Landscape Patch Pattern Effect on Relationships between Soil Properties and Earthworm Assemblages: A Comparison of two Farmlands of Different Spatial Structure

• Autorzy: Regulska E. , Kołaczkowska E.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.3161/15052249PJE2015.63.4.007

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Our survey was carried out in two study sites of approximately 3.3 ha each located in the Suwałki Lake District in NE Poland in the year 2008. Earthworms and soil samples were collected during two campaigns (spring and autumn) from 25 × 25 cm and 30 cm deep sampling points. The complex arable landscape (CAL) supported higher earthworm diversity, density and biomass than the similarly managed but homogeneous arable landscape (HAL). The spring and autumn earthworm sampling campaigns revealed very different patterns, and we conclude that autumn sampling is the most adequate for biomonitoring. On the other hand, the spring collections were significantly correlated to soil physical parameters, thus spring sampling is more suitable for studying such correlations. Significant correlations occurred almost exclusively for CAL and the soil parameters significantly relating with earthworm community were: soil moisture, nitrogen and organic carbon contents. The possible reason for it is the presence of numerous refuges for lumbricids offered by field margins, balks, woodlots and meadows in the CAL and lack of them in the HAL.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Lumbricidae; soil properties; landscape structure; arable field margins; biological monitoring

PL

dżdżownicowate; właściwości gleby; struktura krajobrazu; pole uprawne; monitoring biologiczny

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 63, nr 4
• Strony: 549--558
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 45 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Regulska E.

• Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Sciences, Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warsaw, Poland

autor

Kołaczkowska E.

• Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Sciences, Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Batáry P. , Báldi A. , Kleijn D. , Tscharntke T. 2011 — Landscape-moderated biodiversity effects of agrienvironmental management: a meta-analysis — Proc. R. Soc. 278: 1894–1902.
• 2. Benton T.G. , Vickery J.A. , Wilson J.D. 2003 — Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? — Trends Ecol Evol. 18: 182–188.
• 3. Ber A. 1999 — [Glaciotectonic of the Suwałki Augustów Lakeland in connection to neotectonic movements and tectonic structures of the crystalline basement (NE Poland)] — Przegląd Geologiczny, 47: 831–839(in Polish, English summary).
• 4. Beylich A. , Graefe U. 2009 — Investigations of annelids at soil monitoring sites in Northern Germany: reference ranges and time-series data — Soil Org. 81: 175–196.
• 5. Blackshaw R.P. , Donovan S.E. , Hazarika S. , Bol R. , Dixon E.R. 2007 —Earthworm responses to long term agricultural management practices: Spatial relationships with soil properties — Eur. J. Soil Biol. 43: 171–175.
• 6. Bueno C.G. , Jiménez J.J. 2014 — Livestock grazing activities and wild boar rooting affect alpine earthworm communities in the Central Pyrenees (Spain) — App. Soil Ecol. 83: 71–78.
• 7. Chan K.Y. , Barchia I. 2007 — Soil compaction controls the abundance, biomass and distribution of earthworms in a single dairy farm in south-eastern Australia — Soil Till. Res. 94: 75–82.
• 8. Cluzeau D. , Guernion M. , Chaussod R. , Martin Laurent F. , Villenave C. ,Cortet J. , Ruiz-Camacho N. , Pernin C. , Mateille T. , Philippot L. , Bellido A. , Rougé L. , Arrouays D. , Bispo A. , Pérès G. 2012 — Integration of biodiversity in soil quality monitoring: Baselines for microbial and soil fauna parameters for different land-use types — Eur. J. Soil Biol. 49:63–72.
• 9. Concepción E.D. , Diaz M. , Kleijn D. , Báldi A. , Batáry P. , Clough Y. ,Gabriel D. , Herzog F. , Holzschuh A. , Knop E. , Marshall E.J.P ,Tscharntke T. , Verhulst J. 2012 — Interactive effects of landscape context constrain the effectiveness of local agri-environmental management — J. Appl. Ecol. 49: 695–705.
• 10. Curry J.P. , Byrne D. , Schmidt O. 2002 — Intensive cultivation can drastically reduce earthworm populations in arable land — Eur. J. Soil Biol. 38: 127–130.
• 11. Deibert E.J. , Utter R.A. 2003 — Earthworm (Lumbricidae) survey of North Dakota fields placed in the U.S. Conservation Reserve Program — J. Soil Water Conserv. 58: 39–45.
• 12. Despiney-Zochowska B. 2003 — Restructuring Polish agriculture: the case study of state owned agricultural enterprises — Extraordinario, 6:1–18.
• 13. Flohre A. , Rudnick M. , Traser G. , Tscharntke T. , Eggers T. 2011 —Does soil biota benefit from organic farming in complex vs. simple land-scapes? — Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 141: 210–214.
• 14. Hernández P. , Gutiérrez M. , Ramajo M. , Trigo D. , Díaz Cosín D.J. 2003— Horizontal distribution of an earthworm community at El Molar, Madrid (Spain) — Pedobiologia, 47: 568–573.
• 15. Hubbard V.C. , Jordan D. , Stecker J.A. 1999 — Earthworm response to rotation and tillage in a Missouri claypan soil — Biol. Fert. Soils 29:343–347.
• 16. Irmler U. 2010 — Changes in earthworm populations during conversion from conventional to organic farming — Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 135:194–198.
• 17. Iordache M. , Borza I. 2010 — Relation between chemical indices of soil and earthworm abundance under chemical fertilization — Plant Soil Environ. 56: 401–407.
• 18. Ivask M. , Kuu A. , Sizov E. 2007— Abundance of earthworm species in Estonian arable soils — Eur. J. Soil Biol. 43: 39–42.
• 19. Jänsch S. , Steffens L. , Höfer H. , Horak F. , Roß Nickoll M. , Russell D. ,Toschki A. , Römbke J. 2013 — State of knowledge of earthworm communities in German soils as a basis for biological soil quality assessment — Soil Org. 85: 215–233.
• 20. Joschko M. , Fox C.A. , Lentzsch P. , Kiesel J. , Hierold W. , Krück S. ,Timmer J. 2006 — Spatial analysis of earthworm biodiversity at the regional scale — Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 112: 367–380.
• 21. Joschko M. , Gebbers R. , Barkusky D. , Timmer J. 2010 — The apparent electrical conductivity as a surrogate variable for predicting earthworm abundances in tilled soils — J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 173: 584–590.
• 22. Kasprzak K. 1986 — [Soil Oligochaeta III. Family Lumbricidae. Keys for the Identification of Polish Invertebrates, vol. 6] — PWN, Warszawa, 186pp. (in Polish).
