Features of underground real estate use: infrastructural and regional aspects

• Autorzy: Meteshkin Kostiantyn , Shipulin Volodymyr , Nesterenko Serhii , Kobzan Serhii

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/gac.2020.131081

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The transformation processes that occur in the technical, informational, and economic spheres of the regions require the development of new conceptual approaches to the development of a full-fledged land use system based on an analysis of the problems of using underground real estate. Determination of the features of land use of underground real estate is based on a quantitative basis, which is built on a systematic, integrated approach. Indicators that determine the condition and use of underground real estate are of particular importance for the development of the approach. A method of estimating a generalized indicator of the use of underground real estate in the system of land use of regions based on an integrated approach, which includes the method of expert assessments by applying qualitative indicators characterizing the status and level of use of underground real estate, considering urban, spatial, investment and innovation legal and safety features is developed. The assessment results of the integrated indicator of underground real estate land use, as well as the results of the assessment by region, showed a low level of use of underground real estate in the land use system of the regions. It is determined that most of the lands in the regions have low levels of underground real estate use. Besides, there is a need to increase the use of underground real estate by developing appropriate methodological recommendations.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

underground real estate; land use; integrated indicator; urban planning; assessment

PL

nieruchomość podziemna; użytkowanie gruntów; planowanie urbanistyczne

• Wydawca: Komitet Geodezji PAN
• Czasopismo: Geodesy and Cartography
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 69, no. 1
• Strony: 53--64
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 14 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Meteshkin Kostiantyn

• O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv, Ukraine

autor

Shipulin Volodymyr

• O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv, Ukraine

autor

Nesterenko Serhii

• O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv, Ukraine

autor

Kobzan Serhii

• O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• [1] Bober, A., Calka, B. and Bielecka E. (2016). Synthetic Landscape Differentiation Index a Tool for Spatial Planning. 2016 Baltic Geodetic Congress (BGC Geomatics), Gdansk, Poland, 2016, pp. 234–238. DOI: 10.1109/BGC.Geomatics.2016.49.
• [2] Calka, B. and Bielecka E. (2016). The Application of Geoinformation Theory in Housing Mass Appraisal. 2016 Baltic Geodetic Congress (BGC Geomatics), Gdansk, Poland, 2016, pp. 239–243. DOI: 10.1109/BGC.Geomatics.2016.50.
• [3] Enemark, S. (1998). Updating digital cadastral maps: the Danish experience. Proceedings of the FIG XXI International Congress. Commission 7: Cadastre and Land Management. July 19–25. Brighton: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, pp. 426–437.
• [4] Gasiorowski, J. and Bielecka, E. (2014). Land fragmentation analysis using morphometric parameters. Conference: 9th International Conference on Environmental Engineering (ICEE). Vilnius, Lithuania, May 22–23, 2014. 9th International Conference Environmental Engineering (9th ICEE) – Selected Papers.
• [5] Maleta, M. and Moscicka, A. (2018). Selection and significance evaluation of agricultural parcels determinants. Geodesy and Cartography, 67(2), 239–253. DOI: 10.24425/gac.2018.125473.
• [6] Mamonov, K., Nesterenko, S., Radzinskaya, Yu. and Palamar, A. (2019). The method for assessing the urban land investment attractiveness. Geodesy and Cartography, 68(2), 321–328. DOI: 10.24425/gac.2019.128467.
• [7] McCalla, A.F. and Ayres,W.S. (1997). Rural development: From vision to action.Washington D.C., USA: The World Bank. DOI: 10.1596/0-8213-3966-4.
• [8] Mingming, W., Nesterenko, S. and Shterndok, E. (2019). Modelling of the parcel pattern impact. In International science and technology conference “Earth science”. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 272, 032085. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/272/3/032085.
• [9] Nesterenko, S. and Plugin, D. (2017). Research into the effectiveness of grounded screens of electroconductive silicate compositions for electrocorrosion protection. MATEC Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, 116:01012, 01–12. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201711601012.
• [10] Nesterenko, S. and Radzínskaya, and Yu, B. (2018). Directions for the development of the categorical apparatus for land determining. In XX?V International scientific conference “The overall development of the modern world”. Morrisville, USA: Lulu Press, pp. 7–10.
• [11] Pieri, C., Dumanski, J., Hamblin, A. and Young, A. (1996). Land quality indicators. World Bank Discussion Paper 315. Washington D.C., USA: The World Bank. DOI: 10.1596/0-8213-3511-1.
• [12] Rockström, J., Karlberg, L.,Wani, S.P., Barron, J., Hatibu, N., Oweis, T., Bruggeman, A., Farahani, J. and Qiang Z. (2010). Managing water in rainfed agriculture – The need for a paradigm shift. Agricultural Water Management, 97(4), 543–550. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.09.009.
• [13] Smyth, A.J., Dumanski, J. and Spendjian, G. (1993). FESLM: An international framework for evaluating sustainable land management: Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Rome: Land and Water Development Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. UNECE (2005). Inventory of land administration systems in Europe and North America.
• [14] UNECE working party on land administration. London: Ed. 4. HM Land Registry.www.unece.org/index.php?id=10952.