Distribution of epiphytic algae on macrophytes of various ecological groups : the case study of water bodies in the Dnieper River basin

• Autorzy: Klochenko P. , Shevchenko T.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/ohs-2017-0030

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The generalization and analysis of original data have shown that the nature of epiphytic algae distribution on higher aquatic plants, representing different ecological groups, is very similar in various types of numerous water bodies in the Dnieper River basin. Their species richness and values of quantitative indices were mostly higher on submerged plants compared to plants of other ecological groups. The number of epiphytic algae species was 1.1-1.7 times higher on submerged plants compared to that on half-submerged plants and 1.6-3.1 times higher compared to plants with floating leaves. The taxonomic structure and species composition of epiphyton were very similar on half-submerged and submerged plants and moderately similar on plants with floating leaves compared to macrophytes of other ecological groups. It is emphasized that the specificity of epiphytic algae distribution on macrophytes of various ecological groups should be taken into account when performing monitoring and assessment of the ecological status of water bodies by the bioindication method.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

algal cell counts; biomass; ecological groups; epiphytic algae; higher aquatic plants; species composition; species richness; taxonomic structure; water bodies of various types

• Wydawca: Institute of Oceanography University of Gdańsk
• Czasopismo: Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 46, No. 3
• Strony: 283--293
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 73 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Klochenko P.

• Department of Ecological Physiology of Aquatic Plants, Institute of Hydrobiology of NAS of Ukraine, Geroyev Stalingrada Ave. 12, Ukraine

autor

Shevchenko T.

