Effect of open spaces in residential complexes on the social interactions of inhabitants

• Autorzy: Khaleghimoghaddam Navid

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/acee-2025-0003

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The recent growth of urbanisation has increased the demand for mass housing and led to a decline in design quality and attractiveness. The design of contemporary residential complexes has posed serious problems for the personal and social life of residents because it has not taken into account human needs and psychological consequences. This includes neglecting the relationship between social interactions and physical factors. The aim of the present study is to investigate the relationship between open spaces and social interactions in the design of residential complexes. It was carried out through field studies and surveys. After explaining the different aspects of the importance of social relationships between people, the effects of open spaces on the social interactions of residents in three residential complexes in Tabriz, Iran, were investigated. The results show that factors such as the social homogeneity of residents and the use of design patterns to create safe, attractive and comfortable conditions for the presence of families in the open spaces of the complex have a significant effect on increasing the social interactions of neighbours.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

environment; open spaces; residential complex; social interaction; Tabriz

PL

środowisko; otwarta przestrzeń; kompleks mieszkaniowy; interakcje społeczne; Tabriz

• Wydawca: Silesian University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Architecture Civil Engineering Environment
• Rocznik: 2025
• Tom: Vol. 18, no. 1
• Strony: 33--47
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 41 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Khaleghimoghaddam Navid

• Assistant Prof. Dr.; Konya Food and Agriculture University, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Interior Architecture, Bey§ehir Avenue, No 9, 42080 Meram, Konya, Turkey

