Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Law requires from employers to assess occupational risk in workplaces. A well-executed occupational risk assessment promotes the improvement of working conditions and reduces a negative impacts on employees’ health and life. Employers by conducting occupational risk assessment not only meet legal requirements but also benefit from it in two ways. They eliminate loss of an enterprise connected with employees’ absence, and they also decrease the probability of high compensation pay due to situations that have a destructive influence on the employees' health. However, in order to benefit from such actions, firstly, it is necessary to select a risk assessment method properly, then to apply it and implement preventive measures. The paper presents the results of the occupational risk assessment carried out on the example of a CNC machine operator by means three-stage methods in accordance with the PN-N-18001, PHA and Risc Score. Despite the subjectivity of the assessment, there were differences in the results. Thus, it is advisable to choose a risk assessment method skilfully, for example by comparing several similar methods.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
28--31
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 12 poz. tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Rzeszow University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aviation, al. Powstancow Warszawy 8 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland
Bibliografia
- 1. ULEWICZ R., ŻYWIOŁEK J. 2016. Bezpieczeństwo systemu: człowiek – obiekt techniczny – otoczenie. Oficyna Wydawnicza Stowarzyszenia Menedżerów Jakości i Produkcji, Częstochowa.
- 2. GÓRSKA E. 2012. Metody oceny ryzyka zawodowego. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warszawa.
- 3. KABER D., ZAHABI M. 2017. Enhanced Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment for Human-in-the-Loop Systems. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Volume: 59, Issue: 5, 861-873.
- 4. KRAUSE M. 2011. Praktyczne aspekty doboru metod oceny ryzyka zawodowego. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, S. Organizacja I Zarządzanie, Z. 59, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, Gliwice.
- 5. PN-N 18002:2011, Systemy zarządzania bezpieczeństwem i higiena pracy – Ogólne wytyczne do oceny ryzyka zawodowego. PKN, Warszawa.
- 6. RACHIERU N., BELU N., ANGHEL D.C. 2015. An improved method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of CNC lathe, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 95(1), 012139.
- 7. ROMANOWSKA-SŁOMKA I., SŁOMKA A. 2104. Ocena ryzyka zawodowego, Wydanie III, Tar-bonus, Kraków-Tarnobrzeg.
- 8. WOŹNY A., PACANA A. 2014. Ocena ryzyka zawodowego – teoria i przykłady. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Rzeszowskiej, Rzeszów.
- 9. YIN C., HE L., LUO Z., HUANG H.Z. 2013. Applying FAHP to safety and risk assessment of CNC spindle system based on Hilbert space. QR2MSE 2013 - Proceedings of 2013 International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering, 6625587, 296-298.
- 10. ZHU X.C., CHEN F., WANG J.L., (...), WANG L.D., JIA Y.H. 2013. Subsystems risk assessment of the CNC machine tools, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 432, 310-315.
- 11. LESTYANSZKA-SKURKOVA K. 2017. Implementation of a system quality tool to reduce the costs of scrap loss in industrial enterprise. Quality Production Improvement No. 1(6), 93-111.
- 12. NOWICKA-SKOWRON M., ULEWICZ R. 2016. Problems in the implementation of lean concept in the metal industry companies. Metal 2016: 25th Anniversary International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials, 1962-1967.
Uwagi
Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-09e2f03d-f2a3-4817-86fd-3c0421a09da6