PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Broken engine’s crankshaft misalignment inspection by using reverse engineering technique

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: The research aims to study the measuring data comparison between the broken crankshaft and the new crankshaft. The broken crankshaft has been investigated whether to measure dimensions or misalignment value. Therefore, the new crankshaft was measured and compared with a broken crankshaft using a 3D laser scanner. The misalignment value has been related to the overlapping value of a broken crankshaft by using a 3D software application. Design/methodology/approach: The broken crankshaft has been compared with the new crankshaft in contemporary models. The broken crankshaft was produced and assembled from an automobile manufacturer’s factory. It belonged to a particular Diesel engine that fractured while running in normal driving conditions. The broken crankshaft dimension has been investigated to find out the worn-out and misalignment value. The broken crankshaft inspection was measured using a micrometre and a 3D laser scanner application. Both crankshafts were created as artefact 3D models by the 3D laser scanner of the HandySCAN700 model. The accuracy of the 3D laser scanner will be presented in terms of measuring error. Two crankshafts were combined in concentric mate function. The inspection points were carried out at 4 points of each 90° around the main journal diameter, by following the guidelines of crankshaft inspection on a workshop manual basis. The overlapping value of each main journal will be measured by a 3D compare function at 0°, 90°, 180° and 270° respectively. Findings: The results showed the average diameter of the broken crankshaft’s main journal was less than the limit value. A new crankshaft was judged to be needed to be replaced. Moreover, it showed the lowest diameter of main journal No. 2 was 69.890 mm. It carried a 0.06% excessive worn-out value. The measuring error value of the 3D laser scanner was found and required for user-performed calibration procedures. The highest overlapping value was higher than the standard tolerance, up to 117%. It was located at the main journal No. 3 at 180° and near the fractured point of the broken crankshaft. Research limitations/implications: The study of the broken crankshaft inspection was limited to either under-warranty or over-warranty cases. Most of the technicians in authorised automobile dealerships had no intention of performing the inspection process completely. In addition, they were lack of measuring skills and data records. Moreover, automotive manufacturers cannot support the 3D dimension data because it may affect the business’s confidential data leakage. Practical implications: The workshop manual mentioned the crankshaft inspection as a basic tool. In the case of complex components, automotive manufacturers should consider the utilisation of non-contact measuring tools for inspection reference. Originality/value: A reverse engineering technique was applied to scan the broken crankshaft into a 3D model using 3D laser scanning technology, which is used to reduce the measuring time and measuring value error in the inspection process.
Rocznik
Strony
65--74
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 30 poz.
Twórcy
  • Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep, Bangkok 10120, Thailand
autor
  • Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep, Bangkok 10120, Thailand
autor
  • Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep, Bangkok 10120, Thailand
Bibliografia
  • [1] P. Baras, J. Sawicki, Numerical analysis of mechanical properties of 3D printed aluminium components with variable core infill values, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering 103/1 (2020) 16-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.6912
  • [2] L. Kaczmarek, P. Kula, J. Sawicki, S. Armand, T. Castro, P. Kruszyński, A. Rochel, New possibilities of applications aluminium alloys in transport, Archives of Metallurgy and Materials 54/4 (2009) 1199-1205.
  • [3] M. Fonte, M. Freitas, L. Reis, Failure analysis of a damaged diesel motor crankshaft, Engineering Failure Analysis 102 (2019) 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.04.025
  • [4] V. Infante, M. Freitas, M. Fonte, Failure analysis of a crankshaft of a helicopter engine, Engineering Failure Analysis 100 (2019) 49-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.01.072
  • [5] K. Aliakbari, R. Nejad, S. Toroq, W. Macek, R. Branco, Assessment of unusual failure in the crankshaft of heavy-duty truck engine, Engineering Failure Analysis 134 (2022) 106085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106085
  • [6] D. Kopeliovich, Knowledge source on materials engineering, Available from: http://www.substech.com/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=engi ne_bearing_housing_and_how_it_affects_engine_bear ings&s=misalignment, Access in: 15.06.2023.
