Application of diatoms to assess the quality of the waters of the Baryczka stream, left-side tributary of the River San

• Autorzy: Noga T. , Stanek-Tarkowska J. , Kochman N , Peszek Ł. , Pajączek A , Woźniak K.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/2081139X.1055818

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The Baryczka stream is a small (about 20 km long), left bank tributary of the River San (Podkarpackie Voivodeship). Studies on diversity of diatom communities using OMNIDIA software were conducted in 2010 and 2011. Diatomaceous indices IPS, GDI and TDI and Van Dam et al. classification system were used for water quality assessment. Planothidium lanceolatum, Cocconeis placentula var. lineata, Achnanthidium minutissimum var. minutissimum, Nitzschia linearis, Rhoicosphenia abbreviata, Navicula lanceolata and Naicula gregaria were the most numerous. Values of the IPS index indicate good water quality (II–III class). Based on the GDI index, waters of the Baryczka stream were classified to III class water quality. The TDI index indicated poor and bad ecological state on the most sampling sites. On all sampling sites alaliphilous (pH>7) diatoms taxa predominated. The most common were eutraphentic and hypereutraphentic diatoms. With respect to trophy, it was shown that α- and β-mesosaprobous diatoms were the most common (III and II class water quality).

Słowa kluczowe

EN

diatoms (Bacillariophyceae); diatoms indices IPS; GDI; TDI; water quality; diversity; ecology; Baryczka stream

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: Vol. 14, nr 3
• Strony: 8--23
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 55 poz., tab., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Noga T.

• Department of Biological Foundations of Agriculture and Environmental Education, Faculty of Biology and Agriculture, University of Rzeszów, Ćwiklińskiej 2, 35–601 Rzeszów, Poland

autor

Stanek-Tarkowska J.

• Department of Soil Studies, Environmental Chemistry and Hydrology, Faculty of Biology and Agriculture, University of Rzeszów, Ćwiklińskiej 2, 35–601 Rzeszów, Poland

autor

Kochman N

• Department of Biological Foundations of Agriculture and Environmental Education, Faculty of Biology and Agriculture, University of Rzeszów, Ćwiklińskiej 2, 35–601 Rzeszów, Poland

autor

Peszek Ł.

• International Doctoral Studies in Natural Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Agriculture, University of Rzeszów, Ćwiklińskiej 2, 35–601 Rzeszów, Poland

autor

Pajączek A

• Department of Soil Studies, Environmental Chemistry and Hydrology, Faculty of Biology and Agriculture, University of Rzeszów, Ćwiklińskiej 2, 35–601 Rzeszów, Poland

autor

Woźniak K.

