PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

An assessment of the impact of logistics and related infrastructure on the economy : a comparative analysis of the Visegrad countries

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Ocena wpływu logistyki i powiązanej infrastruktury na gospodarkę : analiza porównawcza krajów wyszehradzkich
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
On a global scale, effective logistics and the management thereof are critical for sustainable economic growth. Logistics are seen as the support sector of the economy that ‘oils the wheels’ for growth. The objective of the study was to analyse the impact of the logistics sector and related infrastructure on economic activities. The focus of the study was on the four Visegrad countries and a quantitative research methodology was followed. A three-phased data analysis approach was followed. Firstly, a descriptive comparative data analysis was completed; secondly, a comparative logistics index was constructed; and lastly, secondary panel time series data were used to determine the relationships between variables using Granger causality tests. In terms of results, Poland had the highest economic logistics index, followed by the Czech Republic, Slovakia and lastly, Hungary. From the literature review and data analysis, well-developed, managed and maintained logistic infrastructure could significantly enhance economic growth. Development policies should be directed to such strategies. The scientific contribution of the research is the formulation of the comparative logistics index.
PL
W skali globalnej efektywna logistyka i zarządzanie nią ma kluczowe znaczenie dla zrównoważonego wzrostu gospodarczego. Logistyka jest postrzegana jako sektor wsparcia gospodarki, który „oliwa koła” dla wzrostu. Celem badania była analiza wpływu sektora logistyki i związanej z nią infrastruktury na działalność gospodarczą. W badaniu skoncentrowano się na czterech krajach wyszehradzkich i zastosowano metodologię badań ilościowych. Zastosowano trójfazową analizę danych. Po pierwsze, zakończono opisową analizę porównawczą danych; po drugie, skonstruowano porównawczy indeks logistyczny; i wreszcie, dane szeregów czasowych panelu wtórnego wykorzystano do określenia związków między zmiennymi za pomocą testów przyczynowości Grangera. Pod względem wyników najwyższy wskaźnik logistyki gospodarczej miała Polska, za nią plasowały się Czechy, Słowacja i wreszcie Węgry. Z przeglądu literatury i analizy danych wynika, że dobrze rozwinięta, zarządzana i utrzymywana infrastruktura logistyczna może znacznie zwiększyć wzrost gospodarczy. Polityka rozwojowa powinna być ukierunkowana na takie strategie. Wkład naukowy badań polega na sformułowaniu porównawczego wskaźnika logistycznego.
Rocznik
Strony
295--309
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 40 poz., tab.
Twórcy
  • University of Johannesburg, College of Business and Economics
Bibliografia
  • 1. Arvis, J., Mustra, M. A., Panzer, J., Ojala, L. and Naula, T., (2008). Connecting to compete: Trade logistics in the global economy. In R. Z. Lawrence, J. Blanke, M. D. Hanous and J. Moavenzadeh. The Global Enabling Trade Report. Geneva: The World Economic Forum.
  • 2. Bensassi, S., Márquez-Ramos, L., Martínez-Zarzoso, I. and Suárez-Burguet, C., (2015). Relationship between logistics infrastructure and trade: Evidence from Spanish regional exports. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 72, 47-61.
  • 3. Catalbas, N., (2012). Lojistik ilkeleri [Logistics principles]. Anadolu Universitesi Acikogretim Yayinları [Anadolu University Open Education Publications]. Yayın No: 2517
  • 4. Christopher, M.I., (2017). Logistics & supply chain management. 4th Edition. London. Peason.
  • 5. Chu, Z., (2012). Logistics and economic growth: a panel data approach. The Annals of Regional Science, 49(1), 87-102.
  • 6. Coto-Milán, P., Agüeros, M., Casares-Hontañón, P. and Pesquera, M., (2013). Impact of Logistics Performance on World Economic growth (2007-2012). World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, 4(4), 300-310.
  • 7. D’Aleo, V., Sergi, B.S., (2017). Does logistics influence economic growth? The European experience. Management Decision, 55(8), 1-19.
  • 8. Dhonde, B., Patel, C.R., (2020). Implementing circular economy concepts for sustainable urban freight transport: Case of textile manufacturing supply chain. Acta Logistica, 7(2), 131-143.
  • 9. Gleissner, H., Femerling J.C., (2013). Logistical Infrastructure. In: Logistics. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham.
  • 10. Gudehus, T. & Kotzab, H., (2012). Comprehensive logistics. Springer Science & Business Media.
  • 11. Hausman, W.H., Lee, H.L. and Subramanian, U., (2013). The impact of logistics performance on trade. Production and Operations Management, 22(2), 236-252.
  • 12. Hayaloglu, P., (2015). The impact of developments in the logistics sector on economic growth: The case of OECD countries. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(2), 523-530.
  • 13. Havenga, J., (2010). Logistics costs in South Africa - The case for macroeconomic measurement. South African Journal of Economics, 78(4), 460-476.