• 23. Keith A.M. , Boots B. , Hazard C. , Niechoj R. , Arroyo J. , Bending G.D. ,Bolger T. , Breen J. , Clipson N. , Doohan F.M. , Griffin C.T. , Schmidt O.2012 — Crosstaxa congruence, indicators and environmental gradients in soils under agricultural and extensive land management — Eur. J. Soil Biol. 49: 55–62.
• 24. Kovács-Hostyánszki A. , Elek Z. , Balázs K. , Centeri C. , Falusi E. ,Jeanneret P. , Penksza K. , Podmaniczky L. , Szalkovszki O. , Báldi A.2013 — Earthworms, spiders and bees as indicators of habitat quality and management in a low-in-put farming region — A whole farm approach — Ecol. Indic. 33: 111–120.
• 25. Lavelle P. , Spain A.V. 2006 — Soil ecology — Kluwer Scientific Publications, Amsterdam, 654 pp.
• 26. Lima M.P.R. , Soares A.M.V.M. , Loureiro S. 2011 — Combined effects of soil moisture and carbaryl to earthworms and plants: Simulation of flood and drought scenarios — Environ Pollut. 159: 1844–1851.
• 27. Lüscher G. , Jeanneret P. , Schneider M.K. , Turnbull L.A. , Arndorfer M. ,Balázs K. , Báldi A. , Bailey D. , Bernhardt K.G. , Choisis J.-P. , Elek Z. ,Frank T. , Friedel J.K. , Kainz M. , Kovács Hostyánszki A. , Oschatz M.-L., Paoletti M.G. , Papaja-Hülsbergen S. , Sarthou J-P. , Siebrecht N. ,Wolfrum S. , Herzog F. 2014 — Responses of plants, earthworms, spiders and bees to geographic location, agricultural management and surrounding landscape in European arable fields — Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 186: 124–134.
• 28. McGarigal K. , Marks B.J. 1995 — FRAGSTAT: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure — USDA Forest Service.Technical Reports, PNW-351, Portland.
• 29. Mele P.M. , Carter M.R. 1999 — Species abundance of earthworms in arable and pasture soils in south-eastern Australia — Appl. Soil Ecol. 12:129–137.
• 30. Muys B. , Granval P. 1997 — Earthworms as bio-indicators of forest site quality — Soil Biol Biochem. 29: 323–328.
• 31. Ouellet G. , Lapen D.R. , Topp E. , Sawada M. , Edwards M. 2008 — A heuristic model to predict earthworm biomass in agroecosystems based on selected management and soil properties — Appl. Soil Ecol. 39: 35–45.
• 32. Paoletti M.G. 1999 — The role of earthworms for assessment of sustainability and as bioindicators (In: Invertebrate Biodiversity as Bioindicators of Sustainable Landscapes, Ed: M.G. Paoletti ) — Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 74: 137–155.
• 33. Plisko J.D. 1973 — [Fauna of Poland. Lumbricidae — earthworms (Annelida: Oligochaeta)] — PWN, Warszawa, 156 pp. (in Polish).
• 34. PN-ISO 10390:2005 — Soil quality — Determination of pH — Polish Committee for Standardization, 7 pp.
• 35. PN-ISO 11261:1995 — Soil quality — Determination of total nitrogen — Modified Kjeldahl method — Polish Committee for Standardization, 4 pp.
• 36. PN-ISO 11265: 1994 — Soil quality — Determination of the specific electrical conductivity — Polish Committee for Standardization, 4 pp.
• 37. PN-ISO 11465:1999 — Soil quality — Determination of dry matter and water content on a mass basis — Gravimetric method — Polish Committee for Standardization, 3 pp.
• 38. Roarty S. , Schmidt O. 2013 — Permanent and new arable field margins support large earthworm communities but do not increase infield populations — Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 170: 45–55.
• 39. Römbke J. , Jänsch S. , Didden W. 2005 — The use of earthworms in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts — Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 62: 249–265.
• 40. Schmidt O. , Curry J.P. 2001 — Population dynamics of earthworms (Lumbricidae) and their role in nitrogen turnover in wheat and wheatclover cropping systems — Pedobiologia, 45: 174–187.
• 41. Smith J. , Potts S.G. , Woodcock B.A. , Eggleton P. 2008 — Can arable field margins be managed to enhance their biodiversity, conservation and functional value for soil macrofauna — J. Appl. Ecol. 45: 269–278.
• 42. Sepp K. , Ivask M. , Kaasik A. , Mikk M. , Peepson A. 2005 — Soil biota indicators for monitoring the Estonian agrienvironmental programme — Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 108: 264–273.
• 43. Umiker K.J. , Johnson-Maynard J.L. , Hatten T.D. , Eigenbrode S.D. ,Bosque-Perez N.A. 2009 — Soil carbon, nitrogen, pH, and earthworm density as influenced by cropping practices in the Inland Pacific Northwest— Soil Till. Res. 105: 184–191.
• 44. Valckx J. , Cockx L. , Wauters J. , Van Meirvenne M. , Govers G. , Hermy M. , Muys B. 2009 — Within-field spatial distribution of earthworm populations related to species interactions and soil apparent electrical conductivity — Appl. Soil Ecol. 41: 315–328.
• 45. Wolters V. 2001 — Biodiversity of soil animals and its function — Eur. J. Soil Biol. 37: 221–227.