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2505-207X

Bibliografia

• [1] Kachur, V., & Kozin, S. (2021). Legal culture as determining factor for legal socialization of modern personality. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 10, 37-42.
• [2] Skrede, J., & Andersen, B. (2022). The emotional element of urban densification. Local Environment, 27(2), 251-263.
• [3] Thornock, C. M., Nelson, L. J., Porter, C. L., & Evans-Stout, C. A. (2019). There's no place like home: The associations between residential attributes and family functioning. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 64, 39-47.
• [4] Mousavinia, S. F. (2023). Effects of housing layout and perceived behavioral control over social distancing in relation between social isolation and psychological distress during pandemic of COVID-19. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 38, 2247-2265.
• [5] Cacioppo, J. T., & Patrick, W. (2009). Loneliness: Human nature and the need for social connection. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
• [6] Umberson, D., & Montez, J. K. (2010). Social relationships and health: A flashpoint for health policy. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51, 54-66.
• [7] Berkman, L. F., Glass, T., Brissette, I., & Seeman, T. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science & Medicine, 51(6), 843-857.
• [8] Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: Using public space. Washington: Island Press.
• [9] Francis, J., Giles-Corti, B., Wood, L., & Knuiman, M. (2012). Creating sense of community: The role of public space. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 401-409.
• [10] Kuo, F. E. (2003). The role of arboriculture in a healthy social ecology. Journal of Arboriculture, 29(3), 148-155.
• [11] Nejade, R.M., Grace, D., & Bowman, L.R. (2022). What is the impact of nature on human health? A scoping review of the literature. Journal of Global Health, 12, 1-16.
• [12] Moleski, W. H., & Lang, L. T. (2010). Organizational goals and human needs in office planning. In Jean D. Wineman (Ed), Behavioral issues in office design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
• [13] McCamant, K., & Durrett, C. (1994). Cohousing: A contemporary approach to housing ourselves. Oakland: Ten Speed Press.
• [14] Scotthanson, C., & Scotthanson, K. (2004). The cohousing handbook: A place for community. Canada: New Society Publishers.
• [15] Muhuri, S., & Basu, S. (2021). Interactional spaces of a high-rise group housing complex and social cohesion of its residents: case study from Kolkata, India. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 36, 781-820.
• [16] Nowzari, Z., Armitage, R., & Maghsoodi Tilaki, M. J. (2023). How does the residential complex regulate residents’ behaviour? An empirical study to identify influential components of human territoriality on social interaction. sustainability, 15(14), 1-24.
• [17] Du, Y., Jiang, H., Huang, Z., & Yang, H. (2023). Associations between neighborhood environment and sense of community belonging in urban China: Examining mediation effects of neighborly interactions and community satisfaction. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1-14.
• [18] Askarizad, R., Lamíquiz Daudén, P. J., & Garau, C. (2024). The application of space syntax to enhance sociability in public urban spaces: A systematic review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 13(7), 1-30.
• [19] Yadollahi, M., Mahdavinia, M., & Ghiai, M.M. (2015). Residential complex based on increasing social interaction approach. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 3(3), 482-491.
• [20] Bahador, A., & Bavar, S. (2022). Creating private and semi public open spaces to achieve social sustainability in residential complexes. Facilities, 40(11/12), 757-773.
• [21] Hoppler, S. S., Segerer, R., & Nikitin, J. (2022). The six components of social interactions: Actor, partner, relation, activities, context, and evaluation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-13.
• [22] McMahon, E., & Isik, L. (2023). Seeing social interactions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27(12), 1165-1179.
• [23] Chen, Y., Liu, T., & Liu, W. (2016). Increasing the use of large-scale public open spaces: A case study of the North Central Axis Square in Shenzhen, China. Habitat International, 53, 66-77.
• [24] Faivre, N., Fritz, M., & Freitas, T. de Boissezon, B., & Vandewoestijne, S. (2017). Nature-Based Solutions in the EU: Innovating with nature to address social, economic and environmental challenges. Environmental Research, 159, 509-518,
• [25] Jones, M., & Reed, R. G. (2018). Open space amenities and residential land use: An Australian perspective. Land Use Policy, 75, 1-10.
• [26] Lynch, A. J. (2021). The role and potential of residential open space in a suburban green space network. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 58, 1-7.
• [27] Ajayi, A. O., & Amole, O. O. (2022). Open spaces and wellbeing: the impact of outdoor environments in promoting health. Cities & Health, 6(6), 1106-1121.
• [28] Carmona, M. (2019). Principles for public space design, planning to do better. Urban Design International, 24, 47-59.
• [29] Combrinck, C. (2018). Socially responsive research-based design in an architecture studio, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 7(2), 211-234.
• [30] Lorenzo, M., Ríos-Rodríguez, M. L., Suárez, E., Hernández, B., Rosales, C. (2023). Quality analysis and categorisation of public space, Heliyon, 9(3), 1-11.
• [31] Dutta, S., Koduru, S., & Juganaru, M. (2023). Impact of physical density on nature and use of open spaces: A pilot study of two residential areas from Jaipur, India. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, 104 (1), 95-110.
• [32] Milanović, D., & Vasilevska, L. (2018). Influence of private open spaces on the quality of living in low-rise high density housing. Facta Universitatis, Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering, 19, 293-305.
• [33] de Macedo, P. F., Ornstein, S. W., & Elali, G. A. (2022). Privacy and housing: research perspectives based on a systematic literature review. Journal of Housing and Built Environment, 37(2), 653-683.
• [24] Zhang, L., Shao, K., Tang, W., Lau, S. S. Y., Lai, H., & Tao, Y. (2023). Outdoor space elements in urban residential areas in Shenzhen, China: Optimization based on health-promoting behaviours of older people. Land, 12(6), 1-23.
• [35] Jiang, Y., & Huang, G. (2022). Urban residential quarter green space and life satisfaction. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 69, 1-11.
• [36] Seaman, P. J., Jones, R. & Ellaway, A. (2010). It's not just about the park, it's about integration too: why people choose to use or not use urban greenspaces. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 7(78), 1-9.
• [37] Kearns, A., & Forrest, R. (2000). Social cohesion and multilevel urban governance. Urban Studies, 37(5-6), 995-1017.
• [38] Adjei-Boadi, D., Agyei-Mensah, S., Adamkiewicz, G., Rodriguez, J. I., Gemmell, E., Ezzati, M., Baumgartner, J., & Owusu, G. (2022). Neighbourhood, built environment and children's outdoor play spaces in urban Ghana: Review of policies and challenges. Landscape and Urban Planning, 218, 1-10.
• [39] Duedahl, E., Blichfeldt, B., & Liburd, J. (2020). How engaging with nature can facilitate active healthy ageing. Tourism Geographies, 24(6-7), 1082-1102.
• [40] Talen, E., & Lee, S. (2018). Design for social diversity. London: Routledge.
• [41] Jacobs, J. (2016). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage Books.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).