PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Assessment of the digital economy's level among the EU countries - an empirical study

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Ocena poziomu gospodarki cyfrowej w krajach UE - badanie empiryczne
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The development of new technologies brings a boom in global business and trade and increases demands on knowledge and skills, which is reflected positively in economic growth. The aim of the research is to investigate the best EU countries in the digital economy, using two representative approaches. The attention is focused on the DESI index in 2014-2021 and the Global Digital Competitiveness Index. Using multidimensional approach and multi-criteria methods, the best countries were identified as Denmark, Finland and the Netherlands and also driving forces, both significant in statistical and economic contexts. The significant correlations between the dimensions of the DESI index were also demonstrated. The identified key factors for managerial implications in the strategy of digital transformation of the EU are human capital, integration of digital technology and digital skills, based on the best practices from the best EU countries.
PL
Rozwój nowych technologii powoduje gwałtowny wzrost w globalnym biznesie i handlu oraz zwiększa zapotrzebowanie na wiedzę i umiejętności, co pozytywnie odbija się na wzroście gospodarczym. Celem badania jest identyfikacja najlepszych krajów UE pod względem gospodarki cyfrowej, przy użyciu dwóch reprezentatywnych podejść. Uwagę zwraca indeks DESI za okres- 2014-2021 oraz Global Digital Competitiveness Index. Stosując podejście wielowymiarowe i metody wielokryterialne, za najlepiej rozwinięte kraje pod względem realizacji gospodarki cyfrowej zostały uznane: Dania, Finlandia i Holandia, dodatkowo zidentyfikowano siły napędowe tej sytuacji, istotne w kontekście statystycznym i ekonomicznym. Wykazano również istotne korelacje między wymiarami wskaźnika DESI. W oparciu o najlepsze praktyki przodujących pod względem cyfryzacji krajów UE zidentyfikowano kluczowe czynniki o implikacjach zarządczych w strategii transformacji cyfrowej UE do których zaliczono: kapitał ludzki, integrację technologii cyfrowej i umiejętności cyfrowych.
Rocznik
Strony
107--124
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 50 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • University of Prešov in Prešov, Faculty of Management and Business
  • University of Prešov in Prešov, Faculty of Management and Business
autor
  • University of Prešov in Prešov, Faculty of Management and Business
  • University of Prešov in Prešov, Faculty of Management and Business
Bibliografia
  • 1.Afonasova et al. (2019). Digitalization in Economy and Innovation: The Effect on Social and Economic Processes. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19 (2), 22-32.
  • 2.Balejová, M. (2015). Vyšehradská skupina na ceste k digitálnej ekonomike (Vysehrad group on the way to digital economy). Economic, Political and Legal Issues of International Relations, p. 25. Bratislava: Ekonom. ISBN 978-80-225-4099-5.
  • 3.Balcerzak, P., Bernard, M. P. (2017). Digital economy in Visegrad countries. Multiple-criteria decision analysis at regional level in the years 2012 and 2015. Journal of Competitiveness, 9(2), 5-18.
  • 4.Bánhidi, Z., Dobos, I. and Nemeslaki, A. (2020). What the overall Digital Economy and Society Index reveals: A statistical analysis of the DESI EU28 dimensions. Regional Statistics, 10(2), 42-62.
  • 5.Barefoot, K., Curtis, D., Jolliff, W., Nicholson, J. R. and Omohundro, R. (2018). Defining and measuring the digital economy. US Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis, Washington, DC, 15.
  • 6.Başol, O., Yalçın, E. C. (2021). How does the digital economy and society index (DESI) affect labor market indicators in EU countries? Human Systems Management, 40(4), 503-512.
  • 7.Borowiecki, R., Siuta-Tokarska, B., Maroń, J., Suder, M., Thier, A. and Żmija, K. (2021). Developing digital economy and society in the light of the issue of digital convergence of the markets in the European Union countries. Energies, 14(9), 2717.
  • 8.Borza, S., Inta, M., Serbu, R. and Marza, B. (2018). Multi-criteria analysis of pollution caused by auto traffic in a geographical area limited to applicability for an eco-economy environment. Sustainability, 10(11), 4240.
