The effects of innovation adoption on the business creativity of electrical and electronics industries in Malaysia

• Autorzy: Bhatti Muhammad Awais , Tajuddin Ahmad Hakimi

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2022.25.1.06

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wpływ przyjęcia innowacji na kreatywność biznesową przemysłu elektrycznego i elektronicznego w Malezji

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The innovation has become a vital element to improve the business creativity and performance and obtain the focus of recent studies and regulators. Therefore, paper aim is to analyze the impact of culture innovation, product innovation and market innovation on the business creativity of the electrical and electronics industries in Malaysia. This paper also investigates the mediating role of organizational learning between the relations of culture innovation, product innovation, market innovation, and business creativity of the electrical and electronics industries in Malaysia. This paper has followed the quantitative methods and used survey questionnaires for data collection, while SPSS and AMOS were used to test the hypotheses. The results indicated that culture innovation, product innovation and market innovation have a positive association with business creativity of the electrical and electronics industries in Malaysia. The findings also exposed that organizational learning significantly mediates among the nexus of culture innovation, product innovation, market innovation, and business creativity of the electrical and electronics industries in Malaysia. This paper is suitable for the regulation developing authorities that they should formulate effective policies related to the innovation adoption that enhance the business creativity and performance.

PL

Innowacja stała się istotnym elementem poprawy kreatywności i wydajności biznesowej oraz uzyskania zainteresowania ostatnich badań i organów regulacyjnych. Dlatego celem artykułu jest analiza wpływu innowacji kulturowych, innowacji produktowych i rynkowych na kreatywność biznesową przemysłu elektrycznego i elektronicznego w Malezji. Niniejszy artykuł analizuje również pośredniczącą rolę organizacyjnego uczenia się między relacjami innowacji kulturowej, innowacji produktowej, innowacji rynkowej i kreatywności biznesowej przemysłu elektrycznego i elektronicznego w Malezji. W niniejszym artykule zastosowano metody ilościowe i wykorzystano kwestionariusze ankiety do zbierania danych, natomiast do testowania hipotez wykorzystano SPSS i AMOS. Wyniki wskazują, że innowacje kulturowe, innowacje produktowe i innowacje rynkowe mają pozytywny związek z kreatywnością biznesową przemysłu elektrycznego i elektronicznego w Malezji. Odkrycia ujawniły również, że uczenie się organizacji znacząco pośredniczy w splocie innowacji kulturowych, innowacji produktowych, innowacji rynkowych i kreatywności biznesowej przemysłu elektrycznego i elektronicznego w Malezji. Niniejszy dokument jest odpowiedni dla organów opracowujących regulacje, które powinny sformułować skuteczną politykę związaną z przyjęciem innowacji, która zwiększy kreatywność i wydajność przedsiębiorstw.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

innovation; business creativity; organizational learning

PL

innowacje; kreatywność biznesu; uczenie się organizacji

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 25, No. 1
• Strony: 92--106
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 39 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Bhatti Muhammad Awais

• Department of Management, College of Business Administration, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia

autor

Tajuddin Ahmad Hakimi

• School of Accounting and Finance, Taylor’s University, Selangor, Malaysia

Bibliografia

• 1.Abdussalam, M., Menezes, K., (2021). On the question of collective liability in innovation and creativity networks deploying blockchains-A discussion concerning joint liability for the unauthorised application of proprietary information. Law, Innovation and Technology, 1-27.
• 2.Antunes, H. D. J. G., Pinheiro, P. G., (2020). Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(2), 140-149.
• 3.Awan, U., Sroufe, R. and Kraslawski, A., (2019). Creativity enables sustainable development: supplier engagement as a boundary condition for the positive effect on green innovation. Journal of cleaner production, 226, 172-185.
• 4.Balbay, S., (2020). Review of Innovations and Challenges in Language Learning Motivation. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(3), 543-547.
• 5.Byrne, B. M., (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• 6.Brix, J., (2017). Exploring knowledge creation processes as a source of organizational learning: A longitudinal case study of a public innovation project. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 33(2), 113-127.
• 7.Caliskan, A., Zhu, C., (2020). Organizational Culture and Educational Innovations in Turkish Higher Education: Perceptions and Reactions of Students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 20(1), 20-39.
• 8.Cudny, W., Comunian, R. and Wolaniuk, A., (2020). Arts and creativity: A business and branding strategy for Lodz as a neoliberal city. Cities, 100, 102-123. doi:
• 9.Danielle, N., Masilela, L., (2020). Open Governance For Improved Service Delivery Innovation In South Africa. International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies, 12(1), 33-47.
• 10.Fedorko, I., Bacik, R. and Gavurova, B. (2018). Technology Acceptance Model in E-Commerce Segment. Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 13(4), 1242-1256.
• 11.Freixanet, J., Rialp, A. and Churakova, I., (2020). How do innovation, internationalization, and organizational learning interact and co-evolve in small firms? a complex systems approach. Journal of Small Business Management, 58(5), 1030-1063.
• 12.Grebski, M. and Mazur, M., (2022) Social climate of support for innovativeness. Production Engineering Archives, 28(1), 110-116.
• 13.Grebski, M., (2021) Mobility of the Workforce and Its Influence on Innovativeness (Comparative Analysis of the United States and Poland). Production Engineering Archives, 27 (4), 272-276.
• 14.Haddad, G., Haddad, G. and Nagpal, G., (2021). Can students’ perception of the diverse learning environment affect their intentions toward entrepreneurship?. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(3), 167-176.
• 15.Hair, Jr, J. F., Babin, B. J., and Krey, N., (2017). Covariance-based structural equation modeling in the Journal of Advertising: Review and recommendations. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 163-177.
• 16.Halaskova, M., Gavurova, B. and Kocisova, K., (2020). Research and Development Efficiency in Public and Private Sectors: An Empirical Analysis of EU Countries by Using DEA Methodology. Sustainability, 12(17), 7050.
• 17.Halaskova, M., Gavurova, B., and Korony, S., (2020). Change of EU28 countries research and development indicators between 2010 and 2015. Economics and Sociology, 13(1), 230-248.
• 18.Hong, J., Hou, B., Zhu, K. and Marinova, D., (2018). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation and employee creativity. Chinese Management Studies, 12(2), 268-286.
• 19.Hughes, D. J., Lee, A., Tian, A. W., Newman, A. and Legood, A., (2018). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 549-569.
• 20.Kaundert, M., Masys, A. J., (2018). Mass migration, humanitarian assistance and crisis management: embracing social innovation and organizational learning Security by Design 12, 73-91
• 21.Khan, M. A., Domicián, M., Abdulahi, M. E., Sadaf, R., Khan, M. A., Popp, J. and Oláh, J., (2020). Do institutional quality, innovation and technologies promote financial market development. European Journal of International Management, 14(2), 1-24.
• 22.Kryshtanovych, M., Bilyk, V., Hanushchyn, S., Sheremet, I. and Vasylenko, K., (2021). Modelling the ways to increase the creativity of psychology students as a basic factor in professional development. Creativity Studies, 14(1), 34-50.
• 23.Lee, C., Hallak, R. and Sardeshmukh, S. R., (2019). Creativity and innovation in the restaurant sector: Supply-side processes and barriers to implementation. Tourism Management Perspectives, 31, 54-62.
• 24.Naqshbandi, M. M., Tabche, I., (2018). The interplay of leadership, absorptive capacity, and organizational learning culture in open innovation: Testing a moderated mediation model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133, 156-167.
• 25.Oláh, J., Hidayat, Y. A., Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z., Hasan, M. and Popp, J., (2021). Interorganizational trust on financial performance: proposing innovation as a mediating variable to sustain in a disruptive era. Sustainability, 13(17), 9947
• 26.Olsson, A., B. Paredes, K. M., Johansson, U., Olander Roese, M. and Ritzén, S., (2019). Organizational climate for innovation and creativity - a study in Swedish retail organizations. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 29(3), 243-261.
• 27.Ozgenel, M., (2020). The role of charismatic leader in school culture. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 20(86), 85-114.
• 28.Palos-Sanchez, P., Saura, J. R., Grilo, A. and Ramirez, R. R., (2020). How attitudes, vision and ability to capture opportunities affect startups’ business creativity. Creativity Studies, 13(2), 387-405.
• 29.Patterson, F., Zibarras, L. D., (2017). Selecting for creativity and innovation potential: implications for practice in healthcare education. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 22(2), 417-428.
• 30.Raj-Reichert, G., (2020). Global value chains, contract manufacturers, and the middle-income trap: The electronics industry in Malaysia. The Journal of Development Studies, 56(4), 698-716.
• 31.Richter, N., Jackson, P. and Schildhauer, T., (2018). Outsourcing creativity: An abductive study of open innovation using corporate accelerators. Creativity and Innovation Management, 27(1), 69-78.
• 32.Schubert, T., Tavassoli, S., (2020). Product innovation and educational diversity in top and middle management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 63(1), 272-294.
• 33.Schumacker, R. E., Lomax, R. G., (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling, Second edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• 34.Stojcic, N., Hashi, I. and Orlic, E., (2018). Creativity, innovation effectiveness and productive efficiency in the UK. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(4), 564-580.
• 35.Tucker, L. R., Lewis, C., (1973). The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.
• 36.Sutanto, E. M., (2017). The influence of organizational learning capability and organizational creativity on organizational innovation of Universities in East Java, Indonesia. Asia Pacific Management Review, 22(3), 128-135.
• 37.Waruwu, H., Asbari, M., Purwanto, A., Nugroho, Y. A., Fikri, M. A. A., Fauji, A. and Agistiawati, E., (2020). The Role of Transformational Leadership, Organizational Learning and Structure on Innovation Capacity: Evidence from Indonesia Private Schools. EduPsyCouns: Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 2(1), 378-397.
• 38.Zhang, F., Zhu, L., (2019). Enhancing corporate sustainable development: Stakeholder pressures, organizational learning, and green innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1012-1026.
• 39.Zuo, L., Fisher, G. J. and Yang, Z., (2019). Organizational learning and technological innovation: the distinct dimensions of novelty and meaningfulness that impact firm performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(6), 1166-1183.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).