Restoration is an investment. Comparing restoration costs and ecosystem services in selected European wetlands

• Autorzy: Strzęciwilk Karolina , Grygoruk Mateusz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/jwld.2025.153534

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Wetland restoration aims to restore key environmental functions to degraded ecosystems, but it comes with costs, which can hinder public acceptance of restoration. However, the benefits we gain from restoration can be valued higher than the costs of restoration, making restoration an investment. This study aimed to analyse the costs of wetland restoration projects implemented in selected European countries. We analysed 100 projects implemented between 1996 and 2019. Results showed increasing numbers of wetland restoration projects implemented in Europe since the early 21^st century. The total budgets for wetland restoration projects rose in the years reviewed, increasing the average project budgets. The average cost of restoring 1 hectare of wetland in the 100 projects analysed was 9,084 EUR∙ha^-1, which, including the amortisation rate of actions implemented to restore wetlands, allowed us to estimate the average unit cost of wetland restoration to 227 EUR∙ha^-1∙y^-1. Available information on the average values of ecosystem services provided by wetlands (estimated to be 4,011 EUR∙ha^-1∙y^-1) allowed us to conclude that the value of sustainably managed wetlands is from ten to fifty times higher than the average wetland restoration costs. Our findings indicate that wetland restoration should be considered an investment, as the revenue the society gains from reestablished wetlands outweighs the costs of their restoration. These findings contribute to the international discussion on wetland restoration’s role in boosting environmental and economic resilience, underscoring the need for regular restoration efforts to benefit ecosystems, economies, and societies.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

ecosystem services; management; peatland; restoration; riparian; valuation

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo ITP
• Czasopismo: Journal of Water and Land Development
• Rocznik: 2025
• Tom: no. 64
• Strony: 221--229
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 32 poz., mapa, tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Strzęciwilk Karolina

• Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Centre for Climate Research, Nowoursynowska St, 166, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5226-8039

autor

Grygoruk Mateusz

• Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Centre for Climate Research, Nowoursynowska St, 166, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6465-9697

