Resilience of nuclear plants in case of hazards

• Autorzy: Berg H. P. , Krauß M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Internal and external hazards analysis methods have been used recently to evaluate operating nuclear power plants (NPP) and to identify the resilience of NPP in case of hazards and potential needs for modification of plant systems and procedures as well as to support design of new plants The external hazards risk contribution has been modeled in many NPP PSA (at least for some external hazards) over the last decade, including events occurring during shutdown and low power operations. Recently, a revision of the German nuclear safety regulations has been successfully completed and these regulations entitled “Safety Requirements for Nuclear Power Plants”, also requiring a detailed investigation of internal and external hazards and combinations of different hazards applying deterministic and probabilistic safety assessment methods.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

resilience; internal hazards; external hazards; combination of events; safety assessment

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Bezpieczeństwa i Niezawodności
• Czasopismo: Journal of Polish Safety and Reliability Association
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 6, No. 1
• Strony: 7--14
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 25 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Berg H. P.

• Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Salzgitter, Germany

autor

Krauß M.

• Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Salzgitter, Germany

Bibliografia

• [1] Berg, H.P. (2013). Critical infrastructure and resilience goals. Journal of Polish Safety and Reliability Association, Summer Safety and Reliability Seminars, 4, 2, 147-154.
• [2] Berg, H.P., Fröhmel, T. & Wassilew-Reul, C. (2003). Deterministic and probabilistic safety assessment as complementary tools for comprehensive safety reviews. Proc. of 17th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT-17), Post-Conference-Seminar No. 15 – Optimizing Plant Safety and Operation Using a Blend of Probabilistic and Deterministic Methods -, TÜVAkademie, München.
• [3] Berg, H.P., Görtz, R. & Schimetschka, E. (2003). Quantitative probabilistic safety criteria for licensing and operation of nuclear plants, Comparison of the international status and development. BfS-Bericht BfS-SK-03/03, Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Salzgitter.
• [4] Berg, H.P. & Winter, C. (2009). Analysis of external flooding and tsunamis for nuclear power plants at tidal rivers. Kerntechnik, Vol. 74, No 3, p. 132-139.
• [5] Berg, H.P. & Hauschild, J. (2010). Probabilistic assessment of external pressure waves. Proc. of the 8th International Probabilistic Workshop, November 2010, Akademia Morska, Szczecin, 27-39.
• [6] Berg, H.P. & Krauß, M. (2010). Risk assessment of extreme weather conditions for nuclear power plants at tidal rivers. Journal of KONBiN - Safety and Reliability Systems, Nr. 1, p. 41-52.
• [7] Berg, H.P. & Krauß, M. (2011). Use of Safety Goals to Assess the Safety Level of Nuclear Power Plants, Technical Meeting on safety goals in application to nuclear installations, Vienna, Austria.
• [8] Coleman, J. & Sabharwall, P. N. (2014). Seismic Isolation Working Meeting Gap Analysis Report, INL/EXT-14-33234, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho, September 2014.
• [9] Facharbeitskreis Probabilistische Sicherheitsanalyse für Kernkraftwerke (2005). Methods for PSA for NPPs (Methoden zur probabilistischen Sicherheitsanalyse für Kernkraftwerke). BfSSCHR-37/05, Salzgitter, Oktober 2005.
• [10] Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety - Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (2005). Leitfaden zur Durchführung der Sicherheitsüberprüfung gemäß §19a des Atomgesetzes, – Leitfaden probabilistische Sicherheitsanalyse – für Kernkraftwerke in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Bundesanzeiger Nr. 207a vom 03.11.2005 (in German) http://www.bfs.de/de/ bfs/recht/rsh/volltext/3_BMU/3_74_3.pdf.
• [11] Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety - Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (2011). EU Stresstest National Report of Germany, Implementation of the EU Stress Tests in Germany.
• [12] Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety -Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (2015). Safety requirements for nuclear power plants, 22 November 2012, Federal Gazette, AT January 24, 2013 B3, amendment of 3 March 2015, Federal Gazette, AT March 3, 2015 B2.
• [13] Hauschild, J., Andernacht, M. & Berg, H.P. (2013). Case studies for evaluating conditional probabilities of external explosions. Kerntechnik 78 (2013) 2, 143-149.
• [14] International Atomic Energy Agency – IAEA (2008). Integrated Regulatory Review Service (IRRS) to Germany. Bonn and Stuttgart, Germany.
• [15] Kamanja, F. & Jonghyun, K. (2014). Characterization of resilience in Nuclear Power Plants. PSAM12 – Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, 22-27 June 2014, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
• [16] Krauß, M., Elsche, B. & Roth, G. (2013). Design of nuclear power plants against seismic events in Germany – seismic instrumentation and postseismic actions. Transactions SMiRT-22, San Francisco, California, USA.
• [17] Krauß, M. & Berg, H.P. (2014). Current regulatory developments concerning the implementation of probabilistic safety analyses for external hazards in Germany, Nuclear Energy Agency (2014). PSA of natural external hazards including earthquake. NEA/CSNI/R (2014) 9, July 2014, 327-334.
• [18] KTA 2201 (2011). Safety Standards of the Nuclear Safety Standards Commission (KTA), “Design of Nuclear Power Plants against Seismic Events; Part 1 Principles”, Part 2 Soil, Part 3 Structures, Part 4 Systems and Components, Part 5 Seismic Instrumentation, Part 6 Post-seismic actions”.
• [19] Nuclear Energy Agency (2014). PSA of natural external hazards including earthquake. NEA/CSNI/R (2014) 9, July 2014.
• [20] Nuclear Safety Standards Commission – KTA (2004). Flood Protection of Nuclear Power Plants (Schutz von Kernkraftwerken gegen Hochwasser). KTA 2207, Salzgitter.
• [21] Reactor Safety Commission – RSK (2012). Summarising assessment and recommendations of the RSK STATEMENT Plant-specific safety review (RSK-SÜ) of German nuclear power plants in the light of the events in Fukushima-1 (Japan). http://www.rskonline.de/English/ statements---recommendations/index.html.
• [22] Röwekamp, M. & Berg, H.P. (2013). Current Activities to Enhance PSA and Update the Corresponding Nuclear Regulatory Framework in Germany. Proc. of the International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis (PSA 2013), Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
• [23] Thuma, G., Türschmann, M. & Krauß, M. (2010). Development of advanced methods for seismic probabilistic safety assessments. In: Furuta, Frangopol & Shinozuka (Eds). Proc. of the International Conference on Safety, Reliability and Risk of Structures, Infrastructures and Engineering Systems, London, Taylor & Francis Group, p. 1641-1645.
• [24] Türschmann, M. & Sperbeck, S.T. (2014). Recent research on natural hazards PSA in Germany and future needs. Nuclear Energy Agency (2014). PSA of natural external hazards including earthquake. NEA/CSNI/R(2014)9, July 2014, 191-200.
• [25] Zerger, B., Ramos, M. M. & Peinador Veira, M. (2013). Report on External Hazard related events at NPPs – Summary Report of an European Clearinghouse Topical Study, Report EUR 26104 EN, JRC Scientific and Policy Reports.