PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Risk and quality management in maritime transport of live animals – Analysis of EU regulations and challenges in occupational safety and animal welfare

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The aim of this article is to identify and assess environmental, organizational, and technical risks associated with the maritime transport of live animals, with a particular emphasis on their impact on the quality of transport processes, animal welfare, and the occupational health and safety of ship crews. Despite the existence of European Union regulations such as Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/372, which establish minimum standards for space, ventilation, access to water, contingency planning, and port infrastructure, significant shortcomings in the organization and quality of transport persist in practice. Inadequate onboard infrastructure, failures of ventilation, feeding and watering systems, and overcrowding lead to stress, dehydration, and disease in animals, which increase the risk of injuries. At the same time, crew members are exposed to harmful factors such as toxic gases, animal waste, slippery surfaces, and extreme temperatures. Poorly organized loading and unloading procedures further escalate the risk of accidents and negatively affect the quality of service provided during transport. This article proposes quality-oriented management actions to improve transport safety and animal welfare, such as the implementation of advanced monitoring technologies, mandatory presence of animal welfare specialists on board, regular technical inspections of vessels, and systematic training for crew members.
Rocznik
Strony
48--57
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 31 poz., tab.
Twórcy
  • Czestochowa University of Technology, Faculty of Management Department of Production Engineering and Safety 19b Armii Krajowej Ave., 42-201 Czestochowa, Poland
  • Czestochowa University of Technology, Faculty of Management Department of Production Engineering and Safety 19b Armii Krajowej Ave., 42-201 Czestochowa, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. Bhatt, N., Singh, N.P., Mishra, A.K., Kandpal, D., Rajneesh & Jamwal, S. (2021) A detailed review of transportation stress in livestock and its mitigation techniques. International Journal of Livestock Research 11 (1), pp. 30–41.
  • 2. Bossard, C., Bonnemains, J. & Baumgärtner, I. (2024) 64 EU-approved livestock carriers. Robin des Bois, Animal Welfare Foundation e.V.
  • 3. Boström, M. & Österman, C. (2022) Creating clarity and crew courage: Preventive and promotive measures for a maritime industry without bullying and harassment. Occupational Health Science 6, pp. 605–629, doi: 10.1007/ s41542-022-00129-5.
  • 4. Bravo Ovalle, V.M., Knowles, T.G. & Gallo, C. (2020) Transport, associated handling procedures, conditions and behaviour of calves marketed through Chilean auction markets. Animals 10 (11), 2170, doi: 10.3390/ani10112170.
  • 5. Burciu, Z. & Abramowicz-Gerigk, T. (2023) Autonomous shipping ‒ a stochastic model of the process describing the safety of MASS operation. Scientific Journals of the Maritime University of Szczecin, Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Morskiej w Szczecinie 76 (148), pp. 57‒64, doi: 10.17402/586.
  • 6. Caulfield, M.P., Cambridge, H., Foster, S.F. & McGreevy, P.D. (2014) Heat stress: A major contributor to poor animal welfare associated with long-haul live export voyages. The Veterinary Journal 199 (2), pp. 223–228, doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.018.
  • 7. Dunston-Clarke, E., Willis, R.S., Fleming, P.A., Barnes, A.L., Miller, D.W. & Collins, T. (2020) Developing an animal welfare assessment protocol for livestock transported by sea. Animals 10 (4), 705, doi: 10.3390/ani10040705.
  • 8. ElSharkawy, M.F. (2024) Workplace hazards and safety practices in the small-scale industries. Production Engineering Archives 30 (2), pp. 241‒250, doi: 10.30657/ pea.2024.30.23.
  • 9. Gualandri, F. & Kuzior, A. (2024) AI Integration and Economic Divides: Analyzing Global AI Strategies. System Safety: Human ‒ Technical Facility ‒ Environment 6 (1), pp. 46‒53, doi: 10.2478/czoto-2024-0006.
  • 10. Gucma, M., Deja, A. & Szymonowicz, J. (2023) Environmental solutions for maritime ships: challenges and needs. Production Engineering Archives 29 (2), pp. 216‒224, doi: 10.30657/pea.2023.29.25.
  • 11. Guevara, R.D., Pastor, J.J., Manteca, X., Tedo, G. & Llonch, P. (2022) Systematic review of animal-based indicators to measure thermal, social, and immune-related stress in pigs. PLOS One 17 (5), e0266524, doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0266524.
  • 12. Hing, S., Foster, S. & Evans, D. (2021) Animal Welfare Risks in Live Cattle Export from Australia to China by Sea. Animals 11 (10), 2862, doi: 10.3390/ani11102862.
  • 13. Jagusiak-Kocik, M. (2023) Identification and improvement of processes using selected quality tools: a case study. Scientific Journals of the Maritime University of Szczecin, Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Morskiej w Szczecinie 75 (147), pp. 59‒67, doi: 10.17402/574.
  • 14. Knapik, J.J., Reynolds, K.L. & Castellani, J.W. (2020) Frostbite: Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention. Journal of Special Operations Medicine 20 (4), pp. 123–135, doi: 10.55460/PDX9-BG8G.