Bibliografia

• Aubert, G., McDonald, H. and Scholl, L. (2022) How much will the implementation of the Nature Restoration Law cost and how much funding is available? Brussels, Berlin: IEEP, Ecologic Institute. Available at: https://ieep.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/4_-Nature-Restoration-Law-and-Funding.pdf (Accessed: December 19, 2022).
• Bączyk, A. et al. (2018) “Influence of technical maintenance measures on the ecological status of agricultural lowland rivers – Systematic review and implications for river management,” Science of the Total Environment, 627, pp. 189–199. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.235.
• Barbier, E.B., Acreman, N. and Knowler, D. (1997) Economic valuation of wetlands: A guide for policymakers and planners. Gland, Switzerland: Ramsar Convention Bureau. Available at: https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/lib/lib_valuation_e.pdf (Accessed: October 10, 2021).
• Beckmann, A. (2020) 1 + 1 + 1 = 5 …or maybe even 9. Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/1-5-maybe-even-9-andreas-beckmann (Accessed: October 10, 2021).
• Belyaev, A.I., Pugacheva, A.M. and Korneeva, E.A. (2022) “Assessment of ecosystem services of wetlands of the Volga–Akhtuba flood-plain,” Sustainability, 14(18), 11240. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811240.
• Bertolini, C. and Mosto da, J. (2021) “Restoring for the climate: A review of coastal wetland restoration research in the last 30 years,” Restoration Ecology, 29, e13438. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13438.
• CBD (2015) “Wetlands and ecosystem services,” CBD Policy Brief. Montreal, Canada: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Available at: https://www.cbd.int/waters/doc/wwd2015/wwd-2015-press-briefs-en.pdf (Accessed: July 18, 2019).
• Clarkson, B.R., Ausseil, A.E. and Gerbeaux, P. (2013) “Wetland ecosystem services,” in J.R. Dymond (ed.) Ecosystem services in New Zealand: Conditions and trends. Lincoln, New Zealand: Manaaki Whenua Press, pp. 192–203.
• Costanza, R. et al. (1997) “The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital,” Nature, 387, pp. 253–260. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0.
• Costanza, R. et al. (2014) “Changes in the global value of ecosystem services,” Global Environmental Change, 26, pp. 152–158. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002.
• CINEA (no date) LIFE Programme. Brussels: European Climate Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency. Available at: https://cinea.ec.europa.eu/life_pl (Accessed: July 20, 2019).
• Čížková, H. et al. (2013) “Actual state of European wetlands and their possible future in the context of global climate change,” Aquatic Sciences, 75(1), pp. 3–26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-011-0233-4.
• Davidson, N. (2014) “How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area,” Marine and Freshwater Research, 65(10), pp. 934–941. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1071/MF14173.
• Eric, A. et al. (2022) “Evaluating ecosystem services for agricultural wetlands: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Wetlands Ecology and Management, 30, pp. 1129–1149. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-022-09857-5.
• Groot de, R. et al. (2012) “Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units,” Ecosystem Services, 1(1), pp. 50–61. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005.
• Grygoruk, M. et al. (2013) “How much for water? Economic assessment and mapping of floodplain water storage as a catchment-scale ecosystem service of wetlands,” Water, 5(4), pp. 1760–1779. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/w5041760.
• Grygoruk, M. et al. (2015) “Assessing habitat exposure to eutrophica-tion in restored wetlands: Model-supported ex-ante approach to rewetting drained mires,” Journal of Environmental Management, 152, pp. 230–240. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.049.
• Grygoruk, M. and Rannow, S. (2017) “Mind the gap! Lessons from science-based stakeholder dialogue in climate-adapted management of wetlands,” Journal of Environmental Management, 186 (Pt 1), pp. 108–119. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.066.
• Jabłońska, E. et al. (2020) “Catchment-scale analysis reveals high cost-effectiveness of wetland buffer zones as a remedy to non-point nutrient pollution in North-Eastern Poland,” Water, 12(3), 629. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030629.
• LIFE PROGRAMME (2016) LIFE PROGRAMME European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA) FINAL report: Life to ad(d)mire. LIFE08/NAT/S/000268. Available at: https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/life/publicWebsite/project/LIFE08-NAT-S-000268/life-to-addmire-restoring-drained-and-overgrowing-wetlands (Accessed: July 30, 2019).
• Liu, E. et al. (2023) “Production in peatlands: Comparing ecosystem services of different land use options following conventional farming,” Science of the Total Environment, 875, 162534. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162534.
• Makrickas, E. et al. (2023) “Trading wood for water and carbon in peatland forests? Rewetting is worth more than wood production,” Journal of Environmental Management, 341, 117952. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117952.
• Patten, D.T. (2006) “Restoration of wetland and riparian systems: The role of science, adaptive management, history, and values,” Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 134, pp. 9–18. Available at: https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=jcwre (Accessed: August 3, 2019).
• Petsch, D.K. et al. (2023) “Ecosystem services provided by river-floodplain ecosystems,” Hydrobiologia, 850, pp. 2563–2584. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-04916-7.
• Ramsar (2015) “Wetlands: A global disappearing act,” Factsheet, 3. Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. Available at: http://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/factsheet3_global_disappearing_act_0.pdf (Accessed: July 18, 2019).
• Regulation (2024) “Regulation (EU) 2024/1991 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2024 on nature restoration and amending Regulation (EU) 2022/869 (Text with EEA relevance),” Official Journal, L, 2024/1991.
• Siuta, M. and Nedelciu, C.E. (2016) Report on socio-economic benefits of wetland restoration in Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest, Hungary: CEEweb for Biodiversity. Available at: https://www.ceeweb.org/ducuments/publications/report_on_socio_economic_benefits_of_wetland_restoration_in_CEE.pdf (Accessed: July 30, 2019).
• Stachowicz, M. et al. (2022) “To store or to drain – to lose or to gain? Rewetting drained peatlands as a measure for increasing water storage in the transboundary Neman River Basin,” Science of the Total Environment, 829, 154560. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154560.
• Stachowicz, M. et al. (2025) “Hydrological response to rewetting of drained peatlands – A case study of three raised bogs in Norway,” Land, 14(1), 142. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/land14010142.
• Strzęciwilk, K., Stachowicz, M. and Grygoruk, M. (2023) “Świadczenia ekosystemów mokradłowych, czyli rzecz o niemających alternatywy, opartych na naturze metodach gospodarowania wodą [Ecosystem services of wetlands – on the nature-based water management solutions that have no technical alternative],” Gospodarka Wodna, 1. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15199/22.2023.1.3.
• Szałkiewicz, E., Jusik, S. and Grygoruk, M. (2018) “Status of and perspectives on river restoration in Europe: 310,000 Euros per hectare of restored river,” Sustainability, 10(1), 129. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010129.
• Tóth, F. et al. (2020) “Seasonal differences in taxonomic diversity of rotifer communities in a Hungarian Lowland oxbow lake exposed to aquaculture effluent,” Water, 12(5), 1300. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051300.