Urban Design 1960−2020. Evolution of the curriculum. Case of Faculty of Architecture, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology

• Autorzy: Szumilas Agnieszka

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/teka.3621

Warianty tytułu

PL

Projektowanie urbanistyczne, 1960−2020. Ewolucja programu studiów. Przypadek Wydziału Architektury Politechniki Wrocławskiej

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper presents the results of research on the evolution of the curriculum of urban design at the Faculty of Architecture of Wroclaw University of Science and Technology (Poland). Urban Design is one of the many courses that future engineers in the program of Architecture and Urban Design participate in. Urban Design is an important subject, it deals with land development and the organization of public space. Several dozen study programs, project topics and form of classes were analyzed. The teaching of Urban Design was juxtaposed with changes taking place in post-war cities, trends and planning documents. The research results allow us to see the current state of urban design education and in what direction it is evolving.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

urban design; spatial planning; curriculum

PL

urbanistyka; planowanie przestrzenne; program nauczania

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Lubelskiej ; Polska Akademia Nauk, Oddział w Lublinie
• Czasopismo: Teka Komisji Architektury, Urbanistyki i Studiów Krajobrazowych
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: T. 19, nr 2
• Strony: 89--95
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 13 poz., fig.

Twórcy

autor

Szumilas Agnieszka

• Wrocław University of Science and Technology (Poland)

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7287-2383

Bibliografia

• 1. Elrahman S. Abd and Asaad M., Urban design & urban planning: A critical analysis to the theoretical relationship gap, Ain Shams Engineering Journal (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.04.020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.04.020 Google Scholar
• 2. Madanipour A., Roles and Challenges of Urban Design, Journal of Urban Design, vol. 11 issue 2, 173−193 (2006). DOI: 10.1080/13574800600644035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800600644035 Google Scholar
• 3. Marshall S., Science, pseudo-science and urban design, Urban Design International, 17, 257−271 (2012) doi:10.1057/udi.2012.22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2012.22 Google Scholar
• 4. Biddulph M., The Problem with thinking about or for Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design 17:1, 1−20 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2011.646251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2011.646251 Google Scholar
• 5. Cozzolino S., Polivka J., Fox-Kämper R., Reimer M., Kummel O., What is urban design? A proposal for a common understanding, Journal of Urban Design 25(2):1−15 (2020), DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2019.1705776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2019.1705776 Google Scholar
• 6. Gunder M., Commentary: Is Urban Design Still Urban Planning? An Exploration and Response, Journal of Planning Education and Research 31 (2) 184−195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X10393358 Google Scholar
• 7. Linovski O., Loukaitou-Sideris A., Evolution of Urban Design Plans in the United States and Canada: What Do the Plans Tell Us about Urban Design Practice? Journal of Planning Education and Research 33 (1) 66−82 (2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X12454174 Google Scholar
• 8. Jackson L.E , The relationship of urban design to human health and conditio, Landscape and Urban Planning 64 191−200 (2003). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00230-X Google Scholar
• 9. Black P., Street E., The Power of Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Urban Design in Cycling Behaviours and Healthy Ageing. Transportation Research Procedia vol 4, 68−79, (2014). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2014.11.006 Google Scholar
• 10. Gale C.R., Dennison E.M., Cooper C., Sayer A.A., Neighbourhood environment and positive mental health in older people: the Hertfordshire Cohort Study, Health and Place, vol. 17, no. 4, 867−74 (2011). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.05.003 Google Scholar
• 11. Śleszyński P., Markowski T., Kowalewski A., Kryzys gospodarki przestrzennej i urbanistyki, Studia KPZK, t.182 Studia nad chaosem przestrzennym (2018). Google Scholar
• 12. Bański J., Koncepcje rozwoju struktury przestrzennej w Polsce – polaryzacja czy równoważenie? Przegląd Geograficzny 79, 1, s. 45−79 (2007). Google Scholar
• 13. Kowalski, J.S. Grime E.K., Some Problems of Regional Planning in Poland, Built Environment (1978-), vol. 9, no. 1, 83−88. (1983). Google Scholar