  • 15. Kunda, J.J., Gosling, S.N. & Foody, G.M. (2024) The effects of extreme heat on human health in tropical Africa. International Journal of Biometeorology 68, pp. 1015–1033, doi: 10.1007/s00484-024-02650-4.
  • 16. Kuzior, A. & Kopij, G. (2024) Occupational Risk Management in OHS Based on Risk Assessment and Control. System Safety: Human ‒ Technical Facility ‒ Environment 6 (1), pp. 26‒34, doi: 10.2478/czoto-2024-0004.
  • 17. L‘yarfi, H., Motaki, N., Derrhi, M. & Lahlou, I. (2025) Towards a Decision-Making Framework for Successful ERP Project Implementation: A Qualitative Study. Production Engineering Archives 31 (1), pp. 91‒105, doi: 10.30657/ pea.2025.31.9.
  • 18. Lambooij, E. (2024) Animal Stress and Welfare During Transport and Slaughtering: An Outline for Future Policies. Animals (Basel) 14 (21), p. 3064, doi: 10.3390/ani14213064.
  • 19. Meléndez, D.M., Marti, S., Haley, D.B., Schwinghamer, T.D. & Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K.S. (2020) Effect of transport and rest stop duration on the welfare of conditioned cattle transported by road. PLOS One 15, e0228492, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228492.
  • 20. Navarro, G., Col, R. & Phillips, C.J.C. (2020) Effects of doubling the standard space allowance on behavioural and physiological responses of sheep experiencing regular and irregular floor motion during simulated sea transport. Animals 10 (3), p. 476, doi: 10.3390/ani10030476.
  • 21. Nielsen, S.S., Alvarez, J., Bicout, D.J., Calistri, P., Canali, E., Drewe, J.A. … & Velarde, A. (2022a) Welfare of domestic birds and rabbits transported in containers. EFSA Journal 20 (9), e07441, doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7441.
  • 22. Nielsen, S.S., Alvarez, J., Bicout, D.J., Calistri, P., Canali, E., Drewe, J.A. … & Herskin, M. (2022b) Welfare of cattle during transport. EFSA Journal 20 (9), e07442, doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7442.
  • 23. Pilarczyk, M. (2022) Occupational health and safety when handling farm animals. Folia Pomeranae Universitatis Technologiae Stetinensis, Agricultura, Alimentaria, Piscaria et Zootechnica 365 (64) 4, pp. 51–57, doi: 10.21005/ AAPZ2022.64.4.6.
  • 24. Pilarczyk, M. & Ulewicz, R. (2023) Evaluating occupational hazards and prevention strategies in agriculture: case study. System Safety: Human ‒ Technical Facility ‒ Environment 5 (1), pp. 212–223, doi: 10.2478/czoto-2023-0023.
  • 25. Popa, C., Stefanov, O. & Goia, I. (2025) Multimodal Livestock Operations Analysis Using Business Process Modeling: A Case Study of Romanian Black Sea Ports. Economies 13 (3), 69, doi: 10.3390/economies13030069.
  • 26. Rahman, M.N.A. & Adnan, A.A. (2023) A Review on Heat Stress Issues Among Workers at Automotive Service Centre. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology 32 (3), pp. 334–341, doi: 10.37934/ araset.32.3.334341.
  • 27. Sampson, H. & Ellis, N. (2020) Stepping up: the need for Proactive Employer Investment in Safeguarding Seafarers’ Mental Health and Wellbeing. Maritime Policy & Management 48 (8), pp. 1069‒1081, doi: 10.1080/03088839.2020. 1867918.
  • 28. Sturmer, J. & Asada, Y. (2020) Gulf Livestock I Survivor. Gulf Livestock I survivor asked ‘I’m the only one?’ as he was pulled from the sea after rescue off Japan. [Online] 4 September. ABC News. Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/ news/2020-09-04/fears-for-dozens-of-crew-members-onship-capsized-off-japan/12630056 [Accessed: October 21, 2020].
  • 29. Świt, G., Dzioba, I., Ulewicz, M., Lipiec, S., Adamczak-Bugno, A. & Krampikowska, A. (2023) Experimental-numerical analysis of the fracture process in smooth and notched V specimens. Production Engineering Archives 29 (4), pp. 444‒451, doi: 10.30657/pea.2023.29.49.
  • 30. Timini, J. & Viani, F. (2022) A highway across the Atlantic? Trade and welfare effects of the EU-Mercosur agreement. International Economics 169, pp. 291‒308, doi: 10.1016/j. inteco.2022.02.003.
  • 31. University of Wisconsin-Madison Safety Department (2020) Chapter 5: Procedures for loading, transporting, and unloading cattle and swine. Available online: https://safety. cals.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/325/2021/11/Ch.- 5-Procedures-for-Loading-Transporting-and-UnloadingCattle-and-Swine.pdf [Accessed: March 04, 2025].
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-0a950a22-dfdd-4fd1-b4a7-80ca03ecafc5
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.