A design method for seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete frame buildings using aluminum shear panels

Ferraioli, Massimiliano; Lavino, Angelo; De Matteis, Gianfranco

doi:10.1007/s43452-023-00639-1

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

A design method for seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete frame buildings using aluminum shear panels

Autorzy

Ferraioli Massimiliano , Lavino Angelo , De Matteis Gianfranco

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

http://www.springer.com/journal/43452

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s43452-023-00639-1

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Despite significant progress in research and development of aluminum shear panels in recent decades, their implementation for seismic retrofit of existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings can still be significantly extended. Their application is limited by the general lack of relatively simple and effective design criteria and proper guidelines. This paper develops a design method for the seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete buildings using aluminum multi-stiffened shear panels as dampers. Both the nonlinearity in the structure and the dampers-structure interaction are considered to give an optimal distribution of the shear panels over the height of the building. The analytical laws refer to dissipative aluminum shear panels recently tested and analyzed by the authors. The proposed procedure has been described in detail. Its applicability has been demonstrated by analyzing two typical RC buildings having drift capacity-to-demand ratios ranging from 0.505 to 0.624. The design value of the panel-to-frame stiffness ratio has been found to range from 0.594 to 1.432 as a function of the lateral stiffness of the existing building. The verification of the proposed procedure has been carried out by checking the validity of the design assumptions. The first one (i.e., the mode shapes remain the same before and after retrofit) has been checked using the modal assurance criterion that gives values ranging from 0.992 to 0.998. The second one (i.e., uniform yield drift distribution over the building height) has been checked by comparing the yield drifts with their average value giving a standard deviation ranging from about 11 to 15%. The effectiveness of the design method has been finally validated through nonlinear time-history analysis for different seismic accelerograms and hysteresis models. The results show that the seismic retrofit design procedure is effective in significantly reducing inter-story drift (maximum inter-story drift ratio demands ranging from 1.04 to 2.07%) thus satisfying the acceptance criteria of the building, and avoiding drift concentration and consequential weak story collapse.

Słowa kluczowe

aluminum shear panel RC structure design method seismic retrofit

panel aluminiowy konstrukcja żelbetowa metoda projektowania

Wydawca

Springer
Wrocław University of Science and Technology

Czasopismo

Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering

Rocznik

2023

Tom

Vol. 23, no. 2

Strony

art. no. e106, 2023

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 92 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Ferraioli Massimiliano

massimiliano.ferraioli@unicampania.it

Department of Engineering, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Roma 29, 81031 Aversa, CE, Italy

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-857X

autor

Lavino Angelo

angelo.lavino@unicampania.it

Department of Architecture and Industrial Design, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via San Lorenzo 31, 81031 Aversa, Italy

autor

De Matteis Gianfranco

gianfranco.dematteis@unicampania.it

Department of Architecture and Industrial Design, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via San Lorenzo 31, 81031 Aversa, Italy