• Department of Biological Foundations of Agriculture and Environmental Education, Faculty of Biology and Agriculture, University of Rzeszów, Ćwiklińskiej 2, 35–601 Rzeszów, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Bernat P., Noga T. 2012. Różnorodność zbiorowisk okrzemek potoku Trzcianka. Rocznik Przemyski, 48(3), 29–44.
• 2. Bogaczewicz-Adamczak B., Dziengo M. 2003 – Using benthic diatom communities and diatom indices to assess water pollution in the Pucka Bay (Southern Baltic Sea) littoral zone – Oceanol. Hy¬drobiol. St., 32(4), 131-157.
• 3. Bogaczewicz-Adamczak B., Kłosińska D., Zgrundo A. 2001 – Diatoms as indicators of water pollution in the coastal zone of the Gulf of Gdańsk (southern Baltic Sea) – Oceanol. Hydrobiol. St., 30(3-4), 59-75.
• 4. CEMAGREF 1982. Etude des méthodes biologiques quantitative d’appréciation de la qualité des eaux. Rapport Division Qualité des Eaux Lyon – Agence financiére de Bassin Rhone – Méditer-ranée – Corse, Pierre –Bénite, pp. 218.
• 5. Coste M., Ayphassorho H. 1991 – Étude de la qualité des eaux du Bassin Artois–Picardie a l`aide des communautés de diatomées benthiques (Application des indices diatomiques) – Raport Cemagref. Bordeaux – Agence de l`Eau Artois–Picardie, Douai, pp. 277.
• 6. Dumnicka E., Jelonek M., Klich M., Kwandrans J., Agata W., Żurek R. 2006. Ichtiofauna i status ekologiczny wód Wisły, Raby, Dunajca i Wisłoki. Copyright by Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences. Kraków, pp. 220.
• 7. Hofmann G., Werum M., Lange-Bertalot H. 2011. Diatomeen im Süβwasser – Benthos vom Mitteleuropa. Bestimmungsflora Kieselalgen für die ökologische Praxis. Über 700 der häufigsten Arten und ihre Ökologie. [In:] H. Lange-Bertalot. (ed.), A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G., pp. 908.
• 8. Kawecka B. 1993. Zbiorowiska glonów osiadłych w potokach Kotliny Zakopiańskiej. Monogr. Kotliny Zakopiańskiej – poznanie, przemiany, zagrożenie, ochrona. [In:] Z. Mirek, H. Piękoś- Mirkowa (eds). Tatry i Podtatrze 2. Kraków – Zakopane, 209–217.
• 9. Kawecka B. 2012. Diatom diversity in streams of the Tatra National Park (Poland) as indicator of environmental conditions. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, pp. 213.
• 10. Kawecka, B., Kwandrans, J. 2000. Diversity of flora and fauna in running waters of the Province of Cracow (southern Poland) in relation to water guality. Acta Hydrobiol., 42(3/4), 145–173.
• 11. Kawecka B., Sanecki J. 2003. Didymosphenia geminata in running waters of southern Poland – Symptoms of change in water quality? Hydrobiol., 495, 193–201.
• 12. Kawecka B., Kwandrans J., Szyjkowski A. 1996. Use of algae for monitoring rivers in Poland [In:] Whitton B. A., Rott E. (eds) Use of algae for monitoring rivers II, Institut für Botanik, Universität Innsbruck, 137–141.
• 13. Kawecka B., Kwandrans J., Szyjkowski A. 1999. Use of algae for monitoring rivers in Poland – Situation and development. [In:] Use of algae for monitoring rivers III. J. Prygiel, B.A. Whitton, J. Bukowska (eds), Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie, 57–65.
• 14. Kelly M.G. 2003. Short term dynamics of diatoms in an upland stream and implications for monitoring eutrophication. Environmental Pollution, 125, 117–122.
• 15. Kelly M.G., Whitton B.A. 1995. The Trophic Diatom Index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. J. Appl. Phycol., 7, 433–444.
• 16. Kelly M.G., Juggins S., Guthrie R., Pritchard S., Jamieson J., Rippey B., Hirst H., Yallop M. 2008. Assessment of ecological status in U.K. rivers using diatoms. Freshwater Biology, 53, 403–422.
• 17. Krammer K., Lange-Bertalot H. 1986–1991. Bac¬illariophyceae. 1–4. [In:] Ettl H., J. Gerloff, H. Heyning., D. Mollenhauer (eds), Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa 2(1–4). G. Fischer Verlag, Stutt-gart – New York – Jena.
• 18. Krammer K. 2000. The genus Pinnularia. Vol. 1. [In:] H. Lange-Bertalot (ed) Diatoms of Europe. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G., pp. 703.
