Harmonizacja strategii pomiarowych do oceny narażenia na: nanoobiekty, ich aglomeraty i agregaty (NO A A)

• Autorzy: Jankowska E.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Harmonizing measurement strategies for assessing exposure to nano-objects and their agglomerates and aggregates (NOAA)

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

W artykule przedstawiono zagadnienia, które powinny być uwzględnione podczas harmonizacji metod pomiarów wykonywanych w rzeczywistych warunkach na stanowiskach pracy w kontekście oceny narażenia i ryzyka zawodowego oraz doboru właściwych środków ochrony. Stwierdzono, że istotnym zagadnieniem jest również harmonizacja w zakresie: analizowania, oceny i opracowywania sprawozdań dotyczących danych o narażeniu na: nanoobiekty, ich aglomeraty i agregaty (NOAA), podczas badań wykonywanych w rzeczywistych warunkach ich emisji na stanowiskach pracy oraz określenie trybu postępowania podczas kalibrowania aparatury pomiarowej stosowanej w badaniach emisji NOAA w czasie rzeczywistym. Bardzo ważnym działaniem, z uwagi na opracowywanie baz danych, jest przechowywanie informacji dotyczących narażenia na NOAA i oceny ryzyka zawodowego związanego z występowaniem NOAA w środowisku pracy. Informacje te mogą stanowić podstawę do przyszłego rozwoju, kalibracji i walidacji modeli narażenia lub budowania scenariuszy narażenia.

EN

This article discusses harmonizing methods of measurements done in real conditions at workstations in the context of assessing exposure and occupational risk and selecting appropriate protection measures. It is important to harmonize the analysis, evaluation and reporting of data on exposure to nanoobjects during measurements done in real conditions and to determine procedures for calibrating equipment for measuring emission of nanoobjects in real time. In the context of the development of the database, it is also very important to store information on exposure to nanoobjects and on risk assessment related to the presence of nanoobjects in the working environment, 'lilis information can provide a basis for future development, calibration and validation of models or for building exposure scenarios.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

nanotechnologie; nanomateriały; nanoobiekty; NOAA; powietrze na stanowiskach pracy; strategie pomiarowe; ocena narażenia

EN

nanotechnology; nanomaterials; nano-objects; NOAA; workplace air; measurement strategies; evaluation of exposure

• Wydawca: Centralny Instytut Ochrony Pracy - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
• Czasopismo: Podstawy i Metody Oceny Środowiska Pracy
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Nr 4 (82)
• Strony: 7--21
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Jankowska E.

• Centralny Instytut Ochrony Pracy - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy 00-701 Warszawa ul. Czerniakowska 16

