquiry dialogue system. Autonomous Agent Multi-Agent Systems 18 (2009) 173–209
• [3] Budzynska, K.: Circularity in ethotic structures. Synthese 190(15) (2013) 3185-3207
• [4] Dunin-Kęplicz, B., Strachocka, A., Szałas, A., Verbrugge, R.: A paraconsistent approach to speech acts. In: Proc. of ArgMAS (2012) 59–78
• [5] Dunin-Kęplicz, B., Strachocka, A., Szałas, A., Verbrugge, R.: Perceiving speech acts under incomplete and inconsistent information. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 252 (2013) 255–264
• [6] Dunin-Kęplicz, B., Strachocka, A., Verbrugge, R.: Deliberation dialogues during multiagent planning. LNCS 6804 (2011) 170–181
• [7] Grabowski, A., Schwarzweller, C.: Translating mathematical vernacular into knowledge repositories. In: Mathematical Knowledge Management, M. Kohlhase, Ed., LNCS 3863 (2006) 49–64
• [8] Hamblin, C.: Fallacies. Methuen, London (1970)
• [9] Kacprzak, M., Yaskorska, O.: Dialogue Protocols for Formal Fallacies. Argumentation 3 (2014)
• [10] Keiff, L.: Dialogical logic. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2011)
• [11] Lorenz, K., Lorenzen, P.: Dialogische logik. WBG. Darmstadt (1978)
• [12] Loui, R.: Process and policy: resource-bounded non-demonstrative reasoning. Computational Intelligence 14 (1998) 1–38
• [13] Mackenzie, J. D.: Question begging in non-cumulative systems. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1979) 117–133
• [14] McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: Games that agents play: A formal framework for dialogues between autonomous agents. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13 (2002) 315–343
• [15] Parsons, S., McBurney, P., Wooldridge, M.: The mechanics of some formal inter-agent dialogues. In: Advances in Agent Communication, Springer (2004) 329–348
• [16] Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M., Amgoud, L.: Properties and complexity of some formal inter-agent dialogues. Journal of Logic and Computation 13 (2003) 347–376
• [17] Prakken, H.: Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation. Journal of Logic and Computation 15 (2005) 1009–1040
• [18] Prakken, H.: Formal systems for persuasion dialogue. The Knowledge Engineering Review 21 (2006) 163–188
• [19] Rahman, S., Tulenheimo, T.: From games to dialogues and back: towards a general frame for validity. Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy (2006)
• [20] Szałas, A.: How an agent might think. Logic J. IGPL 21(3) (2013) 515–535
• [21] Visser, J., Bex, F., Reed, C., Garssen, B.: Correspondence between the pragma-dialectical discussion model and the argument interchange format. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 23(36) (2011) 189–224
• [22] Walton, D.: Begging the Question: Circular Reasoning as a Tactic of Argumentation. New York, Greenwood Press (1991)
• [23] Walton, D. N., Krabbe, E. C. W.: Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. State University of N.Y. Press (1995)
• [24] Wells, S., Reed, C.: A domain specific language for describing diverse systems of dialogue. Journal of Applied Logic 10(4) (2012) 309-329
• [25] Yaskorska, O., Budzynska, K., Kacprzak, M.: Rules for formal and natural dialogues in agent communication. In: Proc. of CS&P (2012) 416–427
• [26] Yaskorska, O., Budzynska, K., Kacprzak, M.: Proving propositional tautologies in a natural dialogue. Fundamenta Informaticae 128(1-2) (2013) 239–253