• Department of Ecological Physiology of Aquatic Plants, Institute of Hydrobiology of NAS of Ukraine, Geroyev Stalingrada Ave. 12, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• [1]. Ács, É., Szabó K., Tóth, B. & Kiss, K.T. (2004). Investigation of benthic algal communities, especially diatoms of some Hungarian streams in connection with reference conditions of the Water Framework Directives. Acta Botanica Hungarica 46(3-4): 255-278.
• [2]. Arsan, O.M., Davydov, O.A., Dyachenko, T.M., Yevtushenko, N.Yu., Zhukinskiy, V.M. et al. (2006). Metody gidroekologichnykh doslidzhen poverkhnevykh vod. (Methods of hydroecological investigations of surface waters.) Kyiv: Logos Press.
• [3]. Bauer, D.E., Gomez, N. & Hualde, P.R. (2007). Biofilms coating Schoenoplectus californicus as indicators of water quality in the Rio de la Plata Estuary (Argentina). Environ. Monit. Assess. 133: 309-320.
• [4]. Belyayeva, P.G. (2013). Role of phytoperiphyton in organic matter production and nitrogen cycle in river ecosystems (a review). Hydrobiol. J. 49(5): 12-13.
• [5]. Blümel, C. (2003). Taxonomy and nomenclature. In H. Schubert & I. Blindow (Eds.), Charophytes of the Baltic Sea (pp. 261-284). Liechtenstein, Ruggell: Gantner Verlag.
• [6]. Calisová, L. & Gabka, M. (2009). Charophytes (Characeae, Charophyta) in the Czech Republic: taxonomy, outecology and distribution. Fottea 9(1): 1-43.
• [7]. Cattaneo, A., Galanti, G., Gentinetta, S. & Romo, S. (1998). Epiphytic algae and macroinvertebrates on submerged and floating-leaved macrophytes in an Italian lake. Freshwater Biol. 39(4): 725-740.
• [8]. Ettl, H. (1978). Xanthophyceae. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. (Bd. 3/1). Stuttgart, New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
• [9]. Ettl, H. (1983). Chlorophyta. Phytomonadina. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. (Bd. 9/1). Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
• [10]. Ettl, H. (1988). Chlorophyta. Tetrasporales, Chlorococcales, Gloeodendrales. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. (Bd. 10/2). Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
• [11]. Glushchenko, L.A. (2010). Struktura fitoperifitona v otsenke kachestva vody raznotipnykh vodnykh obyektov basseyna reki Yenisey. (Phytoperiphyton structure in assessing water quality in different water bodies of the Yenisey River basin.) Author’s abstract of PhD Thesis. Krasnoyarsk.
• [12]. Hill, W.R. (1996). Effects of light. In R.J. Stephenson, M.L. Bethwell & R.L. Lowe (Eds.), Algal ecology; freshwater benthic ecosystems (pp. 121-149). California: Academic Press, Inc.
• [13]. John, D.M., Whitton, B.A. & Brook, A.J. (2011). The freshwater algal flora of the British Isles. An identification guide to freshwater and terrestrial algae. (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
• [14]. Karosiené, J. (2007). The study of epiphyton algae in some lakes of Lithuania. In Ozernye ekosistemy: biologicheskiye protsessy, antropogennaya transformatsiya, kachestvo vody. Materialy III Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii, Minsk – Naroch, 17-22 sentyabrya 2007 g. (Lake ecosystems: biological processes, anthropogenic transformation, and water quality. Proceedings of the III International Scientific Conference, Minsk – Naroch, 17-22 September 2007.) (pp. 143-144). Minsk: Belorusskiy Universitet Press.
• [15]. Karosiené, J. & Kasperovichené, J. (2008). Seasonal succession of epiphyton algal communities on Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. in a mesoeutrophic lake. Ekologija 54(1): 32-39.
• [16]. Kasperovichene, Yu. & Karosene, Yu. (2005). Structural and functional characteristics of epiphyton and phytoplankton in the littoral zone of Lake Spera (Lithuania). Vestnik TGU 5:70-77.
• [17]. Klochenko, P.D., Kharchenko, G.V. & Shevchenko, T.F. (2012a). Peculiarities of the distribution of epiphyton algae in water bodies of Kiev. Hydrobiol. J. 48(3): 39-51.
• [18]. Klochenko, P.D., Shevchenko, T.F. & Kharchenko, G.V. (2012b). Taxonomic structure of phytoepiphyton of water bodies of Kiev. Naukovi Zapysky Ternopilskogo Natsionalnogo Pedagogichnogo Universytetu. Seriya Biologiya 1(50): 42-49.
• [19]. Klochenko, P.D., Shevchenko, T.F., Vasilchuk, T.A., Osipenko, V.P., Yevtukh, T.V. et al. (2014a). On the ecology of phytoepiphyton of water bodies of the Dnieper River basin. Hydrobiol. J. 50(3): 41-54.
• [20]. Klochenko, P., Shevchenko, T., Barinova S. & Tarashchuk, O. (2014b). Assessment of the ecological state of the Kiev Reservoir by the bioindication method. Oceanol. Hydrobiol. St. 43(3): 228-236.
• [21]. Klochenko, P.D., Shevchenko, T.F. & Kharchenko, G.V. (2015a). Structural and functional organization of phytoplankton in the thickets and in the section free of vegetation in the lakes of Kiev. Hydrobiol. J. 51(3): 45-60.
