Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Spór o interpretację w literaturoznawstwie – nie taki radykalny, jak go malują

100%

Tarkowski K.

Przestrzenie Teorii

|

2017

|

nr 28

EN

This review of Tomasz Szymon Markiewka’s book, entitled Interpretation Argument in Literary Studies. Analysis of Selected Theoretical Conceptions of 20th Century, focuses on reconstruction of its main theses, as well as on evaluate their methodological aspects. The first part deals with theoretical issues, mainly of terminological decisions and relation between the literature studies and philosophy. Next, article assesses the pros and cons of the main part of the book, which contains analysis of five selected theorists’ ideas of interpretation. The final part of the review raises the issue of the method of interpretation literary texts.

2

Zmieniający się kanon literatury amerykańskiej a kwestia amerykańskiej tożsamości: ponad pół wieku debat i kontrowersji

92%

Dobosiewicz I.

ER(R)GO: Teoria – Literatura – Kultura

|

2017

|

nr 35

EN

[for abstract in Polish, scroll down] Ilona DobosiewiczUniversity of OpoleThe Changing Canon of American Literatureand the Question of American Identity:Over Half a Century of Debate and ControversyAbstract: The article discusses the ways in which political and cultural revolution in the 1960s together with such social practices as university open admissions and affirmative action have changed the canon of American literature. It presents the factors that have led to the broadening of the canon and argues that the evolving canon of American literature no longer constructs a teleological meta-narrative of a unified tradition but instead reflects the ways in which multiple traditions and cultures engage in a dialog and influence one another.Keywords: literary theory, cultural theoryAbstrakt: Artykuł omawia zmiany jakie zachodziły w postrzeganiu pojęcia kanonu literatury amerykańskiej w wyniku rewolucji politycznej i obyczajowej lat sześćdziesiątych ubiegłego wieku oraz takich praktyk społecznych jak uniwersytecka polityka otwartych drzwi i akcja afirmatywna. Pokazje jakie czynniki doprowadziły do rozszerzenia kanonu i wskazuje, że obecny kanon literatury amerykańskiej nie konstruuje już teleologicznej meta-narracji dotyczącej jednolitej tradycji, ale pokazuje w jaki sposób różnorakie tradycje i kltury wchodzą ze sobą w dialog i wzajemnie na siebie oddziaływują.Słowa klucze: teoria literatury, teoria kultury

PL

[for abstract in Polish, scroll down] Ilona DobosiewiczUniversity of OpoleThe Changing Canon of American Literatureand the Question of American Identity:Over Half a Century of Debates and ControversiesAbstract: The article discusses the ways in which political and cultural revolution in the 1960s together with such social practices as university open admissions and affirmative action have changed the canon of American literature. It presents the factors that have led to the broadening of the canon and argues that the evolving canon of American literature no longer constructs a teleological meta-narrative of a unified tradition but instead reflects the ways in which multiple traditions and cultures engage in a dialog and influence one another.Keywords: literary theory, cultural theoryAbstrakt: Artykuł omawia zmiany jakie zachodziły w postrzeganiu pojęcia kanonu literatury amerykańskiej w wyniku rewolucji politycznej i obyczajowej lat sześćdziesiątych ubiegłego wieku oraz takich praktyk społecznych jak uniwersytecka polityka otwartych drzwi i akcja afirmatywna. Pokazje jakie czynniki doprowadziły do rozszerzenia kanonu i wskazuje, że obecny kanon literatury amerykańskiej nie konstruuje już teleologicznej meta-narracji dotyczącej jednolitej tradycji, ale pokazuje w jaki sposób różnorakie tradycje i kltury wchodzą ze sobą w dialog i wzajemnie na siebie oddziaływują.Słowa klucze: teoria literatury, teoria kultury

3

Jak dospět k fikčním světům

92%

Doležel L.

