Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The development of orthodontics has improved thanks to the introduction of adhesives which are physically and chemically akin to tooth enamel and brackets. These materials often fall short of the required durability standards. The objective was to evaluate the real strength of the adhesives and to introduce a proprietary device, generating multiple vectors of strength between dental brackets and the surface of enamel. 11 types of adhesive materials have been studied. 990 applications have been made using removed teeth, followed by a randomised creation of 11 groups containing 90 samples each. The threshold values of the strength needed to break the brackets off were determined in torsional, shear and tension strength tests. A comparison between tensometric and planimetric methods was made by means based on ARI index. Resistance was highest for torsional stress, weaker for shear stress and the weakest for tension stress. A correlation was found between tensometric results. The study attempted to systematise the methodology of direct tests.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
33--42
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 39 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Department of Orthodontics, Clinic of Dental Medicine, Medical Faculty, Olomouc, Czech Republic
autor
- Institute of Physiotherapy, University of Opole, Biotechnology Laboratory “Labiot”, Cieszyn, Poland
autor
- Department of Orthodontics, Clinic of Dental Medicine, Medical Faculty, Olomouc, Czech Republic
Bibliografia
- [1] JOHNSON N.C.L., SANDY J.R., Tooth position and speech – is there a relationship? Angle Orthod., 1999, Vol. 69(4), 306–310.
- [2] PROFFIT W.R., FIELDS H.W., Ortodoncja współczesna, Wydawnictwo Czelej, 2001
- [3] ELIADES T., BRANTLEY W.A., The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic. Bond strength assessment protocols, Eur. J. Orthod., 2000, Vol. 22, 13–23.
- [4] GRABER T.M., VANARSDALL R.L. Jr., Orthodontics, current principles and techniques, 3rd ed., Mosby Inc., St Louis, 2000.
- [5] GRABER T., Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques, 4th ed., Mosby Inc., St Louis, 2005.
- [6] LOPEZ J., Retentive shear strengths of various bonding attachment bases, Am. J. Orthod., 1980, Vol. 77, 669–678.
- [7] MAJER R., SMITH D.C., Variables influencing the bond strength of metal orthodontic bracket bases, Am. J. Orthod., 1981, Vol. 79, 20–34.
- [8] MANDAIL N., MILLETT D., MATTICK C., HICKMAN J., WORTHINGTON H., MACFARLANE T.J., Orthodontic adhesives: a systematic review, J. Orthod., 2002, Vol. 29(3), 205–210.
- [9] ARTUN J., BERGLAND S., Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment, Am. J. Orthodont., 1984, Vol. 85(4), 333–340.
- [10] REYNOLDS I.R., VON FRAUNHOFER J.A., Direct Bonding of Orthodontic Attachments to Teeth: the Relation of Adhesive Bond Strength to Gauze Mesh Size, BJO, 1976, Vol. 3(2), 91–95.
- [11] BISHARA S.E., VON WALD L., LAFFOON J.F., WARREN J.J., Effect of a self-etch primer/adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 2001, Vol. 119(6), 621–624.
- [12] BISHARA S.E., OSTBY A.W., LAFFOON J.F., WARREN J., Shear bond strength. Bond comparison of two adhesive systems following thermocycling. A new self-etch primer and a resin-modified glass ionomer, Angle Orthod., 2007, Vol. 77, 337–341.
- [13] CAGRI U., OZGUR I., Temperature rise and shear bond strength of bondable buccal tubes bonded by various light sources, Eur. J. Orthod., 2000, Vol. 30, 413–417.
- [14] UNDERWOOD M., RAWLS H., ZIMMERMAN B., Clinical evaluation of a fluoride-exchanging resin as an orthodontic adhesive, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial, 1989, Vol. 96(2), 93–99.
- [15] FRANCHI L., BECCETTI T., CAMPORESI M., Forces released by nonconventional brocket on ligature systems during alignment of buccally displaced teeth, Am. J. Orth. Dent. Orthop., 2009, Vol. 136(3), 316–317.
- [16] NEWMAN G.V., Adhesion and orthodontic plastic attachments, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 1969, Vol. 56(6), 573–588.
- [17] RELIEF D., Failure at the dental adhesive etched enamel interface, J. Oral. Rehab., 1974, Vol. 1, 265–284.
- [18] NKENKE N., HIRSFELDER U., MARTUS P., Evaluation of the bond strength of different bracket-bonding systems to bovine enamel, Eur. J. Orthod., 1997, Vol. 19, 259–270.
- [19] VALLETTA R., PRISCO D., AMBROSIO L., Evaluation of the debonding strength of orthodontic brackets using three different bonding systems, Eur. J. Orthod., 2007, Vol. 29, 571–577.
