Eddy Current Tomography for Nondestructive Testing

• Autorzy: Salach J.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14313/JAMRIS_4-2014/31

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper presents an eddy current tomography setup with high spatial resolution and high accuracy of measurements of signal on detection coil. In proposed solution both amplitude as well as phase shift are measured, which gives the possibility of calculation of spatial distribution of both permeability and resistivity of tested element. As a result, presented setup creates possibility of effective detection of discontinuities in cylindrical elements, which opens new possibilities for industrial applications of eddy current tomography.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

eddy current tomography; NDT; signal processing

• Wydawca: Łukasiewicz Industrial Research Institute for Automation and Measurements PIAP
• Czasopismo: Journal of Automation Mobile Robotics and Intelligent Systems
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 8, No. 4
• Strony: 11--14
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 14 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Salach J.

• Institute of Metrology and Biomedical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Boboli 8, 02-525 Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Cartz L., Nondestructive Testing, Asm International, UK, 1995.
• [2] Hellier C., Handbook of Nondestructive Evaluation. McGraw-Hill, USA, 2012.
• [3] Wei H-Y., Wilkinson A.J., “Design of a Sensor Coil and Measurement Electronics for Magnetic Induction Tomography”, IEEE T INSTRUM MEAS vol. 60, no. 12, 2011, 3853–3859. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2011.2147590.
• [4] Watson S., Williams R.J., Griffiths H., Gough W., Morris A., “A transceiver for direct phase measurement magnetic induction tomography”, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 4, 2001, 3182–3184. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2001.1019498.
• [5] Ioan D., Rebican M., “Numerical Model for Eddy-Current Testing of Ferromagnetic SteelParts”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 38, no. 2, 2002, 629–633. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/20.996164.
• [6] Soleimani M., “Simultaneous Reconstruction of Permeability and Conductivity in Magnetic Induction Tomography”, J. Electromagn. Waves Appl., vol. 23, 2009, 785–798. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156939309788019822.
• [7] Kai X., Cao Z., Mi W., “A Fast Eddy Current Forward Solver for EMT based on Finite Element Method (FEM) And Negligibly Coupled Field Approximation”, IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST),2011, 16–20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IST.2011.5962167.
• [8] Prémel D., Mohammad-Djafari A., “Eddy Current Tomography in Cylindrical Geometry”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 31, 1995, 2000–2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/20.376435.
• [9] Bowler J.R., “Eddy current calculations using half-space Green’s functions”, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 61, 1987, 833–840.
• [10] Soleimani M., Lionheart W., Peyton A., Ma X., Higson S., “A Three-Dimensional Inverse Finite-Element Method Applied to Experimental Eddy-Current Imaging Data”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 42, 2006, 1560–4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2006.871255.
• [11] Nikolova M., Mohammad-Djafari A., “Eddy current tomography using a binary Markov model”, Journal Signal Processing, vol. 49, no. 2, 1996, 119–132. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-1684(95)00151-4.
• [12] Brühl M., Hanke M., “Numerical implementation of two noniterative methods for locating inclusions by impedance tomography”,Inverse Problems, vol. 16, no. 4, 2000, 1029–1042. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/16/4/310.
• [13] Hanke M., Brühl M., “Recent progress in electrical impedance tomography”, Inverse Problems, vol. 19, 2003, 65–90.
• [14] Merwa R., Hollaus K., Brandstätter B., Scharfetter H., “Numerical solution of the general 3D eddy current problem for magnetic induction tomography (spectroscopy)” Physiological Measurement, vol. 24, no. 2, 2003, 545–54. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/24/2/364.