The functioning of smart city in the context of global city rankings

• Autorzy: Rożałowska Barbara

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2020.146.29

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: This paper raises theoretical issues related to the functioning of cities that are determined as smart in order to find a better operational definition for further research. Design/methodology/approach: In search of the essence of the term, the paper refers to variety of definitions of smart city, and also to the theoretical models in operation enabling the measurement and comparison of indicators among urban areas in the different world locations. The analysis was performed on three rankings: Cities in Motion Index, Mercer Quality of Living, Arcadis The Sustainable Index. Findings: The conclusions indicate that the Smart City concept is connected with sustainable development more than to the quality of life. The city rankings concerning the highest life quality is completely different from the hierarchy of smart cities. Originality/value: The paper extends the definition of smart city and it may be valuable for researchers who develop the concept of smart city in their research.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

smart city; sustainable development; quality of life; benchmarking cities

PL

inteligentne miasto; rozwój zrównoważony; jakość życia; benchmarking miast

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: z. 146
• Strony: 413--425
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Rożałowska Barbara

• Silesian University of Technology

Bibliografia

• 1. Acardis (2018). Citizen Centric Cities The Sustainable Cities Index 2018. https://www.arcadis.com/en/global/our-perspectives/sustainable-cities-index-2018/citizen-centricities/, 10.06.2019.
• 2. Bosch, P., Jongeneel, S., Neumann, H.M., Iglar, B., and Huovila, A. (2017). Recommendations for the smart city index. Retrieved from http://nws.eurocities.eu/ MediaShell/media/CITYkeys%20D3.3%20-%20Recommendations%20for%20the%20 Smart%20City%20Index.pdf, 11.06.1019.
• 3. Calzada, I., and Cowie, P. (2017). Beyond smart and data-driven city-regions? Rethinking stakeholder-helixes strategies. Regions. The Voice Of The Membership, 308(4), pp. 25-28. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3082935, 11.06.2019.
• 4. Calzada, I. (2016). (Un)Plugging Smart Cities with Urban Transformations: Towards Multi-stakeholder City-Regional Complex Urbanity? URBS, Revista de Estudios Urbanos y Ciencias Sociales Journal, 2. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=2815957, 10.06.2019.
• 5. Calzada, I., and Cobo, C. (2015). Unplugging: Deconstructing the Smart City, Journal of Urban Technology, 2 (1), pp. 23-43. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2014.971535.
• 6. Caragliu, A., De Bo, C., and Nijcamp, P. (2009). Smart city in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(0048), pp. 45-69. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2011.601117.
• 7. Cardullo, P., and Kitchin, R. (2019). Being a ‘Citizen’ in the Smart City: Up and down the Scaffold of Smart Citizen Participation in Dublin, Ireland. GeoJournal, 84(1), pp. 1-13. doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9845-8.
• 8. Cities in Motion Index, ISEE (2018). https://media.iese.edu/research/pdfs/ST-0471-E.pdf.
• 9. Cities in Motion Index, ISEE (2019). https://media.iese.edu/research/pdfs/ST-0509-E.pdf.
• 10. Cowley R., Simon J., and Youri, D. (2018). The smart city and its publics: insights from across six UK cities. Urban Research & Practice, 11(1), pp. 53-77. doi: 10.1080/ 17535069.2017.1293150.
• 11. Dameri, R. (2017). Smart City Implementation. Creating Economic and Public Value in Innovative Urban Systems. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/ 10.1007%2 F978-3-319-45766-6.pdf, 10.05.1019.
• 12. Dameri, R.P. (2013). Searching for smart city definition: A comprehensive proposal. International Journal of Computers & Technology, 11(5), pp. 2544–2551. https://doi.org/10.24297/ijct.v11i5.1142.
• 13. Galvão, A., Mascarenhas, C., Rodrigues, R.G., Marques, C.S., and Leal, C.T. (2017). A quadruple helix model of entrepreneurship, innovation and stages of economic development. Review of International Business and Strategy, 27(2), pp. 261-282, doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-01-2017-0003.
• 14. Giffinger, R., and Haindlmaier, G. (2010). Smart cities ranking: an effective instrument for the positioning of the cities? ACE: Architecture, City and Environment, 4(2), pp. 7-26. doi10.5821/ace.v4i12.2483.
• 15. Höjer, M., and Wangel, J. (2015) Smart Sustainable Cities: Definition and Challenges. In: L. Hilty and B. Aebischer (Eds.), ICT Innovations for Sustainability. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 310. Cham: Springer.
• 16. Hollands, R.G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? City: Analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 12(3). pp. 303-320, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 13604810802479126.
• 17. Komninos, N. (2002). Intelligent Cities: Innovation, Knowledge Systems and Digital Spaces. London: Spon Press.
• 18. Komninos, N. (2008). Intelligent Cities and Globalisation of Innovation Networks. London-New York: Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.stellenboschheritage.co.za/wp-content/ uploads/Intelligent-Cities-and-Globalisation-of-Innovation-Networks.pdf, 10.05.1019.
• 19. Komninos, N. (2018). Smart Cities. In: B. Warf (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of the Internet, 783-789. Sage Publications. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781473960367.n229, 06.06.2019.
• 20. Kummithaa, R.K.R., and Crutzenb, N. (2017). How do we understand smart cities? An evolutionary perspective. Cities, 67. pp. 43-52, doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.010.
• 21. Kuźnik, F., and Baron, M. (2018) Użytkownicy miasta wobec smart city – studium prospektywne. Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 365, pp. 63-77. http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element. cejsh-501d1868-086f-422a-a8d6-8baf4732a829, 17.07.2019.
• 22. Mercer Quality of Living (2018). https://www.mercer.com/newsroom/2018-quality-of-living-survey.html, 10.06.2019.
• 23. Orłowski, C. (2014). Rule-based model for selecting integration technologies for smart cities systems. Cybernetics and Systems, 45(2), pp. 136–145. doi.org/10.1080/01969722. 2014.874811.
• 24. Shelton, T., and Lodato, T. (2019). Actually existing smart citizens. Expertise and (non)participation in the making of the smart city. City, 23(1), pp. 35-52. doi.org/10.1080/ 13604813.201.157511.
• 25. Stawasz, D., and Sikora-Fernandez, D. (2016). Koncepcja smart city na tle procesów i uwarunkowań rozwoju współczesnych miast. Łódź: Wyd. Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
• 26. WHO (2013). World Health Statistics 2013, http://www.who.int/gho/publications/ world_health_statistics/2013/en/, 07.06.2019.
• 27. Zuzańska-Żyśko, E. (2016). Procesy metropolizacji. Teoria i praktyka. Warszawa: PWN.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).