An integrated risk informed decision making in the nuclear industry

• Autorzy: Borysiewicz M. , Kowal K. , Prusiński P. A. , Dąbrowski M.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Zintegrowany proces decyzyjny uwzględniający ryzyko w przemyśle jądrowym

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The regulatory body, established to ensure safety of nuclear facilities, is expected to make right decisions and provide appropriate regulations for the nuclear industry. The traditional manner of its activity has been based on a deterministic approach to safety analyses. However, increased maturity of Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) makes it complementary to deterministic studies. The new IAEA concept, described in this article, is to apply an integrated approach by combining both deterministic and probabilistic insights with other requirements affecting the decision making process.

PL

Organ regulacyjny, powołany w celu zapewnienia bezpieczeństwa jądrowego, jest odpowiedzialny za podejmowanie decyzji i wprowadzanie rozporządzeń dla przemysłu jądrowego. Tradycyjny sposób jego funkcjonowania opiera się na deterministycznym podejściu do analiz bezpieczeństwa. Rozwój analiz probabilistycznych (PSA) sprawia jednak, iż są one traktowane jako podejście komplementarne. Nowa koncepcja IAEA, opisana w tym artykule, polega na zintegrowanym podejściu, uwzględniającym analizy deterministyczne, probabilistyczne i inne aspekty procesu decyzyjnego.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

nuclear safety; Integrated Risk Informed Decision Making; probabilistic safety assessment; Deterministic Safety Assessment

PL

bezpieczeństwo jądrowe; proces decyzyjny; ryzyko; probabilistyczne analizy bezpieczeństwa; deterministyczne analizy bezpieczeństwa

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Lubelskiej
• Czasopismo: Informatyka, Automatyka, Pomiary w Gospodarce i Ochronie Środowiska
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: nr 2
• Strony: 22--34
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 40 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Borysiewicz M.

• National Centre for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Nuclear Energy Department, Nuclear Energy Division, Poland

autor

Kowal K.

• National Centre for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Nuclear Energy Department, Nuclear Energy Division, Poland

autor

Prusiński P. A.

• National Centre for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Nuclear Energy Department, Nuclear Energy Division, Poland

autor

Dąbrowski M.