Filosofický časopis (Philosophical Journal)

|

2012

|

tom 60

|

nr 3

323-336

EN

The quest for the basis of fiction and fictional literature belongs to the fundamental questions of literary theory and, ultimately, is connected to the inquiry into the very identity of (fictional) literature. There are multiple possible answers to these and similar questions. This study maps a concrete approach – a certain series of choices which it is necessary to make in order to arrive at one specific possibility of such fictional literature. A particular dichotomous linking of suggestions between which to choose originates from the most various areas of theoretical study (philosophy, logic, semiotics and so on) and presents concrete possibilities of conceptual and methodological approaches on the way to a consistent theory of fiction. One such consistent theory of fiction is the unique theory of fictional worlds whose ultimate form we gain after we have gone through the set of all proposed choices.

CS

Tázání po podstatě fikce a fikčnosti literatury patří k základním otázkám literární teorie a v konečném důsledku souvisí se zkoumáním samotné identity (fikční) literatury. Možných odpovědí na tyto a podobné otázky existuje vícero. Předkládaná studie mapuje konkrétní postup, jistou posloupnost voleb, které je nutné uskutečnit, aby nás dovedly k jedné specifické možnosti takové fikční teorie. Jednotlivé dichotomicky spárované návrhy, mezi nimiž je voleno, pocházejí z nejrůznějších oblastí teoretického bádání (filozofie, logika, sémiotika aj.) a představují konkrétní možnosti ideových a metodologických přístupů na cestě ke konzistentní teorii fikce. Takovou konzistentní teorii fikce splňuje jedinečná teorie fikčních světů, jejíž výsledný tvar získáváme poté, co jsme prošli množinou všech proponovaných voleb.

4

Poetics Then and Now

92%

Kostkiewiczowa T.

Tematy i Konteksty

|

2020

|

nr 1

31-42

EN

The meaning of the word “poetics,” as derived from Aristotle’s understanding given in Poetics, points to the ways of creating verbal works, their components and connections as well as the formation of utterances. Poetics presents a fundamental set of terms referring to a literary work, which are still used and, in fact, are indispensable in all areas of contemporary literary, as well as cultural studies. Due to the changes in the field of literature itself, this set of terms and notions is constantly being updated, and it is still open in terms of both its components and their senses. It constitutes a conceptual framework, some elements of which are universal and operational in nature, and some connected with a particular cognitive horizon and a certain way of perceiving and understanding literature. Poetics is not a permanent theoretical model of literariness, nor is it a set of instructions determining theinterpretation of a literary work. It aims at establishing certain testable tools which are indispensable not only in literary studies, but also in studying all other forms having a semiotic content (intersemiotic poetics). For this reason, certain basic terms and notions applied in poetics can be seen as important epistemological categories through which the human mind perceives the world.

5

Antyk w prozie J. R. R. Tolkiena

92%

Piętka R.

Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae

|

2011

|

tom 21

|

nr 1

95-117

EN

The article tends to analyse the problems concerning the reception of classical texts and ideas in twentieth century, using as an example the prose works of J. R. R. Tolkien. Tolkiens’s oeuvre and its problematic relationships with classical tradition serve in this paper as an illustration of the diverse approaches, methods, and styles of lecture concerning the nature of literary allusivity. As a point of departure in the paper has been taken the reflection on the common phrase about “antiquity in something” deployed broadly in the reception studies. The questions raised here are as follows: what does precisely “in” mean in that metaphor? Or, to put in more general terms, when an allusion to another text can be treated as an inherent part of interpretation? Answer to these questions was possible due to Umberto Eco’s statements in the well-known dispute relating to the interpretation and overinterpretation; in conclusion the author was trying to show that Eco’s criterion of textual economy in interpretation justifies somehow (in author’s opinion) the new look on the essential Tolkien’s symbol, i.e. the ring of power, as a symbol of the Roman imperial rule. This means (in the context of the translatio imperii and cultural change from pagan to Christian empire) that ‘The Lord of the Rings’ can be seen in a way as a novelistic version of Augustine’s ‘The City of God’

6

Siódma przechadzka po lesie fikcji. O książce „Między światami” Piotra Stasiewicza i badaniach nad fantastyką po zwrocie postmodernistycznym

92%

Maj K. M.

