Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The literature on occupational safety and health (OSH) interventions contains many debates on how interventions should work, but far less attention has been paid to how they actually do work, and to the contextual factors that influence their implementation, development and effect. The need of improving the understanding of the OSH interventions issue is particularly relevant for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), since they experience worse OSH conditions, and have fewer physical, economic and organizational resources if compared to larger enterprises; thus, SMEs strongly need to focus their few resources in the decision-making process so as to select and put in place only the most proper interventions. This exploratory study is based on interviews with safety officers of 5 SMEs, and it gives an overview of the key features of the actual intervention process in SMEs and of the contextual factors making this actual intervention process similar or dissimilar to the ideal case. The results show how much qualitative and experience driven the actual intervention process is; they should be used to direct the future research towards an increasingly applicable one, to enable practitioners from SMEs to develop, implement and evaluate their OSH interventions in an “ideal” way.
Wydawca
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
385--405
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 74 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
autor
- Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
autor
- Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
Bibliografia
- 1.Cagno E, Di Giulio A, Trucco P. An algorithm for the implementation of safety improvement programs. Saf Sci. 2001;37(1):59–75.
- 2.Oyewole SA, Haight JM, Freivalds A, Cannon DJ, Rothrock L. Statistical evaluation and analysis of safety intervention in the determination of an effective resource allocation strategy. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2010;23(5):585–93.
- 3.Rasmussen J, Svedung I. Proactive risk management in a dynamic society. Karlstad, Sweden: Swedish Rescue Services Agency; 2000. Retrieved July 8, 2014, from: https://www.msb.se/RibData/Filer/pdf/16252.pdf.
- 4.Theberge N, Neumann W. Doing ‘organizational work’: expanding the conception of professional practice in ergonomics. Appl Ergon. 2010;42(1):76–84.
- 5.Champoux D, Brun J. Occupational health and safety management in small size enterprises: an overview of the situation and avenues for intervention and research. Saf Sci. 2003;41(4):301–18.
- 6.Hasle P, Limborg HJ. A review of the literature on preventive occupational health and safety activities in small enterprises. Ind Health. 2006;44(1):6–12.
- 7.Robson LS, Shannon HS, Linda M. Goldenhar LM, Hale AR. Guide to evaluating the effectiveness of strategies for preventing work injuries. How to show whether a safety intervention really works (DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2001-119). Cincinnati, OH, USA: Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH); 2001. Retrieved July 8, 2014, from: http://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/11272.
- 8.Jørgensen K. A systematic use of information from accidents as a basis of prevention activities. Saf Sci. 2008;46(2):164–75.
- 9.Silverstein BA, Stetson DS, Keyserling WM, Fine LJ. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: comparison of data sources for surveillance. Am J Ind Med. 1997;31(5):600–8.
- 10.Ergonomic checkpoints. Practical easy-toimplement solutions for improving safety, health and working conditions. 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office; 2010. Retrieved July 8, 2014, from: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_protect/@protrav/@safework/documents/instructionalmaterial/wcms_178593.pdf.
- 11.Nishikido N, Yuasa A, Motoki C, Tanaka M, Arai S, Matsuda K, et al. Development of multi-dimensional action checklist for promoting new approaches in participatory occupational safety and health in small and medium-sized enterprises. Ind Health. 2006;44(1):35–41.
- 12.Earp JA, Ennett ST. Conceptual models for health education research and practice. Health Educ Res. 1991;6(2):163–71.
- 13.Cagno E, Di Giulio A, Trucco P. Risk and causes-of-risk assessment for an effective industrial safety management. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering. 2000;7(2):113–28.
- 14.Shakioye SO, Haight JM. Modeling using dynamic variables—an approach for the design of loss prevention programs. Saf Sci. 2010;48(1):46–53.
- 15.Goldenhar LM, LaMontagne AD, Katz T, Heaney C, Landsbergis P. The intervention research process in occupational safety and health: an overview from the national occupational research agenda intervention effectiveness research team. J Occup Environ Med. 2001;43(7):616–22.
- 16.Kristensen TS. Intervention studies in occupational epidemiology. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62(3):205–10.
- 17.Nilsen P. The how and why of communitybased injury prevention: a conceptual and evaluation model. Saf Sci. 2007;45(4):501–21.
- 18.Victora CG, Habicht J, Bryce J. Evidencebased public health: moving beyond randomized trials. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(3):400–5. Retrieved July 8, 2014, from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448265/pdf/0940400.pdf.
- 19.Pedersen LM, Nielsen KJ, Kines P. Realistic evaluation as a new way to design and evaluate occupational safety interventions. Saf Sci. 2012;50(1):48–54.
- 20.Baril-Gingras G, Bellemare M, Brun J. The contribution of qualitative analyses of occupational health and safety interventions: an example through a study of external advisory interventions. Saf Sci. 2006;44(10):851–74.
- 21.Baker R, Brockhaus A, Boucier D, Chapman L, Collins J, Goldenhar L, et al. May 2000 supplement on preventing occupational injuries. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(4):308–9.