• [22]. Klochenko, P.D., Shevchenko T.F. & Tarashchuk O.S. (2015b). Quantitative indices of epiphytic algae development in the riverbed section of the Kanev Reservoir. Naukovi Zapysky Ternopilskogo Natsionalnogo Pedagogichnogo Universytetu. Seriya Biologiya 3-4(64): 305-309.
• [23]. Klochenko, P.D., Shevchenko T.F. & Tarashchuk O.S. (2016). Phytoepiphyton of the additional net of the Kanev Reservoir. Hydrobiol. J. 52(3): 22-37.
• [24]. Klochenko, P.D. & Shevchenko, T.F. (2016). Phytoepiphyton of macrophytes of various ecological groups of the Kiev Reservoir. Hydrobiol. J. 52(6): 3-16.
• [25]. Komárek, J. & Fott, B. (1983). Chlorophyceae. Chlorococcales. Das Phytoplankton des Süßwassers. Systematik und Biologie. (Bd. XVI/7). Stuttgart: E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung (Nagele u. Obermiller).
• [26]. Komárek, J. & Anagnostidis, K. (1999). Cyanoprokaryota.Chroococcales. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. (Bd. 19/1). Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
• [27]. Komárek, J. & Anagnostidis, K. (2005). Cyanoprokaryota. Oscillatoriales. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. (Bd. 19/2). Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
• [28]. Komulaynen, S. (2002). Use of phytoperiphyton to assess water quality in north-western Russian rivers. J. Appl. Phycol. 14: 57-62.
• [29]. Komulaynen, S.F. (2004). Ekologiya fitoperifitona malykh rek vostochnoy Fennoskandii. (Ecology of phytoperiphyton of small rivers of the eastern Fennoscandia.) Petrozavodsk: Karelskiy Nauchny Tsentr RAN Press.
• [30]. Komulaynen, S.F. (2006). Experience of the use of phytoperiphyton in assessing the state of river systems. In Bioindikatsiya v monitoringe presnovodnykh sistem. Tezisy dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii, Sankt-Peterburg, 23-27 oktyabrya 2006 g. (Bioindication in monitoring freshwater systems. Abstracts of reports of the International Conference, Saint-Petersburg, 23-27 October 2006.) (p. 74). Saint-Petersburg.
• [31]. Kopyrina, L.I. (2003). Phytoperiphyton on various substrata of water bodies of the middle reaches of the Lena River. In Ozernye ekosistemy:biologicheskiye protsessy, antropogennaya transformatsiya, kachestvo vody. Materialy II Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii, Minsk – Naroch, 22-26 sentyabrya 2003 g. (Lake ecosystems: biological processes, anthropogenic transformation, and water quality. Proceedings of the II International Scientific Conference, Minsk – Naroch, 22-26 September 2003.) (pp. 281-284). Minsk: Belorusskiy Universitet Press.
• [32]. Korneva, L.G. (2009). Formirovaniye fitoplanktona vodoyemov basseyna Volgi pod vliyaniyem prirodnykh i antropogennykh faktorov. (Phytoplankton formation in water bodies of the Volga River basin under the influence of natural and anthropogenic factors.) Author’s abstract of Doctor Thesis. Saint-Petersburg.
• [33]. Krammer, K. & Lange-Bertalot, H. (1986). Bacillariophyceae. Naviculaceae. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. (Bd. 2/1). Stuttgart, New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
• [34]. Krammer, K. & Lange-Bertalot, H. (1988). Bacillariophyceae. Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. (Bd. 2/2) Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
• [35]. Krammer, K. & Lange-Bertalot, H. (1991a). Bacillariophyceae. Centrales; Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae, Achnanthaceae. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. (Bd. 2/3). Stuttgart, Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
• [36]. Krammer, K. & Lange-Bertalot, H. (1991b). Bacillariophyceae. Achnanthaceae, Kritische Erganzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema Gesamtliteraturverzeichnis. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. (Bd. 2/4). Stuttgart, Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
• [37]. Laugaste, R., Mäemets, H., Reunanen, M. & Freiberg, L. (2003). Characteristics of epiphyton and its connections with macrovegetation in ten small Estonian lakes of different type. In Ozernye ekosistemy: biologicheskiye protsessy, antropogennaya transformatsiya, kachestvo vody. Materialy II Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii, Minsk – Naroch, 22-26 sentyabrya 2003 g. (Lake ecosystems: biological processes, anthropogenic transformation, and water quality. Proceedings of the II International Scientific Conference, Minsk – Naroch, 22-26 September 2003.) (pp. 383-387). Minsk: Belorusskiy Universitet Press.
• [38]. Leonova, M.V. (2012). Taxonomic structure of epiphyton of Lake Peipsi/Pinkva (Russia). In Aktualnye problemy sovremennoy algologii. Tezisy dokladov IV Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii, g. Kiev, 23-25 maya 2012 g. (Urgent problems of modern algology. Abstracts of reports of the IV International Conference, Kiev, 23-25 May 2012.) (pp. 164-165) Kiev.