Creatio Fantastica

|

2018

|

nr 1(58)

191-212

EN

Reviewed book: Piotr Stasiewicz, Między światami. Intertekstualność i postmodernizm w literaturze fantasy, Białystok Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku 2016, ISBN 978-83-7431-494-7

7

Bezpieczna i pożyteczna kraina niedorosłości. Literatura dziecięca jako konstrukt

92%

Skowera M.

Jednak Książki. Gdańskie Czasopismo Humanistyczne

|

2017

|

nr 7 "Pomiędzy dziećmi i dorosłymi. Przekraczanie granic w literaturze dla dzieci i młodzieży"

13-30

EN

The paper discusses children’s literature as a construction (re)produced by adults. The author refers to several questions raised about the meaning of this notion and its relationships with so-called adult literature, presents main scholarly theories on it, and shows that western image of this category of books relies on constructions of childhood. It is indicated that the dominant western construction of children’s literature as a “safe and useful land of immaturity” bases on two discourses, which organize the ways of understanding childhood in this cultural circle (not forgetting about particular national variants): the Romantic discourse and the discourse of tabula rasa. From this perspective, children’s literature can be seen as a result of adult fantasies, assumptions, desires, and rules. This construction, as the author argues, is being reproduced by children’s stories, which may repeat it in various modalities or, paradoxically, negate it.

8

Antyczna filozofia i poezja: zły glina, dobry glina

82%

Wolski P.

Forum Poetyki

|

2017

|

nr 7

98-103

EN

The author discusses Malcolm Heath’s book Ancient Philosophical Poetics, in which Heath attempts to present ancient Greek philosophical views on poetry to both an academic audience and non-specialists. Leading with the warning that the essay is not concerned with what literary theory looked like in ancient Greece, but rather how philosophy looked at poetry, Heath reveals the views of the philosophers on truth and goodness in poetry. Though most often these views relegate poetry to a lower status than philosophy (Heath’s focus is on the philosophy of Plato and the Platonists, with some consideration given to Aristotle), Ancient Philosophical Poetics demonstrates conclusively that, for example, the famous Platonic dictum that poets should be exiled form the ideal state is really a call to read their work with greater insight. The author of this essay presents and commends Heath’s book as an example of a highly contemporary approach to ancient philosophy and poetics, and simultaneously one refreshingly free of anachronism.

PL

Autor omawia książkę Ancient philosophical poetics Malcolma Heatha, który stara się w niej przybliżyć czytelnikom zarówno akademickim, jak i spoza specjalistycznego kręgu poglądy filozofów na poezję. Czyniąc zastrzeżenie, że nie jest to rozprawa o tym, jak wyglądała teoria literatury w czasach starożytnej Grecji, ale o tym, jak filozofia spoglądała na poezję, Heath ukazuje poglądy filozofów na prawdę i dobro w poezji. Jakkolwiek najczęściej jest to pogląd o niższości poezji wobec filozofii (angielski badacz skupia się na filozofii Platona i platoników, choć także Arystotelesa), to autor Ancient philosophical poetics udowadnia ostatecznie, że np. słynne platońskie wezwanie do wygnania poetów z państwa jest w istocie wezwaniem do wnikliwego ich czytania. Autor omówienia jego książki ukazuje w związku z tym wywód Heatha jako przykład bardzo współczesnej, a jednocześnie nieanachronizującej postawy wobec antycznej filozofii i poetyki.

9

Дослідження експресіонізму в сучасному українському літературознавстві

81%

Radavska O.

Studia Ucrainica Varsoviensia

|

2017

|

tom 5

243-251

PL

The article refers to the work of Ukrainian researchers devoted to expressionism, such as O. Chernenko, M. Moklytsi, A. Biloi, O. Osmak, G. Yastrubetskoyi and others. It defi nes the main directions of research and characterizes researchers by their theoretical concepts, focusing on the names of the writers who are called the representatives of Ukrainian literary expressionism. Attention is paid to the fact that the theories may often be similar but researchers represent diff erent series of names and works. This requires further development of the theory of expressionism and the Ukrainian literature study in this aspect.