- 22.Sinclair RC, Gershon RR, Murphy LR, Goldenhar LM. Operationalizing theoretical constructs in bloodborne pathogens training curriculum. Health Education & Behavior. 1996;23(2):238–55.
- 23.Leviton LC, Sheehy JW. Encouraging small businesses to adopt effective technologies to prevent exposure to health hazards. Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(4):409–11.
- 24.Clarke S, Robertson I. A meta-analytic review of the big five personality factors and accident involvement in occupational and non-occupational settings. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2005;78(3):355–76.
- 25.Forcier BH, Walters AE, Brasher EE, Jones JW. Creating a safer working environment through psychological assessment: a review of a measure of safety consciousness. J Prev Interv Community. 2001;22(1):53–65.
- 26.Evans DD, Michael JH, Wiedenbeck JK, Ray CD. Relationships between organizational climates and safety-related events at four wood manufacturers. Forest Products Journal. 2005;55(6):23–8.
- 27.Probst TM. Safety and insecurity: exploring the moderating effect of organizational safety climate. J Occup Health Psychol. 2004;9(1):3–10.
- 28.Probst TM. Layoffs and tradeoffs: production, quality, and safety demands under the threat of job loss. J Occup Health Psychol. 2002;7(3):211–20.
- 29.Størseth F. Changes at work and employee reactions: organizational elements, job insecurity, and short-term stress as predictors for employee health and safety. Scand J Psychol. 2006;47(6):541–50.
- 30.Zohar D. The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups. J Organ Behav. 2002;23(1):75–92.
- 31.Probst TM, Brubaker TL, Barsotti A. Organizational injury rate underreporting: the moderating effect of organizational safety climate. J Appl Psychol. 2008;93(5):1147–54.
- 32.Probst TM, Estrada AX. Accident underreporting among employees: testing the moderating influence of psychological safety climate and supervisor enforcement of safety practices. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42(5):1438–44.
- 33.Neal A, Griffin MA. A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(4):946–53
- 34.Griffin MA, Neal A. Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. J Occup Health Psychol. 2000;5(3):347–58.
- 35.Wu T, Chen C, Li C. A correlation among safety leadership, safety climate and safety performance. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2008;21(3):307–18.
- 36.Zohar D. A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. J Appl Psychol. 2000;85(4):587–96.
- 37.Brun J, Loiselle CD. The roles, functions and activities of safety practitioners: the current situation in quebec. Saf Sci. 2002;40(6):519–36.
- 38.Garrigou A, Weill-Fassina A, Brun JP, Six F, Chesnais M, Cru D. Prevention of work injury. In: Karwowski W, editor. International encylopedia of ergonomics and human factors. 2nd ed. London, UK: Taylor & Francis; 2006. vol. 3, p. 3302–7.
- 39.Swuste P, Arnoldy F. The safety adviser/manager as agent of organisational change: a new challenge to expert training. Saf Sci. 2003;41(1):15–27.
- 40.Noro K, Imada AS. Participatory ergonomics. London, UK: Taylor & Francis; 1991.
- 41.Schurman SJ, Silverstein BA, Richards SE. Designing a curriculum for healthy work: reflections on the United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers-General Motors Ergonomics Pilot Project. Occup Med. 1993;9(2):283–304.
- 42.Koningsveld EAP, Vink P, Urlings IJM, de Jong AM. Reducing sprains and strains in constructions through worker participation. Washington, DC, USA: Center to Protect Workers’ Rights; 1998. Retrieved July 8, 2014, from: http://www.elcosh.org/record/document/980/d000011.pdf.
- 43.Loisel P, Gosselin L, Durand P, Lemaire J, Poitras S, Abenhaim L. Implementation of a participatory ergonomics program in the rehabilitation of workers suffering from subacute back pain. Appl Ergon. 2001;32(1):53–60.
- 44.Brown O Jr. Macroergonomic methods: participation. In: Hendrick HW, Kleiner BM, editors. Macroergonomics: theory, methods, and applications. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Erlbaum; 2002. p. 25–44.
- 45.Hess JA, Hecker S, Weinstein M, Lunger M. A participatory ergonomics intervention to reduce risk factors for low-back disorders in concrete laborers. Appl Ergon. 2004;35(5):427–41.
- 46.Vredenburgh AG. Organizational safety: which management practices are most effective in reducing employee injury rates? J Saf Res. 2002;33(2):259–76.
- 47.Reason P. Three approaches to participative inquiry. In: In Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage; 1994. p. 324–39.
- 48.Zohar D. Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. J Appl Psychol. 1980;65(1):96–102.
- 49.Kompier MAJ, Cooper CL, Geurts SAE. A multiple case study approach to work stress prevention in Europe. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2000;9(3):371–400.
- 50.Saksvik PØ, Nytrø K, Dahl-Jørgensen C, Mikkelsen A. A process evaluation of individual and organizational occupational stress and health interventions. Work Stress. 2002;16(1):37–57.
