PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Towards a Model of Safety Climate Measurement

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
In this study, a survey instrument was developed to measure safety climate. A review of the scientific literature as well as consultation with an expert panel was used to determine the survey’s dimensions. Next, the survey was administered, first as a pilot study (n = 15) and then as a full scale study (n = 229), to employees of the City of Cincinnati Department of Public Works. The psychometric integrity of the survey was assessed according to validity, reliability and utility criteria. Results are presented and discussed.
Rocznik
Strony
303--318
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 38 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Safat, Kuwait
  • Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Program, University of Cincinnati, OH, USA
autor
  • Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Program, University of Cincinnati, OH, USA
autor
  • Office of Environmental Management, Employee Safety/Environmental Compliance Division, Cincinnati, OH, USA
autor
  • Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Program, University of Cincinnati, OH, USA
Bibliografia
  • 1. Peterson D. Techniques of safety management: a systems approach. New York, NY, USA: Professional and Academic; 1989.
  • 2. Guldenmund F. (2000). The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research. Saf Sci 2000;34(1-3);215-57.
  • 3. Schneider B, Gunnarson S, Niles-Jolly K. Creating the climate and culture of success. Organ Dyn 1994;23(1):17-29.
  • 4. Cox S, Flin R. Safety culture: philosopher’s stone or man of straw? Work Stress 1998;12:189-201.
  • 5. Zohar D. Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. J Appl Psychol 1980;65(1):96-101.
  • 6. Glennon DP. Safety climate in organizations. In: Ergonomics and Occupational Health. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Ergonomics Society of Australia and New Zealand; 1982. p. 17-31.
  • 7. Brown R, Holmes H. The use of factor-analysis procedure for assessing the validity of an employee safety climate model. Accid Anal Prev 1986;18:445-70.
  • 8. Dedobbelear N, Beland F. A safety climate measure for construction sites. J Safety Res 1991;22:97-103.
  • 9. Cooper MD, Phillips RA. Validation of a safety climate measure. Annual Occupational Psychology Conference of the British Psychological Society, Birmingham, UK, January 3-5. Journal of Organizational Behavior 1994;9:23-7.
  • 10. Donald IJ, Canter DV. Employee attitudes and safety in the chemical industry. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industry 1994;7(3):203-8.
  • 11. Niskanen T. Safety climate in the road administration. Saf Sci 1994;17:237-55.
  • 12. Coyle I, Sleeman S, Adams D. Safety climate. J Safety Res 1995;22:247-54.
  • 13. Cabrera D, Isla R, Vilela L. An evaluation of safety climate in ground handling activities. In: Soekkha HM, editor. Aviation safety, Proceedings of the IASC-97 International Aviation Safety Conference. La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain: University of La Laguna; 1997. p. 255-68.
  • 14. Williamson A, Feyer A, Cairns D, Biancotti D. The development of a measure of safety climate: the role of safety perceptions and attitudes. Saf Sci 1997;25:15-27.
  • 15. Hayes B, Perander J, Smecko J, Trask J. Measuring perceptions of workplace safety: development and validation of the work safety scale. J Safety Res 1998;29(3):145-61.
  • 16. Cox S, Cox T. The structure of employee attitudes to safety: a European example. Work Stress 1991;5:93-106.
  • 17. Ostrom L, Wilhelmsen C, Kaplan B. Assessing safety culture. Nuclear Safety 1993;34(2):163-72.
  • 18. Berends J. On the measurement of safety culture [unpublished report]. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology; 1996.
  • 19. Lee T. Perceptions, attitudes and behavior: the vital elements of a safety culture. Health and Safety 1996;October:1-15.
  • 20. Carmines EG, Zeller RA. Reliablity and validity assessment. London, UK: Sage; 1979.
  • 21. Petitti DB. Meta-analysis, decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press; 1994.
  • 22. Shoaf C, Genaidy A, Shell R. A perspective on work system analysis: classification and evaluation of methods. Ergonomics 1998;41(6):881-98.
  • 23. Flin R, Mearns K, O’Connor P, Bryden R. Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features. Saf Sci 2000;34:177-92.
  • 24. Lynn M. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 1986;35:382-5.
  • 25. Bailey C, Peterson D. Using perception surveys to assess safety system effectiveness. Prof Saf 1989;34(2):22-6.
  • 26. Brauer R. Safety and health for engineers. New York, NY, USA: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1990.
  • 27. Murphy L, Sturdivant K, Gershon R. Organizational and employee characteristics predict compliance with universal precautions [paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Society, Chicago, IL, USA]; 1993.
  • 28. Phillips R, Cooper D, Sutherland V, Makin P. A question of safety climate: measuring perceptions of the working environment. In: Annual Conference of the British Health and Safety Society, Birmingham, UK; 1993. p. 74-81.
  • 29. Alexander M, Cox S, Cheyne A. (1995). The concept of safety culture within an UK offshore organization. In: Collected papers of the Understanding Risk Perception Conference. Aberdeen, UK; 1995. p. 119-23.
  • 30. Janssens M, Brett J, Smith F. Confirmatory cross-cultural research: Testing the viability of a corporation-wide safety policy. Acad Manage J 1995;38:364-82.
  • 31. Diaz R, Cabrera D. Safety climate and attitude as evaluation measures of organizational safety. Accid Anal Prev 1996;29(5):643-50.
  • 32. Budworth N. The development and evaluation of a safety climate measure as a diagnostic tool in safety management. IOSH Journal 1997;1:19-29.
  • 33. Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Safety climate measurement tool. Sudbury, Suffolk, UK: HSE; 1997.
  • 34. Mearns K, Flin R, Fleming M, Gordon R. Human and organizational factors in offshore safety. (Report OTH 543). Offshore Safety Division. Sudbury, Suffolk, UK: Health and Safety Executive; 1997.
  • 35. Carroll J. Safety culture as an ongoing process: culture surveys as opportunities for enquiry and change. Work and Stress 1998;12:272-84.
  • 36. Lee T. Assessment of safety culture at a nuclear reprocessing plant. Work Stress 1998;12:217-37.
  • 37. Borg G. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982;14(5):377-81.
  • 38. Hernandez L, Alhemood A, Genaidy A, Karwowski W. Evaluation of different scales for measurement of perceived physical strain during performance of manual tasks. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics (JOSE) 2002;8(4):413-32.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-02956511-ad67-4d8b-9613-5a6d36f7fa33
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.