  • 9.Brynjolfsson, E., Kahin, B. (Eds.). (2002). Understanding the digital economy: data, tools, and research. MIT press.
  • 10.Bukht, R., Heeks, R. (2017). Defining, conceptualising and measuring the digital economy. Development Informatics working paper, (68). ISBN: 978-1-905469-62-8.
  • 11.Colin, N., Landier, A., Mohnen, P. and Perrot, A. (2015). The digital economy. Notes du conseil danalyse economique, (7), 1-12.
  • 12.Dahmani, M., Mabrouki, M. and Ben Youssef, A. (2022). The Information and Communication Technologies-Economic Growth Nexus in Tunisia: A Cross-Section Dynamic Panel Approach. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 18(2), 161-174.
  • 13.Dahlman, C., Mealy, S. and Wermelinger, M. (2016). Harnessing the digital economy for developing countries. OECD Development Centre Working Paper, 334, 77.
  • 14.DESI. (2020). Available at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi, Accessed on: 4.2.2022.
  • 15.DESI. (2021). Available at: https://digital-agenda-data.eu/datasets/digital_agenda_ scoreboard_key_indicators/visualizations, Access on: 8.2.2022.
  • 16.D'Souza, C., Williams, D. (2017). The digital economy. Bank of Canada Review, 2017 (Spring), 5-18.
  • 17.Esses, D., Csete, M. S. and Németh, B. (2021). Sustainability and Digital Transformation in the Visegrad Group of Central European Countries. Sustainability, 13(11), 5833.
  • 18.Gavurova, B., Cepel, M., Belas, J. and Dvorsky, J. (2020). Strategic Management in SMEs and its Significance for Enhancing the Competitiveness in the V4 Countries - A Comparative Analysis. Management and Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 15(4), 557-569.
  • 19.Goldfarb, A., Greenstein, S. M. and Tucker, C. E. (Eds.). (2015). Economic analysis of the digital economy. University of Chicago Press.
  • 20.Grigorescu, A., Lincaru, C., Pîrciog, S. and Chițescu, R-I. (2019). Competitiveness and sustainable development in public services. Management and Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 14(1), 108-129.
  • 21.Holford, W. D. (2019). The future of human creative knowledge work within the digital economy. Futures, 105, 143-154.
  • 22.Huang, I. B., Keisler, J. and Linkov, I. (2011). Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends. Science of the total environment, 409(19), 3578-3594.
  • 23.IMD. (2022). Available at: https://www.imd.org/centers/world-competitiveness-center/rankings/world-competitiveness, Accessed on: 9.2.2022.
  • 24.Ivanová, E., Čepel, M. (2018). The impact of innovation performance on the competitiveness of the Visegrad 4 countries. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(1), 54-72.
  • 25.Ivanová, E., Masárová, J., and Koišová, E. (2019). Hodnotenie úrovne rozvoja digitálnej ekonomiky a digitálnych zručností v Slovenskej a Českej republike (Evaluation of the level of development of the digital economy and digital skills in the Slovak and Czech Republics). Proceedings of scientific papers from the international scientific conference - The impact of Industry 4.0 on job creation, pp.167. ISBN 978-80-8075-903-2.
  • 26.Jenčová, S. et al. (2021). Financial analysis and competitiveness of public universities of Slovakia in the context of financial management. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 24(2), 156-177.
  • 27.Kersan-Skabic, I. (2021). Digital Trade Enablers and Barriers in the European Union. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 17(4), 99-109.
  • 28.Kiseľáková, D., Širá, E. and Šofranková, B. (2021). Digital performance in V4 countries. Journal of Management and Business: Research and Practice, 13(2), 10.
  • 29.Kovács, T. Z., Bittner, B., Huzsvai, L. and Nábrádi, A. (2022). Convergence and the Matthew Effect in the European Union Based on the DESI Index. Mathematics, 10(4), 613.
  • 30.Laitsou, E., Kargas, A. and Varoutas, D. (2020). Digital Competitiveness in the European Union era: The Greek case. Economies, 8(4), 85.