- [20] KALLIO T.T., LASTUMÄKI T.M., VALLITTU P.K., Bonding of restorative and veneering composite resin to some polymeric composites, Dent. Mater., 2001, Vol. 17, 80–86.
- [21] NOSOWICZ P., CZARNECKA B., Clinical aspects of bonding orthodontic brackets to various dental restorative materials, Czas. Stomatol., 2006, Vol. LIX(4), 279–284.
- [22] TSURUOKA T., NAMURA Y., SHIMIZU N., Development of an easy debonding orthodontic adhesive using thermal heating, Dent. Mat. J., 2007, Vol. 26 (1), 78–83.
- [23] ONG E., MCCALLUM H., GRIFFIN M.P., HO C., Efficiency of self-ligating vs conventionally ligated brackets during initial alignment, Am. J. Orthodont. Dent. Orthop., 2010, Vol. 138(2), 131–138.
- [24] WENDL B., DROSCHL H., A comparative in vitro study of the strength of directly bonded brackets using different curing techniques, Eur. J. Orthod., 2004, Vol. 6, 535–544.
- [25] KAO E.C., ELIADES T., REZVAN E., JOHNSTON W.M., Torsional bond strength and failure pattern of ceramic brackets bonded to composite resin laminate veneers, Eur. J. Orthod., 1995, Vol. 17, 533–540.
- [26] LOPES G.C., GREENHALGH D., KLAUSS P., MUSSI G., WIDMER N., Enamel acid etching, a review, Compendium, 2007, Vol. 28(1), 662–669.
- [27] REYNOLDS I.R., A review of direct orthodontic bonding, Br. J. Orthod., 1975, Vol. 2, 171–178.
- [28] SMITH D.C., MAIJER R., Improvements in bracket base design, Am. J. Orthod., 1983, Vol. 83, 227–281.
- [29] SCOUGALL-VILCHIS R.J., YAMAMOTO S., KITAI N., YAMAMOTO K., Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives, Am. J. Orthodont. Dent. Orthop., 2009, Vol. 136(3), 425–430.
- [30] CACCIAFESTA V., SFONDRINI M.F., STIFANELLI P., SCRIBANTE A., KLERSY C., The effect of bleaching on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer, Amer. J. Orthodont. Dent. Orthop., 2006, Vol. 130(1), 83–87.
- [31] DEVANNA R., KELUSKAR K.M., Cristal growth vs. conventional acid etching: A comparative evaluation of etch patterns, penetration depths and bond strengths, Indian J. Dent. Res., 2008, Vol. 19(4), 309–314.
- [32] MOVAHHED H.Z., OGAARD B., SYVERUD M., An in vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement and a composite adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets, Eur. J. Orthodont., 2005, Vol. 27(5), 477–483.
- [33] PAWLUS B., DYSZKIEWICZ A., ŠPIDLEN M., Comparison of bond strength of adhesives used in orthodontics, Orthod., 2012, Vol. 1(21), 16–22.
- [34] PRIETSCH J.R., SPOHR A.M., LIMA DA SILVA I.N., PINHEIRO BECK J.C., SILVA OSHIMA H.M., Development of a device measure bracket debonding force in vivo, Eur. J. Orthodont., 2007, Vol. 29, 564–570.
- [35] DYSZKIEWICZ A., POŁEĆ P., ZAJDEL J., CHACHULSKI D., Specific evaluation of pelvic radiograms and hip BMD in structural scoliosis reflectorica and reactive pain conditions of the backbone, Springer, Advances in Soft Computing, Information Technologies in Biomedicine, 2010, (June), 491–507.
- [36] DYSZKIEWICZ A., PAWLUS B., Sposób i wieloczynnościowe urządzenie do oceny fizykochemicznych cech materiałów oraz biomateriałów, P 393426 Zgłoszono 23.12.2010.
- [37] DERĘGOWSKA-NOSOWICZ P., CZARNECKA B., Clinical aspects of bonding orthodontic brackets to various dental restorative materials, Czas. Stomatol., 2006, Vol. 59(4), 279–284.
- [38] REGAN D., VAN NOORT R., Bond strengths of two integral bracket base combinations: an in vitro comparison with foilmesh, Eur. J. Orthod., 1989, Vol. 11, 144–153.
- [39] SOKUCU O., SISO S.H., OZTURK F., NALCACI R., Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Cured with Different Light Sources under Thermocycling, Eur. J. Dent., 2010, Vol. 4(3), 257–262.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-05e38c6d-b5ab-42e7-9e58-96b592ea09da