The application of forest sustainable management framework and community participation adjacent to Doi Laung wildlife sanctuary, Thailand

• Autorzy: Khonkaen P. , Cheng J.-D.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/aep-2017-0011

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper present the data for monitoring forest conditions and forest resource management by a local community adjacent to the Doi Laung Wildlife Sanctuary, Huaimai Sub-district, Song District, Phrae Province, Thailand. This study uses quantitative forest surveys, interviews, discussions, and descriptions of the historical context of public participation in forest management including a detailed assessment of field conditions. The findings of a forest resources inventory show that (1) from the three sampled areas, Doi Laung Wildlife Sanctuary has highest richness, followed by village #16 and #14, and (2) Huaikhon #16 implied the process of framework to maintain a healthy condition and response to community needs with collective management. The conceptual model assessment that links key group indicators and drivers is presented based on previously developed assessment models. The framework focuses on the best way to provide forest management, forest fire prevention, and firefighting as well as monitoring of Check-dam construction and other activities that support the recovery of the forest community. This paper demonstrates the general of an environmental assessment framework to applying organize environmental information to facilitate policy decision making for the sustainable development.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

conservation activities; forest health; group interview; species diversity; planning management

• Wydawca: Institute of Environmental Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Archives of Environmental Protection
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 43, no. 1
• Strony: 87--94
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 17 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Khonkaen P.

• National Chung-Hsing University, Taiwan Department of Soil and Water Conservation
• Maejo University Phrae Campus, Thailand

autor

Cheng J.-D.

• National Chung-Hsing University, Taiwan Department of Soil and Water Conservation

Bibliografia

• [1]. Agrawal, A. & Gibson, C.C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation, World Development, 27, pp. 629–649. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2
• [2]. Daily, C.G., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., Kareiva M.P., Mooney, A.H., Pejchar, L., Ricketts, H.T., Salzman, J. & Shallenberger, R. (2009). Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 21–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/080025.
• [3]. Agyemang, I., McDonald, A. & Carver, S. (2007). Application of the DPSIR framework to environmental degradation assessment in northern Ghana, Natural Resources Forum, 31, 212–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2007.00152.x.
• [4]. Ludwig, A.J. & Reynolds, J.F. (1988). Statistical ecology: A primer on methods and computing, in: Ecology Statistical Method, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, pp. 1–44.
• [5]. Turner J.C. & Oakes, P.J. (1989). Self-categorization theory and social influence. 2nd edition In: The Psychology of group influence. Erlbaum, Hillsdale. pp. 233–275.
• [6]. Berninger, K., Kneeshaw, D. & Messier, C. (2009). The role of cultural models in local perceptions of SFM-differences and similarities of interest groups from three boreal regions, Journal of Environmental Management, 90, pp. 740–751. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.01.004
• [7]. Kent, M. & Coker, P. (1992). Vegetation description and analysis: A practical approach, 2nd edition, in: Chapter 1 The nature of quantitative plant ecology and vegetation science, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 1–22.
• [8]. Kusek, J.Z. & Rist, R.C. (2004). A handbook for development practitioners: ten Steps to a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System: a handbook for development practitioners, in: Step 5: Planning for Improvement—Selecting Results Targets. Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp. 90–95.
• [9]. Li, M.T. (2002). Engaging simplifications: community-based resource management, market processes and state agendas in Upland Southeast Asia, World Development, 30, 265–283, doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00103-6.
• [10]. Lyman, M.W., Evans, J.R. & Mytar, M. (2011). Community forests: needs and resources for creating and managing community forests, in: Complete Finding, New England: Community Forest Collaborative, The Trust for Public Land (TPL). pp. 15–24.
• [11]. Margules, C.R. & Pressey, R.L. (2000). Systematic conservation planning, Nature, pp. 405, 243–253. doi:10.1038/35012251.
• [12]. Hares, M. (2009). Forest conflict in Thailand: Northern minorities in focus, Environmental Management, 43, pp. 381–395. doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9239-7.
• [13]. Pye, O. (2005). Strategic groups and counter-strategic formation in Thai Forestry. Bonn, Germany: Department of Southeast Asian Studies Bonn University, Southeast Asian Studies Working Paper No. 22.
• [14]. Naidoo, R., Balmford, A., Ferraro J.P., Polasky, S., Ricketts, H.T. & Rouget, M. (2006). Integrating economic costs into conservation planning, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, pp. 681–687. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.003.
• [15]. De Groot, R.S., Alkemadeb, R., Braatc, L., Heina, L. & Willemen, L.. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making, Ecological Complexity, 7, pp. 260–272. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006.
• [16]. Cormier, M.S. & Suter II, W.G. (2008). A framework for fully integrating environmental assessment, Environmental Management, 42, pp. 543–556. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9138-y.
• [17]. Lü, Y., Fu, B., Wei, W., Yu, X. & Sun, R. (2011). Major ecosystems in China: dynamics and challenges for sustainable management, Environmental Management, 48, pp. 13–27. doi:10.1007/s00267-011-9684-6.

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).