10

Дигитална хуманистика и завере (не)читања. Пројекат Књиженство, теорија и историја женске књижевности на српском језику до 1915. године

81%

Дојчиновић Б.

Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne

|

2016

|

nr 11

EN

The article tries to answer the following question: “what is the potential of digital data bases in research of the history and theory of marginal literatures”, that is, in the research of women’s writing? The focus of the text is on the data base Knjiženstvo, as well as on the complete project Knjiženstvo, theory and history of women’s writing in Serbian language until 1915 which connects its topic with European context in an innovative way.

SR

.

11

Inna teoria

80%

Krajewska A.

Przestrzenie Teorii

|

2018

|

nr 29

7-11

EN

The article contains reflections on “a different theory of literature”. By emphasising the impossibility of maintaining a vision of theory as a history of courses, research methods, academic disciplines and other ‘isms’ and ‘turns’, the author suggests replacing this with ‘a different theory’. This is ‘different’ in that it is written as dramatography; different because it does not comprise uniform subject matter, but various interwoven discourses; different because it consolidates individual experiences and frequently develops away from one concept. This issue of “Przestrzenie Teorii” deals with theory emerging from art, theory rooted in and rooting itself in art.

12

Las corrientes de investigación en teoría de lo fantástico presentes en el hispanismo: estado de la cuestión

80%

Gregori A.

Studia Romanica Posnaniensia

|

2013

|

tom 40

|

nr 2

5-23

EN

Tzvetan Todorov typified the literary fantastic as an autonomous gender in 1970, separating it from marvelous texts and other bordering modes that contained unreal or supernatural elements. In the Latin-American Hispanic studies his model and several other views about fantastic literature encouraged an advancing body of important theorizing, more or less critical with his definition of the gender, finding or not correlations with French or Anglo-Saxon alternative approaches to Todorov’s taxonomist view. In Spain a consistent incorporation to the debate occurred much later thanks to Catalan researcher David Roas. In the present article it is presented a brief state of the investigation about the literary fantastic through the last 20 years in Hispanic studies, when the first reactions to structuralist visions of the subject were enriched by sociocritical, historic, psychologist and philological contributions. two particular, solid but conflicting approaches are analyzed as the opposed poles of a quite wide spectrum of different understandings and ways of doing literary fantastic: on one hand, Mexican scholar Ana María Morales philologist and intratextual-based view, and, on the other hand, Roas psychologist and actual-reader-response-based position. This accurately examined presentation shows the complex variety and the enormous interest of Hispanic studies theorizing about fantasy worlds.

13

Scalanie i percepcja wizualna. Kognitywne warunki odbioru dzieł sztuki (malarstwo, rzeźba, literatura)

80%

Saja K.

Przestrzenie Teorii

|

2019

|

nr 31

227-246

EN

This article aims to indicate universal cognitive diagrams for the process of interpreting and creating works of art. This text deals primarily with issues such as visual perception, neural representations and mental maps. Each of these concepts has a direct connection with the reception of works of art (painting, sculptural and literary). A certain scope of cognitive processes may constitute a cognitive universe with respect to works of visual art. In every field of art, a set of similar, if not identical patterns with regard to a specific realization is noticed. We can therefore speak of generalizations, mutations and emanations in culture. This article is only a research proposal, which requires a wider study.

14

O egzystencji w dziele literackim i o egzystencji dzieła

80%

Wachowski J.