Bibliografia

• 1.Azong-Wara N., Asbach C., Stahlmecke B. i in.(2009) Optimisation of a thermophoretic personal sampler for nanoparticle exposure studies. J. Nanopart. Res. 11, 1611-24.
• 2.Bello D., Wardle Bl., Zhang J. (2010) Exposure to nanoparticles during drilling of CNT composites. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health. 16. 434-50.
• 3.BSI, British Standards Institution. London, UK( 2009) ,(BSI PD 6699 - 3) Nanotechnologies - part 3: guide to assessing airborne exposure in occupational settings relevant to nanomaterials.
• 4.Brouwer D., van Duuren-Stuurman B., Berges M., Jankowska E., Bard D., Mark D. (2009) From workplace air measurement results toward estimates of exposure? Development of a strategy to assess exposure to manufactured nano-objects. J. Nanopart. Res. 11(8), 1867-1881. DOI 10.1007/ si 1051-009-9772-1.
• 5.Brouwer D., Berges M., Virji M.A., Fransman W.. Bello D., Hodson L., Gabriel S., Tielemans E. (2012) Harminization of measurement strategies for exposure to manufactured nano-objects. Report of a workshop. Ann. Occup. Hyg. vol. 56,1, 1-9.
• 6.Brouwer D., van Duuren-Stuurman B., Berges M, Bard D., Jankowska E.. Moehlmann C., Pelzer J.. Mark D. (2013) Workplace air measurements and likelihood of exposure to manufactured nanoobjects, agglomerates, and aggregates. J. Nanopart. Res. 15, 2090. DOI 10.1007/s 11051-013-2090-7.
• 7.deCastro B.R.. Wang L., Mihalic J.N., Breysse P.N., Geyh A.S (2008) The longitudinal dependence of black carbon concentration on traffic volume in an urban environment. J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 58, 928-939.
• 8.Commission recommendation of 18 October (2011) on the definition of nanomaterial [Text with
• 9.EEA relevance] (2011 /696/EU). L 275/38 Official Journal of the European Union 20.10.2011. Guide to measuring airborne carbon nanotubes in workplace (2013) New energy and industrial technology development organization of Japan (NEDO), October.
• 10.Houseman E.A., Ryan L., Levy J.I., Spengler J.D. (2002) Autocorrelation in real-time continuous monitoring of microenvironments. Journal of Applied Statistics 29, 855-872.
• 11.ISO/TS 12901-1:2012 Nanotechnologies - Occupational risk management applied to engineered nanomaterials - Part 1 : Principles and approaches. ISO/TS 12901-2:2014 Nanotechnologies - Occupational risk management applied to engineered nanomaterials - Part 2: Used of the control banding approach.
• 12.Jankowska E., Łukaszewska J. (2013) Potencjalne narażenie na nanocząstki srebra podczas rozpylania preparatu do czyszczenia klimatyzacji. Medycyna Pracy 64 ( 1 ), 57-67.
• 13.Kałuża S., Balderhaar Orthen B., Honnert B., Jankowska E., Pietrowski P., Rosell MG., Tanarro C„ TejedorJ., Zugasti A. (2009) Workplace exposure to nanoparticles. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, EN 2.
• 14.Kuhlbusch T., Asbach C., Fissan H., Gohler D.. Stintz M. (2011) Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces. A review. Particle and Fibre Toxicology. 8, 22.
• 15.Methner M, Hodson L., Geraci C. (2010) Nanoparticle emission assessment technique (NEAT) for the identification and measurement of potential inhalation exposure to engineered nanomaterials - part A. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 7, 127-32.
• 16.Nanotransport project. Report nr 2008-0921.
• 17.Neubauer N. i in. (2011) A highly sensitive technique for detecting catalytically active nanoparticles against a background of general workplace aerosols. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2011, 304(1), 1-9. DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/304/1/012011.
• 18.NIOSH, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (2013) Current intelligence bulletin 65. Occupational exposure to carbon nanotubes and nanofibers. Cincinnati. OH: Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Publication 145.
• 19.NIOSH, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (2011). Current intelligence bulletin 63. Occupational exposure to titanium dioxide. Cincinnati, OH: Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Publication 160.
• 20.Neubauer N., Seipenbusch M., Kasper G. (2012) (Quasi) Real-time detection of catalytically active nanoparticles in presence of a background aerosol [W:] European Aerosol Conference 2012. Granada, Spain 2-7.09.2012.[http://www.eac20l2. com/EAC2012Book/files/98.pdf.].
• 21.Pfefferkorn F., Bello D., Haddad G. (2010) Characterization of exposures to airborne nanoscale particles during friction stir welding of aluminum. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 54, 486-503.
• 22.Płonka M. (2014) Co trzeba wiedzieć korzystając z modelu ARIMA i które parametry są kluczowe? 7.10.2014. [http://support.predictivesolutions.pl/ekspress/dow nload/EB54/mat/model_A R1M A__istotność_ parametrów.pdf.].
• 23.Rajan B., Alesbury R., Carton B. i in. (1997) European proposal for core information for storage and exchange of workplace exposure measurements on chemical agents. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 12, 31-9.
• 24.Ramachandran G. (2008) Toward better exposure assessment strategies - the new NIOSH Initiative. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 52, 297-301.
• 25.Schneider 71, Brouwer D., Koponen /. i in. (2011) Conceptual model assessment of inhalation exposure to manufactured nanoparticles. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology 21, 450-463.
• 26.Smith T.J., Kriebel D. (2010) A biologic approach to environmental assessment and epidemiology. New York, Oxford University Press.
• 27.Smith R.W., Sahl J.D., Kelsh M.A. i in. (1997) Task based exposure assessment: analytical strategies for summarizing data by occupational groups. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 58, 402-412.
• 28.Tielemans E., Marquart H., De Cock J. i in. (2002) A proposal for evaluation of exposure data. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 36, 287-97.
• 29.Tiered approach to an exposure measurement and assessment of nanoscale aerosols released from engineered nanomaterials in workplace operations. [https://www.vci.de/Downloads/Tiered- Approach.pdf.].
• 30.Virji M.A., IVoskie S.R., Waters M. i in. (2009) Agreement between task-based estimates of the full-shift noise exposure and the full-shift noise dosimetry. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 53, 201-2014.
• 31.White S.A., van den Broek N. (2004) Methods for assessing reliability and validity for a measurement tool. A case study and critique using the WHO hemoglobin colour scale. Stat. Med. 23, 1603-19.