Comprehensive analysis of navigational accidents using the MAART method: a novel examination of human error probability in maritime collisions and groundings

• Autorzy: Bowo Ludfi Pratiwi , Gusti Ayudhia Pangestu , Waskito Dwitya Harit , Puriningsih Feronika Sekar , Muhtadi Ahmad , Furusho Masao

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.18.03.10

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Navigational accidents are one of the most common types of maritime accidents, and they can result from various factors, including human error, adverse weather conditions, technical issues with the ship, or a combination of these factors. In this study, navigational accidents, including collision and grounding, that occurred in Germany were analysed using the MAART method. The novelty of this research lies in its detailed examination of the Human Error Probability (HEP) result, which has yet to be explored in previous studies. There are 47 collision cases and 15 grounding cases in the 13-year occurrence period. In total, 290 causal factors were found in the analysis. Furthermore, it is found that management, media, and machines are the main causal factors in navigational accidents in Germany. In collision accidents, management factors had the highest number of contributing factors, followed by media and machine factors. Contrary to grounding accidents, based on the results of the EPC, the machine factor had the highest number of contributing factors to accidents, followed by media and management. Finally, the human error probability values for collision accidents range from 0.06 to 1, averaging 0.54. In contrast, the HEP values for grounding accidents range from 0.0048 to 1, averaging 0.26.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

comprehensive methods; grounding accident; Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach; SHERPA; Human Error Probability; HEP; navigational accidents; collision; Technique for Human Error Rate Prediction; THERP; Maritime Accident Analysis and Reduction Techniques; MAART

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 18 No. 3
• Strony: 565--574
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 40 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Bowo Ludfi Pratiwi