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7413-6769

Bibliografia

1. Kasai K, Fu Y, Watanabe A. Passive control systems for seismic damage mitigation. J Struct Eng. 1998;124(5):501-12. https:// doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:5(501).
2. Takewaki I. Building control with passive dampers: optimal performance-based design for earthquakes. Oxford: Wiley; 2009.
3. Dolce M, Cardone D, Marnetto R. Implementation and testing of passive control devices based on shape memory alloys. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2000;29:945-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096- 9845(200007)29:7%3c945::AID-EQE958%3e3.0.CO;2-%23.
4. Ferraioli M, Mandara A. Base isolation for seismic retrofitting of a multiple building structure: design, construction, and assessment. Math Probl Eng. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4645834.
5. Ferraioli M, Mandara A. Base isolation for seismic retrofitting of a multiple building structure: evaluation of equivalent linearization method. Math Probl Eng. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8934196.
6. Constantinou M, Symans M. Experimental study of seismic response of buildings with supplemental fluid dampers. Struct Design Tall Build. 1993;2(2):93-132. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal. 4320020203.
7. Adachi F, Fujita K, Tsuji M, Takewaki I. Importance of interstory velocity on optimal along-height allocation of viscous oil dampers in super high-rise buildings. Eng Struct. 2013;56:489-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.036.
8. Impollonia N, Palmieri A. Seismic performance of buildings retrofitted with nonlinear viscous dampers and adjacent reaction towers. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2018;47(5):1329-51. https://doi. org/10.1002/eqe.3020.
9. Pall AS, Marsh C. Response of friction damped braced frames. J Struct Eng. 1982;108(9):1313-23. https://doi.org/10.1061/ JSDEAG.0005968.
10. Grigorian CE, Yang T-S, Popov EP. Slotted bolted connection energy dissipators. Earthq Spectra. 1993;9(3):491-504. https:// doi.org/10.1193/1.1585726.
11. Kobori T, Miura Y, Fukuzawa E. Development and application of hysteresis steel dampers. In: Proceedings of the 10th world conference on earthquake engineering, Rotterdam. p. 2341-2346.
12. Formisano A, De Matteis G, Mazzolani FM. Numerical and experimental behaviour of a full-scale RC structure upgraded with steel and aluminium shear panels. Comput Struct. 2010;88:1348-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.05.027.
13. Ferraioli M, Concilio A, Molitierno C. Seismic performance of a reinforced concrete building retrofitted with self-centering shape memory alloy braces. Earthq Eng Eng Vib. 2022;21(3):785-809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-022-2113-4.
14. Takeuchi T, Nakamura H, Kimura I, Hasegawa H, Saeki E, Watanabe A. Buckling restrained braces and damping steel structures. US patent No. US20050055968A1. 1999.
15. Monsef Ahmadi H, De Matteis G. Seismic performance of steel shear panels with butterfly-shaped links. Ing Sismica. 2020;37(1):84-101.
16. Mistakidis ES, De Matteis G, Formisano A. Low yield metal shear panels as an alternative for the seismic upgrading of concrete structures. Adv Eng Softw. 2007;38:626-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2006.08.043.
17. Whittaker AS, Bertero VV, Thompson CL, Alonso LJ. Seismic testing of steel plate energy dissipation devices. Earthq Spectra. 1991;7:563-604. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585644.
18. Tsai KC, Chen HW, Hong CP, Su YF. Design of steel triangular plate energy absorbers for seismic resistant construction. Earthq Spectra. 1993;9(3):505-28. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585727.
19. Ozkaynak H, Khajehdehi A, Gullu A, Azizisales F, Yuksel E, Karadogan F. Uni-axial behavior of energy dissipative steel cushions. Steel Compos Struct. 2018;27(6):661-74. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.27.6.661.
20. Gullu A, Smyrou E, Khajehdehi A, Ozkaynak H, Bal IE, Yuksel E, Karadogan F. Numerical modelling of energy dissipative steel cushions. Int J Steel Struct. 2019;19:1331-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-019-00213-7.
21. Jain S, Rai DC, Sahoo DR. Postyield cyclic buckling criteria for aluminum shear panels. ASME J Appl Mech. 2008;75(2):0210151-8. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2793135.
22. Mimura H, Akiyama H. Load-defection relationship of earthquake resistant steel shear walls with a developed diagonal tension field. Trans. Arch. Inst. of Japan, Tokyo. 1977. p. 109-114.
23. Thorburn LJ, Kulak GL, Montgomery CJ. Analysis of steel plate shear walls. Structural engineering report No. 107, University of Alberta. 1983.
