Managing e-learning in public universities by investigating the role of culture

• Autorzy: Sarbaini , Jumadi , Abbas Ersis Warmansyah , Rajiani Ismi

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2019.20.1.34

Warianty tytułu

PL

Zarządzanie e-nauczaniem w uniwersytecie publicznym przez podniesienie roli kultury

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The phenomenal growth of e-learning in the developed countries makes Indonesia going with the trend by investing massively in Information Technology and Communication (ICT) to push the country into a knowledge economy. However, e-learning - as the implementation of ICT in higher education - is not without challenges and failures as the technology cannot be perceived as a panacea. Many researchers and practitioners have acknowledged that e-learning as a future prospective medium of instruction encounters difficulties and challenges to implement successfully. The objective of study is to investigate the influential adoption factors to adopt new technologies drawn from recent technology adoption theories. Further, the present study examines the moderating impact of one Hofstede’s national culture dimensions (individualism-collectivism) toward adoption factors in adopting e-learning technology. The empirical data, which consists of 200 valid datasets, were collected from lecturers in Indonesia via self-administered paper-based questionnaire, and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was employed. The finding of this research advances our understanding of the dynamics of e-learning technologies and refines existing conclusions about perspectives of educators towards the adoption process of e-learning technologies. Further, the current gap between developed and developing countries on the effects of cultural dimensions provide an original reference on how the culture side influences the individuals’ behaviors when adopting new technology.

PL

Fenomenalny rozwój e-learningu w krajach rozwiniętych sprawia, że Indonezja podąża za tym trendem, inwestując masowo w technologie informacyjne i komunikacyjne (ICT), aby pchnąć kraj w gospodarkę opartą na wiedzy. Jednak e-learning podobnie jak wdrażanie ICT w szkolnictwie wyższym - nie jest pozbawiony wyzwań i porażek, ponieważ technologii nie można postrzegać jako panaceum. Wielu badaczy i praktyków przyznało, że e-learning jako przyszłe przyszłe medium nauczania napotyka trudności i wyzwania, które należy skutecznie wdrożyć. W artykule przedstawiono badania wpływowych czynników akceptacji w celu przyjęcia nowych technologii zaczerpniętych z najnowszych teorii adaptowania technologii. Ponadto w badaniu przeanalizowano moderujący wpływ jednego z narodowych wymiarów kultury Hofstede (indywidualizm-kolektywizm) na czynniki adaptacyjne przy wdrażaniu technologii e-learningu. Dane empiryczne, które składają się z 200 ważnych zestawów danych, zostały zebrane wśród wykładowców w Indonezji za pomocą kwestionariusza w formie papierowej i zastosowania modelowania równań strukturalnych (SEM). Wyniki tych badań przyspieszą nasze zrozumienie dynamiki technologii e-learningu i udoskonalą istniejące wnioski dotyczące perspektyw nauczycieli w zakresie procesu wdrażania technologii e-learningu. Ponadto obecna luka między krajami rozwiniętymi i rozwijającymi się w zakresie wpływu wymiarów kulturowych stanowi oryginalne odniesienie do tego, w jaki sposób kultura wpływa na zachowania jednostek podczas przyjmowania nowych technologii.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

e-learning; culture; technology acceptance; Indonesia

PL

e-learning; kultura; akceptacja technologii; Indonezja

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 20, No. 1
• Strony: 394--404
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Sarbaini

• Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia

autor

Jumadi

• Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia

autor

Abbas Ersis Warmansyah

• Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia

autor

Rajiani Ismi

• Muhammadiyah University of Gresik, Indonesia

Bibliografia

• 1. A’ang Subiyakto, A., Ahlan, R., Kartiwi, M., Hakiem, N., Huda, M.Q. & Susanto, A. (2018). The Information System Project Profiles among Universities in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 12(2).
• 2. Akhtar, R., Alam, S. & Siddiquee, N.K.A. (2019). Telemedicine: an ICT based healthcare approach to ensure health service for all. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 6(9).
• 3. Alraja, M.N. (2016). The effect of social influence and facilitating conditions on e-government acceptance from the individual employees’ perspective. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 14(2).
• 4. Ariel, Y., Elishar-Malka, V. (2019). Learning in the smartphone era: Viewpoints and perceptions on both sides of the lectern. Education and Information Technologies, 1-12.
• 5. Caporarello, L., Sarchioni, G. (2014). E-learning: the recipe for success. Journal of e-learning and Knowledge Society, 10(1).
• 6. Chin W.W. (2010). Bootstrap cross-validation indices for PLS path model assessment, Springer.
• 7. Giglio, A. (2019). Practicing the Oral Production Skills in E-Learning Contexts: Is It Still an Achilles’ Heel? [In:] Teaching Language and Teaching Literature in Virtual Environments, Springer.
• 8. Guspatni, M. (2018). Students’ activities in, perceptions of and expectations for e-learning: A case in Indonesia. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal,10(1).
• 9. Hair, J.E., Andersson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. & Black, W.C. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International.
• 10. Hair Jr, J.F., Matthews, L.M., Matthews, R.L. & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2).
• 11. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1).
• 12. Huang, F., Teo, T., Sánchez-Prieto, J.C., García-Peñalvo, F.J. & Olmos-Migueláñez, S. (2019). Cultural values and technology adoption: A model comparison with university teachers from China and Spain. Computers & Education, 133.
• 13. Johansen, J.S., Tkachenko, E. (2019). Exploring the dynamics of cultures of learning in internationalised higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(5).
• 14. Kim, B., Park, M.J. (2018). Effect of personal factors to use ICTs on e-learning adoption: comparison between learner and instructor in developing countries. Information Technology for Development, 24(4).
• 15. Kot, S., Tan, M. & Dragolea, L. (2017). The use of social media supporting studying. Economics & Sociology, 10(1).
• 16. Minkov, M., Dutt, P., Schachner, M., Morales, O., Sanchez, C., Jandosova, J., Khassenbekov, Y. & Mudd, B. (2017). A revision of Hofstede’s individualism-collectivism dimension: A new national index from a 56-country study. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 24(3).
• 17. Minkov, M. (2018). A revision of Hofstede’s model of national culture: old evidence and new data from 56 countries. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 25(2).
• 18. Pretorius, R.W., Anderson, R., Khotoo, A. & Pienaar, R., 2019, Creating a context for campus sustainability through teaching and learning: The case of open, distance and e-learning. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(3).
• 19. Rajiani I., Kot S. (2018). The Prospective Consumers of the Indonesian Green Aviation Initiative for Sustainable Development in Air Transportation. Sustainability, 10(6).
• 20. Rajiani, I., Pypłacz, P. (2018). National culture as modality in managing the carbon economy in Southeast Asia. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(1).
• 21. Rajiani, I., Ismail, N. (2019). Management Innovation in Balancing Technology Innovation to Harness Universities Performance in the Era of Community 4.0. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(1).
• 22. Rufín, R., Bélanger, F., Molina, C.M., Carter, L. & Figueroa, J.C.S. (2018). A cross-cultural comparison of electronic government adoption in Spain and the USA. [In:] Technology adoption and social issues: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications, IGI Global.
• 23. Saleem, N.E., Al-Saqri, M.N. & Ahmad, S.E. (2016). Acceptance of Moodle as a teaching/learning tool by the faculty of the department of information studies at Sultan Qaboos University, Oman based on UTAUT. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology, 6(2).
• 24. Slade, E.L., Dwivedi, Y.K., Piercy, N.C. & Williams, M.D. (2015). Modeling consumers’ adoption intentions of remote mobile payments in the United Kingdom: extending UTAUT with innovativeness, risk, and trust. Psychology & Marketing, 32(8).
• 25. Smoląg, K., Ślusarczyk, B. & Kot, S. (2016). The role of social media in management of relational capital in universities. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 9(10).
• 26. Sroka, M., Tabor, J. (2016). The E-learning Course of Technical Prevention and Occupational Risk Systems, [In:] Present Day Trends of Innovations, 6 (Eds.) Varkoly, L., Szczebiot, R., Zabovsky, M., Printing House of Lomza State University of Applied Sciences, p.168-175.
• 27. Tarhini, A., Hone, K., Liu, X. & Tarhini, T. (2017). Examining the moderating effect of individual-level cultural values on users’ acceptance of E-learning in developing countries: a structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(3).
• 28. Triana, N., Rajiani, I. (2019). Interprofessional education module in achieving ethics/values, roles, responsibilities, professional communication competencies, and team collaboration among the college of health students. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 10(1).
• 29. Triandis, H.C. (2018). Individualism and collectivism, New York: Routledge.
• 30. Smith, C. (2016). The conceptual incoherence of “culture” in American Sociology. The American Sociologist, 47(4).
• 31. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y., Chan, F.K., Hu, P.J.H. & Brown, S.A. (2011). Extending the two‐stage information systems continuance model: Incorporating UTAUT predictors and the role of context. Information Systems Journal, 21(6).

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).