Estimation of radiation doses for transition from emergency to existing exposure situation

• Autorzy: Hamed A. A. , Salem E. F. , Abdien A. K.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/nuka-2015-0146

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The transition from emergency to existing exposure situation is an important stage in the nuclear or radiological emergency plan. It requires arrangements to be put in place and to be implemented so as to ensure that the transition is made in a coordinated and orderly manner of guidelines for adjusting the undertaken protective actions and other response actions. The delivering radiation doses to public and environmental pollution are monitoring that measurements should be implemented according to certain plan of intervention and protective actions in the different stages of the N/R accident. In this study, a computer model (RASCAL) is used to calculate the effect of severe accident could have detected on an operating nuclear power reactor PWR and the possible impact on the public. Features for the decision to implement the transition from emergency to existing exposure situation are proposed depending on the estimation of the collection of deliver exposure doses to the public and environment due to monitoring the different radiation sources resulting from the N/R accident.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

nuclear emergency; emergency computer code; severe accident

• Wydawca: Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology
• Czasopismo: Nukleonika
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 60, No. 4, part 2
• Strony: 943--950
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 11 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Hamed A. A.

• Egypt Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Authority, Nasr City, P. O. Box 7551, Cairo, Egypt

autor

Salem E. F.

• Egypt Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Authority, Nasr City, P. O. Box 7551, Cairo, Egypt

autor

Abdien A. K.

• Egypt Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Authority, Nasr City, P. O. Box 7551, Cairo, Egypt

Bibliografia

• 1. Diaz Maurin, F. (2011). Fukushima: Consequences of systemic problems in nuclear plant design. Economic & Political Weekly (Mumbai), 46(13), 10–12. http://epw.in/epw/uploads/articles/15865.pdf.
• 2. International Commission on Radiological Protection. (2009). Application of the Commission’s recommendations for the protection of people in emergency exposure situations. (ICRP Publication 109). Ann.ICRP, 39(1).
• 3.Working Group Special Committee on Nuclear Disaster. (2012). Interim report for reviewing. Regulatory guide: Emergency preparedness for nuclear facilities, nuclear safety commission emergency preparedness guidelines. 4. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2012, March). RASCAL
• 4. Description of models and methods. Washington, DC: Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response. (20555-0001).
• 5.A European manual. (2002). Off-site emergency planning and response to nuclear accidents.
• 6. International Commission on Radiological Protection. (1991). Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. (Publication 60). Oxford: Pergamom Press.
• 7.Jensen, P. H. (2012). Justification, optimization and decision – aiding in existing exposure situations. Section of Applied Health Physics, Risø National Laboratory, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
• 8.International Atomic Energy Agency. (1996). International basic safety standards for protection against radiation and for the safety of radiation sources. Vienna: IAEA. (Safety Series No. 115).
• 9. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2002, January). Modeling potential reactor accident consequences. (NUREG/BR-0359).
• 10. International Atomic Energy Agency. (1997). Generic assessment procedures for determining protective actions during a reactor accident. Vienna: IAEA. (IAEA-TECDOC-955).
• 11. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2002). Safety requirements in emergency preparedness and response. Vienna: IAEA. (IAEA-SR-GS-R-2).