24. Caccese V, Elgaaly M, Du C. Post-buckling behaviour of steel-plate shear walls under cyclic loads. J Struct Eng. 1993;119:588- 605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-022-00704-5.
25. Deng K, Pan P, Sun J, Liu J, Xue Y. Shape optimization design of steel shear panel dampers. J Constr Steel Res. 2014;99:187-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.03.001.
26. Zhu B, Wang T, Zhang L. Quasi-static test of assembled steel shear panel dampers with optimized shapes. Eng Struct. 2018;172:346-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.004.
27. Valizadeh H, Sheidaii M, Showkati H. Experimental investigation on cyclic behavior of perforated steel plate shear walls. J Constr Steel Res. 2012;70:308-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.09.016.
28. Hitaka T, Matsui C. Experimental study on steel shear wall with slits. J Struct Eng. 2003;129(5):586-95. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:5(586).
29. Sabouri-Ghomi S, Ventura CE, Kharrazi MH. Shear analysis and design of ductile steel plate walls. J Struct Eng. 2005;131:878-89. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:6(878).
30. Nakashima M, Iwai S, Iwata M, Takeuchi T, Konomi S, Akazawa T, Saburi K. Energy dissipation behavior of shear panels made of low yield steel. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 1994;23:1299-313. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290231203.
31. Nakashima M. Strain-hardening behavior of shear panel made of low yield steel. I: test. ASCE J Struct Eng. 1995. https://doi.org/ 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:12(1742).
32. Tanaka K, Torii T, Saski Y, Miyama T, Kawai H, Iwata. M, Practical application of damage tolerant structures with seismic control panel using low yield point steel to a high-rise steel building, Proceedings, Structural Engineering World Wide, Elsevier, CDROM, Paper T190-4, 1998.
33. Xu L-Y, Nie X, Fan J-S. Cyclic behaviour of low-yield-point steel shear panel dampers. Eng Struct. 2016;126:391-404. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.08.002.
34. Yao Z, Wang W, Zhu Y. Experimental evaluation and numerical simulation of low-yield-point steel shear panel dampers. Eng Struct. 2021;245:112860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct. 2021.112860.
35. Rai DC. Inelastic cyclic buckling of aluminum shear panels. J Eng Mech. 2002;128(11):1233-7. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE) 0733-9399(2002)128:11(1233).
36. De Matteis G, Brando G, Panico S, Mazzolani FM. Bracing type pure aluminium stiffened shear panels: an experimental study. Adv Steel Constr. 2009;5(2):106-19.
37. De Matteis G, Brando G, Mazzolani FM. Pure aluminium: an innovative material for structural applications in seismic engineering. Constr Build Mater. 2012;26(1):677-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.071.
38. Zhang C, Zhang Z, Shi J. Development of high deformation capacity low yield strength steel shear panel damper. J Constr Steel Res. 2012;75:116-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.03.014.
39. Zhang C, Aoki T, Zhang Q, Wu M. Experimental investigation on the low-yield strength steel shear panel damper under different loading. J Constr Steel Res. 2013;84:105-13. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jcsr.2013.01.014.
40. Chen Z, Ge H, Usami T. Hysteretic model of stiffened shear panel dampers. J Struct Eng. 2006;132(3):478-83. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:3(478).
41. Deng K, Pan P, Li W, Xue Y. Development of a buckling restrained shear panel damper. J Constr Steel Res. 2015;106:311-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.01.004.
42. Lin X, Wu K, Skalomenos KA, Lu L, Zhao S. Development of a buckling-restrained shear panel damper with demountable steel-concrete composite restrainers. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2019;118:221-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.12.015.
43. Brando G, D’Agostino F, De Matteis G. Experimental tests of a new hysteretic damper made of buckling inhibited shear panels. Mater Struct. 2013;46:2121-33. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0040-6.
44. De Matteis G, D’Agostino F, Brando G. Experimental tests on steel buckling inhibited shear panels. Open Constr Build Technol J. 2014;8(Suppl 1: M8):279-88. https://doi.org/10.2174/18748 36801408010279.
45. Brando G, De Matteis G. Design of low strength-high hardening metal multi-stiffened shear plates. Eng Struct. 2014;60:2-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.12.005.
46. Manual JSSI. Design and construction manual for passively controlled buildings, Tokyo. Japan: Japan Society of Seismic Isolation; 2007. (in Japanese).
47. Shen H, Zhang R, Weng D, Gao C, Luo H, Pan C. Simple design method of structure with metallic yielding dampers based on elastic-plastic response reduction curve. Eng Struct. 2017;150:98-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.047.
