Enhancing the academics’ continuous use of educational management information systems in the post-pandemic era

Putro, Herry Porda Nugroho; Arisanty, Deasy; Subiyakto, Bambang; Syaharuddin

doi:10.17512/pjms.2023.27.1.17

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Enhancing the academics’ continuous use of educational management information systems in the post-pandemic era

Autorzy

Putro Herry Porda Nugroho , Arisanty Deasy , Subiyakto Bambang , Syaharuddin

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2023.27.1.17

Warianty tytułu

Poprawa ciągłości korzystania przez nauczycieli akademickich z systemów informatycznych zarządzania edukacją w erze post-pandemicznej

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The Covid-19 pandemic has acknowledged the importance of educational management information systems (EMIS) for quality management (QM) in higher education and set new directions for post-pandemic studies. Successful implementation of QM, however, processes depends mainly on lecturers' perceptions about quality and educational technology. However, higher education lecturers’ profiles regarding these quality perceptions and their commitment to technology acceptance must be investigated more. The aim of research is to analyse the relationship between Education Management Information System (EMIS) and Quality Management (QMAS) to lecturers' Continuance Commitment (CC). In response to this research gap, the researchers identified such profiles using a quantitative survey of 534 lecturers from Indonesian higher education institutions. A seven-point Likert scale was used to measure the respondents' expectations or expression of their perceived experience on all indicators used in the study. The data analyses were descriptive analysis and factor analysis. Based on the seminal work of Roger's diffusion of innovations, technology enthusiasts, visionaries, pragmatists, conservatives and sceptics remain valid in the organisation, and the uptake of educational management information systems is still in the hands of technology enthusiasts and visionaries. Quality management and EMIS acceptance are critical factors that make lecturers willing to continue using the system to support accreditation. These profiles will enable customised training in the recovery after the Covid-19 pandemic.

Pandemia Covid-19 potwierdziła znaczenie systemów informacyjnych zarządzania edukacją (Education Management Information Systems - EMIS) dla zarządzania jakością (Quality Management - QM) w szkolnictwie wyższym i wyznaczyła nowe kierunki badań post-pandemicznych. Pomyślne wdrożenie zarządzania jakością zależy głównie od postrzegania jakości i technologii edukacyjnych przez wykładowców. Należy także dokładniej zbadać profile wykładowców szkolnictwa wyższego w zakresie postrzegania jakości i ich zaangażowania w akceptację technologii. Celem badania jest analiza związku między Systemem Informacji o Zarządzaniu Edukacją (EMIS) a Zarządzaniem Jakością (QMAS) w odniesieniu do ciągłego zaangażowania wykładowców (Continuance Commitment - CC). W odpowiedzi na tę lukę badawczą naukowcy zidentyfikowali takie profile za pomocą ankiety ilościowej przeprowadzonej wśród 534 wykładowców z indonezyjskich instytucji szkolnictwa wyższego. Siedmiostopniowa skala Likerta została wykorzystana do pomiaru oczekiwań respondentów lub wyrażenia ich postrzeganego doświadczenia we wszystkich wskaźnikach wykorzystanych w badaniu. Analizy danych obejmowały analizę opisową i analizę czynnikową. W oparciu o przełomową pracę Rogera na temat dyfuzji innowacji, entuzjaści technologii, wizjonerzy, pragmatycy, konserwatyści i sceptycy pozostają ważni w organizacji, a absorpcja systemów informatycznych zarządzania edukacją jest nadal w rękach entuzjastów technologii i wizjonerów. Zarządzanie jakością i akceptacja EMIS są krytycznymi czynnikami, które sprawiają, że wykładowcy chcą nadal korzystać z systemu w celu wspierania akredytacji. Profile te umożliwią zindywidualizowane szkolenia w zakresie odbudowy po pandemii Covid-19.

