Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Purpose: This paper aims to assess the impact of energy economic instruments and macroeconomic stabilization on decarbonization in the Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs) from 2005 to 2019. The central research hypothesis (H) is "The impact of economic instruments and macroeconomic stabilization on decarbonization varies in the Central and Eastern European Countries from 2005 to 2019". Design/methodology/approach: We use the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) to verify our hypothesis. Findings: The impact of economic instruments is varied. The most effective instruments are the EU Emissions Trading System, outlays on renewable energy sources, and futures contracts for CO2 emissions. Research limitations/implications: The availability of data, the choice of normalization method and the choice of estimation method for both the one-equation model. Practical implications: The results show that economic instruments and macroeconomic stabilization have a positive impact on the decarbonization of economies, hence shaping their appropriate level is important for sustainable development. Social implications: Economic instruments impact on decarbonization and thus improve the quality of life. Originality/value: The impact of economic instruments is varied. The most effective instruments are the EU Emissions Trading System, outlays on renewable energy sources, and futures contracts for CO2 emissions.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
319--334
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 39 poz.
Twórcy
autor
- Faculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodz
autor
- Faculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodz
Bibliografia
- 1. Boţa-Avram, C., Groşanu, A., Răchişan, P.-R., Gavriletea, M.D. (2018). The Bidirectional Causality between Country-Level Governance, Economic Growth and Sustainable Development: A Cross-Country Data Analysis. Sustainability, 10, 502. DOI 103390/su10020502.
- 2. Brazovskaia, V., Gutman, S., Zaytsev, A. (2021). Potential Impact of Renewable Energy on the Sustainable Development of Russian Arctic Territories. Energies, 14(12), 3691. DOI 10.3390/en14123691.
- 3. Catalano, M., Forni, L., Pezzolla, E. (2020). Climate-change adaptation: The role of fiscal policy. Resource and Energy Economics, 59. DOI 101016/jreseneeco201907005.
- 4. Drummond, P., Ekins, P. (2017). Cost-effective decarbonization in the EU: an overview of policy suitability. Climate Policy, 17, sup. 1, S51-S71, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2016. 1258634.
- 5. Ernst, A., Albers, C. (2017). Regression assumptions in clinical psychology research practice—A systematic review of common misconceptions. Peer J., 5, e3323. Available https://peerjcom/articles/3323pdf
- 6. Fajczak-Kowalska, A., Misztal, A., Kowalska, M. (2021). Energy, Pollution, and Transport Taxes as Instruments of Sustainable Development of Manufacturing Enterprises in Emerging Economies in the European Union. European Research Studies Journal, XXIV, 2B, DOI: 10.35808/ersj/2261.
- 7. Flachsland, Ch., Pahle, M., Burtraw, D., Edenhofer, O., Elkerbout, M., Fischer, C., Tietjen, O., Zetterberg, L. (2020). How to avoid history repeating itself: the case for an EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) price floor revisited. Climate Policy, 20, 1, 133-142, DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2019.1682494.
- 8. Gouldson, A., Sudmant, A., Khreis, H., Papargyropoulou, E. (2018). The Economic and Social Benefits of Low-Carbon Cities: A Systematic Review of the Evidence Coalition for Urban Transitions London and Washington, DC. Available: http://newclimateeconomynet/content/cities-working-papers.
- 9. Habert, G., Miller, S.A., John, V.M. et al. (2020). Environmental impacts and decarbonization strategies in the cement and concrete industries. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 1, 559-573. DOI 101038/s43017-020-0093-3.
- 10. Haldar, A., Sethi, N. (2020). Effect of institutional quality and renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions−an empirical investigation for developing countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-11532-2.
- 11. Hany, E., Khaled, S.A. (2017). Green Fiscal Reforms. Environment and Sustainable Development, 1, 48-52. DOI 1033094/82017114852.
- 12. Hintermayer, M. (2020). A carbon price floor in the reformed EU ETS: Design matters! Energy Policy, 147, 111905. DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111905.
- 13. Issah, M., Antwi, S. (2017). Role of macroeconomic variables on firms’ performance: Evidence from the UK. Cogent Economics & Finance, 5, 1. DOI: 101080/2332203920171405581.
- 14. Jenniches, S. (2018). Assessing the regional economic impacts of renewable energy sources – A literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 93, 35-51. DOI 101016/jrser201805008.
- 15. Kołodko, G.W. (1993). Kwadratura pięciokąta. Od załamania gospodarczego do trwałego wzrostu. Warszawa: Poltext.
- 16. Kolosok, S., Bilan, Y., Vasylieva, T., Wojciechowski, A., Morawski, M. (2021). A scoping review of renewable energy, sustainability and the environment. Energies, 14(15), 4490.
- 17. Louche, C., Busch, T., Crifo, P., Marcus, A. (2019). Financial Markets and the Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy: Challenging the Dominant. Logics Orgzanization & Environment, 32, 1. DOI 101177/1086026619831516.
