Energy Balance and Green House Gas Emisson on Smallholder Java Coffee Production at Slopes Ijen Raung Plateau of Indonesia

• Autorzy: Harsono Soni Sisbudi , Wibowo Robertoes Koekoeh Koentjoro , Supriyanto Edy

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/138997

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Coffee production has been a major source of income in Indonesia since the early twentieth century. This study aimed to estimate the energy balances and determine the environmental impact of Robusta and Arabica coffee production as well as identify the measures to increase the efficiency of Robusta and Arabica yield using the life cycle assessment (LCA) method. The potential adverse impacts of processing ground coffee manifest themselves in the forms of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, acidification, as well as water and environmental pollution due to solid and liquid waste disposal. The total GHG emissions for Arabica coffee processing is 1,804 t CO₂-eq year^-1 while for Robusta, it is 1,356 t CO₂-eq year^-1. The total acidification potential for Arabica coffee processing can be given by 8,013 kg NO₂-eq year^-1 and 10,663 kg SO₂-eq year^-1, while for Robusta coffee processing, the potential for acidification is represented by 60.97 kg NO₂-eq year^-1 and 79.58 kg SO₂-eq year^-1, and the potential GHG per unit weight of Arabica and Robusta ground coffee processing were 98.7 CO₂-eq kg^-1 and Robusta 119.6 CO₂-eq kg^-1, respectively. The potential measures to mitigate this include replacing gasoline with biofuel, utilising liquid waste with chemical processing, and solid wastes of coffee production, such as brickquetess and bio-pellets for renewable energy.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Arabica; Robusta; greenhouse gas emission; acidification; renewable energy

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 22, nr 7
• Strony: 271--283
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 34 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Harsono Soni Sisbudi

• Department of Agricultural Enginering, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, University of Jember, Jalan Kalimantan 1 Jember, East Java Province, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2198-6724

autor

Wibowo Robertoes Koekoeh Koentjoro

• Department of Mechanical Engineering Faculty of Engineering, University of Jember, Jalan Kalimantan 93 Jember, East Java Province, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7839-2380

autor

Supriyanto Edy

• Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Jember, Jalan Kalimantan 37 Jember, East Java Province, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5601-1524

