The article offers a survey as comprehensive and systematic as possible of all the articles and papers dealing with the Hungarian language written by Czech linguists. It concludes that very little attention has been paid to this topic in Czech linguistics and that the number of papers dedicated to Hungarian itself is very low. The majority of these papers deal with topics such as language contact (etymology, areal linguistics of the Central European Sprachbund, onomastics, the sociolinguistic situation of the Hungarian minority in the Czech Republic) or language comparison (typology). Only a few linguists have dealt with Hungarian to a relatively larger extent: Vladimír Skalička (language typology), Zoe Hauptová (etymology, Hungarian loanwords in Slovak), Vladimír Šmilauer (etymology, onomastics), Rudolf Forstinger (onomastics, etymology), František Kopečný (etymology, morphosyntax), Jiří Pilarský (the Central European Sprachbund, Hungarian‑ German contrastive linguistics), Lucie Jílková (sociolinguistics), Evžen Gál (Hungarian‑ Czech contrastive lexicology, sociolinguistics), Julius Bredár (etymology), Josef Blaskovics (etymology, Turkish loanwords in Hungarian), and Richard Pražák (Dobrovský as Hungarist and Finno‑Ugrist, the typology of national revivals in Central and Eastern Europe).
Marking the occasion of the publication of the 100th volume of The Journal for Modern Philology, the article summarizes key stages in the Journal’s history and describes its role in the development of Czech modern philology. It focuses on outstanding personalities associated with the Journal, the main theoretical issues that have appeared in its pages during the 107 years of its existence, and the impact of the Journal on the past and present of Czech modern philology and linguistics.
3
Dostęp do pełnego tekstu na zewnętrznej witrynie WWW
The article deals with the author’s publications in the area general linguistics (in particular Dějiny lingvistiky, Czech version, Olomouc 1996; Historia de la Lingüística, Spanish version, Cáceres 1998; Malé dějiny lingvistiky, Czech version, Prague 2005) and Czech linguistics (Kdo je kdo v dějinách české lingvistiky, Prague 2008; Lexicon Grammaticorum, Tübingen 2009). It also includes remarks on methodology and observations on possible future developments in the discipline.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.