• [39]. Liboriussen, L. & Jeppesen E. (2003). Temporal dynamics in epipelic, pelagic and epiphytic algal production in a clear and turbid shallow lake. Freshwater Biol. 48(3): 418-431.
• [40]. Lynnyk, P.M., Zhezherya, V.A., Batog, S.V., Zhezherya, T.P., Klochenko P.D. et al. (2015). Ekologichny stan vodnykh obyektiv urbanizovanykh terytoriy. Kytayevski stavky. (Ecological state of water bodies of urban territories. Kytayevo ponds.) Kyiv: Logos Press.
• [41]. Makarevich, T.A. (2003). Taxonomic structure of the algae flora of plankton and periphyton of small dimictic lake. In Ozernye ekosistemy:biologicheskiye protsessy, antropogennaya transformatsiya, kachestvo vody. Materialy II Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii, Minsk – Naroch, 22-26 sentyabrya 2003 g. (Lake ecosystems: biological processes, anthropogenic transformation, and water quality. Proceedings of the II International Scientific Conference, Minsk – Naroch, 22-26 September 2003.) (pp. 305-308). Minsk, Belorusskiy Universitet Press.
• [42]. Meteleva, N.Yu. (2008). Phytoperiphyton of Lake Nero. In Perifiton i obrastaniye: teoriya i praktika. Tezisy dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Sankt-Peterburg, 22-25 oktyabrya 2008 g. (Periphyton and fouling: theory and practice. Abstracts of reports of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, Saint-Petersburg, 22-25 October 2008.) (pp. 60-63). Saint- Petersburg.
• [43]. Meteleva, N.Yu. (2013). Struktura i produktivnost fitoperifitona vodoyemov basseyna Verkhney Volgi. (Phytoperiphyton structure and productivity in water bodies of the basin of the upper reaches of the Volga River.) Author’s abstract of PhD Thesis. Borok.
• [44]. Mirkin, B.M. & Rozenberg, G.S. (1983). Tolkovy slovar sovremennoy fitotsenologii. (Dictionary of modern phytocenology.) Moscow: Nauka Press.
• [45]. Mokhamad Ali, S. & Kasperovichene, Yu. (2001). Influence of ecological factors of the environment on the structure of phytoepiphyton in different communities of macrophytes. In VIII syezd Gidrobiologicheskogo obshchestva RAN. Tezisy dokladov. Kaliningrad, 16-23 sentyabrya 2001 g. (VIII Meeting of Hydrobiological Society of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Abstracts of reports. Kaliningrad, 16-23 September 2001.) (pp. 194-195). Kaliningrad. Vol. 1.
• [46]. Palamar-Mordvintseva, G.M. (2003). Flora vodorosley kontinentalnykh vodoyemov Ukrainy:Desmidiyevye vodorosli. (Algal flora of continental water bodies of Ukraine: Desmidiales.) (Issue 1. Part 1). Kiev: Akademperiodika Press.
• [47]. Palamar-Mordvyntseva, G.M. (2005). Flora vodorostey kontynentalnykh vodoym Ukrayiny: Desmidiyevi vodorosti. (Algal flora of continental water bodies of Ukraine: Desmidiales.) (Issue 1. Part 2). Kyiv: Akademperiodika Press.
• [48]. Popovský, J. & Pfiester, L.A. (1990). Dinophyceae (Dinoflagellida). Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. (Bd. 6). Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
• [49]. Reynolds, C.S., Descy, J.-P. & Padisák, J. (1994). Are phytoplankton dynamics in rivers so different from those in shallow lakes? Hydrobiologia 289: 1-7.
• [50]. Rodriguez, P., Tele, G. & Pizzaro, H. (2001). Epiphytic algal biodiversity in humic shallow lakes from the lower Parana River basin (Argentine). Wetlands 31: 53-63.
• [51]. Rusanov, A.G., Stanislavskaya, E.V. & Ács, É. (2012). Periphytic algal assemblages along environmental gradients in the rivers of the Lake Ladoga basin, Northwestern Russia: Implication for the water quality assessment. Hydrobiologia 695(1): 305-327.
• [52]. Rychkova, M.A. (2003). Seasonal succession of periphyton of Lake Ladoga. In Ozernye ekosistemy: biologicheskiye protsessy, antropogennaya transformatsiya, kachestvo vody. Materialy II Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii, Minsk – Naroch, 22-26 sentyabrya 2003 g. (Lake ecosystems: biological processes, anthropogenic transformation, and water quality. Proceedings of the II International Scientifi c Conference, Minsk – Naroch, 22-26 September 2003.) (pp. 345-349). Minsk: Belorusskiy Universitet Press.
• [53]. Sharipova, M.Yu. (2012). Peculiarities of the vertical distribution of epiphytic algae. In Aktualnye problemy sovremennoy algologii. Tezisy dokladov IV Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii, g. Kiev, 23-25 maya 2012 g. (Urgent problems of modern algology. Abstracts of reports of the IV International Conference, Kiev, 23-25 May 2012.) (pp. 330-331). Kiev.
• [54]. Shevchenko, T.F., Kharchenko, G.V. & Klochenko, P.D. (2010). Cenological analysis of phytoepiphyton of water bodies of Kiev. Hydrobiol. J. 46(1): 41-55.