  • 14. Kot, S., Rajiani, I., (2020). Testing and identifying variable dependency through the Fisher exact test in central Europe enterprises. Ekonomicko-manazerske spektrum, 14(1), 10-18.
  • 15. Kramar, U., Sternad, M. and Cvahte, T., (2015). Logistics performance and its connection to competitiveness of the national economy in Slovenia and the Visegrad Group. European Perspectives, 7(2), 83-94.
  • 16. Kuzu, S., Önder, E., (2014). Research into the long-run relationship between logistics development and economic growth in Turkey. Journal of Logistics Management, 3(1), 11-16.
  • 17. Lean, H.H., Huang, W. and Hong, J., (2014). Logistics and economic development: Experience from China. Transport Policy, 32, 96-104.
  • 18. Liu, X., (2016). The impact of logistics costs on the economic development: The case of Thailand. Business and Public Administration Studies, 10(1), 37-42.
  • 19. Maiden, T., (2020). How big is the logistics industry? https://www.freightwaves.com. Accessed on 28 June 2020.
  • 20. Mangan, J. & Lalwani, C.C., (2016). Global logistics and supply chain management. John Wiley & Sons.
  • 21. Meyer, N., Meyer, D.F., (2019). Examining the impact of entrepreneurial activity on employment and economic growth: The case of the Visegrád countries. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 20(1), 277-292.
  • 22. Munim, Z.H., Schramm, H.J., (2018). The impacts of port infrastructure and logistics performance on economic growth: the mediating role of seaborne trade. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 3(1), 1-12.
  • 23. Oláh, J., Sadaf, R., Máté, D. and Popp, J., (2019). The Influence of the Management Success Factors of Logistics Service Providers on Firms’ Competitiveness. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 17(1), 175-193.
  • 24. Oláh, J., Nestler, S., Nobel, T. and Popp, J., (2018a). Ranking of dry ports in Europe-Benchmarking. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 46(2), 95-100.
  • 25. Oláh, J., Nestler, S., Nobel, T. and Popp, J., (2018b). International characteristics of the macro-logistics system of Freight Villages. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 46(4), 194-200.
  • 26. Petriková, A., Trebuňa, P., (2017). Application of selected logistic methods in the area of supply logistics. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 22(3), 323-334.
  • 27. Rietveld, P., Bruinsma, F., (2012). Is transport infrastructure effective? Transport infrastructure and accessibility: Impacts on the space economy. Springer Science & Business Media.
  • 28. Rodrigues, A.M., Bowersox, D.J. and Calantone, R.J., (2005). Estimation of global and national logistics expenditures: 2002 data update. Journal of Business Logistics, 26(2), 1-16.
  • 29. Sadaf, R., Oláh, J., Popp, J. and Máté, D., (2018). An investigation of the influence of the worldwide governance and competitiveness on accounting fraud cases: A cross-country perspective. Sustainability, 10(3).
  • 30. Sánchez, R.J, Cipoletta, T.G. and Perrotti, D.E., (2012). Is Logistics Performance a Determinant of Economic Development? IAME Annual Conference, Santiago, Chile.
  • 31. Sánchez, R.J., Tomassian, G.C. and Perrotti, D.E., (2014). Economic development and logistics performance. A probabilistic approach. Revista de Economía Mundial, (38), 27-47.
  • 32. Sezer, S., & Abasiz, T., (2017). The impact of logistics industry on economic growth: An application in OECD countries. Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 11-23.
  • 33. Sezer, Ö., Çavuşoğlu, H., (2018). Assessment of the Globalization and Local Development Relationship in Terms of Political Risk Factors. In Strategic Design and Innovative Thinking in Business Operations (pp. 349-371). Springer, Cham.
  • 34. Shpak, N., Dvulit, Z., Luchnikova, T. and Sroka, W., (2018). Strategic development of cargo transit services: a case study analysis, Engineering Management in Production and Services, 10(4), 76-84.
  • 35. Skorobogatova, O., Kuzmina-Merlino, I., (2017). Transport infrastructure development performance. Procedia Engineering, 178, 319-329.
  • 36. Sroka, W., (2015). Sieci logistyczne: wybrane aspekty tworzenia i funkcjonowania, Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach: Zarządzanie, 217(1), 44-55.
  • 37. Szymonik, A., (2013). Transport Economics for Logistics and Logisticians. Theory and Practice. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Andrzej_Szymonik/publication/297369663_Transport_Economics_for_Logistics_and_Logisticians_Theory_and_Practice/links/56de9e9c08aedf2bf0c9bd01/Transport-Economics-for-Logistics-and-Logisticians-Theory-and-Practice.pdf. Accessed on 15 May 2020.
  • 38. Wood, D.F., Barone, A., Murphy, P. and Wardlow, D., (2012). International logistics. Springer Science & Business Media.
  • 39. World Bank (WB). (2020). Development Indicators data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator. Accessed on 23 May 2020.
  • 40. World Economic Forum (WEF). (2020). Global Competitiveness Index. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf. Accessed on 24 May 2020.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-06d11849-c2bc-4a1d-aa2d-dfd2cbe6beb6
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.