Bibliografia

• 1. Alves R.C., Rodrigues F., Nunes M.A.A., Vinha A.F., Oliveira M.B.P.P. State of the art in coffee processing by-products. In: Galanakis C., editor. Handbook of Coffee Processing By-Products: Sustainable Applications. Academic Press-Elsevier; London, UK: 2017. pp. 1–26
• 2. Amaia Iriondo-DeHond, Maite Iriondo-DeHond, and María Dolores del Castilloo, 2019, Applications of Compounds from Coffee Processing By-Products, Biomolecules. ; 10(9): 1219.
• 3. Azwar A.B. 2012. Intensifikasi Kopi Jadi Program Unggulan Baru. Media Perkebunan 99
• 4. Brander, M. 2012. Greenhouse Gases CO2, CO2e dan Carbon. European Commission.
• 5. Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS), 2017, Data Statitisk Indonesia 2017
• 6. Chaerul M, Dirgantara GG, Akib R. 2016. Prediction of Greenhouse Gasses Emission from Municipal Solid Waste Sector in Kendari city, Indonesia. Jurnal Manusia dan Lingkungan. 23 (1), 42-48.
• 7. Chala B., Oechsner H., Latif S., Müller J. 2018. Biogas potential of coffee processing waste in Ethiopia. Sustainability, 10(8),1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082678.
• 8. Climate Change Connection. 2016. CO2 Equivalent. Manitoba Eco-Network [Serial Online]. http;//climatechange connection.org/emissions/co2-equivalent/.
• 9. Coltro L., Mourad A.L., de Oliveira P.P.L.V., Andrade J.P.B.O. 2012. Regional differences of coffee cultivation in Brazil. Coffee Science, 7(1), 31–41.http://taurus.unicamp.br/bitstream/REPOSIP/90250/1/2-s2.0-84864363281.pdf
• 10. Cruz G, Crnkovic PM. 2015. Evaluation of the combustion process of coffee husk samples in a drop tube furnace (DTF). Engenharia Térmica (Thermal Engineering), 14(2):53–62. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2139.8086
• 11. del Castillo M.D., Fernandez-Gomez B., MartinezSaez N., Iriondo-DeHond A., Mesa M.D. 2019, Coffee By-Products. In: Farah A., editor. Coffee: Production, Quality and Chemistry. Royal Society of Chemistry; Oxfordshire, UK: 2019.
• 12. Fatmawati, BPY Kurniawan, dan U Suryadi. 2018. Analisis Daya Saing Dan Strategi Pemasaran Kopi Bubuk Java Coffee. Jurnal Pertanian. 9 (2), 61–75.
• 13. Hareesh S.B., Jayarama, D’Souza M.V., Keshavayya J. 2017. The biochemical status of Robusta coffee (Coffea canephora) influenced by organic and integrated nutrient management practices. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(4), 232–239. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.604.027
• 14. Harsono S.S, Prayoga, Tasliman, Maizirwan, Rida Robby, 2018, Effect of Holes System Designing for Low Energy Stove Using Coffee Husk Bio-Pellet as Solid Fuel, Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 2(5).
• 15. Harsono, S.S, Dilla, Maizirwan, 2019, coffee Husk Biopellet characteristics as Solid Fuel for combustion Stove, HSOA Journal of Environmental Science: Current Research, 1(1).
• 16. Ibnu M., Offermans A., Glasbergen P. 2018. Certification and farmer organisation: Indonesian smallholder perceptions of benefits.Bulletin of Indonesian economic studies, 54(3), 387–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2018.150609
• 17. ISO 50001: 2018, Energy Management
• 18. Kiyingi I., Gwali S. 2012. Productivity and profitability of robusta coffee agroforestry systems in central Uganda. Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 13(1), 85–93. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ujas/article/view/126117/115645
• 19. Killian B., Rivera L., Soto M., Navichoc D. 2013. Carbon footprint across the coffee supply chain: The case of Costa Rican Coffee. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 3(3), 151–170. http://www.mag.go.cr/informacion/prog-nac-cafeCarbon-Footprint.pdf
• 20. KLH/ Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup. 2012. Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Inventarisasi Gas Rumah Kaca Nasional. Jakarta (ID): Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup (in Indonesian).
• 21. Mhilu C.F. 2014. Analysis of Energy Characteristics of Rice and Coffee Husks Blends. ISRN Chemical Engineering, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/196103
• 22. Murthy P.S., Madhava Naidu M. 2012. Sustainable management of coffee industry by-products and value addition – A review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 66, 45–58. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.06.005.
• 23. Mussatto S.I., Machado E.M.S., Martins S., Teixeira J.A. Production, Composition, and Application of Coffee and Its Industrial Residues. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2011;4:661–672. doi: 10.1007/s11947-011-0565-z.
• 24. Nugroho AW. 2014. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Industri Pengolahan Crude Palm Oil di PTPN V (Persero) Riau. Bogor:IPB.
• 25. Noponen M.R.A., Edwards-jones G., Haggar J.P, Soto G., Attarzadeh N., Healey J.R. 2012. Greenhouse gas emissions in coffee grown with differing input levels under conventional and organic management. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 151, 6–15. Https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.01.019
• 26. Panhuysen S., Pierrot J. 2014. Coffee Barometer 2014. Hivos, IUCN Nederland, Oxfam, Novib, Solidaridad, WWF.
• 27. Pehnelt, G., & Vietze, C. 2012. Uncertainties About The GHG Emissions Saving of Repeseed Biodiesel (No. 2012, 039). Jena Economic Research Papers.
• 28. Rudragouda D.S., Mukharib K., Mote N., Gokavi R., Manjunath A.N., Babou C., Raghuramulu Y. 2017. Influence of micro irrigation and drip fertigation practices on yield and quality parameters of robusta coffee (Coffea canephora). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(2), 701–706. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.602.079.
• 29. Selvamurugan, M., Doraisamy, P., & Maheswari, M. 2010. An Intregated Treatment Sytem For Coffee Processing Waste water using Anaerobic and Aerobic Process. Ecological Engineering. 36(12), 1686-1690.
• 30. Unique, 2019, Coffee Production In The Face Of Climate Change: Indonesia, https://www.sustaincoffee.org/assets/resources/Indonesia_CountryProfile_Climate_Coffee_6-11.pdf
• 31. USDA, 2019, Indonesia Coffee Annual Indonesia Coffee Annual Report 2019, https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/report/downloadreportbyfilename?filename=Coffee%20Annual_Jakarta_Indonesia_5-15-2019.pdf
• 32. Vera-Acevedo L.D., Vélez-Henao J.A., Marulanda-Grisales N. 2016. Assessment of the environmental impact of three types of fertilizers on the cultivation of coffee at the Las Delicias indigenous reservation (Cauca).
• 33. Wahyudi T., Jati M. 2012. Challenges of sustainable coffee certification in Indonesia. In Seminar on the Economic, Social and Environmental Impact of Certification on the Coffee Supply Chain, International Coffee Council 109th Session, London, United Kingdom 25th September 2012, pp. 1–14.
• 34. Wilson L., John G.R., Mhilu C.F., Yang W., Blasiak W. 2010. Coffee husks gasification using high temperature air / steam agent. Fuel Processing Technology, 91(10), 1330–1337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.05.003.