- 18. Månberger, A. (2018). Deep Decarbonization and Energy Security for Low-Carbon Societies. In: A.R. Rocamora, T. Ishikawa (Eds.), Green Growth and Decarbonization of Energy Systems in a Changing World. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES).
- 19. Mateusz, P., Wojciechowski, A. (2012). Real-Time Hand Pose Estimation Using Classifiers. Conference Proc. of Computer Vision and Graphics.
- 20. Mazzanti, M., Rizzo, U. (2017). Diversely moving towards a green economy: Techno-organisational decarbonisation trajectories and environmental policy in EU sectors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 115, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.026.
- 21. Mckibbin, W., Morris, A., Panton, A., Wilcoxen, P. (2017). Climate Change and Monetary Policy: Dealing with Disruption. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI 102139/ssrn3084399.
- 22. Menanteau, G.P., El-Methni, J. (2020). Renewable energy policy effectiveness: A panel data analysis across Europe and Latin America. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 133, 110351, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110351
- 23. Naegele, H., Zaklan, A. (2019). Does the EU ETS cause carbon leakage in European manufacturing? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 93, 125-147, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2018.11.004.
- 24. Owen, R., Brennan, G., Lyon, F. (2018). Enabling investment for the transition to a low carbon economy: government policy to finance early stage green innovation Current Opinion. Environmental Sustainability, 31, 137-145. DOI 101016/jcosust201803004.
- 25. Papadis, E., Tsatsaronis, G. (2020). Challenges in the decarbonization of the energy sector. Energy, 205, 118025, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118025.
- 26. Papadopoulou, C.-A., Papadopoulou, M.P., Laspidou, C., Munaretto, S., Brouwer, F. (2020). Towards a Low-Carbon Economy: A Nexus-Oriented Policy Coherence Analysis in Greece. Sustainability, 12, 373. DOI 103390/su12010373.
- 27. Peñasco, C., Anadón, L.D., Verdolini, E. (2021). Systematic review of the outcomes and trade-offs of ten types of decarbonization policy instruments. Nat. Clim. Chang., 11. DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-00971-
- 28. Pieloch-Babiarz, A., Misztal, A., Kowalska, M. (2021). An impact of macroeconomic stabilization on the sustainable development of manufacturing enterprises: the case of Central and Eastern European Countries. Environ. Dev. Sustain., 23, DOI 10.1007/s10668-020-00988-4.
- 29. Pietzcker, R.C., Osorio, S., Rodrigues, R. (2021). Tightening EU ETS targets in line with the European Green Deal: Impacts on the decarbonization of the EU power sector. Applied Energy, 293, 116914, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116914.
- 30. Raveh, O. (2020). Monetary Policy, Natural Resources, and Federal Redistribution. Environ. Resource Econ., 75, 585-613. DOI 101007/s10640-020-00400-9.
- 31. Rivera, N.M. (2020). Is Mining an Environmental Disamenity? Evidence from Resource Extraction Site Openings. Environ. Resource Econ., 75, 485-528. DOI 101007/s10640-019-00397-w.
- 32. Rosendahl, K.E. (2019). EU ETS and the waterbed effect. Nat. Clim. Chang., 9, 734-735. DOI: 10.1038/s41558-019-0579-5.
- 33. Sachs, J.D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Mazzucato, M. (2019). Six Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Sustain., 2, 805-814. DOI 101038/s41893-019-0352-9.
- 34. Simionescu, M., Wojciechowski, A., Tomczyk, A., Rabe, M. (2021). Revised environmental kuznets curve for V4 countries and Baltic states. Energies, 14(11), 3302.
- 35. Sofia, D., Gioiella, F., Lotrecchiano, N., Giuliano, A. (2020). Cost-benefit analysis to support decarbonization scenario for 2030: A case study in Italy. Energy Policy, 137, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111137.
- 36. Stef, N., Ben Jabeur, S. (2020). Climate Change Legislations and Environmental Degradation. Environ. Resource Econ., 77, 839-868. DOI 101007/s10640-020-00520-2
- 37. Umar, M., Ji, X., Kirikkaleli, D., Shahbaz, M., Zhou, X. (2020). Environmental cost of natural resources utilization and economic growth: Can China shift some burden through globalization for sustainable development? Sustainable Development, 28, 6, DOI 10.1002/sd.2116.
- 38. Verburg, R., Rahn, E., Verweij, P.A., Kuijk, M., Ghazoul, J. (2019). An innovation perspective to climate change adaptation in coffee systems. Environmental Science & Policy, 97, 16-24. DOI 101016/jenvsci201903017.
- 39. Wang, K., Zhang, A. (2018). Climate change, natural disasters and adaptation investments: Inter- and intra-port competition and cooperation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 117, A, 158-189. DOI 101016/jtrb201808003.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-04d19914-417a-469e-ba86-6ddd1e1203b9