An analysis of social innovation systems in Liban – impact of nature-based solustions on the quality of life in a city

• Autorzy: Stasiak Patrycja , Kępczyńska-Walczak Anetta

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24427/aea-2023-vol15-05

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the article is to examine the possibility of using the Temporary Innovation System (TIS) structure in the analysed projects in Lebanon, as well as to verify to what extent nature-based solutions (NBS) can be understood through the prism of TIS. The article presents several examples of nature-based solutions (NBS) in various locations in Lebanon as ways to improve the climate and relations between residents of smaller cities. The study used a case study methodology in which four nature-based solutions (NBS) projects in two Lebanese cities were analysed and compared with the expected characteristics of TIS.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

social innovation; nature-based solutions; social innovation system

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Białostockiej
• Czasopismo: Architecturae et Artibus
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 15, no. 2
• Strony: 13--23
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Stasiak Patrycja

• student of the Interdisciplinary Doctoral School, Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environmental Engineering, al. Politechniki 6, 90-924 Lodz, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1934-0561

autor

Kępczyńska-Walczak Anetta

• Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environmental Engineering, al. Politechniki 6, 90-924 Lodz, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4125-2012

Bibliografia

• 1. Ammar W., Jokhadar A., Awar M. (1998), Health sector reform in Lebanon, Lebanese Medical Journal 46:328-334.
• 2. Bou-Zied E., El-Fadel M. (2002, Climate Change and Water Resources in Lebanon and the Middle East, ‘Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management,’ Vol. 128, Issue 5.
• 3. Brilman, J. (2002), Nowoczesne koncepcje i metody zarządzania, PWE, Warszawa.
• 4. Domański R. (2012), Ewolucyjna gospodarka przestrzenna, Wyd. Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu, Poznań.
• 5. Dziemianowicz W. (2017), Terytorialny wymiar innowacji – od problemów analitycznych do dylematów strategicznych, ‘Biuletyn KPZK PAN,’ Issue 268.
• 6. Europa 2020. Strategia na rzecz inteligentnego i zrównoważonego rozwoju sprzyjającego włączeniu społecznemu (2010), final version, Brussels, online: https://drive.google.com/ drive/folders/1rn6mMaEbrkLJNq23zo-BTZyFa4gE9Bg?usp=sharing
• 7. Evergreen City. Urban pine forest rehabilitation, 2023, online: https://www.holcimfoundation.org/ projects/evergreen-city
• 8. Frenken K. (2017), A complexity-theoretic perspective on innovation policy, Complexity, Governance and Networks No. 1.
• 9. Nichols B. and Wagner C. (2017), Scaling and Sustaining Pay for Success: Recommendations for Creating a More Sustainable and Scalable Financing Model, Enterprise Community Partners, Inc.
• 10. Pollitt C. and Bouckaert G. (2011), Public management reform: A comparative analysis – new public management, Governance and the NeoWeberian State, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
• 11. Poulsen M. (2017), Cultivating citizenship, equity, and social inclusion? Putting civic agriculture into practice through urban farming, ‘“Agriculture and Human Values”,’ Vol. 34, online: https://link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s10460-016-9699-y
• 12. Rhodes M.L. and Donnelly-Cox G. (2018), Social impact bonds as temporary innovation systems: towards a framework for analysis, Comparative Perspectives on SIBs and Outcomes-Based Approaches to Public Service Commissioning, Oxford, 6-7 Sep, 2018.
• 13. Rhodes ML, Murphy J, Muir J. and Murray J. (2011), Public Management and Complexity Theory: Richer Decision Making in Irish Public Services, Oxford, Routledge.
• 14. Rhodes M.L. and Donnelly-Cox G. (2019), Social impact bonds as temporary innovation systems: a new model for understanding wicked problem interventions, Presented at IRSPM, Wellington, NZ, 16-18 Apr, 2019.
• 15. Seelos C. and Mair J. (2012), Innovation is not the holy grail, Stanford Social Innovation Review, Fall 2012, available at: https://ssir.org/articles/entry/ innovation_is_not_the_holy_grail# (dostęp access: January 2020).
• 16. Senge P., Hamilton H. and Kania J. (2015), The dawn of system leadership, ‘“Stanford Social Innovation Review”,’ Vol. 13 No. 1.
• 17. Siggelkow N., Rivkin J. (2005), Speed and search: designing organizations for turbulence and complexity, ‘“Organization Science”,’ Vol. 16, No. 2.
• 18. Sustinable Urban Farming at Sky Towers, online: https://food-heritage.org/sustainable-urban-farmingat-sky-towers/
• 19. Tawfic A., Becoming An Urban Gardener To Deal With The Food Crisis In Beirut, online: https:// theurbanactivist.com/idea/becoming-an-urbangardener-to-deal-with-the-food-crisis-in-beirut/
• 20. TEPSIE (2014), Social innovation theory and research: a summary of the findings from TEPSIE. A deliverable of the project: ‘The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe’”,’ (TEPSIE), 7th Framework Programme, Brussels, European Commission, DG Research, online: : https://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/ uploads/2015/04/YOFJ2785_Tepsie_A-guide_for_ researchers_06.01.15_WEB.pdf (access: Grudzień December 2021).
• 21. Trivedi C. and Misra S. (2015), Relevance of systems thinking and scientific holism to social entrepreneurship, The Journal of Entrepreneurship, Vol. 24, No. 1, doi: 10.1177/0971355714560658.