• [55]. Shevchenko, T.F. (2013). Phytoepiphyton of green filamentous algae of the cooling ponds of thermal and nuclear power stations of Ukraine. Hydrobiol. J. 49(6): 43-54.
• [56]. Shmidt, V.M. (1980). Statisticheskiye metody v sravnitelnoy floristike. (Statistical methods in comparing floras.) Leningrad: Leningradskiy Universitet Press.
• [57]. Stanislavskaya, Ye.V. (2012). Periphyton algae of various lakes. In Aktualnye problemy sovremennoy algologii. Tezisy dokladov IV Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii, g. Kiev, 23-25 maya 2012 g. (Urgent problems of modern algology. Abstracts of reports of the IV International Conference, Kiev, 23-25 May 2012.) (pp. 279-280). Kiev.
• [58]. Starmach, K. (1985). Chrysophyceae und Haptophyceae. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. (Bd. 1). Stuttgart, New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
• [59]. Stenina, A.S. (2003). Ecological structure of epiphytic diatoms as the indicator of oil contamination of tundra lakes of the Pechora River basin (Russia). In Perifiton kontinentalnykh vod: sovremennoye sostoyaniye izuchennosti i perspektivy dalneyshikh issledovaniy. Mezhdunarodny simpozium. (Periphyton of continental waters: modern state of the art and perspectives of further investigations. International Symposium.) (pp. 106-107). Tyumen.
• [60]. Sudnitsyna, D.N. (2008). Composition and structure of summer phytoperiphyton on macrophytes of Lake Peipsi/Pinkva. In Perifiton i obrastaniye: teoriya i praktika. Tezisy dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Sankt-Peterburg, 22-25 oktybrya 2008 g. (Periphyton and fouling: theory and practice. Abstracts of reports of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, Saint- Petersburg, 22-25 October 2008.) (pp. 138-140). Saint-Petersburg.
• [61]. Sysova, Ye.A. (2007). Taxonomic structure of phytoperiphyton of the lakes of various types. In Ozernye ekosistemy: biologicheskiye protsessy, antropogennaya transformatsiya, kachestvo vody. Materialy III Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii, Minsk – Naroch, 17-22 sentyabrya 2007 g. (Lake ecosystems: biological processes, anthropogenic transformation, and water quality. Proceedings of the III International Scientific Conference, Minsk – Naroch, 17-22 September 2007.) (pp. 184-185). Minsk: Belorusskiy Universitet Press.
• [62]. Tarashchuk, O.S., Shevchenko, T.F. & Klochenko, P.D. (2011a). Epiphytic algae of the lake section of the Kanev Reservoir (Ukraine). Algologiya 21(2): 202-212.
• [63]. Tarashchuk, O.S., Shevchenko, T.F. & Klochenko, P.D. (2011b). Quantitative indices of epiphyton algae development in the lake section of the Kanev Reservoir. Naukovi Zapysky Ternopilskogo Natsionalnogo Pedagogichnogo Universytetu. Seriya Biologiya 3(48): 38-48.
• [64]. Tarashchuk, O.S., Shevchenko, T.F. & Klochenko, P.D. (2012). Phytoepiphyton of the river section of the Kanev Reservoir (Ukraine). Algologiya 22(2): 198-207.
• [65]. The Directive 2000/60/EP of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. OJL 327.
• [66]. Topachevskiy, A.V. & Masyuk, N.P. (1984). Presnovodnye vodorosli Ukrainskoy SSR. (Freshwater algae of Ukraine.) Kiev: Vyshcha Shkola Press.
• [67]. Toporowska, M., Pawlik-Skowrońska, B. & Wojtal, A.Z. (2008). Epiphytic algae on Stratiotes aloides L., Potamogeton lucens L., Ceratophyllum demersum L. and Chara spp. in a macrophyte-dominated lake. Oceanol. Hydrobiol. St. 37(2): 51-63.
• [68]. Tsarenko, P.M., Wasser, S.P. & Nevo, E. (2006). Algae of Ukraine: diversity, nomenclature, taxonomy, ecology and geography. Cyanoprokaryota, Euglenophyta, Chrysophyta, Xanthophyta, Raphidophyta, Phaeophyta, Dinophyta, Cryptophyta, Glaucocystophyta, Rhodophyta. (Vol. 1). Ruggell: Gantner Verlag.
• [69]. Tsarenko, P.M., Wasser, S.P. & Nevo, E. (2015). Algae of Ukraine: diversity, nomenclature, taxonomy, ecology and geography. Charophyta. (Vol. 4). Ruggell: Gantner Verlag.
• [70]. Tunca, H., Ongun Sevindik, T., Nur Bal, D. & Arabaci, S. (2014). Community structure of epiphytic algae on three different macrophytes at Acarlar floodplain forest (northern Turkey). Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 32(4): 845-857.
• [71]. Vasilevich, V.I. (1969). Statisticheskiye metody v geobotanike. (Statistical methods in geobotany.) Leningrad: Nauka Press.
• [72]. Vetrova, Z.I. (2002). Evglenofitovye vodorosli. Flora vodorosley kontinentalnykh vodoyemov Ukrainy. (Euglenophyta. Algal flora of continental water bodies of Ukraine.) (Issue 2). Kiev, Ternopol: Lileya.
• [73]. Wunsam, S., Cattaneo, A. & Bourassa, N. (2002). Comparing diatom species, genera and size in biomonitoring: a case study from streams in the Laurentians (Quebec, Canada). Freshwater Biol. 47(2): 325-340.

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).