• National Atomic Energy Agency (NAEA), Department of Nuclear Safety, Division of Inspection of Nuclear Installations, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Ahn B.S., Park K.S.: Comparing methods for multi-attribute decision making with ordinal weights. Computers and Operations Research 35/2008, pp. 1660-1670.
• [2] Borysiewicz M., Furtek A., Potempski S.: Poradnik metod ocen ryzyka związanego z niebezpiecznymi instalacjami procesowymi. Instytut Energii Atomowej, Otwock-Świerk 2000.
• [3] Borysiewicz M., Kowal K., Potempski S.: Decision making for safety of technological installations based on risk. Proceedings of the XIX Scientific-Technical Seminar of Materials Investigation for Power Industry, Zakopane 2012, pp. 209-219.
• [4] Cooke R.M.: Experts in Uncertainty. Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1991.
• [5] Govaerts P.: Roles, functions and value of TSOs. Proceedings of an International Conference on Challenges Faced by Technical and Scientific Support Organizations in Enhancing Nuclear Safety, Aix-en-Provence 2007, pp. 49-54.
• [6] Hahn L.: Independent technical and scientific advice for regulatory decision making. Proceedings of an International Conference on Challenges Faced by Technical and Scientific Support Organizations in Enhancing Nuclear Safety, Aix-en-Provence 2007, pp. 55-65.
• [7] Jia J., Fisher G.W., Dyer J.S.: Attribute weighting methods and decision quality in the presence of response error: A simulation study. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 11/1998, pp. 85-105.
• [8] Knudsen J.K., Smith C.L.: Estimation of system failure probability uncertainty including model success criteria. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on PSA and Management, San Juan 2002, pp. 201-206.
• [9] Ko K.S., Han K.I.: Relevance of TSOs in providing technical and scientific services to operators/industry. Proceedings of an International Conference on Challenges Faced by Technical and Scientific Support Organizations in Enhancing Nuclear Safety, Aix-en-Provence 2007, pp. 67-85.
• [10] Lee J.C., McCormick N.J.: Risk and Safety Analysis of Nuclear Systems. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken 2011.
• [11] Lyubarskiy A., Kuzmina I., El-Shanawany M.: Advances in Risk Informed Decision Making – IAEA’s Approach. Proceedings of the Nordic PSA Conference, Gottröra 2011, pp. 1-14.
• [12] Małecki L.: Introduction to the nuclear energy in Poland. Proceedings of the XIX Scientific-Technical Seminar of Materials Investigation for Power Industry, Zakopane 2012, pp. 1-40.
• [13] Rao K.D., Kushwaha H.S., Verma A.K., Srividya A.: Quantification of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties in level-1 probabilistic safety assessment studies. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 92/2009, pp. 947-956.
• [14] Strupczewski A.: Safety classification of nuclear power plants structures, systems and components and their qualification. Proceedings of the XIX Scientific-Technical Seminar of Materials Investigation for Power Industry, Zakopane 2012, pp. 57-84.
• [15] Valtonen K., Vanttola T.: Role of the TSO in public information/debate openness, transparency. Proceedings of an International Conference on Challenges Faced by Technical and Scientific Support Organizations in Enhancing Nuclear Safety, Aix-en-Provence 2007, pp. 97-102.
• [16] Volkanovski A., Čepin M.: Implication of PSA uncertainties on risk-informed decision making. Nuclear Engineering and Design 241/2011, pp. 1108-1113.
• [17] Xuan S.: A Novel Kind of Decision of Weight of Multi-attribute Decision-Making Model Based on Bayesian Networks. International Seminar on Business and Information Management 2/2008, pp. 30-33.
• [18] Health and Safety Executive: The tolerability of risk from nuclear power stations. HSE Books, Sudbury 1992.
• [19] Health and Safety Executive: Reducing Risks, Protecting People: HSE’s decision-making process. HSE Books, Norwich 2001.
• [20] International Atomic Energy Agency: Equipment qualification in operational nuclear power plants: upgrading, preserving and reviewing. IAEA, Vienna 1998.
• [21] International Atomic Energy Agency: Basic safety principles for nuclear power plants. IAEA, Vienna 1999.
• [22] International Atomic Energy Agency: Quality assurance within regulatory bodies. IAEA, Vienna 1999.
• [23] International Atomic Energy Agency: Operational safety performance indicators for Nuclear Power Plants. IAEA, Vienna 2000.
• [24] International Atomic Energy Agency: Training the staff of the regulatory body for nuclear facilities: A competency framework. IAEA, Vienna 2001.
• [25] International Atomic Energy Agency: Safety Margins of Operating Reactors. IAEA, Vienna 2003.
• [26] International Atomic Energy Agency: Precursor analyses – The use of deterministic and PSA based methods in the event investigation process at nuclear power plants. IAEA, Vienna 2004.
• [27] International Atomic Energy Agency: Assessment of Defence in Depth for Nuclear Power Plants. IAEA, Vienna 2005.
• [28] International Atomic Energy Agency: Defence in Depth in Nuclear Safety. IAEA, Vienna 2005.
• [29] International Atomic Energy Agency: Risk informed regulation of nuclear facilities: Overview of the current status. IAEA, Vienna 2005.
• [30] International Atomic Energy Agency: IAEA Safety Glossary – Terminology Used In Nuclear Safety And Radiation Protection. IAEA, Vienna 2007.
• [31] International Atomic Energy Agency: Deterministic Safety Analysis for Nuclear Power Plants. IAEA, Vienna 2009.
• [32] International Atomic Energy Agency: Safety assessment for facilities and activities. IAEA, Vienna 2009.
• [33] International Atomic Energy Agency: Development and Application of Level-1 PSA. IAEA, Vienna 2010.
• [34] International Atomic Energy Agency: Development and Application of Level-2 PSA. IAEA, Vienna 2010.
• [35] International Atomic Energy Agency: The Interface Between Safety and Security at Nuclear Power Plants. IAEA, Vienna 2010.
• [36] International Atomic Energy Agency: A Framework for an Integrated Risk Informed Decision Making Process. IAEA, Vienna 2011.
• [37] International Atomic Energy Agency: Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Design. IAEA, Vienna 2012.
• [38] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Reactor Safety Study - An assessment of accident risks in U. S. commercial nuclear power plants. U.S. NRC, Washington D. C. 1975.
• [39] United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Safety goals for nuclear power plants operations. USNRC, Washington 1996.
• [40] United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Guidance on the Treatment of Uncertainties Associated with PRAs in Risk-Informed Decision Making. US NRC, Washington 2009.