  • [7] Y. Zhang, G. Chen, L. Wang, Thermoelastohydro-dynamic analysis of misaligned bearings with texture on journal surface under high-speed and heavy-load conditions, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 32/5 (2019) 1331-1342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2018.08.005
  • [8] M. Lahmar, D. Frihi, D. Nicolas, The effect of misalignment on performance characteristics of engine main crankshaft bearings, European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids 21/4 (2002) 703-714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0997-7538(01)01202-5
  • [9] B. Kareem, Evaluation of failures in mechanical crankshafts of automobile based on expert opinion, Case Studies in Engineering Failure Analysis 3 (2015) 25-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csefa.2014.11.001
  • [10] O. Hrevtsev, N. Selivanova, P. Popovych, L. Poberezhny, V.Ya. Brych, Yu. Rudyak, O. Shevchuk, N. Bakulina, R. Rozum, M. Buriak, Stress-strain state simulation of non-uniformly heated elements of components and assemblies of automotive, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering 115/1 (2022) 26-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.2339
  • [11] O. Hrevtsev, N. Selivanova, P. Popovych, L. Poberezhny, V. Sakhno, O. Shevchuk, L. Poberezhna, I. Murovanyi, A. Hrytsanchuk, O. Romanyshyn, Simulation of thermomechanical processes in disc brakes of wheeled vehicles, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering 104/1 (2021) 11-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.8482
  • [12] S. Baragetti, Design Criteria for High Power Engines Crankshafts, The Open Mechanical Engineering Journal 9 (2015) 271-281. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874155X01509010271
  • [13] P.G. Ikonomov, A. Yahamed, P.D. Fleming, A. Pekarovicova, Design and testing 3D printed structures for bone replacements, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering 101/2 (2020) 76-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.4922
  • [14] T.P. Kersten, H.-J. Przybilla, M. Lindstaedt, Investigations of the Geometrical Accuracy of Handheld 3D Scanning Systems, Photogrammetrie – Fernerkundung – Geoinformation 5-6 (2016) 271-283. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/pfg/2016/0305
  • [15] Geomagic Software - Innovia3D, Workflow from 3D Scanning to Post-Processing, Available from: https://www.innovia3d.com/products/geomagic-software, Access in: 15.06.2023.
  • [16] D. Redaelli, S. Barsanti, E. Biffi, F. Storm, G. Colombo, Comparison of geometrical accuracy of active devices for 3D orthopaedic reconstructions, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 114 (2021) 319-342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06778-0
  • [17] G. Taubin, D. Moreno, 3D Scanning for Personal 3D Printing: Build Your Own Desktop 3D Scanner, Available from: http://mesh.brown.edu/desktop3dscan, Access in: 15.06.2023.
  • [18] S. Raza, M. Amjad, K. Ishfaq, S. Ahmad, M. Abdollahian, Effect of Three-Dimensional (3D) Scanning Factors on Minimizing the Scanning Errors Using a White LED Light 3D Scanner, Applied Sciences 13/5 (2023) 3303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053303
  • [19] W. Khuanlieng, R. Saodaen, P. Janmanee, Case Study of Broken Engine’s Crankshaft Investigation, Proceedings of the 8th Rajamangala Manufacturing and Management Technology Conference, Chonburi Province, 2023, 782-790.
  • [20] A. Khathri, M. Ismail, A. Abdullah, R. Mamat, S. Sutiman, Performance, Exhaust Emissions and Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology of a Water in Diesel Emulsion on Diesel Engine, Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences 93/1 (2022) 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.93.1.112
  • [21] The HandySCAN 3D, Technical specifications, Available from: https://www.creaform3d.com/en/handyscan-3d-silver-series-professional-3d/technical-specifications, Access in: 15.06.2023.
  • [22] R. Bonin, F. Khameneifar, J.R.R. Mayer, Evaluation of the Metrological Performance of a Handheld 3D Laser Scanner Using a Pseudo-3D Ball-Lattice Artifact, Sensors 21/6 (2021) 2137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s21062137
  • [23] ProCarManuals, ISUZU Diesel engine, Workshop Repair Manual, Engine mechanical 4JK1/4JJ1 model 6A 129-132, Available from: https://procarmanuals.com/pdf-online-isuzu-kb-p190- 2007-iworkshop-repair-manual, Access in: 20.01.2023.
  • [24] M. Givi, L. Cournoyer, G. Reain, B. Eves, Performance evaluation of a portable 3D imaging system, Precision Engineering 59 (2019) 156-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2019.06.002
  • [25] M. Wiater, G. Chladek, J. Żmudzki, FEM numerical simulation of contact stresses between driving shaft and hub impeller of fuel pump, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering 113/1 (2022) 13-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.0941
  • [26] K. Khaeroman, G. Haryadi, R. Ismail, S. Kim, Failure analysis and evaluation of a six cylinders crankshaft for marine diesel generator, AIP Conference Proceedings 1788 (2017) 030064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4968317
  • [27] T.P. Kersten, M. Lindstaedt, D. Starosta, Comparative geometrical accuracy investigation of hand-held 3D scanning systems-An update, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLII-2 (2018) 487-494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2- 487-2018
  • [28] A. Jiao, B. Liu, X. Chen, X. Zou, F. Wang, Fracture Failure Analysis of KL Crankshaft, Engineering Failure Analysis 112 (2020) 104498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104498
  • [29] M. Nargolkar, Analysis of crankshaft, International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research 5/4 (2017) 122-127.
  • [30] F.J. Jiménez-Espadafor, J.A. Becerra Villanueva, M. Torres García, Analysis of a diesel generator crankshaft failure, Engineering Failure Analysis 16/7 (2009) 2333-2341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.03.019
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-081fd333-d908-4cf1-9156-f50bea1f916d
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.