Przestrzenie Teorii

|

2017

|

nr 28

EN

The concept of existence is rooted in (at least) two traditions: philosophical and literary theory. This does not mean, however, that it means the same for both fields. The first tradition is wide ranging because it includes diverse – physical, emotional and spiritual (as well as intellectual) – aspects of being. The second tradition is narrow and it closely refers to literary output. Literary existence – which is based on physical reality – is permanently separated from it. Literature refers to the representation and imagination of the world, not to the empirical experience of physical reality. In addition, literature does not apply the categories of truth and falsehood that we know from social reality (because literary existence stands, beyond the assertion). It is also imprisoned in genology – inscribed in the genre. Literary existence has more to do with poetry, style, artistic convention than what philosophers are examining. Sometimes great literary works deal with great philosophical problems, but sometimes do not and it do not detract from their artistic nature. Both of these tradition – literary and philosophical – however, have many common places, require careful study and analysis. The article is an attempt to show these places and characterize their features.

15

O odbiorze dzieła literackiego

80%

Wachowski J.

Przestrzenie Teorii

|

2017

|

nr 28

EN

The article is an attempt to answer the question: what happens to a literary work – understood as Ingarden’s purely intentional objects – from the recipient’s perspective? And also: how do the images of objects arise in the minds of the audience and what are their properties? Transferring purely intentional objects to the recipient’s perspective changes their status: mental images of objects are subject to numerous fluctuations (based on emotions and cognitive processes). In this way they are transformed into forms that are non-permanent reflections of objects belonging to a literary work. Referring to Ingarden’s terminology, one might say that they become purely intentional reflections (or reflections of purely intentional objects). The article is an attempt to characterize and stratify them.

16

Widma ekokrytyki

70%

Woźniak J.

Przestrzenie Teorii

|

2017

|

nr 28

EN

For years ecocriticism has been almost completely absent in Polish humanities, and although it has become known to a wider group of academics and literary critics and has gained some recognition, it is still not widely acknowledged. This situation raises two basic questions: first, what are the reasons for the low level of interest in ecocriticism in Polish humanities?; secondly, what are the chances and conditions for establishing ecocriticism in the Polish academia? The author assumes that there are spectral remains of the early stages of ecocriticism that still haunt it, casting a shadow on current research and hindering the reception of ecocriticism in Poland. The main specters that haunt ecocriticism are: the specter of romanticism, an anti-theoretical attitude, and naive realism that sprout from the first wave of ecocriticism. Referring to the latest currents in ecological criticism, the author indicates further directions in which Polish ecocriticism should develop in order to be freed from the persecuting specters of the past.

17

Er(r)go...

70%

Kalaga W.

ER(R)GO: Teoria – Literatura – Kultura

|

2017

|

nr 34

EN

Er(r)go… , difficult, difficult times for the humanities, “frail and divided within,” difficult for literary studies, bound by “an ontological corset.” And then, the theoretical impasse: the question about the epistemological potential of the poststructuralist paradigm. Farewell to Derrida? The French theory – an American construct. How to think: ahead or backwards? And Nietzsche is best treated with Nietzsche. Is “prosopopeia of another’s tongue” leading us towards or away from the humanities?Turns, paradigm changes, turns, returns – with corrections – and best of all, a turn away from all turns and a return to philology. The appetite for philology and close-reading is growing. Read, one must read and observe texts in the world. Here arises a dispute over the reading distance – which kind of reading is superior? Close, long, or perhaps middle-distance? And how to distinguish literature from the description of soil erosion in Nebraska? Ask Eagleton. And what if interpretation is an expression of naivety and exaltation? Get to work, literary studies! To work as a text-process, not merely a text-result, to writing, not merely to reading. Here lies the pleasure of pre-texts, consorting with the draft, surrounded by fore-texts, draft projections, draft pre-incarnations of the text, draft close-reading, studying the draft, draft history of the text, meta-draft research and Polish draft studies. The genetics of text and genetics of prints; the flowing and ebbing of meaning, hermeneutics of invention, uncertain determinations. The responsibility of “the I-who-reads” towards the “I-who-is-read.” In the meantime, the death of a professional critic, because who needs literary criticism today? Social redundancy? Where are the critics who understand their task as metaphysical – as serving the word of the Other? In their place, weak professionalism. Atrophy of literary communication, a deluge of quasi-literary works, pauperization of the readers’ competence. So, the idiom of slack (for masses), or a voice of reflection? “A vigorous corpse” in the gray zone between the market and the university. Liberation? But, at the end of the day, the return to centralism.Birth of the author, when was that? And now, after his own death, the author finally returns (the assassin resting in his grave for years). It is now possible to peep on the writer in a closed room, as if in a psycho-anthropological laboratory, and search for the universal laws of human creativity. But one must be careful: after death, the archive is not a workshop; a workshop is always dynamic. Herbert’s vertical notes and the “spreading of the great parable,” five loose pages, Nepenthes Family and Linnaeus, and earlier, a notebook. “Revisionary expanse” of Virginia Woolf’s archive. McLuhan, Gutenberg and a typographical man. Packaged doses of philosophy, the book as a very problematic device and a fatal medium. McLuhan talks to Playboy reporter and Pascal lies down on the Gutenbergian Procrustean bed to torture his own spirit. A fractioned man, dismembered by the alphabet, sliced into pieces by print. Streams of knowledge, like grape must, flowing from under the press (printing one, naturally).And here and there, semiotic absolutism, theoretical dogmatism, the hope of saving one’s own name, cultural recontextualisations, a young wife and ridiculous interpretative errors, cultural studies over copyright, doxa as the voice of the people, medialised and mediatised mind of don Quixote, the art of textual analysis like folk dancing, becoming similarly extinct, a sovereign reader, a pink pirate and the praise of the unproductive. And the subject is travelling from Silesia to Warsaw through Ustrzyki Dolne.The present issue is guest-edited by Professor Adrian Gleń from the University of Opole, Poland.Wojciech Kalaga