48. FEMA 273. NEHRP Guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, prepared for FEMA by the Applied Technology Council and the Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1997.
49. ATC 40 Report. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, Applied Technology Council. 1996.
50. Lin YY, Tsai MH, Hwang JS, Chang KC. Direct displacement-based design for building with passive energy dissipation systems. Eng Struct. 2003;25(1):25-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141- 0296(02)00099-8.
51. FEMA-356. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2000.
52. FEMA 450-1. NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures- Part 1: provisions. Washington: Building Safety Council of the National Institute of Building Sciences, Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2003.
53. NTC-2018 Guidelines. Technical standards for constructions, Offcial Journal of the Italian Republic. 20.02.2018, Rome, Italy, 2018 (in Italian).
54. Kim J, Choi H, Chung L. Energy-based seismic design of structures with buckling-restrained braces. Steel Compos Struct. 2004;4(6):437-52. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2004.4.6.437.
55. Maley TJ, Sullivan TJ, Della CG. Development of a displacement-based design method for steel dual systems with buckling-restrained braces and moment-resisting frames. J Earthq Eng. 2010;14:106-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632461003651687.
56. Durucan C, Dicleli M. Analytical study on seismic retrofitting of reinforced concrete buildings using steel braces with shear link. Eng Struct. 2010;32:2995-3010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engst ruct.2010.05.019.
57. Di Cesare A, Ponzo FC. Seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete frame buildings with hysteretic bracing systems: design procedure and behaviour factor. Shock Vib. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/ 2017/2639361.
58. Bergami AV, Nuti C. A design procedure of dissipative braces for seismic upgrading structures. Earthq Struct. 2013;4(1):85-108. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.4.1.085.
59. Barbagallo F, Bosco M, Marino EM, Rossi PP, Stramondo PR. A multi-performance design method for seismic upgrading of existing RC frames by BRBs. Earthq Eng Struct D. 2017;46(7):1099-119. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2846.
60. Nuzzo I, Losanno D, Caterino N. Seismic design and retrofit of frames structures with hysteretic dampers: a simplified displacement-based procedure. Bull Earthq Eng. 2019;17:2787-819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00558-8.
61. Akcelyan S, Lignos DG, Hikino T, Nakashima M. Evaluation of simplified and state-of-the-art analysis procedures for steel frame buildings equipped with supplemental damping devices based on E-defense full-scale shake table tests. J Struct Eng. 2016;142(6):04016024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943- 541X.0001474.
62. Mohammadi RK, Garoosi MR, Hajirasouliha I. Practical method for optimal rehabilitation of steel frame buildings using buckling restrained brace dampers. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2019;123:242-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.04.025.
63. Bruschi E, Quaglini V, Calvi PM. A simplified design procedure for seismic upgrade of frame structures equipped with hysteretic dampers. Eng Struct. 2022;251:113504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113504.
64. Vargas R, Bruneau M. Analytical response and design of buildings with metallic structural fuses. J Struct Eng. 2019;135(4):386-93. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:4(386).
65. Guerrero H, Ji T, Teran-Gilmore A, Escobar JA. A method for preliminary seismic design and assessment of low-rise structures protected with buckling-restrained braces. Eng Struct. 2016;123:141-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.015.
66. De Sortis A, Vestroni F. Seismic retrofit of low-rise reinforced-concrete buildings: a modified displacement-based design procedure. J Archit Eng. 2020;26(2):04020008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000398.
67. Guo JWW, Christopoulos C. Performance spectra based method for the seismic design of structures equipped with passive supplemental damping systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2013;42(6):935-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2274.
68. Zhang R, Wang C, Pan C, Shen H, Ge Q, Zhang L. Simplified design of elastoplastic structures with metallic yielding dampers based on the concept of uniform damping ratio. Eng Struct. 2018;176:734-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09. 009.
69. Pan Y, An R, Bai J, Yan X, Jin S. Seismic design and performance analysis of buckling-restrained braced RC frame structures. Struct Des Tall Spec Build. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1661.