Słowa kluczowe

Covid-19 pandemic educational management information systems EMIS quality management technology acceptance continuance commitment

pandemia COVID-19 edukacyjne systemy informacji zarządczej EMIS zarządzanie jakością akceptacja technologii ciągłość zaangażowania

Wydawca

Czestochowa University of Technology

Czasopismo

Polish Journal of Management Studies

Rocznik

2023

Tom

Vol. 27, No. 1

Strony

294--311

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 59 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Putro Herry Porda Nugroho

pordabanjar@ulm.ac.id

Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia

https://orcid.org/+0000-0003-2335-7152

autor

Arisanty Deasy

deasyarisanty@ulm.ac.id

Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5937-2309

autor

Subiyakto Bambang

bambangsb@ulm.ac.id

Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia

https://orcid.org/+0000-0002-1035-9813

autor

Syaharuddin

syahar@ulm.co.id

Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin, Indonesia

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5530-2386

Bibliografia

1. Aaltonen, V., Siltaoja, M., (2022). How they walk the talk: Responsible management education in Finnish business schools. Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility, 31(4), 1117-1135.
2. Acevedo-De-los-Ríos, A., Rondinel-Oviedo, D. R., (2022). Impact, added value and relevance of an accreditation process on quality assurance in architectural higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 28(2), 186-204.
3. Adam, E., (2023). Reviving the sociology of organizations in higher education: the case of how global university rankings influence the strategic management of Canadian universities. International Review of Sociology, 1-20.
4. Ali, S., Hafeez, Y., Humayun, M., Jamail, N. S. M., Aqib, M. and Nawaz, A., (2022). Enabling recommendation system architecture in virtualized environment for e-learning. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 23(1), 33-45.
5. Allen, N. J., Grisaffe, D. B., (2001). Employee commitment to the organization and customer reactions: Mapping the linkages. Human Resource Management Review, 11(3), 209-236.
6. Almaiah, M. A., Alfaisal, R., Salloum, S. A., Al-Otaibi, S., Al Sawafi, O. S., Al-Maroof, R. S., Lutfi, A., Alrawad, M., Mulhem, A. Al and Awad, A. B., (2022). Determinants influencing the continuous intention to use digital technologies in Higher Education. Electronics, 11(18), 2827.
7. Al-Mamary, Y. H. S., (2022). Understanding the use of learning management systems by undergraduate university students using the UTAUT model: Credible evidence from Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(2), 100092.
8. Andreani, M., Russo, D., Salini, S. and Turri, M., (2020). Shadows over accreditation in higher education: Some quantitative evidence. Higher Education, 79, 691-709.
9. Anthony Jnr, B., (2022). An exploratory study on academic staff perception towards blended learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3107-3133.
10. Ardolino, M., Bacchetti, A., Dolgui, A., Franchini, G., Ivanov, D. and Nair, A., (2022). The Impacts of digital technologies on coping with the COVID-19 pandemic in the manufacturing industry: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 1-24.
11. Asiyai, R. I., (2022). Best practices for quality assurance in higher education: implications for educational administration. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 25(5), 843-854.
12. Barbato, G., Bugaj, J., Campbell, D. F. J., Cerbino, R., Ciesielski, P., Feliks-Długosz, A., Milani, M. and Pausits, A., (2022). Performance indicators in higher education quality management of learning and teaching: lessons from a benchlearning exercise of six European universities. Quality in Higher Education, 28(1), 82-105.
13. Baron, R. M., Kenny, D. A., (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.
14. Baryshnikova N., Kiriliuk O. and Klimecka-Tatar D., (2021). Enterprises’ strategies transformation in the real sector of the economy in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Production Engineering Archives, 27(1), 8-15.
15. Basuki, B., Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K., Rajiani, I., Widyanti, R. and Kot, S., (2022). Working from home arrangement in delivering public service during the COVID-19 pandemic: innovation or irritation? Administration and Public Management Review, 39.
16. Bonett, D. G., Wright, T. A., (2015). Cronbach’s alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 3-15.
17. Bravo, L. G., Nistor, N., Ramírez, B. C., Soto, I. G., Contreras, M. V., Vives, M. N. and Robles, P. M., (2022). Higher education managers’ perspectives on quality management and technology acceptance: A tale of elders, mediators, and working bees in times of Covid-19. Computers in Human Behavior, 131, 107236.
