PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Ergonomic interventions in shaping the sustainable development of organizations

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: The aim of this article is to predict the impact of selected ergonomic interventions (EIs) on the variables of sustainable development of organizations (SDOs) in small and medium-sized enterprises in the fish food production industry. Design/methodology/approach: The study employed repetitive questionnaire assessments and workplace evaluations, including the use of measuring devices. The prediction results were compared with the evaluation of the ergonomics of the implemented EIs in the organization. Findings: Promising prediction results were obtained regarding the employee's task load. The predictions indicate the validity of applying EIs more broadly to achieve benefits for SDO. The results show a positive impact of automation on reducing the overall task load. Research limitations/implications: A limitation of the study is the sample size due to employment in a small enterprise and the limitations of the FCM Expert program. Practical implications: The study provides an analysis of the possibilities of applying ergonomic interventions (EI) in the fish food production industry and can be used to support decision-making in organizations that prioritize sustainable development. Social implications: The subject matter addressed in this study is important for ensuring human well-being by shaping appropriate working conditions. Originality/value: The originality of the study lies in the creation of a model for predicting the impact of ergonomic interventions (EI) on sustainable development outcomes (SDO) in the niche food industry of fish food production.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
621--637
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 31 poz.
Bibliografia
  • 1. Bolis, I., Brunoro, C.M., Sznelwar, L.I. (2014). Mapping the relationships between work and sustainability and the opportunities for ergonomic action. Applied Ergonomics, 45(4), 1225-1239.
  • 2. Bolis, I., Morioka, S.N., Brunoro, C.M., Sznelwar, L.I. (2013). Sustainability policies and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Ergonomics contribution regarding work in companies. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 57, No. 1. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, pp. 1080-1084.
  • 3. Butlewski, M., Dahlke, G., Drzewiecka-Dahlke, M., Hankiewicz, K., Górny, A., Gajsek, B. (2020). Use of the methodology of network thinking for a fatigue criteria investigation based on the example of mining companies. Tehnički Vjesnik [Technical Gazette], 27(4), 1037-1043.
  • 4. Cinar, A.B., Bilodeau, S. (2022). Sustainable workplace mental well-being for sustainable SMEs: How? Sustainability, 14(9), 5290.
  • 5. Costanza, R., Patten, B.C. (1995). Defining and predicting sustainability. Ecological Economics, 15(3), 193-196.
  • 6. Dekker, S.W., Hancock, P.A., Wilkin, P. (2013). Ergonomics and sustainability: Towards an embrace of complexity and emergence. Ergonomics, 56(3), 357-364.
  • 7. El-Namrouty, K.A., Abushaaban, M.S. (2013). Seven wastes elimination targeted by lean manufacturing case study "Gaza strip manufacturing firms". International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 1, 68-80.
  • 8. Fazlollahtabar, H. (2016). Parallel autonomous guided vehicle assembly line for a semicontinuous manufacturing system. Assembly Automation, 36, 262-273.
  • 9. Gajšek, B., Draghici, A., Boatca, M.E., Gaureanu, A., Robescu, D. (2022). Linking the use of ergonomics methods to workplace social sustainability: The Ovako working posture assessment system and rapid entire body assessment method. Sustainability, 14(7), 4301.
  • 10. Gaudez, C., Gilles, M.A., Savin, J. (2016). Intrinsic movement variability at work: How long is the path from motor control to design engineering? Applied Ergonomics, 53, 71-78.
  • 11. Genaidy, A.M., Sequeira, R., Rinder, M.M., A-Rehim, A.D. (2009). Determinants of business sustainability: An ergonomics perspective. Ergonomics, 52(3), 273-301.
  • 12. Gómez-Galán, M., Pérez-Alonso, J., Callejón-Ferre, Á.-J., Sánchez-Hermosilla-López, J. (2018). Assessment of postural load during melon cultivation in Mediterranean greenhouses. Sustainability, 10, 2729.
  • 13. Grabowski, S., Muraszkiewicz, M. (2017). Modelowanie ekosystemów informacyjnych dla innowacyjnych społeczności programistycznych. Zagadnienia Informacji Naukowej - Studia Informacyjne, 55(2(110)), 30-45.
