Examination of seismo ionospheric anomalies before earthquakes of Mw ≥5.1 for the period 2008–2015 in Oaxaca, Mexico using GPS TEC

• Autorzy: Melgarejo-Morales Angela , Vazquez-Becerra G. Esteban , Millan-Almaraz J. R. , Pérez-Enríquez R. , Martínez-Félix Carlos A. , Gaxiola-Camacho J. Ramon

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s11600-020-00470-9

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Earthquakes are a major danger in a constantly growing society due to their imminent impact and power of destruction. Therefore, the idea of successfully forecasting an earthquake continues to motivate the multidisciplinary study of phenomena proposed as possible earthquake precursors such as ionospheric anomalies. In that sense, total electron content (TEC) has demonstrated to be an efcient parameter for investigating the state of the ionosphere by making use of the Global Positioning System receivers. In the present study, raw vertical TEC data obtained from the standard RINEX fles of the GPS constellation are used to examine the state of the ionosphere during the occurrence of light to moderate earthquakes in Mexico from years 2008 to 2015 with the aim of search for possible ionospheric anomalies related to seismic activity. In order to evaluate the impact at the geomagnetic and ionospheric environments, the Geomagnetic Equatorial Dst index, which is considered to have a great infuence on TEC during geomagnetic storm period, and solar activity parameters, have been considered. The results indicated that 17 (74%) of the studied events presented not quiet geomagnetic conditions for the days before the earthquake. Thus, the changes in VTEC are most likely related to geomagnetic anomalies which rules out its possible seismic origin. Contrariwise, 3 (13%) of the events presented geomagnetic anomalies the days after the earthquake. For the remaining 3 (13%) events, these presented particular characteristics, such as: not quiet geomagnetic condition for the earthquake day, geomagnetic anomalies throughout the period and the opposite.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

GPS-TEC; seismic precursors; Mexico; geomagnetic index; solar conditions

PL

GPS-TEC; prekursory sejsmiczne; Meksyk; indeks geomagnetyczny; warunki solarne

• Wydawca: Instytut Geofizyki PAN ; Springer
• Czasopismo: Acta Geophysica
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 68, no. 5
• Strony: 1229--1244
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 38 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Melgarejo-Morales Angela

• Faculty of the Earth and Space Sciences, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, 80040 Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico

autor

Vazquez-Becerra G. Esteban

• Faculty of the Earth and Space Sciences, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, 80040 Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico

autor

Millan-Almaraz J. R.

• Faculty of Physical-Mathematical Sciences, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, 80040 Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico

autor

Pérez-Enríquez R.

• Center of Geoscience, National Autonomous University of Mexico, 76230 Juriquilla, Qro., Mexico

autor

Martínez-Félix Carlos A.

• Faculty of the Earth and Space Sciences, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, 80040 Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico

autor

Gaxiola-Camacho J. Ramon

• Department of Civil Engineering, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, 80040 Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico

