Analysis of Ecological Condition of Taiga Topsoil During Commercial Development

• Autorzy: Sivkov Y. , Nikiforov A.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/79408

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper analyses the ecological properties of taiga topsoil during its commercial development and assesses the consequences of impact which will be made by the future facilities on the environment (taking into account the types of impact, their characteristics, the tendencies of transformation in the nature systems growing with the increase of service life, which were detected at the producing fields), sanitary and socioeconomic aspects of the facilities operation under the conditions of specific geographical complexes. The object of study included waspodzolic and swamp-podzolic soils located in the Uvat district in Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Region of Tyumen region, in the area of potential impact of industrial facilities. The method of study implied the selection of soil specimens and their examination according to the standard practices. Ten specimens were taken from each of three areas of sampling. The specimens were subjected to office study in order to determine eleven parameters. The sources of impact made by the oil and gas facility on the environment were the material objects (buildings, constructions etc.), elements and assemblies of basic and auxiliary technologies which result in pollutants emission. The major impact on topsoil at the stage of preparatory works and construction of facilities was the mechanical damage to the natural state of soils. It is primarily connected with sites stripping from forestry and ground leveling. The paper reviews the issues of ecological condition of topsoil and forecast of possible changes while commercial development of the studied area. A negative load on soil may be decreased through planning and implementation of organizational measures on assessment of current state of the topsoil within the field and environmental threat from basic and auxiliary industrial facilities.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

soil; pollutants; oil; industrial development; ecology

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: Vol. 19, nr 1
• Strony: 163--169
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 16 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Sivkov Y.

• Department of Technospheric Safety, Tyumen Industrial University, Tyumen, Russia

autor

Nikiforov A.

• Department of Technospheric Safety, Tyumen Industrial University, Tyumen, Russia

Bibliografia

• 1. Faboya O.L., Sojinu S.O., Sonibare O.O., Falodun O.T., Liao Z. 2016. Aliphatic biomarkers distribution in crude oil-impacted soils: an environmental pollution indicator. Environmental Forensics. 1, 27-35.
• 2. Goldberg V.M., Zverev V.P., Arbuzov A.I. et al. 2001. Technogenic pollution of natural waters by hydrocarbons and its ecological consequences. Monograph Moskow. 125.
• 3. Golovanov A.I. 2009. Disturbed soils recultivation: textbook Moscow. 325.
• 4. Guidelines 2.1.7.730-99. “Hygienic assessment of soil quality in populated areas”.
• 5. Kireeva N.A., Bakaeva M.D., Galimzyanova N.F. 2008. Evaluation of the effect of various methods of oil-polluted soil bioremediation on micromycete complexes. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology. 1, 55-59.
• 6. Liao C., Xu W., Lu G., Liang X., Guo C., Yang C., Dang Z. 2015. Accumulation of hydrocarbons by maize (ZEA MAYS L.) in remediation of soils contaminated with crude oil. International Journal of Phytoremediation. 7, 693-700.
• 7. Mamontov V.G., Panov N.P., Ignatiev N.N. 2017. General pedology: Textbook Moscow. 538.
• 8. Melnikov A.A. 2009. Environmental problems and the strategy of its conservation: Proc. Manual for universities Moscow. 720.
• 9. Obiajunwa E.I., Pelemo D.A., Owolabi S.A., Fasasi M.K., Johnson-Fatokun F.O. 2002. Characterisation of heavy metal pollutants of soils and sediments around a crude-oil production terminal using EDXRF. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 1, 61-64.
• 10. Petrov A.M., Versioning A.A., Karimullin L.K., Akaikin D.V., Tarasov O.Y. 2016. Dynamics of ecological and biological characteristics of soddy-podzolic soils under long-term oil pollution. Eurasian Soil Science. 7, 784-791.
• 11. Piekutin J. 2015. Evaluation of petroleum hydrocarbons elution from soil. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 16(3), 14-19.
• 12. Pikovsky Yu. I. 2016. Natural and technogenic flows of hydrocarbons in the environment. Monograph Moskow. 206.
• 13. Podavalov Y.A. 2010. Oil and Gas Production Ecology: textbook Moscow. 416.
• 14. Salanginas L.A. 2003. Change in the properties of soils under the influence of oil and the development of a system of measures for their rehabilitation. Monograph Ekaterinburg. 411.
• 15. SanRaR (Sanitary Rules and Regulations) 2.1.7.1287–03 “Sanitary and Epidemiological Requirements to the Soil Quality”.
• 16. Sivkov Y.V.,Parfenov V.G,Aleksandrov S.V., Nikiforov A.S. 2016. Research of the ecological state of soils in oil producing areas of Western Siberia. 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geo-Conference. Ecology, Economics, Education and Legislation. 2(5), 665-672.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).