• 19. Krammer K. 2002. Cymbella. [In:] Diatoms of Eu¬rope 3. H. Lange-Bertalot (ed.), A.R.G., Gantner Verlag K.G., Rugell., pp. 584.
• 20. Krammer K. 2003. Cymbopleura, Delicata, Navi¬cymbula, Gomphocymbellopsis, Afrocymbella. [In:] Diatoms of Europe 4. H. Lange-Bertalot (ed.), A.R.G., Gantner Verlag K.G., Rugell., pp. 530.
• 21. Kwandrans J. 2002. Upper Vistula River: Response of aquatic communities on pollution and impound¬ment. IX. Benthic diatom communities. Polish J. of Ecology, 50(2), 223–236.
• 22. Kwandrans J., Eloranta P., Kawecka B., Wojtan K. 1998. Use of benthic diatom communities to evaluate water quality in rivers of southern Poland. J. Appl. Phycol., 10, 193–201.
• 23. Lange-Bertalot H. 1993. 83 New taxa and much more than 100 taxonomic clarifications supplementary to Süβwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Vol. 2/1-4. J. Cramer, Berlin – Stuttgart.
• 24. Lange-Bertalot H. 2001. Navicula sensu stricto. 10 genera separated from Navicula sensu lato. Frustulia. [In:] H. Lange-Bertalot (ed.) Diatoms of Europe. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G., pp. 526.
• 25. Lange-Bertalot H., Metzeltin D. 1996. Indicators of Oligotrophy. 800 taxa Represantative of three ecologically discint lake types. Carbonate bufferd – Oligodistrphie – Weakly bufferd soft water. Koeltz Scientic Books, Köningstein.
• 26. Lecointe C., Coste M., Prygiel J. 1993. OMNIDIA: software for taxonomy, calculation of diatom indices and inventories management. Hydrobiol., 269/270, 509–513.
• 27. Levkov Z. 2009. Amphora sensu lato. [In:] H. Lange-Bertalot (ed.) Diatoms of Europe 5. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G., pp. 916.
• 28. Mucha Ł., Musiałek M., Noga T., Pajączek A., Paśko M., Pelczar J. 2009. Różnorodność glonów w wodach Wielopolki, Różanki, Mleczki i Morwawy [In:] P. Skubała (ed.) Homo naturalis. Przy¬rodnicze, społeczne i ekonomiczne aspekty rozwoju zrównoważonego. Word Press, Katowice, 203–210.
• 29. Noga T. 2005. Różnorodność flory okrzemek w wodach płynących na terenie Działów Orawskich i Kotliny Orawskiej. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków, Poland.
• 30. Noga T. 2012. Diversity of diatom communities in the Wisłok River (SE Poland). [In:] Wołowski, K., Kaczmarska, I., Ehrman, J.M., Wojtal, A.Z. (eds), Phycological Reports: Current advances in algal taxonomy and its applications: phylogenetic, ecological and applied perspective. Institute of Botany Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, 109–128.
• 31. Noga T., Peszek Ł. 2011. Occurence of diatoms from the genus Pinnularia in rivers and streams of the Podkarpacie Region. [In:] Book of abstract XXX International Conference of the Polish Phycological Society, J. Matuła et al. (eds.), Wrocław– Pawłowice, 162–163.
• 32. Noga T., Stanek-Tarkowska J., Irlik E., Soliwoda K., Peszek Ł. 2012a. Nowe stanowiska Didymo¬sphenia geminata w Ropie i Białej Tarnowskiej (Polska południowa). Inżynieria Ekologiczna, 30, 257–265.
• 33. Noga T., Stanek-Tarkowska J., Kocielska-Streb M., Kowalska S., Ligęzka R., Kloc U., Peszek Ł. 2012b. Endangered and rare species of diatoms in running and standing waters on the territory of Rzeszów and the surrounding area. [In:] J. Kostecka, J. Kaniuczak (eds.), Practical Applications of Environmental Research. Nauka dla Gospodarki, 3, 331–340.
• 34. Noga T., Stanek-Tarkowska J., Peszek Ł., Pajączek A., Kowalska S. 2013. Use of diatoms to asses water quality of anthropogenically modified Matysówka stream. Journal of Ecological Engineer¬ing, 14(2), 1–11.
• 35. Noga T., Siry K. 2010. Różnorodność flory okrze¬mek w potoku Łubienka (Pogórze Dynowskie, Polska SE). Zeszyty naukowe PTIE i PTG, 12, 75–86.