18. Carnegie, G. D., Guthrie, J. and Martin-Sardesai, A., (2022). Public universities and impacts of COVID-19 in Australia: risk disclosures and organisational change. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 35(1), 61-73.
19. Chauhan, S., Goyal, S., Bhardwaj, A. K. and Sergi, B. S., (2022). Examining continuance intention in business schools with digital classroom methods during COVID-19: a comparative study of India and Italy. Behaviour and Information Technology, 41(8), 1596-1619.
20. Cheah, L. F., Cheng, M. Y. and Hen, K. W., (2022). The effect of quality management practices on academics’ innovative performance in Malaysian higher education institutions. Studies in Higher Education, 1-14.
21. Daumiller, M., Rinas, R., Hein, J., Janke, S., Dickhäuser, O. and Dresel, M., (2021). Shifting from face-to-face to online teaching during COVID-19: The role of university faculty achievement goals for attitudes towards this sudden change, and their relevance for burnout/engagement and student evaluations of teaching quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 118, 106677.
22. Dečman, M., Stare, J. and Klun, M., (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the development of the information society in Slovenia. Administration and Public Management Review, 39, 77-96.
23. Elsotouhy, M. M., Ghonim, M. A., Alasker, T. H. and Khashan, M. A., (2022). Investigating health and fitness app users’ stickiness, WOM, and continuance intention using SOR model: The moderating role of health consciousness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 1-16.
24. Fernandes, J. O., Singh, B., (2022). Accreditation and ranking of higher education institutions (HEIs): review, observations and recommendations for the Indian higher education system. The TQM Journal, 34(5), 1013-1038.
25. Goyal, S., Venkatesh, V. and Shi, X., (2022). Role of users’ status quo on continuance intentions. Information and Management, 59(8), 103686.
26. Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C. and Nitzl, C., (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101-110.
27. Halmai, P., (2022). COVID-19 Crisis and Supply Side Bottlenecks in the EU. Shorter and Longer Term Prospects. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 18(4), 19-30.
28. Harlie, M., Hairul, H., Rajiani, I. and Abbas, E. W., (2019). Managing information systems by integrating information systems success model and the unified theory of acceptance and usage of technology. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 20(1), 192-201.
29. Jurek, P., Korjonen‐Kuusipuro, K. and Olech, M., (2021). When technology use causes stress: Challenges for contemporary research. Human Technology, 17(3), 190-196.
30. Katelo, I., Kokina, I. and Raščevskis, V., (2022). Quality assessment of public services in Latvia. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(4), 359-379.
31. Khalid, B., Lis, M., Chaiyasoonthorn, W. and Chaveesuk, S., (2021). Factors influencing behavioural intention to use MOOCs. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 13(2), 83-95.
32. Khorshid, M., Rezk, M. R., Ismail, M., Piccinetti, L., Radwan, A., Helmy, O. and Sakr, M. M., (2023). Research, development and innovation in business enterprises: experience from Egypt. Insights into Regional Development, 5(1), 41-58.
33. Kocsis, D., de Vreede, T. and Alothaim, A., (2022). Happy to Continue: Satisfaction, Commitment, and Persistence to Use Technology-Supported Collaborative Work Practices. Group Decision and Negotiation, 31(6), 1235-1262.
34. Kooli, C., Abadli, R., (2022). Could education quality audit enhance human resources management processes of the higher education institutions? Vision, 26(4), 482-490.
35. Kravchenko, S.A., Sidorov, N. and Draskovic, V., (2021). New Challenges to Economy Security: the Convergence of Energy and Covid-19 Risks – The Demand for Cosmopolitan Politics. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 17(2), 187-194.
36. Lutfi, A., (2022). Factors Influencing the Continuance Intention to Use Accounting Information System in Jordanian SMEs from the Perspectives of UTAUT: Top Management Support and Self-Efficacy as Predictor Factors. Economies, 10(4), 75.
37. Mäntymäki, M., Islam, A. K. M. N., Turel, O. and Dhir, A., (2022). Coping with pandemics using social network sites: A psychological detachment perspective to COVID-19 stressors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121660.