- 51.Rubenowitz S. Survey and intervention of ergonomic problems at the workplace. Int J Ind Ergon. 1997;19(4):271–5.
- 52.Broberg O, Hermund I. The OHS consultant as a ‘political reflective navigator’ in technological change processes. Int J Ind Ergon. 2004;33(4):315–26.
- 53.Hasle P, Kvorning LV, Rasmussen CDN, Smith LH, Flyvholm MA. A model for design of tailored working environment intervention programmes for small enterprises. Saf Health Work. 2012;3(3):181–91. Retrieved July 8, 2014, from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3443693/pdf/shaw-3-181.pdf.
- 54.Legg S, Olsen K, Lamm F, Laird I, Harris L, Hasle P. Understanding the programme theories underlying national strategies to improve the working environment in small businesses. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety. 2010;8(2):5–35.
- 55.Breslin FC, Kyle N, Bigelow P, Irvin E, Morassaei S, MacEachen E, et al. Effectiveness of health and safety in small enterprises: a systematic review of quantitative evaluations of interventions. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(2):163–79.
- 56.Walters D. Health and safety in small enterprises: European management strategies for managing improvement. Brussels, Belgium: Lang; 2001.
- 57.Antonsson AB, Birgersdotter L, Bornberger-Dankvardt S. Small enterprises in Sweden. Health and safety and the significance of intermediaries in preventive health and safety (Arbete och Hälsa No. 2002:1). Stockholm, Sweden: National Institute for Working Life; 2002. Retrieved July 8, 2014, from: https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/4292/1/ah2002_01.pdf.
- 58.Antonsson AB. Strategies for success? Managing chemical risks in small workplaces: a review of Swedish practice. Stockholm, Sweden: IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute; 2007. Retrieved July 8, 2014, from: http://www.ivl.se/webdav/files/B-rapporter/B1717.pdf.
- 59.Fonteyn P, Olsberg D, Cross J. Small business owners’ knowledge of their occupational health and safety (OHS) legislative responsibilities. International Journal of Occupational Safety and ergonomics (JOSE). 1997;3(1–2):41–57. Retrieved July 8, 2014, from: http://www.ciop.pl/CIOPPortalWAR/file/72427/2013121133317&R1997-V3-N1-2-str41-57.pdf.
- 60.Hasle P, Limborg HJ, Kallehave T, Klitgaard C, Andersen TR. The working environment in small firms: responses from owner-managers. International Small Business Journal. 2012;30(6):622–39.
- 61.Garrigou A, Peissel-Cottenaz G. Reflexive approach to the activity of preventionists and their training needs: Results of a French study. Saf Sci. 2008;46(8):1271–88.
- 62.Hale AR, Guldenmund FG. Role and tasks of safety professionals: some results from an international survey [paper presented at the Safety In Action, Melbourne, Australia]. 2006. Retrieved July 8, 2014, from: http://www.ohseducationaccreditation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/2006_Profile_of_an_OHS_professional_International_Hale_SIA.pdf.
- 63.Whysall Z, Haslam C, Haslam R. Implementing health and safety interventions in the workplace: an exploratory study. Int J Ind Ergon. 2006;36(9):809–18.
- 64.European Agency for Health and Safety at Work. European survey of enterprises on new and emerging risks. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2010. Retrieved July 8, 2014, from: https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/reports/esener1_osh_management.
- 65.Barbeau E, Roelofs C, Youngstrom R, Sorensen G, Stoddard A, LaMontagne AD. Assessment of occupational safety and health programs in small businesses. Am J Ind Med. 2004;45(4):371–9.
- 66.Hale AR, Guldenmund F, Van Loenhout P, Oh J. Evaluating safety management and culture interventions to improve safety: effective intervention strategies. Saf Sci. 2010;48(8):1026–35.
- 67.Walker D, Tait R. Health and safety management in small enterprises: an effective low cost approach. Saf Sci. 2004;42(1):69–83.
- 68.Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage; 2009.
- 69.Micheli GJL, Cagno E. Dealing with SMEs as a whole in OSH issues: warnings from empirical evidence. Saf Sci. 2010;48(6):729–33.
- 70.Gibbert M, Ruigrok W, Wicki B. What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Manage Journal. 2008;29(13):1465–74.
- 71.Eisenhardt KM. Building theories from case study research. Acad Manage Rev. 1989;14(4):532–50.
- 72.Vredenburgh AG. Organizational safety: which management practices are most effective in reducing employee injury rates? J Saf Res. 2002;33(2):259–76.
- 73.Swuste P, Hale A. Databases on measures to prevent occupational exposure to toxic substances. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1994;9(1):57–61.
- 74.Schulte P, Okun A, Stephenson C, Colligan M, Ahlers H, Gjessing C, et al. Information dissemination and use: critical components in occupational safety and health. Am J Ind Med. 2003;44(5):515–31.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-058264a3-2692-409e-8871-5d646bb9ab10