Bibliografia

• 1. Akhoondzadeh M (2019) Kalman filter and Neural Network methods for detecting irregular variations of TEC around the time of powerful Mexico (Mw=8.2) earthquake of September 08, 2017. J Earth Space Phys 44:87–97. https://doi.org/10.22059/jesphys.2018.258251.1007007
• 2. Akhoondzadeh M (2013) Genetic algorithm for TEC seismo-ionospheric anomalies detection around the time of the Solomon (Mw = 8.0) earthquake of 06 February 2013. Adv Space Res 52:581–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.04.012
• 3. Akhoondzadeh M (2012) Anomalous TEC variations associated with the powerful Tohoku earthquake of 11 March 2011. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:1453–1462. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1453-2012
• 4. Akhoondzadeh M, Saradjian M (2011) TEC variations analysis concerning Haiti (January 12, 2010) and Samoa (September 29, 2009) earthquakes. Adv Space Res 47:94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.07.024
• 5. Asim KM, Martinez-Alvarez F, Basit A, Iqbal T (2017) Earthquake magnitude prediction in Hindukush region using machine learning techniques. Nat Hazards 85:471–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2579-3
• 6. Atıcı R, Aytas A, Sagır S (2019) The effect of solar and geomagnetıc parameters on total electron content over Ankara, Turkey. Adv Space Res 65:2158–2166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.07.018
• 7. Bolt BA (2001) The nature of earthquake ground motion. In: Naeim F (ed) The seismic design handbook. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1693-4_1
• 8. Calais E, Minster JB (1995) GPS detection of ionospheric perturbations following the January 17, 1994, Northridge Earthquake. Geophys Res Lett 22:1045–1048. https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00168
• 9. Cornely PR, Hughes J (2018) Unbiased total electron content (uTEC), their fluctuations, and correlation with seismic activity over Japan. Acta Geophys 66:51–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-017-0105-y
• 10. Heki K, Otsuka Y, Choosakul N, Hemmakorn N, Komolmis T, Maruyama T (2006) Detection of ruptures of Andaman fault segments in the 2004 Great Sumatra Earthquake with coseismic ionospheric disturbances. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB004202
• 11. Heki K (2011) Ionospheric electron enhancement preceding the 2011 Tohokuoki earthquake. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047908
• 12. Heki K, Enomoto Y (2013) Preseismic ionospheric electron enhancements revisited. J Geophys Res Space Phys. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50578
• 13. He L, Heki K (2017) Ionospheric anomalies immediately before Mw7.0–8.0 earthquakes. J Geophys Res Space Physics 122:8659–8678. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024012
• 14. Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Lichtenegger H, Wasle E (2008) GNSS-Global Navigation Satellite Systems: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, and more. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-73017-1
• 15. Jin XX (1996) Theory of carrier adjusted DGPS positioning approach and some experimental results. Dissertation, Delft University of Technology
• 16. Liu X, Hattori K, Han P et al (2020) Possible anomalous changes in Solar quiet daily geomagnetic variation (Sq) related to the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake (Mw 9.0). Pure Appl Geophys 177:333–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-02086-z
• 17. Marques HA, Monico JFG, Aquino M (2011) RINEX_HO: second and third-order ionospheric corrections for RINEX observations files. GPS Solut 15:305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-011-0220-1
• 18. Mayaud PN (1980) Derivation, meaning and use of geomagnetic indices. American Geophysical Union, Washington. https://doi.org/10.1029/GM022
• 19. Molchanov OA, Hayakawa M, Rafalsky VA (1995) Penetration characteristics of electromagnetic emissions from an underground seismic source into the atmosphere, ionosphere, and magnetosphere. J Geophys Res Space Phys 100:1691–1712. https://doi.org/10.1029/94JA02524
• 20. Nuñez-Cornu F, Ponce L (1989) Zonas sísmicas de Oaxaca, México: sismos máximos y tiempos de recurrencia para el período 1542–1988. Rev de la Unión Geofísica Mexicana 28:587–641
• 21. Odintsov S, Boyarchuk K, Georgieva K, Kirov B, Atanasov D (2006) Long-period trends in global seismic and geomagnetic activity and their relation to solar activity. Phys Chem Earth, Parts A/B/C 31:88–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2005.03.004
• 22. Parrot M, Tramutoli V, Liu TJY, Pulinets S, Ouzounov D, Genzano N, Lisi M, Hattori K, Namgaladze A (2016) Atmospheric and ionospheric coupling phenomena related to large earthquakes. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss Nat. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2016-172
• 23. Pierce ET (1976) Atmospheric electricity and earthquake prediction. Geophys Res Lett 3:185–188. https://doi.org/10.1029/GL003i003p00185
• 24. Pulinets SA, Contreras AL, Bisiacchi-Giraldi G, Ciraolo L (2005) Total electron content variations in the ionosphere before the Colima, Mexico, earthquake of 21 January 2003. Geofisica Int 44(4):369–377
• 25. Pulinets S, Davidenko D (2014) Ionospheric precursors of earthquakes and global electric circuit. Adv Space Res 53(5):709–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.12.035
• 26. Pulinets SA, Legen’ka AD, Alekseev VA (1994) Pre-earthquake ionospheric effects and their possible mechanisms in dusty and dirty plasmas, noise, and chaos in space and in the laboratory. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1829-7_46
• 27. Pulinets S, Legen'ka A, Gaivoronskaya T, Depuev V (2003) Main phenomenological features of ionospheric precursors of strong earthquakes. J Atmos Solar Terr Phys 65:1337–1347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2003.07.011
• 28. Saroso S, Liu JY, Hattori K, Chen CH (2008) Ionospheric GPS TEC anomalies and M ≥ 5.9 earthquakes in Indonesia during 1993–2002. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 19:481–488. https://doi.org/10.3319/TAO.2008.19.5.481(T)
• 29. Sardon E, Rius A, Zarraoa N (1993) Estimación del contenido total de electrones en la ionosfera usando datos del sistema de posicionamiento global. Física de la Tierra 5:167–182
• 30. Sentürk E, Çepni MS (2018) A statistical analysis of seismo-ionospheric TEC anomalies before 63 Mw 5.0 earthquakes in Turkey during 2003–2016. Acta Geophys 66:1495–1507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-018-0214-2
• 31. Tao D, Cao J, Battiston R, Li L, Ma Y, Liu W, Zhima Z, Wang L, Dunlop MW (2017) Seismo-ionospheric anomalies in ionospheric TEC and plasma density before the 17 July 2006 M = 7.7 south of Java earthquake. Ann Geophys 35:589–598. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-589-2017
• 32. Teunissen PJ (1991) The GPS phase-adjusted pseudorange. In: Proceedings of the second international workshop on high precision navigation, Stuttgart pp 115–125
• 33. Tsolis GS, Xenos TD (2010) A qualitative study of the seismo-ionospheric precursors prior to the 6 April 2009 earthquake in L'Aquila, Italy. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:133–137. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-133-2010
• 34. Tsugawa T, Saito A, Otsuka Y, Nishioka M, Maruyama T, Kato H, Nagatsuma T, Murata KT (2011) Ionospheric disturbances detected by GPS total electron content observation after the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake. Earth Planets Space 63:66. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.06.035
• 35. Xu T, Hu Y, Zhang H, Chen Z, Wu J, Xu Z (2012) Ionospheric disturbances on 8 September, 2010: Was it connected with the incoming moderate Chongqing earthquake? Adv Space Res 50(2):205–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2012.03.032
• 36. Yao YB, Chen P, Zhang S, Chen JJ, Yan F, Peng WF (2012) Analysis of pre-earthquake ionospheric anomalies before the global M = 7.0+ earthquakes in 2010. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:575–585. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-575-2012
• 37. Zakharenkova IE, Shagimuratov II (2009) Using of global and regional ionospheric maps to study of the preseismic ionosphere modification. IET 11th International Conference on Ionospheric Radio Systems and Techniques (IRST 2009) 14:18. https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2009.0025
• 38. Zaslavski Y, Parrot M, Blanc E (1998) Analysis of TEC measurements above active seismic regions. Phys Earth Planet Int 105:219–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9201(97)00093-9