• National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2407-2271

autor

Gusti Ayudhia Pangestu

• National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7946-4104

autor

Waskito Dwitya Harit

• National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0508-9799

autor

Puriningsih Feronika Sekar

• National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2088-2736

autor

Muhtadi Ahmad

• National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7974-566X

autor

Furusho Masao

• Kobe University, Kobe, Japan

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7085-7593

Bibliografia

• [1] Fan L, Wang M, Yin J. The impacts of risk level based on PSC inspection deficiencies on ship accident consequences. Research in Transportation Business and Management. 2019;33:100464.
• [2] Bowo LP, Mutmainnah W, Furusho M. The Development of Marine Accidents Human Reliability Assessment Approach: HEART Methodology and MOP Model. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation. 2017;11:63–68.
• [3] Li B, Pang FW. An approach of vessel collision risk assessment based on the D-S evidence theory. Ocean Engineering. 2013;74:16–21.
• [4] Weng J, Yang D. Investigation of shipping accident injury severity and mortality. Accid Anal Prev. 2015;76:92–101.
• [5] Weng J, Ge YE, Han H. Evaluation of Shipping Accident Casualties using Zero-inflated Negative Binomial Regression Technique. Journal of Navigation. 2016;69:433–448.
• [6] Ko YG, Kim SJ, Paik JK. Effects of a deformable striking ship’s bow on the structural crashworthiness in ship–ship collisions. Ships and Offshore Structures. 2018;13:228–250.
• [7] Kim K Il, Jeong JS, Lee BG. Study on the analysis of near-miss ship collisions using logistic regression. Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics. 2017;21:467–473.
• [8] Du L, Goerlandt F, Kujala P. Review and analysis of methods for assessing maritime waterway risk based on non-accident critical events detected from AIS data. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2020;200:106933.
• [9] Pedersen PT, Chen J, Zhu L. Design of bridges against ship collisions. Marine Structures. 2020;74:102810.
• [10] Chen J, Bian W, Wan Z, et al. Identifying factors influencing total-loss marine accidents in the world: Analysis and evaluation based on ship types and sea regions. Ocean Engineering. 2019;191:106495.
• [11] Chen J, Bian W, Wan Z, et al. Factor assessment of marine casualties caused by total loss. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2020;47:101560.
• [12] Kim K Il, Jeong JS, Lee BG. Study on the analysis of near-miss ship collisions using logistic regression. Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics. 2017;21:467–473.
• [13] Wang Y, Fu S. Framework for Process Analysis of Maritime Accidents Caused by the Unsafe Acts of Seafarers: A Case Study of Ship Collision. J Mar Sci Eng. 2022;10:1793.
• [14] Sujan MA, Embrey D, Huang H. On the application of Human Reliability Analysis in healthcare: Opportunities and challenges. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2020;194:0–1.
• [15] Helmreich RL. On error management: Lessons from aviation. Br Med J. 2000;320:781–785.
• [16] Kirimoto Y, Hirotsu Y, Nonose K, et al. Development of a human reliability analysis (HRA) guide for qualitative analysis with emphasis on narratives and models for tasks in extreme conditions. Nuclear Engineering and Technology. 2021;53:376–385.
• [17] Mirzaei Aliabadi M, Esmaeili R, Mohammadfam I, et al. Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) Using Standardized Plant Analysis Risk-Human (SPAR-H) and Bayesian Network (BN) for Pipeline Inspection Gauges (PIG) Operation: A Case Study in a Gas Transmission Plant. Health Scope. 2019;8.
• [18] Di Pasquale V, Miranda S, Iannone R, et al. A Simulator for Human Error Probability Analysis (SHERPA). Reliab Eng Syst Saf [Internet]. 2015;139:17–32. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832015000484.
• [19] Ramezani A, Nazari T, Rabiee A, et al. Human error probability quantification for NPP post-accident analysis using Cognitive-Based THERP method. Progress in Nuclear Energy. 2020;123:103281.
• [20] Gibson WH, Kirwan B. Application of the CARA HRA tool to air traffic management safety cases. 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management 2008, PSAM 2008. 2008;2:1312–1319.
• [21] Wang W, Liu X, Qin Y. A modified HEART method with FANP for human error assessment in high-speed railway dispatching tasks. Int J Ind Ergon. 2018;67:242–258.
• [22] Deacon T, Amyotte PR, Khan FI, et al. A framework for human error analysis of offshore evacuations. Saf Sci. 2013;51:319–327.
• [23] Akyuz E, Celik M. A methodological extension to human reliability analysis for cargo tank cleaning operation on board chemical tanker ships. Saf Sci. 2015;75:146–155.
• [24] Bowo LP, Furusho M. A comparison of the common causes of maritime accidents in Canada, Indonesia, Japan, Australia, and England. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer International Publishing; 2019.
• [25] Islam R, Abbassi R, Garaniya V, et al. Development of a human reliability assessment technique for the maintenance procedures of marine and offshore operations. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2017;50:416–428.
• [26] Akyuz E, Celik M. A methodological extension to human reliability analysis for cargo tank cleaning operation on board chemical tanker ships. Saf Sci. 2015;75:146–155.
• [27] De Maya BN, Kurt RE. Application of fuzzy cognitive maps to investigate the contributors of maritime grounding accidents. RINA, Royal Institution of Naval Architects - Human Factors 2018, Papers. 2018;44.
• [28] Wang W, Liu X, Qin Y. A modified HEART method with FANP for human error assessment in high-speed railway dispatching tasks. Int J Ind Ergon. 2018;67:242–258.
• [29] Bowo LP, Prilana RE, Furusho M. A modified heart-4m method with topsis for analyzing Indonesia collision accidents. TransNav. 2020;14:751–759.
• [30] Bowo LP, Ispandiari AR, Wibowo DA, et al. Maritime accident analysis and reduction technique for analysing maritime collision accidents. Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs [Internet]. 2024;0:1–28. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2024.2350792.
• [31] Mazaheri A, Montewka J, Kujala P. Correlation between the Ship Grounding Accident and the Ship Traffic – A Case Study Based on the Statistics of the Gulf of Finland. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation. 2013;7:119–124.
• [32] Mazaheri A, Montewka J, Nisula J, et al. Usability of accident and incident reports for evidence-based risk modeling – A case study on ship grounding reports. Saf Sci. 2015;76:202–214.
• [33] Bowo LP. A NEW METHODOLOGY ON HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS FOR SHIP SAFETY: Maritime Accident Analysis and Reduction Technique (MAART). Kobe University; 2021.
• [34] Bowo LP, Furusho M. Integrated methods for analysing the causal factors in Australian maritime occupational accidents. Int J Human Factors and Ergonomics. 2021;8:23–25.
• [35] Kamis AS, Fuad AFA, Anwar AQ, et al. A systematic scoping review on ship accidents due to off-track manoeuvring: A systematic scoping review on ship accidents due to off-track manoeuvring. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2022.
• [36] ITF. STCW: A Guide for Seafarers: Taking into account the 2010 Manila amendments. International Transport Workers’ Federation,. 2010;78p.
• [37] Chauvin C, Lardjane S, Morel G, et al. Human and organisational factors in maritime accidents: Analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;59:26–37.
• [38] Kamis AS, Fuad AFA, Saadon MSI, et al. the Impact of Basic Training on Seafarers’ Safety Knowledge, Attitude and Behaviour. J Sustain Sci Manag. 2020;15:137–158.
• [39] Parrott DS. Bridge Resource Management for Small Ships: The Watchkeeper’s Manual for Limited-tonnage Vessels. McGraw Hill Professional; 2011.
• [40] Salas E, Rosen MA, Burke CS, et al. Markers for enhancing team cognition in complex environments: The power of team performance diagnosis. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007;78.

Uwagi

Pełne imiona podano na stronie internetowej czasopisma.

Authors in other databases.