Analysis communication network of construction project participants

• Autorzy: Trach Roman , Bushuyev Sergey

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.22630/PNIKS.2020.29.3.33

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The construction industry is characterized by limited resources and a high level of competition. Limited resources and a competitive environment determine knowledge and information as a particularly important resource for the development of the construction industry. A communication network is one of the elements of a knowledge management system in projects and serves to organize and maintain information links between project participants. We have analysed the communication network between project participants for residential building construction using social network analysis (SNA). The purpose of this work is the calculation and analysis centrality measures for participants in the construction project delivery. Centrality measures can answer the following questions whether the node is influential or central to the network and whether the node is critical for the flow of information in the network.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

social network analysis; centrality measures of nodes; construction project; communication; knowledge

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Szkoły Głównej Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie
• Czasopismo: Przegląd Naukowy Inżynieria i Kształtowanie Środowiska
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 29, No. 3
• Strony: 388--396
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 23 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Trach Roman

• Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie, Instytut Inżynierii Lądowej, ul. Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warszawa, Poland

autor

Bushuyev Sergey

• Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture

Bibliografia

• Abbsaian-Hosseini, A., Liu, S.M. & Hsiang, S.M. (2017). Social network analysis for construction crews. International Journal of Construction Management, 19(2), 1-15.
• Baiden, B.K., Price, A.D.F. & Dainty, A.R.J. (2006). The extent of team integration within construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24(1), 13-23.
• Bonacich, O.F. (1987). Power and centrality: a family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1170-1182.
• Bornholdt, S. & Schuster, H. (eds.). (2003). Handbook of graphs and networks: From the genome to the Internet. Weinheim: WileyVCH Verlag.
• Briscoe, G. & Dainty, A.R.J. (2005). Construction supply chain integration: an elusive goal? Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10(4), 319-326.
• Chinowsky, P. & Songer, A. (2011). Organizational management in construction. New York: Spon Press.
• Freeman, L.C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40, 35-41.
• Freeman, L.C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239.
• Loosemore, M. (1998). Social network analysis: using a quantitative tool within an interpretative context to explore the management of construction crises. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 5(4), 315-326.
• Madani, F., Daim, T. & Weng, C. (2017). Smart building technology network analysis: applying core–periphery structure analysis. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 12(1), 1-11.
• Mahmud, S. (2009). Framework for the role of self-organization in the handling of adaptive challenges. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 11(2), 1-14.
• Marsden, P. & Lin, Y.N. (1982). Social structure and network analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publishing.
• Nicolini, D., Holti, R. & Smalley, M. (2001). Integrating project activities: the theory and practice of managing the supply chain through clusters. Construction Management and Economics, 19(1), 37-47.
• Ochieng, E.G. & Price, A.D.F. (2009). Framework for managing multicultural project teams. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 16(6), 527-543.
• Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R. & Winograd, T. (1999). The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report 1999-66. Stanford: Stanford InfoLab, Stanford University.
• Project Management Institute [PMI] (2000). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide). Edition 2000. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
• Pryke, S. (2005). Towards a social network theory of project governance. Construction Management Economics, 23(9), 927-939.
• Pryke, S. (2012). Social network analysis in construction. Oxford: Wiley and Sons.
• Pryke, S., Badi, S., Almadhoob, H., Soundararaj, B. & Addyman, S. (2018). Self-organizing networks in complex infrastructure projects. Project Management Journal, 49(2), 18-41.
• Radziszewska-Zielina, E., Śladowski, G., Kania, E., Sroka, B. & Szewczyk, B. (2019). Managing information flow in self-organising networks of communication between construction project participants. Archives of Civil Engineering, 65(2), 133-148.
• Śladowski, G., Radziszewska-Zielina, E. & Kania, E. (2019). Analysis of self-organising networks of communication between the participants of a housing complex construction project. Archives of Civil Engineering, 65(1), 181-195.
• Trach, R. & Lendo-Siwicka, M. (2018). Zastosowanie sieciowej struktury organizacyjnej w zintegrowanej realizacji przedsięwzięcia budowlanego [Network organizational structure ap-plication in integrated project delivery]. Scientific Review – Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 27(1), 82-90.
• Trach, R., Pawluk, K. & Lendo-Siwicka, M. (2020). The assessment of the effect of BIM and IPD on construction projects in Ukraine. International Journal of Construction Management, 1-8.