  • 14. Haslam, R., Waterson, P. (2013). Ergonomics and sustainability. Ergonomics, 56(3), 343347.
  • 15. Kowalczyk, E. (2024). Proces starzenia się ludności Polski. Przyczyny i skutki. Wieś i Rolnictwo, 1(202), 7-40.
  • 16. Kushwaha, D.K., Kane, P.V. (2016). Ergonomic assessment and workstation design of shipping crane cabin in steel industry. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 52, 29-39.
  • 17. Lin, C.J., Efranto, R.Y., Santoso, M.A. (2021). Identification of workplace social sustainability indicators related to employee ergonomics perception in Indonesian industry. Sustainability, 13(19), 11069.
  • 18. Marilungo, E., Papetti, A., Germani, M., Peruzzini, M. (2017). From PSS to CPS design: A real industrial use case toward Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 64, 357-362.
  • 19. McCann, J., Kohntopp, T. (2017). Developing a sustainable environment for workplace diversity. International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management, 5(4), 347-365.
  • 20. Nápoles, G., Falcon, R., Papageorgiou, E., Bello, R., van den Herik, H.J. (2018). FCM Expert: Software tool for scenario analysis and pattern classification based on fuzzy cognitive maps. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, 27(7), 1860010. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218213018600102.
  • 21. Peng, T., Zhou, B. (2018). Scheduling multiple servers to facilitate just-in-time part-supply in automobile assembly lines. Assembly Automation, 38, 347-360.
  • 22. Poon, W.C., Herath, G., Sarker, A., Masuda, T., Kada, R. (2016). River and fish pollution in Malaysia: A green ergonomics perspective. Applied Ergonomics, 57, 80-93.
  • 23. Realyvásquez-Vargas, A., Arredondo-Soto, K.C., Blanco-Fernandez, J., SandovalQuintanilla, J.D., Jiménez-Macías, E., García-Alcaraz, J.L. (2020). Work standardization and anthropometric workstation design as an integrated approach to sustainable workplaces in the manufacturing industry. Sustainability, 12(9), 3728.
  • 24. Ren, C., Barlotti, C., Cohen, Y., Frangipane, B., Garofalo, M., Cozzari, G., Metz, C. (2015). Re-layout of an assembly area: A case study at Bosch Rexroth Oil Control. Assembly Automation, 35, 94-103.
  • 25. Romero, D., Stahre, J., Wuest, T., Noran, O., Bernus, P., Fast-Berglund, Å., Gorecky, D. (2016). Towards an operator 4.0 typology: A human-centric perspective on the fourth industrial revolution technologies. Proceedings of the international conference on computers and industrial engineering (CEI46), Tianjin, China, 29-31.
  • 26. Sarbat, I., Ozmehmet Tasan, S. (2020). A structural framework for sustainable processes in ergonomics. Ergonomics, 63(3), 346-366.
  • 27. Scott, P.A. (2008). Global inequality, and the challenge for ergonomics to take a more dynamic role to redress the situation. Applied Ergonomics, 39(4), 495-499.
  • 28. Sonmez, V., Testik, M.C., Testik, O.M. (2018). Overall equipment effectiveness when production speeds and stoppage durations are uncertain. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 95, 121-130.
  • 29. Thatcher, A., Yeow, P.H. (2016). Human factors for a sustainable future. Applied Ergonomics, 57, 1-7.
  • 30. Wróbel, K., Hoffmann, T., Czarnecki, K. (2020). Management of ergonomic interventions when modeling the technological processes in the Industry 4.0. Proceedings of the 36th International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA), Granada, Spain, 4-5 November 2020, pp. 3202-3211.
  • 31. Yeow, J.A., Ng, P.K., Tan, K.S., Chin, T.S., Lim, W.Y. (2014). Effects of stress, repetition, fatigue and work environment on human error in manufacturing industries. Journal of Applied Sciences, 14, 3464-3471.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-07829671-f764-499a-98e0-c6cd06b4c544
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.