70. Priestley MJN, Calvi GM, Kowalski MJ. Displacement based seismic design of structures. Pavia: IUSS Press; 2007.
71. Lin YY, Tsai MH, Hwang JS, Chang KC. Direct displacement- based design for building with passive energy dissipation systems. Eng Struct. 2003;25:25-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141- 0296(02)00099-8.
72. Pennuci D, Calvi GM, Sullivan TJ. Displacement-based design of precast walls with additional dampers. J Earthq Eng. 2009;13(1):40-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460902813265.
73. Teran-Gilmore A, Virto N. Preliminary design of low-rise buildings stiffened with buckling restrained braces by a displacement-based approach. Earthq Spectra. 2009;25(1):185-211. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3054638.
74. Mazza F, Vulcano A. Displacement-based design procedure of damped braces for the seismic retrofitting of R.C. framed buildings. B Earthq Eng. 2015;13:2121-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9709-7.
75. Choi H, Kim J. Energy-based seismic design of buckling-restrained braced frames using hysteretic energy spectrum. Eng Struct. 2006;28(2):304-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct. 2005.08.008.
76. Aliakbari F, Garivani S, Aghakouchak AA. An energy based method for seismic design of frame structures equipped with metallic yielding dampers considering uniform inter-story drift concept. Eng Struct. 2020;205:110114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. Engstruct.2019.110114.
77. Habibi A, Ricky Chan WK, Albermani F. Energy-based design method for seismic retrofitting with passive energy dissipation systems. Eng Struct. 2013;46:77-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. Engstruct.2012.07.011.
78. Rahmat Rabi R, Bianco V, Monti G. Energy-based method to design hysteretic bracings for the seismic rehabilitation of low-to-medium rise RC frames. Bull Earthq Eng. 2022;20:587-605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01249-z.
79. Hareen CHBV, Mohan SC. Energy-based seismic retrofit and design of building frames with passive dampers. Eng Struct. 2022;250:113412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021. 113412.
80. De Matteis G, Formisano A, Mazzolani FM. An innovative methodology for seismic retrofitting of existing RC buildings by metal shear panels. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2009;38:61-78. https://doi. org/10.1002/eqe.841.
81. De Matteis G, Ferraioli M. Metal shear panels for seismic upgrading of RC buildings: a case study. Key Eng Mater. 2018;763:1058-66. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientifc.net/KEM.763.1058.
82. Formisano A, De Matteis G, Panico S, Mazzolani FM. Seismic upgrading of existing RC buildings by slender steel shear panels: a full-scale experimental investigation. Adv Steel Constr. 2008;4(1):26-45.
83. Driver RG, Kulak GL, Elwi AE, Kennedy DJL. FE and simplified models of steel plate shear wall. J Struct Eng (ASCE). 1998;124(2):121-30. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733- 9445(1998)124:2(121).
84. Lubell S, Prion HGL, Ventura CE, Rezai M. Unstiffened steel plate shear wall performance under cyclic loading. J Struct Eng. 2000;126(4):453-60. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733- 9445(2000)126:4(453).
85. Takeda T, Sozen MA, Nielsen NN. Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes. J Struct Div ASCE. 1970;96(12):2557-73.
86. Kasai K, Ito H. JSSI Manual for building passive control technology Part-8 peak response evaluation and design for elasto-plastically damped system. In: Proceedings of 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 2004.
87. DM96: Norme tecniche per le costruzioni in zona sismica. D.M. 16 Gennaio 1996 (in Italian).
88. CSI Computer & Structures Inc. SAP2000. Linear and nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of three-dimensional structures. Research Ultimate Version 21.0, Analysis Ref. Manual, Computer and Structures, Berkeley; 2019.
89. EN 1998-3. Eurocode 8-Design of structures for earthquake resistance- Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings, European Communities for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium; 2005.
90. Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R. Theoretical stress-strain model for confned concrete. J Struct Eng. 1988;114(8):1804-26. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
91. Allemang RJ, Brown DL. A correlation coeffcient for modal vector analysis. In: 1st international modal analysis conference (IMAC), Orlando, FL. 1982.
92. Iervolino I, Galasso C, Cosenza E. REXEL: computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis. B Earthq Eng. 2010;8:339-62.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-01ce31da-f07c-4b17-9149-e12bab751b41