38. Menshikov, V., Ruza, O., Kokina, I. and Arbidane, I., (2022). Entrepreneurial University: Topicality of Creation, International experience, Situation in Latvia. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(4), 156-177.
39. Muangmee, C., Kot, S., Meekaewkunchorn, N., Kassakorn, N., Tiranawatananun, S. and Khalid, B., (2021). Students’ Use Behavior towards E-Learning Tools during COVID-19 Pandemics: Case Study of Higher Educational Institutions of Thailand. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(4), 1166-1175.
40. Papademetriou, C., Anastasiadou, S., Konteos, G. and Papalexandris, S., (2022). COVID-19 pandemic: the impact of the social media technology on higher education. Education Sciences, 12(4), 261.
41. Phimolsathien, T., (2022). Guidelines for driving business sector into digital transactions for business survival: a case study of the impact of covid-19 to smes business in thailand. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 26(2), 293-309.
42. Putro, H. P. N., Hadi, S., Rajiani, I. and Abbas, E. W., (2022). Adoption of e-learning in Indonesian higher education: innovation or irritation? Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 22(1), 36-45.
43. Rajiani, I., Kot, S., (2018). The prospective consumers of the Indonesian green aviation initiative for sustainable development in air transportation. Sustainability, 10(6), 1772.
44. Recch, F., Petherick, A., Hinton, R., Nagesh, R., Furst, R. and Goldszmidt, R., (2023). Education data needs and challenges for building back from COVID-19. Epidemics, 100673.
45. Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A. and Quinlan, M. M., (2019). Diffusion of Innovations. In D. W. Stack, M. B. Salwen, and K. Eichhorn (Eds.), An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research: Vol. 2nd Edition (pp. 1-17). Routledge.
46. Romanowski, M. H., Alkhateeb, H., (2022). Problematizing accreditation for teacher education. Higher Education Policy, 1-21.
47. Rosser, A., (2023). Higher education in Indonesia: The political economy of institution-level governance. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 53(1), 53-78.
48. Sader, S., Husti, I. and Daroczi, M., (2022). A review of quality 4.0: Definitions, features, technologies, applications, and challenges. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 33(9-10), 1164-1182.
49. Satispi, E., Rajiani, I., Murod, M. and Andriansyah, A., (2023). Human Resources Information System (HRIS) to Enhance Civil Servants’ Innovation Outcomes: Compulsory or Complimentary? Administrative Sciences, 13(2), 32.
50. Savastano, M., Zentner, H., Spremić, M. and Cucari, N., (2022). Assessing the relationship between digital transformation and sustainable business excellence in a turbulent scenario. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 1-22.
51. Sell, A. J., (2023). Contextual factors associated with the morale of academic and suport staff in universities. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 1-10.
52. Shrestha, N., (2021). Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9(1), 4-11.
53. Stoyanova, T. and Markova, M., (2022). Researching digitalization of the education: a case study of Bulgarian universities. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 10(1), 50-63.
54. Suzuki, K., Ikushima, Y. and Murayama, Y., (2023). Changes in Cargo Movement due to the Effects of COVID-19. Production Engineering Archives, 29(2) 147-154.
55. Tirastittam, P., Thammaboosadee, S. and Chuckpaiwong, R., (2022). Importance Of Talent Management For Information Technology Personnel In The Thailand’s Bureaucratic Organization. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 25(2), 341-356.
56. Ulewicz, R., Kanchana, S., (2020), Experience with the accreditation of technical studies in Poland and Thailand. [in:] International Symposium on Project Approaches in Engineering Education 10, 149-156.
57. Yazdani, M., Pamucar, D., Erdmann, A. and Toro-Dupouy, L., (2023). Resilient sustainable investment in digital education technology: A stakeholder-centric decision support model under uncertainty. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188, 122282.
58. Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Roslan, S., Mohamad, Z., Ismail, I. A., Ab Jalil, H. and Ahrari, S., (2022). Influencing factors in MOOCs adoption in higher education: a meta-analytic path analysis. Sustainability, 14(14), 8268.
59. Zhao, F., Ahmed, F., Iqbal, M. K., Mughal, M. F., Qin, Y. J., Faraz, N. A. and Hunt, V. J., (2020). Shaping behaviors through institutional support in British higher educational institutions: Focusing on employees for sustainable technological change. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 584857.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-0a4c74e2-3fd0-471f-b42c-9d52967677b0