  • 31.Masárová, T., Kordoš, M. and Strunz, H. (2018). The impact of Industry 4.0 initiative on labour market. Proceedings of International Scientific Conference Economic and Social Policy (pp. 4-6).
  • 32.Milošević, N., Dobrota, M. and Rakočević, S.B. (2018). Digital economy in Europe: Evaluation of countries' performances. Zbornik Radova Ekonomski Fakultet u Rijeka, 36(2), 861-880.
  • 33.Novikova N. V., Strogonova, E. V. (2020). Regional aspects of studying the digital economy in the system of economic growth drivers. Journal of New Economy, 21(2), 76-93.
  • 34.Nwaiwu, F. (2018). Review and comparison of conceptual frameworks on digital business transformation. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(3), 86-100.
  • 35.OECD. (2020). A Roadmap toward a Common Framework for Measuring the Digital Economy. Report for the G20 Digital Economy Task Force. Saudi Arabia, 123.
  • 36.Parra, J., Pérez-Pons, M. E. and González, J. (2020). Study Based on the Incidence of the Index of Economy and Digital Society (DESI) in the GDP of the Eurozone Economies. International Symposium on Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence 17th International Conference - Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1242, 164-168.
  • 37.Rusly, F. H., et al. (2019). Modelling the internal forces of SMEs digital adaptation strategy towards industry revolution 4.0. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 24(1), 306-321.
  • 38.Russo, V. (2020). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). European guidelines and empirical applications on the territory. Qualitative and Quantitative Models in Socio-Economic Systems and Social Work, 208, 427-442.
  • 39.Severvic, N. (2007). Digital Ekonomika. Ekonomika, Journal for Economic Theory and Practice and Social Issues, 53(1350-2019-2752), 104-111.
  • 40.Sevgi, H. (2021). Analysis of the digital economy and society index (DESI) through a cluster analysis. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23, 37-51.
  • 41.Širá, E., Kotulič, R., Kravčáková Vozárová, I. and Daňová, M. (2021). Sustainable development in EU countries in the framework of the Europe 2020 strategy. Processes, 9(3), 443.
  • 42.Stankovic, J. J., Marjanovic, I., Drezgic, S. and Popovic, Z. (2021). The Digital Competitiveness of European Countries: A Multiple-Criteria Approach. Journal of Competitiveness, 13(2), 117-134.
  • 43.Stavytskyy, A., Kharlamova, G. and Stoica, E. A. (2019). The analysis of the digital economy and society index in the EU. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 9(3), 245-261.
  • 44.Štefko, R., Vašaničová, P., Jenčová, S. and Pachura, A. (2021). Management and economic sustainability of the Slovak industrial companies with medium energy intensity. Energies, 14(2), 267.
  • 45.Stoica, E. A., Bogoslov, I. A. (2017). A comprehensive analysis regarding DESI country progress for Romania relative to the European average trend. Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business Education, 2(1), 258-266.
  • 46.Vavrek, R. (2019). Evaluation of the Impact of Selected Weighting Methods on the Results of the TOPSIS Technique. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 18(06), 1821-1843.
  • 47.Vyshnevskyi, O., Stashkevych, I., Shubna, O. and Barkova, S. (2021). Economic growth in the conditions of digitalization in the EU countries. Estudios de economía aplicada, 38(4), 4041.
  • 48.Zaharia, M., Balacescu, A. (2020). Digital Economy and Society. Comparative Cluster Analysis of EU States. Journal of Applied Computer Science and Mathematics, 14(29), 30-36.
  • 49.Zhang, W., Zhao, S., Wan, X. and Yao, Y. (2021). Study on the effect of digital economy on high-quality economic development in China. PloS one, 16(9), e0257365.
  • 50.Zoltan, B., Imre, D. and András, N. (2019). Comparative Analysis of the Development of the Digital Economy in Russia and EU Measured with DEA and Using Dimensions of DESI. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Экономика, 35(4), 588-605.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-0493ff4e-bc18-4379-b8fe-49c1ab2828b0
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.