Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 3

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The authoress considers a mass media text and an artistic text to be autonomous artistic entities which are not placed in a relativistic or contrastive relationship. On the contrary, she respects their form and genre and language uniqueness. The second point of departure for her is a conviction according to which it would be instrumental and appropriate to use the term 'medium' not only for denoting but also for distinguishing a phenomenon and a means, an expression and a meaning in a way in which the peculiarities of its 'technical and realisation' contexts would be brought into prominence and also the fact that it can represent a set of different and multifaceted means of expression and semantic possibilities. Thus, the authoress alludes to peculiarities caused by their material and from it ensuing narration and communication propensities, sociological or aesthetic interventions and effects. She applies her theoretical assumptions to the analysis of the texts of Jana Bodnarova, prose writer, pop poet, dramatist, and script-writer in one. Her works oscillate between the history and the present of art, i.e. between form and genre possibilities of various types of arts, in order to highlight the intrinsic features and qualities of their expression material in a fashion which is natural to them.
EN
Historically, culturally and ethnically, Slavic era and its studies as well as responses became a part of Slovak and Slavic world. They especially attract attention of artistic literature in its genre structure.
Slavica Slovaca
|
2010
|
tom 45
|
nr 2
144-153
EN
The space of dynamic political and cultural Europe and the period of two centuries, having in mind the period between late 18th century and early 20th century, are a favourable background for the constitution and transformations of the term Slavdom, specification and differentiation of the thesis the idea of Slavdom as well as for a different practice of Slavic mutuality as a complex and contradictory. At the same time, it refers to the differentiated expressions of the phenomenon which was going on individually (nation) or collectively within the set of identification (ethnic, national, cultural, etc.) and emancipation movements. As a matter of fact, they have their genesis in a cultural intention and result in a political practice of that age. Between the thesis and its realization even with the Slavic mutuality it is a priori necessary to take into consideration national or “time” differences.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.