PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Survival Rate of Willow Depending on the Storage Methods of Planting Material

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The paper presents the research results of the survival rate of willow planting material depending on the storage methods and varietal peculiarities. The studies of the storage methods of planting material and their effect on the survival rate of cuttings and shoots were carried out in the years of 2019–2021 in the experimental field of the Institute of bio-energy crops and sugar beets, Ukraine. Two willow (Salix spp.) species: three-stamina variety Panfilivska and common willow variety Zbruch, were studied. Rot-affected cuttings and shoots as well as the number of the sprouted ones were monitored during the period of their placing in the storage till their planting in the field. It was found that both cuttings and shoots stored well in all treatments. During the storage, a small number of sprouted cuttings and disease - affected ones were recorded. Rot-affected cuttings and shoots of both varieties were recorded only when they were stored in plastic bags both with and without lime treatment of incisions. Rot-affected planting material was not recorded when other storage methods were used. It was established that during the storage moisture losses in cuttings and shoots of both varieties were not seen on any record date and as far as the content of nutrition elements (NPK) is concerned, there was a decreasing tendency. It was found that the survival rate of planting material depended on both variety peculiarities and its species, and it was high even on the first record date. Common willow variety Zbruch had the highest percentage of survival rate of cuttings and shoots as compared with the three-stamina variety Panfilivska. All storage methods of cuttings and shoots at air temperature 3–5°C ensure their good shelf-life with small damages caused by disease and slight germination in some years. The survival rate of planting material depended on both varietal peculiarities and its species. The highest percentage of survival rate of cuttings and shoots was typical for common willow variety Zbruch as compared with three-stamina variety Panfilivska.
Słowa kluczowe
Twórcy
autor
  • Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beets of NAAS of Ukraine, Klinichna 25, Kyiv, 03110, Ukraine
  • Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beets of NAAS of Ukraine, Klinichna 25, Kyiv, 03110, Ukraine
  • Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beets of NAAS of Ukraine, Klinichna 25, Kyiv, 03110, Ukraine
autor
  • Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beets of NAAS of Ukraine, Klinichna 25, Kyiv, 03110, Ukraine
autor
  • Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University, Soborna Square 8/1, Bila Tserkva, Kyiv region, 09110, Ukraine
  • Ukrainian Institute for Plant Variety Examination, Gen. Rodymtsev 15, Kyiv, 01100, Ukraine
  • Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University, Sadova Str. 2, Uman, 20300, Ukraine
Bibliografia
  • 1. Barna М.М. 2002. Reproductive biology of species and hybrids of willow family (Salicaceae Mirb.): A thesis of dissertation. Institute of botany named after M.H. Holodnyi of Ukraine’s NAAS, Kyiv, 40.
  • 2. Campbell S.P., Frair J.L., Gibbs J.P., Volk T.A. 2012. Use of short-rotation coppice willow plantations by birds and small mammals in central New York. Biomass and Bioenergy, 47, 342–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.026
  • 3. Caslin B. Short rotation coppice willow best practice guidelines.
  • 4. Horba О.О. et al. 2017. Development and improvement of energy systems in view of the available potential of alternative energy sources: a monograph. Poltava, Ukraine, 326.
  • 5. Dimitriou I., Rosenqvist H., Berndes G. 2011. Slow expansion and low yields of willow short rotation coppice in Sweden; implications for future strategies. Вiomass and Вioenergy, 35(11), 4613–4618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.09.006
  • 6. Doronin V.А., Kravchenok Y.V., Dryha V.V., Doronin V.V. 2018. Formation of planting material of miscanthus in the second vegetative year depending on the elements of the cultivation technology. Bioenergetics, 2(12), 28−31.
  • 7. Fausto L. 1963. Gorini. L’impriego della giberellina nella coltura del sedano. Informacion ortofrutticoltura, 20, 243–246.
  • 8. Fuchylo Y.D., Hnap І.V. 2018. Effect of soil and weather conditions on a successful creation of energy plantations of willow. Major problems and tendencies of further development of forestry in the Ukrainian Carpathians: proceedings of the international scientific-practical. Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, 326–331.
  • 9. Fuchylo Y.D., Sbytna М.V., Fuchylo О.Y., Litvin V.М. 2009. Experience and prospects of poplar cultivation (Populus sp.) in the southern steppe of Ukraine. Proceedings of Ukraine’s Forest academy sciences, 7, 66–69.
  • 10. Volkodav V.V. 2000. Methodology of state variety testing of agricultural crops. Techniques for the determination of crop produce quality, 7, 143.
  • 11. Mozharivska І.А. 2013. Cultivation technology of rare energy crops for the manufacture of various kinds of bio-fuel. Proceedings of the Institute of bio-energy crops and sugar beets, 19, 85.
  • 12. Tharakan P.J., Volk T.A., Nowak C.A., Abrahamson L.P. 2005. Morphological traits of 30 willow clones and their relationship to biomass production. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35(2), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1139/x04-195
  • 13. The analysis of the consumption efficiency of energy resources in industrialized countries and the dependence on their import. 2015. Kyiv, 88. https://ua.energy/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/1. Efektyvnist_energ_resursiv.pdf
  • 14. Wang D., Jaiswal D., LeBauer D.S., Wertin T.M., Bpllero G.A., Leakey A.D.B, Long S.P. 2015. A physiological and biophysical model of coppice willow (Salix spp.) production yields for the contiguous USA in current and future climate scenarios. Plant, Cell and Environment, 38(9), 1850–1865. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12556
  • 15. Bressler A.S., Vidon P.G., Volk T.A. 2017. Impact of shrub willow (Salix sp.) as a potential bioenergy feedstock on water quality and greenhouse gas emissions. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 228(4), 170–188. https://doi.org/0.1007/s11270-017-3350-4
  • 16. Major J.E., Mosseler A., Malcolm J.W. 2017. Salix species variation in leaf gas exchange, sodium, and nutrient parameters at three levels of salinity. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 47(8), 1045–1055. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2017-0028
  • 17. Stajić B. 2016. Short rotation energy crops of fastgrowing tree species in Serbia: biomass production, legislation, market, and environmental impacts – potentials and constraints: Raport UNDP Serbia. September, 80. http://biomasa.undp.org.rs/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Izvestaj_ engleski_26_11_201
  • 18. Tumminello G., Volk T.A., McArt S.H., Fierke M.K. 2015. Pollinator diversity associated with willow biomass crop. Entomological Society of America National Conference (Minneapolis, MN, Nov. 15–18, 2015). NRCS Soils, USDA NRCS. URL: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/survey/geo/?cid=nrcs142p2_053626
  • 19. Zamora D.S., Apostol K.G., Wyatt G.J. 2014. Biomass production and potential ethanol yields of shrub willow hybrids and native willow accessions after a single 3-year harvest cycle on marginal lands in central Minnesota, USA. Agroforestry Systems, 88(4), 593–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9693-6
  • 20. Volk T.A., Berguson B., Daly C. et al. 2018. Poplar and shrub willow energy crops in the United States: field trial results from the multiyear regional feedstock partnership and yield potential maps based on the PRISM-ELM model. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 10(10), 735–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12498
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-033197c7-cb49-4a97-ada5-5924d9ab5b31
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.