18

Jakiego literaturoznawstwa potrzebujemy? Uwagi wstępne

70%

Gleń A.

ER(R)GO: Teoria – Literatura – Kultura

|

2017

|

nr 34

EN

Introductory remarks on the literary scholarship in the future: prolegomena to the questions raised in the present issue of Er(r)go.

PL

An introductory reflection upon the literary scholarship of the future.

19

Teoria (literatury) to było coś innego. Z Profesor Teresą Cieślikowską rozmawia Irena Hübner

70%

Cieślikowska T. , Hübner I. , Uniwersytet Łódzki W. F. , Teresa Cieślikowska – prof. dr hab. e. p. U. Ł. W. k.-r. K. T. L. o. d. I. T. L. , Irena Hübner – starszy wykładowca w Katedrze Teorii Literatury w Instytucie Kultury Współczesnej UŁ. Jej zainteresowania naukowe koncentrują się wokół problemów interpretacji s. k. , imhibner@gmail.com

Czytanie Literatury. Łódzkie Studia Literaturoznawcze

|

2015

|

tom 04

PL

Teresa Cieślikowska, emerytowana profesor Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, wybitna teoretyk literatury w rozmowie z Ireną Hübner opowiada o swoich studiach na łódzkiej polonistyce i pracy naukowej.

EN

Teresa Cieślikowska, retired professor at the University of Łódź and a prominent theorist of literature talks to Irena Hübner about studying Polish Studies in Łódźand her academic career.

20

The Formalist Roots of Stanley Fish’s and E. D. Hirsch’s Hermeneutics

70%

Stopel B.

Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies

|

2013

|

nr 22/1

19-33

EN

The paper investigates the extent to which Stanley Fish’s constructivism and E. D. Hirsch’s hermeneutics are similar in their assumptions and program. Although it is commonly accepted that they constitute polar opposites of literary theory, Fish and Hirsch are embedded in the theoretical discourse of New Criticism’s approach to literary studies and develop in a form of critique of the formalist stance. The problems they encounter and the way they approach literary texts are shaped by formalist assumptions that eventually lead to serious discrepancies between their postulated theory and practice. Both theories of interpretation seem to be operating within a similar framework of ideas which determines their understanding of the problems regarding literary studies as well as their solutions. What appears to be even more important is that the ‘‘textual” theoretical framework itself causes serious problems for both programmes of literary hermeneutics.