Efficiency multi-agent model assisted Moea/D algorithm for optimization design for building taking into account annual energy consumption and annual user discomfort hours

• Autorzy: Deng Hua , Zhou Kai

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/ace.2024.151904

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Recently, with the continuous consumption of energy, building energy conservation has been popular in the energy field. In response to the high computational cost, slow convergence speed, and low accuracy of existing optimization design methods for building energy efficiency, this study first built a multi-objective optimization model for building energy efficiency on the ground of the annual energy consumption of buildings and the quantity of uncomfortable hours for users. Then it introduces a multi-agent model auxiliary mechanism to improve the decomposition based multi-objective evolutionary optimization algorithm, and then solves the multi-objective optimization model for building energy efficiency. In order to select the optimal decision variable of the algorithm, the decision parameters were analyzed and found that the performance was optimal when the number of samples, aggregation number and base model were set to 25.3 and 20. The improved multi-objective evolutionary optimization algorithm on the ground of decomposition has average supervolume and running time values of 32416.13 and 1774.58 seconds under office buildings, and 7899.13 and 3616.96 seconds under residential buildings, respectively. In addition, the annual user discomfort time of office buildings is 555.28h, which is lower than other comparison algorithms. In summary, the optimal performance of the algorithm when the decision variable is set to 25.3 and 20. The algorithm proposed by the research institute has superior performance and has certain application value in selecting the optimal solution for building energy-saving design.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

multi-aspect model; multi-objective optimization; evolutionary algorithm; decomposition; energy efficiency; energy consumption; discomfort

PL

model wieloaspektowy; optymalizacja wielokryterialna; algorytm ewolucyjny; dekompozycja; efektywność energetyczna; zużycie energii; dyskomfort

• Wydawca: Komitet Inżynierii Lądowej i Wodnej PAN ; Politechnika Warszawska, Wydział Inżynierii Lądowej
• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil Engineering
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 70, nr 4
• Strony: 477--489
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 18 poz., il., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Deng Hua

• School of Mechanical and Engineering, Wuhan University of Engineering Science, Wuhan, China

• https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0689-3320

autor

Zhou Kai

• CITIC General Institute of Architectural Design and Research Co. Ltd., Wuhan, China

• https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4001-6758

Bibliografia

• [1] R. Mathi and S. Jayalalitha, “Influence of renewable energy sources on the scheduling on thermal power stations and its optimization for CO2 reduction”, Computational Intelligence, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 903-920, 2022, doi: 10.1111/coin.12477.
• [2] M. Umair and M.U. Yousuf, “Evaluating the symmetric and asymmetric effects of fossil fuel energy consumption and international capital flows on environmental sustainability: A case of South Asia”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 33992-34008, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24607-z.
• [3] A.M. Usman and M.K. Abdullah, “An assessment of building energy consumption characteristics using analytical energy and carbon footprint assessment model”, Green and Low-Carbon Economy, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 28-40, 2023, doi: 10.47852/bonviewGLCE3202545.
• [4] J. Mamkhezri, S. Manochehri, and Y. Fatemi Zardan, “Assessing economic growth-energy consumption-CO2 nexus by climate zone: international evidence”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 21735-21755, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23586-5.
• [5] S. Suyambazhahan, T. Temesgen, A.A. Nene, and S. Ramachandran, “Energy saving in an air-conditioning system using interdisciplinary energy conversion approach”, Smart Science, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 54-65, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23080477.2021.2012324.
• [6] R. Naji El Idrissi, M. Ouassaid, and M. Maaroufi, “Game theory approach for energy consumption scheduling of a community of smart grids”, Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 2695-2708, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s42835-023-01379-1.
• [7] F. Liu, Q. Zhang, and Z. Han, “MOEA/D with gradient-enhanced kriging for expensive multiobjective optimization”, Natural Computing, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 329-339, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11047-022-09907-0.
• [8] M. Ostadijafari and A. Dubey, “Tube-based model predictive controller for building’s heating ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system”, IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 4735-4744, 2021, doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2020.3017190.
• [9] Y. Wen, J. Leng, F. Yu, and C.W. Yu, “Integrated design for underground space environment control of subway stations with atriums using piston ventilation”, Indoor and Built Environment, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1300-1315, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1420326X20941349.
• [10] Z. Zeng, J. Guo, X. Wei, L. En, and Y. Liu, “The analysis of cooling time and energy consumption of VAV fan-pad evaporative cooling systems in a greenhouse”, HortScience, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 812-818, 2020, doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI14772-20.
• [11] T. Shao, W. Zheng, X. Li, W. Yang, and R. Wang, “Multi-objective optimization design for rural houses in western zones of China”, Architectural Science Review, vol. 65. no. 4, pp. 260-277, 2022, doi: 10.1080/00038628.2022.2040412.
• [12] T.T. Le Gia, H.A. Dang, V.B. Dinh, M.Q. Tong, T.K. Nguyen, H.H. Nguyen, and D.Q. Nguyen, “A simulation-based multi-objective genetic optimization framework for efficient building design in early stages: application for Vietnam’s hot and humid climates”, International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 305-326, 2022, doi: 10.1108/IJBPA-04-2021-0050.
• [13] Z. Liu and A. Guo, “Application of green building materials and multi-objective energy-saving optimization design”, International Journal of Heat and Technology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 299-308, 2021, doi: 10.18280/ijht.390133.
• [14] N. Delgarm, B. Sajadi, and S. Delgarm, “Multi-objective optimization of building energy performance and indoor thermal comfort: A new method using artificial bee colony (ABC)”, Energy and Buildings, vol. 131, pp. 42-53, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.09.003.
• [15] B. Chegari, M. Tabaa, E. Simeu, F. Moutaouakkil, and H. Medromi, “Multi-objective optimization of building energy performance and indoor thermal comfort by combining artificial neural networks and metaheuristic algorithms”, Energy and Buildings, vol. 239, art. no. 110839, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110839.
• [16] A. Khani, M. Khakzand, and M. Faizi, “Multi-objective optimization for energy consumption, visual and thermal comfort performance of educational building (case study: Qeshm Island, Iran)”, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 54, pp. 1-19, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102872.
• [17] D. Tikhomirov, A.N. Vasilyev, D. Budnikov, and A.A. Vasilyev, “Energy-saving automated system for microclimate in agricultural premises with utilization of ventilation air”, Wireless Networks, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 4921-4928, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11276-019-01946-3.
• [18] S. Mousavi, M.H. Jahangir, and A. Kasaeian, “Techno-economic analysis and thermal-electrical demand optimization of a sustainable residential building using machine learning approach”, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, vol. 148, no. 16, pp. 8593-8610, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10973-022-11536-9.