• 36. Pajączek A., Musiałek M., Pelczar J., Noga T. 2012. Diversity of diatoms in the Mleczka River, Morwawa River and Różanka Stream (tributaries of the Wisłok River, SE Poland), with particular reference to threatened species. [In:] Phycological Reports: Current advances in algal taxonomy and its applications: phylogenetic, ecological and applied perspective, K. Wołowski, I. Kaczmarska, J.M. Ehrman, A.Z. Wojtal (eds). Institute of Botany Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, 129–152.
• 37. Peszek Ł. 2012. Zastosowanie okrzemek w ocenie jakości wód potoku Żołynianka (Pradolina Podkarpacka, Polska SE). Unpublished master disserta¬tion, Uniwersytet Rzeszowski, Rzeszów.
• 38. Peszek Ł., Noga T., Stanek-Tarkowska J., Irlik E., Kochman N., Kowalska S., Ligęzka R., Woźniak K. 2012. Diatoms as indicators of water quality in south-eastern Poland. [In:] Algae in human’s envi¬ronment. Taxonomy, ecology and role in ecological status assessment. J. Hutorowicz, A. Napiórkows¬ka-Krzebietke (red.), Book of abstract XXXI International Conference of the Polish Phycological Society, Olsztyn, pp. 75.
• 39. Prygiel J. 2002. Mangement of the diatom monitoring network in France. J. Appl. Phycol., 14, 19–26.
• 40. Prygiel J., Coste M. 1993. The assessment of water quality in the Artois–Picardie water basin (France) by the use of diatom indices. Hydrobiol., 269/270, 343–349.
• 41. 41. Prygiel J., Coste M. 1999. Progress in the use of diatoms for monitoring rivers in France. [In:] Use of algae for monitoring rivers III. J. Prygiel, B.A. Whitton, J. Bukowska (eds), Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie, 165–179.
• 42. Rakowska B. 2001. Studium różnorodności okrze¬mek ekosystemów Polski niżowej. Rozprawy Habilitacyjne UŁ. Wydawnictwo UŁ, Łódź, pp. 77.
• 43. Rakowska B. 2003. Okrzemki – organizmy, które odniosły sukces. Kosmos, 52, 307–314.
• 44. Rakowska B., Szczepocka E. 2011. Demonstration of the Bzura River restoration using diatom indices. Biologia, 66(3), 411–417.
• 45. Siemińska J., Bąk M., Dziedzic J., Gąbka M., Gregorowicz P., Mrozińska T., Pełechaty M., Ow¬siany P. M., Pliński M., Witkowski A. 2006. Red list of the algae in Poland. [In:] Z. Mirek et al. (ed.), Red list of plants and fungi in Poland. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sci-ences. Kraków, 37–52.
• 46. Stanek-Tarkowska J., Noga T. 2012. Diversity of diatoms (Bacillariophyceae) in the soil under traditional tillage and reduced tillage. Inżynieria Ekologiczna, 30, 287–296.
• 47. Szczepocka E. 2007. Benthic diatoms from the outlet section of the Bzura River 30 years ago and presently. Oeanological and Hydrobiological Studies, 36(1), 255–260.
• 48. Szczepocka E., Szulc B. 2009. The use of benthic diatoms in estimating water quality of variously polluted rivers. Oeanological and Hydrobiological Studies, 38(1), 17–26.
• 49. Tambor A., Noga T. 2011. Różnorodność flory okrzemek w rzece Lubcza i potoku Lubenia (Podgórze Rzeszowskie, Polska SE). Rocznik Przemyski, 47(3), 105–118.
• 50. Van Dam H., Martens A., Sinkeldam J. 1994. A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands. Netherlands J. Aquatic Ecol., 28, 117–133.
• 51. Whitton B.A., Rott E. (eds) 1996. Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers II. Institut für Botanik, Universität Innsbruck, pp. 196.
• 52. Wojtal A. 2004. Okrzemki (Bacillariophyceae) jako wskaźniki jakości wód źródeł Wyżyny Krakowsko-Częstochowskiej. [In:] Zróżnicowanie i przemiany środowiska przyrodniczo kulturowe¬go Wyżyny Krakowsko-Częstochowskiej. Tom 1. Przyroda Ojców.
• 53. Wojtal A. 2009. Diatom flora of the Kobylanka stream near Kraków (Wyżyna Krakowsko- Częstochowska Upland, S Poland). Polish Bot. Journal, 54(2),129–330.
• 54. Żelazna-Wieczorek J., Mamińska M. 2006. Algoflora and vascular flora of a limestone spring in the Warta River valley. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae, 75(2), 131–143.
• 55. Żelazowski E., Magiera M., Kawecka B., Kwandrans J., Kotowicz J. 2004. Use of alge for monitoring rivers of Poland – In the light of a new law for environmental protection. Oeanological and Hydrobiological Studies, 33(4), 17–26.